Mistakes Were Made, RTX 4070 Ti Super Review Update
Summary
TLDRمرحبًا بعودتكم إلى Harbor Unbox، في هذا الفيديو نقدم تحديث سريع وإعادة مراجعة لـ RTX 4070 TI Super. في مراجعتنا السابقة، اكتشفنا أن نموذج MSI Ventus 3x يؤدي بشكل أقل بحوالي 5%، مما أدى إلى مشاكل في التقييم الدقيق للبطاقة الرسومية. بعد ذلك، أضفنا نموذج Asus Tough Gaming RTX 4070 Super إلى نظامنا التجريبي وتحققنا من بياناتنا السابقة، مع التأكيد على أن النتائج تظل هي نفسها. هذا الإصدار يبدو مملًا قليلاً من نvida، لكن التغييرات التي أضفها تزيد من قيمة البطاقة بحوالي 3%، لكنها لا تغير رأينا النهائي. كما يمكن الآن تحميل تحديث لبرمجيات البطاقة الرسومية MSI التي ستعالج الأداء المفقود.
Takeaways
- 🚀 يتضمن التحديث السريع هذا إعادة مراجعة لبطاقة RTX 4070 TI super من Nvidia.
- 🕒 قبل يوم من إطلاق مراجعة RTX 4070 TI super، أبلغت Nvidia بوجود خلل في الأداء لنموذج MSI Ventus 3x للبطاقة الرسومية التي تم تزويدي بها للاختبار.
- 🔍 مع وجود محدود للوقت، تم استبدال النموذج الغير ناجحة MSI Ventus 3x بنسخة Asus tough gaming للبطاقة الرسومية RTX 4070 super لتأكيد بيانات الاختبار.
- 🔄 تم إجراء تصحيح لأخطاء في جدول المواصفات في الفيديوهات السابقة، وإزالة القسم المغلوط وإعادة معالجة الفيديو على YouTube.
- 📊 تم تحديث البيانات الفعلية مع النموذج Asus tough gaming، مما أدى إلى زيادة في الأداء بنسب بسيطة.
- 🎮 في 1440p، أظهرت البيانات الجديدة زيادة بـ 3% في الأداء مع النموذج Asus tough gaming، مما يجعلها أسرع بـ 7% من RTX 4070 TI.
- 📊 عند 4K، كانت هناك زيادة بـ 3% في الأداء مع النموذج Asus tough gaming، مما يجعلها أسرع بـ 9% من RTX 4070 TI.
- 🌐 في المعالجة المثلية، كانت هناك زيادة بـ 2% في الأداء مع النموذج Asus tough gaming، مما يجعلها أسرع بـ 6% من RTX 4070 TI.
- 💻 تم توضيح أن النموذج MSI Ventus 3x قد يعاني من مشكلة طاقة، مما يفسر الاختلافات في الأداء مع النماذج المبكرة للبطاقة الرسومية.
- 💡 يظل النموذج RTX 4070 super من Nvidia يمثل قيمة أفضل مقارنة بـ RTX 4070 TI super، مع وجود زيادة في الأداء بـ 3-9% بحسب الدقة.
- 🔧 يمكن الآن لمستخدمي بطاقات RTX 47 TI super من MSI تحميل تحديث للبرمجيات الذي سيحل المشكلة المتعلقة بأداء البطاقة الرسومية.
Q & A
ما هي التحديث السريع الذي يناقشه Steve في مقطع الفيديو؟
-التحديث السريع يتضمن إعادة مراجعة لبطاقة الرسومات RTX 4070 TI Super، حيث يناقش Steve الأخطاء التي حدثت في المراجعة الأولى ونتائج الاختبار التي أظهرت أن البطاقة تحتأداء بحوالي 5%.
لماذا كانت البطاقة المقدمة من قبل MSI (Ventus 3x) تتصرف بشكل أقل من المتوقع؟
-Nvidia أبلغ Steve قبل يوم من نشر المراجعة أن البطاقة المقدمة من قبل MSI (Ventus 3x) كانت تتصرف بشكل أقل من المتوقع بحوالي 5%، ولم يتم تحديد السبب بشكل واضح، لكن يُعتقد أن المشكلة ربما تتعلق بالطاقة.
ما هي الأخطاء التي ارتكبها Steve في جدول المواصفات في مقطع الفيديو؟
-Steve قام بإدخال معلومات خاطئة في جدول المواصفات، مثل تعداد النواة RTX 480 وسعة الذاكرة L2 للبطاقة الرسومية RTX 4070 TI Super.
