Stumping Trumpists 8/9: Who's the Jerk?
Summary
TLDRIn this thought-provoking course segment, the speaker explores the concept of 'herobots'—individuals who adopt an infallible stance, mirroring the behavior of online trolls and Trump supporters. They delve into the human tendency to seek security and power, and how this desire manifests in both our personal lives and our societal structures. The speaker challenges the audience to embrace irony as a superpower, an antidote to dogmatism, and to recognize the universal aspects of the human condition that drive such behaviors. The discussion also touches on the psychological complexities of narcissism and the 'dark triad' personality traits, offering insights into the motivations behind those who exhibit these characteristics.
Takeaways
- 😀 The speaker identifies as both liberal and conservative, emphasizing the need for balance in societal views.
- 🗣️ The script critiques the tendency to label those with opposing views as 'jerks' or 'narcissists', suggesting a more nuanced understanding is needed.
- 🤔 It questions the certainty with which people judge others, advocating for self-reflection and the acknowledgment of one's own potential biases.
- 🧠 The concept of 'herobots' is introduced to describe individuals who claim infallibility and act as if they possess a surefire formula for success.
- 😅 The importance of irony as a coping mechanism for life's uncertainties is discussed, distinguishing it from sarcasm and hypocrisy.
- 🌐 The speaker's personal journey from a 'hippy Buddhist' to a scientific explorer of human nature and the evolution of language is shared.
- 🔬 The script delves into scientific perspectives on life, suggesting that humans' unique ability to use language sets them apart from other creatures.
- 🌱 It explores the idea that life is a continuous struggle against degeneration, and that humans survive by making 'iffy' guesses to regenerate faster than they degrade.
- 🧠 The desire for absolute power, knowledge, and freedom is analyzed as a common human aspiration, reflecting the attributes often ascribed to God.
- 🤝 The script concludes by suggesting that understanding and managing one's own reactions to 'herobots' or narcissists is key to dealing with them effectively.
Q & A
What is the main theme of the short course discussed in the script?
-The main theme of the short course is the exploration of human behavior, particularly focusing on the concepts of 'herobots' and the tendency of individuals to engage in self-deceptive behaviors to maintain a heroic self-image, while also discussing the nature of conflict and the role of irony in understanding and navigating human interactions.
What does the term 'herobots' refer to in the context of the script?
-In the script, 'herobots' refers to individuals who pretend to be infallible and act as if they possess a surefire formula for success, regardless of the reality of the situation. They are likened to robots because they follow a rigid pattern of behavior that is self-aggrandizing and unyielding.
How does the script define irony and why is it considered a superpower?
-Irony in the script is defined as an attitude that includes self-effacing humor and the ability to laugh at oneself, as well as a recognition of the fallibility in one's own actions and decisions. It is considered a superpower because it serves as an antidote to the rigid and self-deceptive 'herobotic' behavior, allowing individuals to navigate life's uncertainties with a more flexible and self-aware approach.
What is the significance of the 'cosmic wedgie' mentioned in the script?
-The 'cosmic wedgie' is a metaphor used in the script to describe the uncomfortable realization that there is no surefire formula for success in life. It emphasizes the inherent uncertainty and the need to make the best guesses or 'bets' despite not being able to eliminate the possibility of ironic or unexpected outcomes.
How does the script suggest we should approach our own fallibility and the pursuit of truth?
-The script suggests that we should approach our fallibility with an ironic attitude, acknowledging that no matter how confident we are in our beliefs or decisions, we should remain even more confident that they are ultimately bets or guesses. It encourages a humble and self-aware pursuit of truth, recognizing that absolute certainty is unattainable.
What role does confirmation bias play in the script's discussion of 'herobots'?
-Confirmation bias is presented in the script as a tool used by 'herobots' to reinforce their self-idealized image. They selectively take in ideas that make them feel good and heroic while rejecting those that challenge their self-view or make them feel inadequate, contrary to the approach of 'decent folks' who recognize and manage their confirmation bias.
How does the script connect the human desire for security and power with the concept of God?
-The script connects the human desire for security, power, and freedom with the concept of God by highlighting that these are the same attributes we ascribe to a divine being. It suggests that the idealization of God as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnificent reflects our own deep-seated wishes for absolute control and certainty in our lives.
What is the 'dark triad personality' mentioned in the script and how does it relate to the concept of 'herobots'?
