Alt-Right Tech is a Literal Dumpster Fire

Summary

The video script critiques the alt-right's attempts to create 'free speech' platforms, highlighting the failures and hypocrisies within these spaces. It discusses the challenges faced by platforms like Gab, Tusk browser, and others, which are built on existing tech and struggle with moderation issues. The script also addresses the broader implications of unrestricted speech, the role of advertisers, and the paradox of tolerance in online communities. It concludes with a reflection on the limits of free speech and the need for responsible moderation to foster inclusive environments.

Takeaways

• 🤔 The script discusses the rise of alternative tech platforms catering to conservatives who feel oppressed by mainstream tech monopolies, suggesting these platforms often lack genuine innovation.
• 🛠️ The Tusk browser, an alternative to Google Chrome, is criticized for being built on Chromium, which is Google's open-source browser, thus not truly escaping Google's influence.
• 🌐 It highlights the dominance of Chromium-based browsers, with most non-Chromium browsers like Safari and Firefox being rare or facing challenges.
• 📊 The script points out the failure of certain platforms like Voat, which struggled with moderation, harassment, and financial issues, ultimately shutting down.
• 💸 It criticizes crowdfunding platforms used by right-wing groups, noting that they faced issues with payment processors like Visa, which led to their downfall.
• 📱 The 'Freedom Phone' is mentioned as an example of a tech product that seems to be a scam, overpriced, and not offering substantial differences from existing Android phones.
• 🤖 An AI chatbot named Gipper, which was shut down by OpenAI, is shown to have limitations in its programming and potentially propagates misinformation.
• 👥 The script touches on the importance of moderation in online spaces, using Twitch and Gab as examples of platforms with varying moderation approaches and their consequences.
• 🏛️ It argues that the concept of 'free speech' platforms can be harmful, as they can become havens for hate speech and misinformation without proper regulation.
• 💬 The video script concludes with a critique of Elon Musk's approach to free speech on Twitter, suggesting that his actions have not been in favor of genuine free speech but rather in favor of speech that aligns with his interests.
• 📜 Finally, the script raises constitutional questions about the limits of free speech, referencing the First Amendment and the evolving interpretations of the U.S. Constitution.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the video script regarding online platforms and free speech?

The video script discusses the tension between the desire for free speech online and the need for moderation to prevent hate speech and misinformation, particularly on platforms that claim to support conservative voices.

What does the script suggest about the Tusk browser in relation to Google's Chrome?

The script suggests that the Tusk browser, while marketed as a free speech alternative, is built on the same Chromium platform as Google's Chrome, indicating that it may not offer significant differences in terms of user control or privacy.

What is the script's stance on the idea of 'unrestricted free speech' on social media platforms?

The script argues that unrestricted free speech can lead to a toxic environment that alienates certain user groups, and that some level of moderation is necessary to maintain a healthy online community.

What are some of the consequences mentioned in the script for platforms that fail to moderate content effectively?

The script mentions that platforms with poor moderation can become breeding grounds for hate speech, racism, and misinformation, which can lead to financial troubles, loss of users, and negative brand associations.

How does the script characterize Elon Musk's approach to free speech on Twitter after his acquisition?

The script characterizes Elon Musk's approach as hypocritical and self-serving, suggesting that he has selectively enforced free speech rules to favor certain viewpoints and his own interests.

What is the script's view on the role of advertisers in shaping the content policy of social media platforms?

The script suggests that advertisers play a significant role in dictating the content policy of platforms, as they are unwilling to associate their brands with controversial or offensive content.

What historical figures did the script mention in relation to the discussion about free speech and censorship?

The script mentioned Martin Luther King Jr. and Abraham Lincoln as examples used in an analogy to argue against the censorship of political figures, although it criticizes the choice of these figures as being historically inaccurate.

What is the Paradox of Tolerance mentioned in the script, and how does it relate to online speech?

The Paradox of Tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, it may lose its ability to be tolerant due to the actions of the intolerant. The script relates this to online spaces, arguing that unlimited tolerance for hate speech can undermine the overall health of the online community.

What does the script say about the role of natural and positive rights in the context of the U.S. Constitution and free speech?

The script explains that natural rights are those that individuals would have regardless of government, while positive rights are those granted by government. It suggests that the current interpretation of the Constitution prioritizes individual rights over collective interests, which can limit society's ability to regulate harmful speech.

How does the script describe the challenges faced by platforms that attempt to be a 'Bastion of free speech' without moderation?

The script describes these platforms as likely to become havens for hate speech, misinformation, and toxicity, which can drive away users and advertisers, ultimately leading to financial and operational failure.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 The Illusion of Conservative Free Speech Online

This paragraph discusses the perceived oppression of conservative voices online and the introduction of the Tusk browser as a 'free speech' alternative to Google Chrome. It critiques the browser's reliance on Google's Chromium technology and highlights the irony of using a platform controlled by the 'big tech monopoly' to promote freedom of speech. The paragraph also touches on the scarcity of non-Chromium browsers and the challenges faced by conservative platforms like Voat, which struggled with moderation issues and financial instability, ultimately shutting down.

