CONTRAÇÕES EM INGLÊS - AULA 32 PARA INICIANTES - PROFESSOR KENNY

Summary

In this video, the instructor provides an in-depth look at common contractions in English, focusing on verbs, auxiliaries, and modals in both present and past tense. The explanation covers how contractions are formed with the verb 'to be,' 'to have,' and other auxiliary verbs, highlighting their irregularities. The lesson also touches on negative contractions and the rules around apostrophe placement. Using playful, childhood learning techniques, the instructor makes the concept more relatable and easier to remember. The video aims to clear up confusion and guide viewers on correctly using and understanding contractions in English.

Takeaways

• 😀 Contractions are a shortened form of words or phrases, often involving the verb 'to be' in both present and past tenses.
• 😀 The verb 'to be' has regular contractions in the present and past forms, with a focus on its negative forms.
• 😀 Negative contractions of verbs like 'to have' and 'to be' also play a significant role in spoken language.
• 😀 Modals and auxiliary verbs such as 'eu' and 'can' also undergo contractions, but with some irregularities in their form.
• 😀 Irregular contractions in negative forms occur when auxiliary verbs include the letter 'm,' creating differences in pronunciation and spelling.
• 😀 British English often favors using contractions like 'knot' in negative forms, adding a layer of formality or regional preference.
• 😀 Some negative contractions are highly irregular, especially when they appear before certain words like 'Shandong' or 'Cade.'
• 😀 In the case of auxiliary verbs like 'ravel' (from 'ray Allen'), negation occurs only when used with the participle form.
• 😀 The formation of negative contractions follows consistent principles, though specific cases like 'Aland' or 'gente' in past tenses may differ.
• 😀 An easy method to understand where to place apostrophes in contractions is to remember childhood techniques, such as imagining a needle turning into a ball.
• 😀 While most contractions follow regular patterns, certain verbs like 'hot' and others have irregularities that need special attention.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the script?

The main topic of the script is contractions, specifically focusing on the verb 'to be', 'to have', and other auxiliary/modal verbs, in both present and past tenses.

How are contractions formed with the verb 'to be'?

Contractions with the verb 'to be' are formed by combining the verb with a negative form, such as 'isn't' for 'is not' or 'wasn't' for 'was not'.

What is mentioned about irregular contractions in the script?

The script discusses how certain contractions, like 'eu' and 'cân', are irregular, and explains how some verbs do not follow the usual principles of contraction.

Why is the contraction of 'eu' considered irregular?

The contraction of 'eu' is irregular because, in certain forms, it already contains an 'm' in its structure, making it different from the typical contraction patterns.

What is the method suggested for teaching contractions to children?

The script suggests a playful method for teaching contractions to children, where they imagine a needle turning into a ball, helping them visualize how contractions are formed.

What are the negative contractions of the verb 'to have' discussed in the script?

The negative contractions of the verb 'to have' are formed similarly to the verb 'to be', with examples like 'haven't' for 'have not' and 'hadn't' for 'had not'.

What does the script say about the use of apostrophes in contractions?

The script emphasizes that apostrophes are used to indicate the contraction of words, removing parts of the word to make it shorter, with exceptions for irregular contractions like 'not'.

How does the script explain contractions involving auxiliary verbs?

The script explains that contractions involving auxiliary verbs follow the same principles as other contractions, with examples like 'can't' for 'cannot' and 'won't' for 'will not'.

What is the significance of the contraction 'knotz' mentioned in the script?

The contraction 'knotz' is used in British English and is noted as a more formal or commonly used contraction for 'not'.

What do the 'negative contractions of the verb 'to have' in the past tense' refer to in the script?

The negative contractions of the verb 'to have' in the past tense, like 'hadn't', are examples where 'have' or 'had' is negated in combination with the past participle.