-The 'dark triad personality' refers to a combination of three personality traits: psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. The script relates this concept to 'herobots' by suggesting that individuals with these traits embody the idealized attributes of being all-powerful, all-righteous, and all-knowing, which are similar to the characteristics claimed by 'herobots' in their self-deceptive behavior.
How does the script suggest we deal with individuals who exhibit 'herobotic' behavior?
-The script suggests that dealing with 'herobotic' individuals involves recognizing the irony and complexity of human behavior, and not falling into the trap of binary thinking that labels others as simply good or bad. It encourages a nuanced understanding and the development of strategies that consider one's own reactions and the dynamics of the situation.
What is the purpose of the email address provided at the end of the script?
-The email address provided is for individuals seeking strategic consulting to tailor their response to dealing with 'herobots' in their lives. The consulting aims to assess the situation and develop a plan to manage conflicts effectively, considering various options such as asserting, accommodating, or distancing oneself from the problematic individuals.
Outlines
🤔 The Paradox of Self-Perception and Ironic Awareness
The speaker begins by addressing the audience's curiosity and the critical feedback received from 'top objective authorities,' which they humorously dismiss as proof of their point. They challenge the audience to consider their own biases and the tendency to label others as 'herobots' or 'buttheads.' The speaker advocates for an ironic perspective, which includes self-effacing humor and the ability to laugh at oneself, as a counter to the infallibility claimed by 'herobots.' They differentiate irony from sarcasm and hypocrisy, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging life's uncertainties and the potential for ironic outcomes, both positive and negative.
🧠 The Evolution of Human Uniqueness and the Pursuit of Certainty
The speaker shares their personal journey from a 'hippy Buddhist' to a seeker of truth through science, influenced by Terrence Deacon's research on human evolution and language. They discuss the human struggle for existence as a continuous battle against degeneration, highlighting the importance of making better guesses in an uncertain universe. The speaker emphasizes the ironic nature of life, where even the best bets can lead to ironic outcomes, and suggests that an ironic attitude is a superpower that allows one to embrace life's uncertainties.
🌿 The Metaphorical Battle for Existence and the Desire for Control
This paragraph delves into the biological necessity of self-regeneration and the selective interaction with the environment for survival. The speaker compares the intake of nourishment to the consumption of ideas, discussing the concept of confirmation bias and the human tendency to seek security and power. They articulate the desire for an ideal state of being, where one has absolute control, knowledge, and goodness, free from the constraints of reality and the ironic situations that life presents.
🔮 The God Complex and the Dark Triad of Personality
The speaker explores the concept of narcissism and the 'dark triad personality' traits, drawing parallels between the idealized human desires for omnipotence, omniscience, and omnificence, and the attributes ascribed to God. They critique the psychology profession for its early-stage understanding of these traits and the tendency to diagnose without fully understanding the complexities within individuals. The 'asshole trinity' is introduced as a cyclical rationalization for bad behavior, where each trait justifies the others in a seemingly consistent but ultimately self-contradictory manner.
🤝 Embracing Irony and Navigating Conflict with Strategic Consultation
In the final paragraph, the speaker invites the audience to recognize the commonalities among all people, including those with whom they disagree. They offer a service for strategic consulting to help individuals deal with conflicts, suggesting that there are multiple approaches to managing difficult relationships. The speaker emphasizes the importance of an ironic perspective, or 'calmfidence,' in dealing with the challenges posed by 'herobots' and other difficult individuals in one's life.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Herobots
💡Irony
💡Narcissism
💡Psychoproctology
💡Confirmation Bias
💡Dark Triad Personality
💡Decent Folks
💡Iffy Guesswork
💡Calmpetent Calmfidence
💡Strategic Consulting
Highlights
Introduction to the course on understanding and dealing with 'herobots' and Trump supporters, emphasizing the importance of recognizing one's own biases.
Acknowledgment of the author's own fallibility and the complexity of political and social stances, rejecting binary 'liberal' or 'conservative' labels.
Discussion on the difficulty of identifying 'jerks' or 'narcissists', suggesting self-awareness as a key differentiator.
Critique of pop psychology's tendency to label others without self-reflection, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of human behavior.
Definition and importance of 'irony' as a superpower, distinguishing it from sarcasm and hypocrisy.
Explanation of how irony relates to life's unpredictability and the human tendency to seek certainty in an uncertain universe.
Analysis of the appeal of 'miraculous' outcomes in fiction and religion, and the human desire for a 'happily ever after'.