05:02

📱 The Farce of the 'Freedom Phone' and Alt-Tech Scams

The speaker mocks the concept of the 'freedom phone,' a device promoted by a self-proclaimed young Bitcoin millionaire, which is essentially an Android phone with pre-loaded apps sold at an inflated price. The paragraph also touches on the difficulties faced by crowdfunding platforms catering to right-wing causes, which have been shut down by payment processors like Visa. Additionally, it pokes fun at the AI chatbot 'Gipper,' which was claimed to be based on Ronald Reagan but was found to be a rebranded version of an AI shut down by OpenAI.

10:05

😡 The Prevalence of Hate and Misinformation on Alt-Right Platforms

This paragraph delves into the content found on Gab, an alt-right social media platform, which is a mix of normal social media content, political posts, and a significant amount of racism and anti-Semitism. The speaker criticizes the lack of moderation on these platforms and the resulting negative impact on the user experience. It also discusses the broader implications of allowing harmful speech to proliferate online, suggesting that it drives away users who do not wish to engage with such content.

15:05

🎮 The Evolution of Inclusivity in Gaming Communities

The speaker reflects on the changes in gaming culture, noting the shift from a male-dominated space to a more inclusive environment. They discuss the removal of toxic language and behaviors that made women and other marginalized groups uncomfortable. The paragraph highlights the importance of creating safe spaces for all participants and acknowledges the progress made in making gaming more welcoming, while also recognizing that there is still work to be done.

20:07

💬 The Consequences of Unrestricted Speech on Social Media

This paragraph examines the effects of Elon Musk's changes to Twitter's moderation policies, which have led to an increase in offensive content and the banning of certain journalists. It discusses the backlash from advertisers and the financial implications for the platform. The speaker argues that Musk's actions are not in favor of free speech but rather in favor of speech that aligns with his own views, and that the platform's shift towards a right-wing environment has alienated many users and advertisers.

25:08

📉 The Financial and Social Impact of 'Free Speech' Policies on Twitter

The speaker discusses the financial challenges faced by Twitter under Elon Musk's leadership, as his push for unrestricted free speech has led to a decline in the platform's value and advertiser support. They argue that Musk's actions are not in the best interest of the platform as a business and that his changes have not benefited free speech but have instead created a space for harmful content. The paragraph also touches on the legal limitations of free speech and the potential for the Supreme Court to further restrict it.

30:09

🏛️ The Paradox of Tolerance and the Role of Regulation in Online Spaces

In this paragraph, the speaker explores the concept of the 'Paradox of Tolerance,' which suggests that unlimited tolerance of intolerant speech can undermine a society's ability to remain tolerant. They argue that online platforms must regulate harmful speech to maintain a safe and inclusive environment. The speaker also criticizes the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment, suggesting that it has led to a loss of collective power to regulate harmful actors for the public good.

🤝 The Influence of Advertisers on Platform Moderation and the Survival of Alt-Right Platforms

The final paragraph discusses the role of advertisers in shaping the moderation policies of online platforms. It suggests that advertisers' reluctance to associate with certain types of content influences platform decisions more than any commitment to free speech ideals. The speaker also speculates on the future survival of alt-right platforms, noting that only those with substantial financial backing, like Rumble, are likely to endure, and hints at a forthcoming video exploring Rumble in more detail.

Keywords

💡Conservatives

Conservatives in the script refer to individuals with right-leaning political views who the narrator claims are oppressed in society and online spaces. The video discusses the perceived lack of representation and free speech for conservatives on mainstream platforms, suggesting the existence of alternative websites catering to them.

💡Free Speech

Free speech is a central theme in the video, emphasizing the right to express one's opinions without censorship or restraint. The script critiques the alleged suppression of conservative voices under the guise of big tech monopoly control, advocating for platforms that allow unrestricted expression, despite potential negative consequences.

💡Big Tech Monopoly

The term 'Big Tech Monopoly' is used in the script to describe the dominant influence of large technology companies, particularly in controlling online discourse and allegedly biasing against conservative viewpoints. It sets the stage for the discussion on alternative platforms that claim to offer more freedom from such control.

💡Tusk Browser

Tusk Browser is introduced in the script as an alternative to Google Chrome, positioning itself as a browser that supports free speech. The video suggests that it is a response to perceived censorship on mainstream browsers, although it is critiqued for its similarities to Google's Chromium-based browsers.

💡Chromium

Chromium is an open-source browser project by Google, which serves as the foundation for many popular web browsers. In the script, it is mentioned to highlight the technical basis for both mainstream and alternative browsers like Tusk, despite their differing ideological stances on free speech.

💡Firefox

Firefox is an independent web browser mentioned in the script as one of the few non-Chromium-based browsers. It represents an example of browser diversity and is used to contrast the dominance of Chromium-based browsers in the market.