كيف قام Steve بإصلاح الأخطاء في جدول المواصفات؟
-بعد اكتشاف الأخطاء، أضف Steve تعليقًا محددًا في الفيديو لتوضيح الأخطاء، ثم قام بإزالة القسم الخاطئ باستخدام وظيفة قص الفيديوهات على YouTube، وقام بعد ذلك بتحديث التعليق المثبت وتغيير التوقيتات لأنها أصبحت غير صحيحة.
ماذا أظهرت البيانات الفعلية بعد استبدال البطاقة الرسومية؟
-بعد استبدال البطاقة الرسومية بنسخة Asus tough gaming، أظهرت البيانات أن الأداء تحسن بنسبة 3% في 1440p و 4K، مما يزيد من القيمة للبطاقة بنفس النسبة.
ما هي التغييرات التي أثرت على التقييم النهائي للبطاقة الرسومية؟
-التغييرات التي حدثت في الأداء لم تغير الرأي النهائي عن البطاقة، حيث ما زالت البطاقة القياسية RTX 4070 super تمثل قيمة أفضل.
ما هي التفاصيل التقنية التي تميز RTX 4070 TI Super عن RTX 4070؟
-RTX 4070 TI Super لديها 13% أقل من النواة مقارنة بـ RTX 480، و10% أكثر من RTX 4070، مع نفس سرعتها الأساسية والذاكرة L2، لكنها لديها شارة ذاكرة واسعة بـ 33% مع تباطؤ في سرعتها الفعلية للذاكرة.
لماذا يرى Steve أن البطاقة RTX 4070 TI Super هي منتج ضئل؟
-Steve يرى أن البطاقة ضئلة لأنها لم تقدم مزيدًا من الأداء بقدر ما يمكن أن يتوقع، مع فقط زيادة 4 GB في الذاكرة العشوائية (VRAM) وزيادة في الأداء تتراوح بين 6% إلى 9% حسب الدقة.
ماذا عن تحديث البرمجيات الذي يوفره MSI؟
-MSI وNvidia يوفرون تحديث برمجي يمكن تنفيذه في 20 ثانية ويعالج الأداء الناقص، لكن لم يتم التفسير الدقيق للمشكلة.
ماذا عن العروض القادمة من Steve في مقطع الفيديو؟
-Steve يذكر الجمهور بضرورة الانضمام إلى موقع Patreon أو الانضمام إلى العضوية في Harbor Unbox للبقاء على اتصال跟他们获取最新消息 والحصول على محتوى خاص وبث مباشر.
Outlines
😀 RTX 4070 TI Super Re-Review and MSI Ventus 3x Performance Issue
The video provides an update on the RTX 4070 TI Super graphics card, addressing a performance discrepancy with the MSI Ventus 3x model. The host explains that Nvidia informed them of a potential 5% underperformance in the MSI model just before their initial review was to go live. Due to time constraints, they were unable to fully retest the card but managed to validate their data with an Asus tough gaming version of the RTX 4070 Super. This retest confirmed that their original data was accurate, and the conclusion of the review would remain unchanged. The host also apologizes for a mistake in the specifications table of the original video, which has since been corrected. The corrected specifications show that the RTX 4070 TI has fewer cores than the 480 and a wider memory bus but slightly slower memory speed, resulting in a bandwidth just 6% less than the RTX 480.
😐 Updated Performance Data and Review Conclusion for RTX 4070 TI Super
This paragraph delves into the updated performance data for the RTX 4070 TI Super using the Asus tough gaming model. At 1080p resolution, there was almost no change in performance, with a 1% uplift. However, at 1440p, there was a 3% increase, making the 4070 TI Super 7% faster than the 4070 on average. At 4K, the performance increase was also 3%, resulting in a 9% lead over the 4070 TI. Specific games like Hogwarts Legacy showed a significant 9% uplift with the tough gaming model. The rate tracing data showed a 2% increase, making the 4070 TI Super 6% faster than the standard 4070 TI. Despite these performance improvements, the conclusion of the review remains the same, as the 3% increase in performance only improves the value of the 4070 TI Super by 3%. The host also discusses the retail market implications and the MSI Ventus 3x model's firmware update to address the missing performance. The video concludes with the host's opinion that the 4070 TI Super is underwhelming, especially considering the price point and the incremental improvements over the previous model.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡RTX 4070 TI super
💡MSI Ventus 3x
💡Asus tough gaming
💡أخطاء المواصفات
💡أداء الألعاب
💡دقة الرسم
💡R Tracing
💡قيمة الشراء
💡تحديث البرمجيات
💡تكنولوجيا Advanced Power Gain
Highlights
The MSI Ventus 3x model of RTX 4070 TI Super was found to be underperforming by up to 5%.