Personal narrative of the author's journey from a 'hippy Buddhist' to a seeker of scientific understanding of human nature.
Introduction of Terrence Deacon's research on human evolution, language, and the unique aspects of human cognition.
Discussion on the fundamental tendency of degeneration in the universe and the paradox of life's persistence.
Explanation of how living beings, including humans, constantly struggle to regenerate themselves against the backdrop of degeneration.
The role of 'iffy guesswork' in Darwin's theory of evolution and the struggle for existence.
Description of the human desire for security, power, and freedom, and the contrast with the reality of life's uncertainties.
Analysis of confirmation bias and the human tendency to seek ideas that confirm one's existing beliefs while avoiding contradictory information.
Comparison of the human desire for omnipotence, omniscience, and omnificence with the traditional attributes of God.
Identification of the 'Dark Triad' personality traits (narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism) and their parallels with divine qualities.
Critique of psychological diagnoses and the concept of the 'asshole trinity' as a cycle of self-justification and moral dissonance.
Final thoughts on the universality of human desires and the challenge of embracing life's ironies with 'calmfidence'.
Transcripts
Welcome to Part 8 of this short course on rolling trolls and stumping Trumpists. I’m grateful
for your curiosity and comments, and especially grateful for the help I’m getting from the world’s
top objective authorities whose comments expose me as just another liberal loser with my panties
in a twist because my dumb, evil, weak, biased bullshit is doomed against the great, heroic,
genius, saintly, mighty eternally triumphant Trump crusade. They’re not the herobots. I am.
I thank them for proving my point. Herobots will say or do anything to pretend they’re heroic.
And no I’m not just another liberal. Like, everyone, I’m a liberal conservative because
duh: We’re all trying to figure out what to loosen and what to tighten,
what to change and what to keep the same. To claim that you’re all for one or all
for the other is just brandstanding, lifestyle-brand grandstanding, like what
you want to loosen or tighten proves you're a heroic crusader for one or the other. Absurd.
Still, my critics raise an important question:
When two factions accuse each other of being jerks, narcissists, a-holes, psychopaths,
or as I’ve been describing them herobots, how can you tell for sure who’s right?
I’ll argue you can’t tell for sure but you can make much better guesses than
most of us do assuming that that whoever we butt heads with the butthead – because
don’t like their attitude, perspective, decisions, lifestyle, tone, power, tribe,
or the way we feel when pissed, bugged, annoyed, and humiliated around them.
Really, what distinguishes a butthead since it can’t just be that you butt heads with them? If
you find that question interesting, that’s a good sign you’re not one. It means you
don’t assume you’re the authority on who’s the buttehead and wonder if maybe you are.
Most pop psychology on narcissism flatters its audience with the assumption that they’re the
good guys. I assume that if I don’t want to be a butthead I have to expect some anxiety about
whether I am. People often ask me if they’re the asshole. I tell them that their self-doubt is a
sign that they’re not. I call this work advanced psychoproctology for beginners – advanced in that
while we’re all quick to call someone any of those names, we rarely get around to defining them.
I’ve argued that herobots pretend they’re infallible. They act like they have the surefire
formula and are destined to reign victorious no matter what. Decent folks are at least a
little more ironic than that. They have an ironic attitude, including some self-effacing irony, an
ability to laugh at themselves, and their fallible struggle to figure out what’s best to do. I’ve
argued that irony is your superpower, the antidote to herobotic BS. It’s time to unpack that.
Maybe you think irony is sarcasm or some kind of witty style. There’s some of that
but it is not the heart of it or the grounding for why I argue that irony is your superpower.
People often confuse irony with hypocrisy. That’s ironic because actually,
it’s the reverse. They’re opposite ways to deal with life’s iffiness.
An ironic situation is one in which the outcome is the reverse of what you assumed and expected.
You made a good bet that ironically turned out
bad. You made a bad bet that ironically turned out good.
Ironic situations are funny. You expected a wooden floor beneath your feet but instead,
there was a banana peel and you fell. Slapstick.
Ironic situations are dire: You landed on your head, cracked your skull, and died. Tragic. Dirony
would be more accurate term: Dire irony. Life as tragicomedy.
Irony can also be the relief we relish in popular fiction. When all seems lost, suddenly there’s a
miracle and it’s happily ever after. To juice that relief, you need tension first, a hero’s journey,
and an existential threat that puts you on the edge of your seat, yet is sure to resolve well.