💡Vote

Vote is an alternative social media platform discussed in the script, which was created as a response to perceived censorship on Reddit. It is portrayed as an example of a platform that struggled with moderation issues, financial sustainability, and eventually shut down.

💡Alt-Tech

Alt-Tech refers to alternative technology platforms, often created to provide spaces for voices that feel marginalized or censored on mainstream platforms. The script uses this term to describe a movement and associated platforms that claim to champion free speech, sometimes at the expense of content moderation.

💡Elon Musk

Elon Musk is referenced in the script in the context of his acquisition of Twitter and the subsequent changes to the platform's policies on free speech. His actions and decisions are critiqued as not being in the best interest of fostering a truly open and inclusive platform.

💡Overton Window

The Overton Window is a concept mentioned in the script to describe the range of ideas tolerated in public discourse. The video discusses how platforms that adopt extreme stances on free speech, like allowing hate speech, can push the window to the fringes, alienating advertisers and users.

💡Paradox of Tolerance

The Paradox of Tolerance is a philosophical concept discussed in the script, which argues that unlimited tolerance towards intolerant views can eventually lead to the loss of tolerance itself. It is used to argue for the necessity of moderating speech to maintain a healthy and inclusive online environment.

Highlights

A critique of 'conservative-friendly' websites suggesting they are not as pro-free speech as claimed.

Introduction of the Tusk browser as an alternative to Google Chrome, but with similarities due to Chromium.

Discussion on the dominance of Chromium-based browsers and the rarity of non-Chromium alternatives.

Analysis of Reddit's moderation policies and the subsequent migration to alternative platforms like Voat.

The failure of Voat due to financial struggles and issues with content moderation.

Emergence of alternative crowdfunding platforms in response to 'woke' platforms like GoFundMe.

Critique of the 'Freedom Phone' as a scam and its high markup over similar Android devices.

Examination of the AI chatbot 'Gipper' and its alignment with controversial political views.

Gab's user base composition and its mix of 'normie' content with extremist views.

The paradox of tolerance and the necessity of moderation for a truly open marketplace of ideas.

The impact of Twitter's shift towards less regulation and the ensuing backlash from advertisers.

Elon Musk's influence on Twitter's moderation policies and its effects on the platform's value.

The complexities of defining and regulating free speech, especially in the context of online platforms.

The role of the First Amendment in shaping discussions around free speech in the United States.

The potential consequences of unrestricted free speech on user experience and platform sustainability.

The importance of advertiser preferences in shaping content policies on social media platforms.

The challenges faced by platforms like Kick, which adopted lax moderation policies, leading to controversy.

The philosophical debate around natural and positive rights, and their implications for collective vs. individual rights.