The Asus Tough Gaming version of RTX 4070 Super was used for retesting to validate the initial data.
The updated data confirmed that the original conclusion about RTX 4070 Super would not change.
RTX 4070 Super has 13% fewer cores than RTX 480 and 10% more than RTX 4070 TI.
The memory bus on RTX 4070 Super is 33% wider at 256 bit with slightly slower 21 GBS per second memory.
At 1440p, RTX 4070 Super saw a 3% increase in performance over the Ventus 3x model.
The 4070 Super is now 7% faster than 4070 TI on average at 1440p.
At 4K, there was a 3% performance increase on average with the Tough Gaming model.
The biggest performance improvement was seen in Dying Light 2 with a 7% increase.
RTX 4070 Super is now 6% faster than the standard 470 TI in ray tracing.
The 3% increase in performance improved the value of RTX 4070 Super by exactly 3%.
In the retail market, RTX 4070 Super costs 9% more per frame compared to 7900 XT.
Standard 4070 Super still represents better value than 4070 Super.
MSI released a firmware update to address the missing performance in RTX 47 TI Super graphics cards.
The performance issue with MSI models is suspected to be power related.
Higher quality silicon performs better when power limited.
The overall performance improvement with the Asus model was just 2 to 3%.
The host, Steve, apologizes for the error in the original video's specifications table.
Transcripts
[Music]
welcome back to Harbor unbox today I
have a quick update video for you a
quick re-review of the RTX 4070 TI super
I guess you could say for those of you
who missed it I noted in our TI super
review that just a day before the review
was set to go live Nvidia informed us
that the MSI Ventus 3x model that we had
been provided with for testing was
underperforming by as much as 5% and
this was a huge problem as we obviously
wanted to evaluate the RTX 4070 super
accurately but there simply wasn't
enough time to fully retest it in fact
testing aside these reviews take an
enormous amount of time to create the
week leading up to the 4070 TI super and
7600 XT reviews I was working 16 to 18
hour days pretty much 7 days a week but
that's not a complaint on my behalf I
absolutely love this the point rather
being that 24 hours just isn't enough
time to reproduce just days and days of
testing but we're also not going to post
a product review with an incorrect
conclusion due to inaccurate testing so
with the little time that I did have
available I slotted in the Asus tough
gaming version of the RTX 472 super into
our test system quickly validated our 40
40p data and after a few hours it was
pretty clear that the data that we had
was within a few per of the tough gaming
and therefore our conclusion wouldn't
change and this really was a bit of a
boring release from Nvidia now I
promised you guys I would go back and
update all of our data using the tough
gaming model and feature that in our RTX
480 super review next week but since I
now have all of the data I figured why
wait we can just quickly go over it now
also the slightly underperforming MSI
Ventus 3x graphics card wasn't
necessarily my fault uh but I did make a
sloppy error that was my fault and I'd
like to apologize for that and then
correct it shortly after releasing that
video which went out at 1:00 a.m. local
time mind you I was made aware of a
sloppy error in my specs table where I
got multiple specifications wrong stuff
like the RTX 480 core count and L2 cach
capacity of the RTX 4072 super so pretty
basic stuff there bit embarrassing
anyway I pinned a comment on the video
at around 2 a.m. explaining the error I
also then trimmed that section of the
video out using the YouTube trim
function but unfortunately this does
require an entire uh well requires the
video to be reprocessed which generally
does take several hours so that being
the case I was completely exhausted and
I went to bed at around 3:00 a.m. so
upon waking up I quickly headed out to
the office and found that YouTube had
processed the video I then updated the
pinned comment and then I had to change
all the time stamps as well because they
were now out because about 2 minutes of
the video had been cut removing that
specification section that I got wrong I
also updated the specs table and the
script for the written version over at
text spot and in the pinned comment I
linked people who were interested in
looking at the correct specification to
go over to the tech spot review so that
was my screw up sorted and before we
move on here is the correct
specifications table the RTX 470 TI has
13% fewer cores than the 480 and 10%
more than the 4070 TI it also packs the
same 48 megab L2 cache as the 470 with
the same core clock speed the key
upgrade of course is the memory bus
which is now 33% wider at 256 bit but
with slightly slower 21 GBS per second
memory the bandwidth is just 6% less
than that of the RTX 480 so those are
the correct specifications and again
sorry for the mistake in the original
video which has now been cut out okay
the next thing to address Performance
but rather than go over all of the games
tested individually as there are a dozen
games tested for rization performance at
two resolutions and then 10 games for R
tracing I'm just going to show you the
average data and then we'll go over all
of the individual game data for the
upcoming RTX 480 super review next week
at 1080p we see almost no change just a
1% uplift with the new data using the
Asus tough gaming RTX 470 TI super so