You know. Like Christ, the tragic martyr who is destined to rule the world,
king of kings. Herobots love that stuff even though it’s contradictory. A believer already
knows the outcome, even though their God works in mysterious ways. “God is absolutely
unknowable. Let me tell you all about him because I know him inside out.” People eat
that stuff up whether it’s a Marvel movie or a Christian miracle. We’d welcome irony if it
always resolved to a miraculous happily ever after. Romance, broadly defined is the dream
of happily ever after that lives in all of us but is never realized in reality.
I was raised on irony. My dad would say “You know I haven’t lived my life in vain for
nothing.” Jews have a tendency toward the tragicomic ironic attitude. And look
at me. Have you seen this nose? So maybe my crusade for irony is just my personal bias:
Anyone who isn’t ironic like me is butthead herobots.
Maybe. I wouldn’t put it past me, cause after all I’m human. If ths were all my personal bias I’d
be the last to know. My mantra is “No matter how hard I chase the truth it will never catch me.”
I don’t bet so and here’s why. Like any of us I’m kind of self-obsessed
always trying to figure out what to try to do. Until my mid-thirties I went about it
the usual way. I was your typical hippy Buddhist love-is-the-answer kind of guy.
I felt brilliant for discovering that love was good and deciding there should
be more of it. I was a loving guy promoting love. That’s me and what I’m trying to do.
I thought of all of us as educatable units. Just educate people to be more loving. Circumstances
sobered me out of it. I ended up trapped with someone who had a lot in common with Trump.
I started to look for what to believe next, but noticed that there’s a tendency for us
seen-the-light, woke, humans to drop a dogma but not the dogmatism, instead transferring
it to some other dogma. I call that “I once was lost but now I’m blind syndrome.”
Rather than jumping on some new bandwagon, I got interested in how people shop among
interpretations of reality. I figured that if I wanted a really grounded
interpretation of who I am, my best bet would be science. Understanding what we really are.
Midsized mammals but different in some radical way from say, a dog.
I lucked into the company of Terrence Deacon a Harvard neuroscientist/biologist/anthropologist
with whom I’ve now been working closely for 30 years. He had just completed decades of research,
explaining how humans evolved language and how it makes us radically different
from other critters. When I met him, he has just turned his attention to an even bigger question,
so big it’s sidestepped by even most researchers.
I ground my work in psychoproctology in 30 years researching the physical origins and
nature of us beings struggling for their own existence. In other words
how mattering emerged from matter, how being beings trying to survive emerged
within nothing but basic chemistry which isn’t trying to do anything.
From this research on the origins of life and the evolution of language it’s become
obvious to me why we humans are so tempted to play hero and are so drawn to imaginary Gods.
You won’t get what I’m about to provide from the philosophers, psychologists,
theologians, or Darwinian atheists. They don’t really explain how we emerged,
they just assume we did. Check this out. A physicist who said the man in the moon trying
to pull on the tides would be considered crazy. Just down the hall a biologist or
psychologist can talk about what living beings are trying to do and no one considers them crazy.
Why the gap? Researchers mostly sidestep the question. The life and social sciences assume
life is just different. Why? Because of natural selection, like it’s trying to evolve life which
it isn’t. And because of DNA which is just a molecule, not a self trying to do anything.
Our research on this big old honking question starts with this:
Everything degenerates. Scientists agree that degeneration is the most fundamental
tendency of everything in the known universe. Durable stuff degenerates slowly. We fragile
living beings are not durable. I mean 15 minutes after death there’s no recovering us. We’re that
fragile. And yet here we are 3.5 billion years of uninterrupted life. How do we pull that off?
Being is a great word for us because it’s a verb and a noun. We’re busy being beings. We
regenerate ourselves faster than we are otherwise degenerating, and by the time
we degenerate at death, we’ve passed on our ability to regenerate to next generations.
How do we do it? The answer is through iffy guesswork. I think of Darwin’s theory as a
cosmic wedgie that’s enough to put any of our panties in a twist. Not
because we descended from apes but because life is an iffy struggle for existence,
a struggle to make better bets in a universe where you can’t eliminate dire ironic situations.
The cosmic wedgie is that there is no surefire formula. You can make better bets but they’ll
never be perfect. The appropriate though disappointing response to reality is an ironic
attitude: No matter how confident you are in a bet, remain still more confident that it is a bet.