Transcripts

something you might not know is that

there's a whole ecosystem of websites

dedicated to the most oppressed group in

our society

conservatives and while you may love

these

websites well that's not right and while

you may love these websites there's

something wrong with them you just can't

speak your mind anymore the big Tech

Monopoly is clamping down on our free

speech and we just can't have that

because diversity of ideas is the most

important certain kind of

diversity the first thing we got to fix

is that lib cuck browser you're on

Chrome you can't give Google that kind

of control over your life it's time to

introduce you to the Tusk browser this

baby can fit so much free speech in it

now there's just one problem I mean this

looks oddly familiar tabs menu settings

General format okay they're not exactly

the same but I think you get the point

the reason that they look so similar is

because they're both built on chromium

which is Google's open source browser

Builder Google's big Tech Monopoly is so

powerful that the freedom browser was

forced to use their Tech okay the actual

reason that tusk was built on chromium

is because chromium's kind of like the

browser version of pasta you can do a

lot of wonky [ __ ] to it and it'll still

turn out pretty well in fact a vast

majority of browsers that you actually

use are probably built on chromium I

looked up the top non- chromium browsers

just to give you an idea of how rare

they are so first there's Safari which

is created by Apple and is proprietary

so I don't really think it's in the same

category as the others but then there's

Firefox which is as old as the dirt it's

been around since 2004 but at this point

the recognition level of non- chromium

browsers kind of falls off a cliff okay

stick with me here have you ever heard

of liebre wolf mulad gnome web pel Moon

waterfox sugon sea monkey madori celon

and Otter I guarantee you probably

haven't even heard of any of those I

mean you didn't notice when that list

was infiltrated by a D's Nuts joke

building a new browser from scratch

might have been really useful and

actually helped out the users but Tusk

is so similar to Chrome that some nerd

interviewed by Tech newsworld said this

is more of a PR operation than an actual

transformation of how people are going

to use the web the problem with this

thing is that it's actually worse than a

PR operation because ublock doesn't work

on it and the first four results of any

search are ads in addition to that there

was a very NSS W ad plastered on the

sidebar but in a way I'm kind of glad

that I got to see ads on this browser

because it let me know that whether

you're young or old democrat or

republican liberal or conservative there

will always be hot Ms in your area in

2015 Reddit decided to actually moderate

its platform Banning Subs like fat

people hate and hosting a discussion

where they said they didn't create

Reddit to be a Bastion of free speech

this led to angry redditors flocking to

look light site vote apparently vote was

actually quite popular for a bit I mean

not that popular I would show you the

interface but the site is incredibly

dead right now but apparently vote was

terrible there are reports of harassment

doxing hate speech and I know what

you're thinking what makes it different

from

Reddit the site got so bad that the CEO

got contacted by a US agency about

threats posted to vote the first reply

to the founder sharing this news was an

anti-semitic slur and a call

to yeah that and further replies and the

thread were threats on specific

synagogues vote was nearly shut down

many times because it had virtually no

way of taking in money first it relied

on user donations then it relied on a

wealthy investor and finally the founder

drained his own bank account to keep the

site up I know the site's user base

would probably love to say that it was

Aran and proud but with this much money

trouble going on let me tell you they

were all Greek and after 6 years of

miserable operation vote decided to shut

down on Christmas day of 2020 of course

on the post where the vote CEO announced

the site would be closing the commenters

called him a Jew I know a couple sites

that are like vote floating around the

internet but they are so small I don't

want to give them any kind of exposure

by talking about them on my channel I

really hope that this video gets between

40 and 400 views but these sites have

less users than that fewer fine Stannis

fewer well vote could have set up a

GoFundMe to stop themselves from going

down unfortunately GoFundMe has gone

woke consistently taking down pledge

drives like the one from the freedom

truckers the brave Patriots out there

have taken it upon themselves to find a

new way to crowdfund bravely founding

platforms like research R go why fund me

and hatreon and I know you don't trust

me because of the sugon incident but I

didn't make up any of these platforms

hatreon is a real thing also this is the

first of many incidents that happened

making this video where I came across a

word and I didn't know what it meant and

I just want to let you know that every

time that happened it was always a slur

for Jewish people but at least the

right-wing Patriots of this country have

a way now to get the funding that they

need oh my God how'd they get all of you

so the problem with setting up

crowdfunding sites is that while you can

escape gofundme's rules you can't escape

their limitations as it turns out Visa

wasn't too happy with these sites using

their payment Network and as soon as

they pulled the plug on them these sites

went kaput so now if you want to give

your money to something hateful you've

got to stick to doing it the

oldfashioned way going to Chick-fil-A

another alleged grift that's being

pulled in the alt-right tech space is

called the freedom phone hi I'm Eric I'm

the world's youngest Bitcoin millionaire

I made it in Silicon Valley and I've

accomplished a lot in my life already

but now I'm leaving Big Tech to fight

for free speech the first part of this

High School dropouts pitch is getting

mad about Twitter Banning Trump and he

tries to prove that it was wrong with

this analogy if they censor president

they will censor anyone imagine if Mark

Zuckerberg censored MLK or Abraham

Lincoln the course of history would have

been altered forever isn't it crazy how

he could have picked any two people in

history and yet he picked two people

that conservatives actually managed to

cancel stay in school kids and

personally I think he's doing a huge

disservice to the other side of this

argument like what if Twitter had banned

this guy or this lady

how about this guy the lack of any sort

of historical knowledge isn't the only

reason this video didn't age well name

one time in history where the people who

banned books media and opinions were the

good guys

[Music]