there's not much more to say here let's
just move on to the 1440p data now 1440p
we're seeing a 3% increase with the
tough gaming over the Ventus 3x going
from 120 FPS to 124 FPS this means
whereas previously the 4072 I super was
just 3% faster than the 4070 TI on
average it's now 7% faster which I
believe is in line with most
testing so just a very minor Improvement
overall here and this is where those
gains come from interestingly we did see
a rather large 9% uplift in Hogwarts
Legacy with the tough gaming with fairly
minor gains elsewhere 4% Resident Evil 4
and a plague Tower aquum with little to
nothing everywhere
else now at 4K we're again looking at a
3% performance increase on average when
using the tough gaming model taking us
from an average of 68 fps to 70 FPS
still this meant where as previously we
found the RTX 470 TI super to be 6% fast
than the 4070 TI it's now 9% faster so
about what the difference and
specifications would suggest we'd
see this time the biggest Improvement
was seen in Dying Light 2 where the
tough gaming was 7% faster than Watch
Dogs Legion with a 6% boost 5% for a
plague Toil requium and then just 4% in
C Punk 2077 and everything else was at
3% or less then we have the rate tracing
data and here we're seeing a 2% increase
when calculating using the geoman making
the 4070 TI super now 6% faster than the
standard 470 TI then if we calculate the
data for each title individually and
then average those results we end up
with a 3% uplift it's near enough to a
rounding era and typically we're looking
at a 4% increase though there were a few
titles that saw no performance change at
all as for how these changes affect our
review conclusion well they don't which
is why we went about publishing the data
that we had as you'd expect a 3%
increase in performance has improved the
value of the 4072 I super by exactly
wait for it 3% and believe it or not
that doesn't change our thoughts about
the product but this is just the MSRP
data so let's see what this does in the
retail Market here we see that instead
of costing 133% more per frame than the
7900 XT the 40702 super really costs 9%
more per frame which is certainly better
but it doesn't change my thoughts about
this product and the standard 4070 super
still represents better value as I said
in my original review so there you have
it our updated data using the Asus tough
gaming version of the RTX 472 super and
of course that fixed specifications
table again sorry for the mess up there
I still feel that the 4072 super is a
very underwhelming product and while
it's nice and I'd suppose necessary at
the $800 price point to go from 12 GB to
16 GB of vram after a year though you'd
probably expect Nvidia to deliver a bit
more than an extra 4 GB of vrm and a
mere 6 to 9% performance uplift
depending on the resolution used for
testing as for the MSI Ventus 3x model
or really all MSI RTX 47 TI super
graphics cards you can now download a
firmware update which takes around 20
seconds to execute and it will address
the missing performance although neither
MSI nor Nvidia have explained what the
issue was I suspect it's power related
and this is because the affected MSI
models were all provided to the media
well in advance so they very early
uction models and it's possible there
was a late change in specification it
appears to me that the MSI models were
shipped with a lower TDP which can
result in a performance loss despite
clock speeds appear Inc correct and this
is a result of nvidia's advanced power
gaing technology which can gate off some
of the SMS to save power so while the
GPU might be running the cores at 2.7
GHz not all cores are active due to a
limited power budget and this explains
why 1080P or some of the less demanding
games we saw little to no difference in
performance between the Juventus 3x and
tough gaming while in the more demanding
scenarios we consistently saw a
performance improvement with the Asus
model and this would also explain why I
heard reports that some Ventus 3x models
were 5% slower on average While others
were 1 to 2% slower basically the
reports were all over the place but this
makes sense as silicon quality does come
into play here higher quality silicon
will perform better when power limited
which is why power M for gpus and CPUs
ensure that even the worst silicon can
achieve the stock or Baseline
performance whatever the case this was a
massive headache but ultimately a bit of
a nothing Burger as well at least in our
case where we only saw a 2 to 3%
Improvement overall if it was 5% or more
than sure anyway I'd better get back to
more testing as I said we have the 4080
super next week along with a few other
new products so there's really no time
to waste if you appreciated this update
then consider becoming a harbor box
member float plan patreon you can SL to
either one of those things uh and it's a
good way for us to stay in touch with
you guys as well I was able to keep our
members a bit more up to date uh I
pinned all of these uh results in our
Discord server a few days ago so people
knew what was what and that we were a
few per off there so anyway we get yeah
access to our exclusive Discord server
monthly live streams Q&A stuff and
behind the scenes content so check that
out if you're interested if it's
perfectly fine and I would like to thank
you for watching this video I'm your
host Steve see you next
time
[Music]
[Music]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)