Yeah but really how do we keep ourselves alive despite the fact that we’re degenerating?
Well, we degenerate food and channel it into regenerating ourselves. For example,
today you’re degenerating recent meals to generate
330 billion replacement cells. You have to because you’re losing them at that rate.
Self-regeneration takes work, which takes energy. Trouble is, energy is more likely to
degenerate than regenerate things. Tornadoes, fires, and floods degenerate. To stay alive,
organisms have to interact selectively with their environments, taking in the energy they
can use to regenerate themselves, not the energy that degenerates them. Digest food, not poison.
Your self-regenerative struggle for existence is what you have in common with all living beings,
even all the ones that can’t feel or think. You’re constantly working to
keep your shit together, your integrity maintained, all the checks-and-balances
biological integration that keeps you living. Death is the collapse of those
checks and balances, runaway effects with nothing to keep them in check.
Like all animals we have feelings. With language, we also have thoughts, concepts, imaginations,
ideas. We can imagine anything including the ideal. We can see how we and our reality
falls short of the ideal but we can imagine a miracle that would give us the surefire formula.
All critters try to eat food, not poison. We do that too but having feelings and thoughts,
we also try to eat nutritious ideas not toxic ones. In other words,
confirmation bias, taking in ideas that make us feel good, even heroic and keeping
out buzzkill ideas that make us feel like chumps. Decent folks recognize confirmation
bias as a problem they have to manage, sometimes taking in discouraging ideas and learning from
them. In contrast, herobots treat confirmation bias as the solution to all of there problems.
OK, so let me give voice to what any organism anywhere in
the universe would want if it had feelings and thoughts like we do.
What do I want? I’ll tell you. First, I don’t like iffiness and I can imagine the ideal of not
having to deal with any more of it. No more ironic situations ever. ‘Cause see,
I’m trying to stay alive. I hate stuff that threatens to kill me. I hate to be
undermined. I’d like to never have to deal with that shit. I want security.
And I love anything that makes it easier for me to stay alive. More than that,
to do whatever the hell I want. You know what I want? I want absolute security and absolute
power. I want absolute safety and absolute freedom. What I want, what I can imagine and
what I deserve is a wild card trump card so I could do anything and could do no wrong.
There’d be like one last ironic miracle that gave me. Just like in the movies,
a revelation, an epiphany. I’d wake up to the absolute truth, take the red pill and suddenly,
I’m woke to the surefire formula that guarantees me success. No more doubt,
no more damned banana peels, no more humiliating ironic situations. No more guessing. No more bets.
See, what I want most is to feel good. I want comfort in my own skin. More than that, actually.
I want constant ecstasy, like heaven, the ultimate reward for my heroic effort to stay alive.
There are thoughts that make me feel good and thoughts that make me feel bad. I try
to keep out the thoughts that make me feel bad. They’re like poison to me. I
hate that shit. But I love thoughts that make me feel good about myself. So yeah,
anyone who makes me feel bad is the enemy, evil, dumb and weak.
What I hate is thoughts that trick me. Thoughts that I mistake as nutritious
when they turn out to be toxic. No more of that shit, no more confusion,
no more getting tricked. I want perfect knowledge about what’s going on so I can feel inner harmony,
like I’m a good guy so I don’t have any more doubt and anxiety making me uncomfortable in
my own skin. I’d like to be able to keep my shit together easily, effortlessly.
Ideally, I’d have perfect freedom, perfect safety, perfect knowledge, so I don’t have any more doubt
about whether I’m a good guy. I’d be all powerful, all knowing, and all good, with perfect integrity.
—
That’s what any critter would want, a tree, tree frog, bacterium,
or even an extraterrestrial being talking, if it had feelings and thoughts like ours.
It’s also exactly what we idealize in God. God is omnipotent, all powerful, free to do whatever he
wants. God is omniscient. He knows everything and is never surprised or confused. God is omnificent,
all good, so no matter what he does, he’s safe, free from guilt or shame. And God is one. He has
perfect integrity. You’ve probably heard the question: Could God build a mountain so big
he can’t move it? If he can or he can’t he’s not all powerful. Well, theologians have an answer:
He wouldn’t. He never gets himself into ironic binds like that because he has perfect integrity.
Herobots play God and God’s defender and no wonder. It’s like a living being’s wet dream
come true. I hope by now you recognize that I’m not just talking about trolls
and trumpists. If you’ve been wondering how this stuff applies to some jerk you
have to deal with at home or work or in your family or among your neighbors and friends,
good. It applies to what are generally known today as narcissists or in everyday language,
assholes, many of whom claim no cause greater than “cause I said so.”