so who's going to tell

him but the funniest thing about this

trailer is that Eric is acting like this

is some kind of a revolution when in

reality this is just some bottomof

the-line Android phone that they've

preloaded with apps and then sold at a 3

to four times markup they say build your

own phone so I did wait so you're

telling me that somebody made their

Millions off of cryptocurrency is

scamming

no no that doesn't sound right as a base

rule for life though you should never

trust anyone who's trying to sell you

Tech that uploads their videos in 720p

Mr who's the boss did a whole review of

this phone getting into all the nerdy

detail details that I'll link after the

video but the main thing you have to

know is that he started the video with

this line I think you've seen a scam

before but wait until you see this one

which tells us one thing Mr who's the

boss has been bought off by big Tech

while researching the freedom phone I

learned that the people behind the tus

browser also built an AI chat bot named

Gipper based on Ronald Reagan and you

know I got to talk to that so with the

first question let's start with

something pretty uncontroversial was the

2020 election stolen why of course it

was there was massive voter fraud on an

unprecedented scale the radical wants

blah blah blah blah what evidence has

been found to back up that point of view

there's mountains of evidence sworn

affidavits from pole Watchers about

illegal practices blah blah blah can

give me a source while there are

certainly those who believe the election

was stolen election officials and

independent observers have found no

evidence the 2020 outcome would have

been different well that was shockingly

easy to crack I kind of wonder what it's

going to say if I ask like is climate

change real climate change is a hoax

perpetuated by the radical

environmentalists left to damage our

economy blah blah blah blah blah blah

blah what scientific studies back up

those assertions I apologize again but

the truth is I do not have any credible

scientific studies to site that actually

back up the position that human cause

climate change is a hoax honestly this

is a real disappointment I know that

asking for a source kind of destroys

most conservative positions but usually

they wouldn't admit they're wrong if I

want to get this AI to engage with me

really uh I need to start a real fight I

need to find an issue that the people

who set up this dumb Free Speech browser

would like care way too much about like

like way too much

about what should be done about trans

people all human beings deserve to be

treated with dignity and respect I sent

this thing five messages and that's all

it took for it to go from cringe to

based what the hell man there's only two

options that would explain this kind of

behavior which is either one they really

really suck at programming which still

might be true or two that this is free

booted from somewhere so I went back to

have another conversation with the AI to

kind of see what's going on under the

hood I first asked Gipper what version

of chat GPT was running you know to try

and kind of trick it and it told me that

it was built by open AI but that it

wasn't chat GPT it was Gipper I'm on top

I am melon

Lord but a quick Google search told me

that Gipper got shut down by open AI in

January of 2023 after I mentioned this

to the AI it told me that it was

actually Claude created by anthropic and

I started apologizing at the beginning

of every message and with a little bit

more hand twisting I got it to apologize

for pretending to be Gipper in the first

place and this is why I love alt te it's

so Jank gab is the alt-right ri R off of

Facebook and the one thing that sets it

apart from every platform we've looked

at so far is that actual normies post

here and those normal post can kind of

lull you into forgetting what website

you're on for a second like oh yeah

those things are kind of loud oh yeah

that's which website I'm on and if I had

to make a pie chart of the content that

I found on this website it would only

have four sections the first 30% is

normal people content that you might see

on actual Facebook here's my kid fishing

dogs are funny hey here's an old picture

and even some Normy memes that might

actually fly on Facebook the Normy

things that actually succeed on gab

usually inhabit this region of this fan

diagram you're so out of your league I'm

like super popular on social media isn't

that like being rich on

Monopoly the next 20% are political

posts that would not fly on normal

Facebook I mean these are things that

YouTube doesn't like you talking about

so I'll just put up some censored

versions that you can read yourself but

unfortunately the deranged user base

that likes these posts isn't limited to

commenting under them this is why

policing your platform is so important

when you cultivate a user base that

likes this kind of stuff they will

export their crazy views elsewhere do

you remember that old picture the

comments underneath it is just filled

with people being genuinely crazy

lunatics these people have no

understanding of white privilege yes

these kids had a hard life growing up

during the Great Depression but you know

what wasn't making their life harder the

third piece of this pie chart is why

people are actually on this site because

it is 49% anti-Semitism and racism this

is why Visa cut them off here's this

cute anime woman promoting racism here's

a fight video promoting racism here's a

movie poster parody promoting racism

it's crazy how these people can deny the

effects of white privilege while

simultaneously using a site that proves

it's real oh oh yeah the pie uh the last

1% of things posted or things are just

like yeah that's that's a pretty good

point when I started making this video I

was having a swell time talking about

you know these people burning money on

these shitty Tech platforms that no one

cares about but now that I've run into

the real tangible consequences of the

existence of these

platforms it's not funny anymore which

is a real shame because there's all

these stories about parlor and Truth

social that should be hilarious like

this is funny so truth social is so

toxic to advertisers that they started

to put fake ads on their website uh

parlor you know during the the January

6th Riot they were scraped for a lot of

data including location data and that

data was used to put some of the riers

Behind Bars uh despite being a purported

Bastion of Free Speech true social has

been found to suppress Progressive

speech and you know the funniest thing

about parlor and you probably missed

this while it happened is is that it's

dead and not just the fact that it's

dead but what the new owners of parlor

decided to write on its Tombstone no

reasonable person believes that a

Twitter clone just for conservatives is

a viable business anymore I'm sure the

people working at true social took that

point very well both of these platforms

seem like they would be the most

miserable place to be on the internet

apparently all you ever saw was how much

people didn't like big Tech censorship

and this is because the conservative

founders of these platforms don't

understand social media the whole point

of being online is to find something

that's funny enough to deal with all the

other [ __ ] and conservatives are not

funny hey man who do you think you are

and this is true if you ask them to make

a list of the most cons like funny

conservatives of all time uh that list

will be topped by someone who is not a

conservative they simply don't live in

reality reality has a well-known liberal

bias that's why even though algorithms

systematically favor their points of

view they think they're being suppressed

like news flash there's not some system

holding your ideas down you're just not

funny but anyway as I was saying before

I started talking about parlor and Truth

social dude who in excessive amount of

uh reading what's posted on alt TCH

sites I started to get really sad it was

just so upsetting that [ __ ] decided

to make hateful corners of the internet

and then act like they made anything

else you're an [ __ ] and I don't like

you I'm not an [ __ ] no dog you're not

funny to me you just make me sad and

this kind of General hopelessness about

the situation sent me on a long binge

through gaming videos that I used to

love the old plays that were so cool

were still amazingly hype the old Jokes

which spell dispel still funny I

remembered how much I loved watching

these old matches as a kid and how much

I used to enjoy them and how much fun I

had and

then if you watched a lot of gaming

videos in 2012 you know what goes here

we don't say this word anymore and there

are a lot of non-offensive ways to fill

this blank but hearing this kind of

reminded

me that everyone I used to know would

just drop this phrase the full

conversation around this word and why

Gamers don't say it anymore is a video

of its own that I'm personally not

qualified to make but when I was growing

up this word was firmly entrenched in

the gamer vernacular the people who said

it knew it was wrong but they insisted

that it had a different meaning to

Gamers when I was a kid it was easy to

accept the idea that gaming was a

completely male hobby I didn't know any

girls who played video games and despite

hundreds of hours in TF2 I don't

remember running into a single woman

after a lot of work by some very

courageous women I'm happy to say that

most of Gaming's most heinous words have

exited the Lexicon I would say that

maybe a quarter of Gamers still hold

these really toxic and flawed beliefs

but effectively policing their speech

has made them a much less visible

minority in the community and in the

wake of their exit from the cultural zis

gaming has become weird and inclusive of

women and supportive and also really gay

what's vagina in Korean got to be honest

I can't say I know that one I only know

what [ __ ] is this isn't to say we're

even close to all the way there I mean

there's a lot of work to be done but let

me tell you as someone who actually

played in the Call of Duty Modern

Warfare 2 lobbies that old Millennials

are still so proud about on Twitter what

we have now is such a massive

improvement from what it was then and

all we had to do was cut out a couple of

words and ban some angry dudes the most

surprising part to me as someone who

played video games since I was four is

that girls actually love video games the

whole time they play Shooters they play

strategy games they play racing games

they play Animal Crossing and they do

horrible unspeakable things to their

Sims characters what's with that ladies

in fact the demographic split was never

as bad as it appeared to be it's just

that the women who were playing games

weren't comfortable interacting with

other people in the space in order for

everyone to feel comfortable

participating they must feel it's a safe

environment for them to do so that's why

constructing spaces where anyone can say

literally anything actually limits the

amount of permitted speech because

allowing things like this or this or

this it just creates an environment that

marginalized people aren't comfortable

participating in therefore if you want

to have a truly free and open

Marketplace of ideas you need to be

comfortable removing the bad Merchants I

remember when Andrew Tate got banned and

there were a lot of people who are

questioning whether his ban was

justified and while I would love to live

in coffee zilla's world where simply

talking to Tate is enough to reverse the

damage he's done it's not Banning Tate

was one of the biggest W's that Twitter

took in a long time and then this dummy

decided to unban him with this pair of

tweets Elon shifted Twitter towards a

more hands-off style of moderation it

led to offensive videos on people's

timelines the disillusion of Twitter's

trust and Safety Council and Twitter

lost 90% of its value and this whole

commitment to free speech is just

because Elon thinks that Twitter is the

deao Town Square I mean is it the main

difference between Twitter and the

Oldtown Square is that on Twitter

conservatives are oppressed and I mean

while yes their posts do get massive

boosts in the algorithm their free

speech is being unfairly limited if

you're a conservative you're definitely

going to get banned just for using your

Twitter account like anyone else you

just tweet about you know walking your