Well, it’s funny. Narcissists are named after Narcissus,
a guy who couldn’t stop looking at himself, but that’s the one thing you can’t get a narcissist
to do. “You’re a narcissist. You should take a good look at yourself.” Weird huh?
But not when you realize that narcissists have split personalities. They play God and
God’s goon defender. One part of them is fixated on a herobotic self-idealization,
the God they pretend they are. The other part is a thug who will wage holy war to protect and promote
their God-like authority. Holy means pure. War is dirty. No deed to dirty for a saint like them.
In psychology, the current term for current term for herobots is dark triad personality. These are
early days for psychology, a hundred-year-old field that isn’t rocket science. It’s way,
way harder. I’m happy to cut my profession lots of slack, but not
when it acts like it has solved psychology already. There’s lots more to figure out.
Psychology is still more engineering than science. Its focus is on troubleshooting
broken minds. It has its diagnostic categories, which are often based more on impressions than
what’s really going on inside the people it’s trying to debug. Narcissists can’t,
won’t and act like they shouldn’t introspect, but they appear self-obsessed. Psychopathy
means ill soul. Again, these are early days for psychological science.
The Dark Triad personality is just the combination of three diagnostic categories;
Psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavelianism.
But notice this: Those three traits match the ideal we envision for God. Narcissism is,
“I’m absolutely righteous. Perfectly pure and holy. Everything I do is virtuous.”
Psychopathy is, “I’m absolutely powerful. Nothing can stop me. I’m perfectly safe
and secure from being overthrown.” Machiavelianism is “I’m all-knowing,
always right, clever, cunning, devious. Nothing can ever outwit me.”
Dark triad isn’t just three separate traits. It’s a shell game, I’ll call the assholey
trinity. Since I’m sweet I should cheat, since I cheat I can beat. That I beat proves I’m sweet.
Because I’m always good, it’s my duty to win be deviously nasty. No deed too nasty for a saint
like me. Being devious, I always win and even when I don’t I can be devious and claim I won.
Always winning proves I’m mighty. And since might makes right, it proves I’m a saint. I’m a saint
‘cause I win. As a saint I should sin.'Cause I sin, I can win. I’m a saint cause I win.
Shell games lack integrity. I mean no deed too dirty for a saint like me? How does that
work? Easily. Just claim that you have perfect integrity. You’re like God that way. You’re one.
Just insist that you never contradict yourself. You only have to be consistent about one thing:
The claim that you’re consistent. As long as you can overpower people with that,
you can do whatever you want. You get your wildcard trumpcard. You feel perfectly safe
and free. Free to do anything safe from having to ever admit you’re bad or wrong.
Free to pretend you’re heroic, eternally right righteous, mighty, and consistent.
I hope you can see how tempting it would be to play herobot. A lot of people proudly proclaim
they’ll never understand Trumpists or jerks, beneath us, like they’re some weird species.
I’ll end with a bit of irony: There are two kinds of people.
Those who recognize and those who don’t recognize that we are all the same.
I’m both. In the next video, I’ll explain how to resign yourself to irony as comfortably
as possible. Because rolling trolls, stumping Trumpists, and disappointing narcissists of all
kinds is not some formula to perform robotically. You really have to live and breathe irony to voice
your embrace of life’s iffiness with calmpetent calmfidence – calm competent confidence.
And if you are dealing with one of these folks, get in touch. Here’s my email. I
do short-term strategic consulting to tailor your response to your particulars. I figure
you’ve got three main options in any conflict, rolling them being only one. You can assert,
accommodate, or put some distance between you and them. Any of those can work or fail. We
assess your situation including your appetites aptitudes and opportunities. We consider the
upsides and downsides of variations on those three and come up with a plan to get your mind
back from the herobots in your life. Clients rave about my services as an efficient bargain.
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
The Psychology of Trolling
COMO A AUTOSSABOTAGEM NOS DESTRÓI
You have no free will at all | Stanford professor Robert Sapolsky
Toxic Femininity - Do Not Date These Women
LA MENTE DEL SOCIÓPATA Y LA MENTE DEL PSICÓPATA -
The Narcissism Doctor: "1 In 6 People Are Narcissists!" How To Spot Them & Can They Change?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)