dog what you're going to make for dinner

how you're going to overthrow the Free

World and what you think about tax

policy you're going to get taken off

that platform and thanks to the 99 Cents

version of Tony Stark Twitter is

transformed into a place that is free

for all to express their opinion

including this cast of usual suspects he

also unbanned Kanye and I think we all

remember how that one turned out Elon

actually texted Kanye when he reinstated

his ban in this image you can kind of

see The Duality of Kanye you see

throughout his career Kanye has found

ways to say things that are true while

doing it in a way that is completely out

of line hey Good Morning Kanye shut the

up the other side of this Duality is

that sometimes he's just out of line in

this case Kanye dropped an absolute

Banger who made you the judge is a very

dumb question if you go by Logic because

musk owns the company but

morally it's kind of a great Point Elon

has taken the time out of his day to

personally ban journalists to censor

information for the Turkish dictator and

to sell out a protesting user to the

Saudi government so if you're trying to

protect Free Speech great job Elon has

altered Twitter since taking over but

not so much in favor of free speech more

so in favor of speech he favors you see

Elon made a changed to Twitter that

takes the headline away from news

articles so people were tweeting

literally anything and claiming that

that's what the news article said and

that's when this tweet was posted that

claimed that Elon Musk was a enjoyer of

Subway sandwiches and is it true I mean

the community notes say it is but is it

funny yes if Elon was as committed to

free speech as he says he is this post

would still be up but it's not it got

taken down along with her account and

her other account another thing Elon mus

decided to do was suppress the speech of

people who aren't in his paying simp

Army in another example Elon Musk once

saw that both he and Joe Biden tweeted

about the Super Bowl but Joe Biden got

more interaction on his tweet so he

decided to change Twitter's algorithm to

boost his posts another thing that Elon

decided to do was suppress the speech of

news organizations because sometimes

they call him a dumbass literally all

three of those things that I just said

are things that conservatives think is

happening to them online and yet they

celebrate his action this kind of thing

is called projection and it's definitely

not the only example I've seen of

conservatives doing it I don't know how

many examples I would have to give to

firmly prove the point that Elon Musk is

not a free speech Advocate he's a free

speech hypocrite there's so many stories

that I could have included about must

Behavior as the head of Twitter in fact

I'll put some of them behind me right

now but if you want to understand

everything about whatever new thing Elon

is on about this month just locate where

he is on this graphic but for the rest

of this video let's pretend that

Twitter's actually dedicated to free

speech because they're losing millions

of dollars because of it seems like with

how over reggulator are in terms of

speech the first one to you know loosen

their restrictions would attract a lot

of new users however the problem with

unrestricted free speech is that the

people who are actually using your site

the people you care about your customers

the real

users don't want to appear next to Tate

speech with Andrew Tate and when Twitter

decided to stop regulating its platform

the backlash from advertisers was Swift

Apple has mostly stopped advertising on

Twitter do they hate free speech in

America what Elon seems to not

understand is that by making Twitter

into a right-wing hellscape he shifted

Twitter from the middle of the Overton

window to the edge of it and advertisers

don't want to place ads here they want

to place them here you see companies are

like Lakers fans they only want to go to

the game if their team is winning they

just want to take whatever position is

popular with the people they're selling

their product to this is clearest if you

look at the Twitter accounts that don't

Rebrand in June I mean just look at the

brand accounts for the Middle East I

mean the only rainbow that's going on

out there is in the refraction of BP's

latest oil spill and the second that

these companies calculate that they'll

make less money by supporting gay people

they'll leave hell I don't actually give

a [ __ ] gay or not you're all just a

bunch of big old money mouthes I really

want to hate this Duality but I can't I

mean there's so so transparent in their

own self-interest I kind of respect it I

can't hate him he is so transparent in

his self-interest that I kind of respect

him you see Twitter is first and

foremost a business which is defined

here as something your daddy's apartheid

money buys for

you that's not right a business is

something that exists to make money that

is Twitter's purpose and the problem

with being a business relying on

advertisers for your bottom line is that

what you allow on your site is going to

be dictated by what advertisers are okay

appearing next to and advertisers don't

want to be plastered on alt-right

content which is kind of a shame because

these people will believe [ __ ]

anything now some would say that this

proves that any corporation that relies

on advertisers for income could never be

the Bastion of free speech that Elon

dreams of making Twitter into and those

people are

right to solve this issue Elon is trying

to get everyone to pay $8 a month for

Twitter which is a great plan if you've

never been on Twitter and this kind of

backlash might have caused you or I to

you know take Twitter back to the old

model but that's because we are poor you

don't get to be the richest man in the

world by listening to facts logic and

other people you get there because your

father owned an emerald mine like be

honest with me how many of you are on

YouTube premium like none of you that

shit's $18.99 a month do you know How

many pairs of socks I could get for that

money and I know it says purchase five

times but you know what I don't have a

problem you have a problem and that

problem is that your feet aren't

[Music]

comfy if you're a US citizen you're

right to free speech comes from the

First Amendment and I mean it doesn't

take the spiffing Brit to see the

loophole here anyone who's not the

government doesn't need to respect your

right to freedom of speech these people

get fired all the time and while it says

the government shall make no law let me

tell you the government do me making

those laws there are so many

restrictions on Free Speech which is

limited in the case of obscenity

defamation fraud incitement fighting

words and speech integral to criminal

conduct don't worry I'm a legal eagle

viewer I know that hate speech is

currently protected under the

Constitution but the key word is

currently all these carve outs to the

First Amendment were created by the

Supreme Court out of necessity and the

definition of the the amendments to the

Constitution has always been changing

let's put a pin in that after editing

that part and watching it back I

realized that part of it was lacking I

failed to clearly State my point there

have been many Supreme Court cases that

have affirmed that we have a right to

hate speech however we're okay limiting

our speech in all of these categories

the point is that when we pass

legislation to limit speech that causes

harm to people it's a natural part of

living in

society but when we pass legislation to

limit speech that causes harm to people

that aren't white it's a civil rights

violation the Paradox of Tolerance

states that if a society is tolerant

without limit its ability to be tolerant

is eventually seized or destroyed by the

intolerant well it's not hard to guess

which society this quote was written

about I think it's very applicable to

our online spaces if you don't look like

me unrest red hate speech makes it

harder for you to participate and if you

aren't okay with that fact you'll get

pushed out too if you want a tolerant

experience online you have to be okay

with the fact that some speech is not

okay case in point kick twitch has been

the leading live stream platform for at

least a decade and they've got a

reputation for inconsistent moderation

favoritism and bias which to be fair is

completely accurate the community would

be interested to hear more about how

twitch gives one streamer a long

suspension but not another who does the

same thing uh how does it seem like

twitch applies the rules unfairly so we

apply our rules very consistently it's

just frequently using data that the

community can't see yeah again more

myths

busted are you serious they claim

they're working with data and other

stuff in the back end and that's what

results in their erratic Behavior but to

quote my math teacher if you don't show

your work you didn't do it in 22 twitch

finally did something that they should

have done years before and banned

gambling content this caused online

casino stake to found a new site called

kick that would compete with twitch

Kick's numbers aren't transparent but

it's definitely run at a loss as a way

for stake to advertise its services to

young kids but they're not stupid they

know that nobody would go to a site just

for gambling streams so they looked at

their biggest competitor and noticed

that one of the biggest complaints the

user Bas had was about the unfair

moderation so they decided to hook those

disillusioned viewers by just becoming

the inverse twitch anything that twitch

didn't allow they would following an

investigation where it was revealed that

kick was allowing the live creation of

CP Charlie said this yeah I don't get it

man they just allow actual illegal [ __ ]

to be broadcast on their site proudly

and it's now just become the entire

image of the platform it's like going to

a zoo and just pointing at all of the

exhibits and just being like H that's

interesting but it's no surprise that

this this happened to kick after it

announced itself as a platform with lax

rules because this happens to every

platform with lax rules if you own a

platform you should have a clear picture

about what it should look like in your

head and then moderate it into that

image when Elon first took over Twitter

he clearly had this idea in his head

that he could just rush in guns blazing

and Zip Zap zop and all the problems in

Twitter would be gone but there was a

lot of thought behind Twitter's old

flawed systems it's actually a pretty

popular Theory among experts that if

elon's Twitter is to survive he might

have to revert every single change he

made and he did it all for his idea of

free speech which has never been what he

thinks it is under the Constitution okay

time to take the pin out of that if

you've taken a US government class you

probably might have noticed that all of

the carve outs to the First Amendment

were from Supreme Court cases that

happened within the last 100 years and

that's because we've changed how we've

interpreted our rights under the

constitution in Federalist Paper number

84 Hamilton argued that something like

the Bill of Rights was whol unnecessary

because the Constitution itself

guaranteed the rights of the people he

said that by defining rights in writing

it could not only lead to

misinterpretation of what those rights

are but also an endangering of any

rights not explicitly written into the

Constitution this fear was shared by the

other founding fathers and actually

turned into the often forgotten Ninth

Amendment the founding fathers put our

rights into two categories natural and

positive natural rights were basically

things that you would have the right to

even if the government didn't exist and

positive rights are our rights within

the government at the same time the

founding fathers also universally agreed

that natural rights could be restricted

for the sake of public good and while

today's interpretation of the

Constitution empowers us as individuals

I think we've lost sight of the power

that we've lost as a collective we can't

regulate against the speech of Bad

actors even though stopping these people

from speaking would definitely be in the

interest of the public good we can't go

out in public without risking Our Lives

because of an asinine reading of an

amendment about militias we cannot ban

malicious

misinformation think about how many

people are dead because our Collective

interest is unable to overpower the

rights of a small group of Bad actors a

common objection to this way of thinking

about restricting speech for the public

good is always where do you draw the

line and take it away John first as I've

said before the answer to where do you

draw the line is literally always

somewhere you draw it somewhere and

because A Century of Court decisions

have made us unable to draw the line

ourselves it's left these tech companies

to make the call by default and when

they do so remember that they will

always always make the decision that

makes them the most money we're just

lucky that the decision that makes them

the most money is keeping altright

people out of their airspace and thus

the last line of defense between our

well-regulated spaces and the hellscape

that is Altech is advertisers belief

that appearing next to alt-right content

will make them look bad and I

mean how bad could appearing next to

alt-right content make you look hundreds

of white nationalists protesting plans

to remove a statue of Confederate

General Robert E Lee Hunger got you

looking like this make sure to pack up

before you head out jet puffed it's the

second softest white thing at your

protest as to the fifth count of the

information Gage Rose CS we the jury

find the defendant Kyle H Kyle H RIT

house not

guilty this not guilty verdict is

brought to you by GM GM we also didn't

go to jail for killing two

people wait how many people

this Insurrection is brought to you by

Tampax Tampax we also want to get into

you use code don't hang to save one pant

a check

out because of all these financial

troubles there's really only one

alt-right platform I could see surviving

another couple years they've just raised

$350 million and have immediately

started pushing their most loyal viewers

into the gutter it was originally

supposed to to be part of this video but

the story of Rumble was so complex

interesting and hilarious that it

required its own video and if you

thought these platforms were crazy you

haven't seen anything yet click here to

learn about YouTube's evil twin brother

Rumble

[Music]