Klaim Nelayan Bangun Pagar Laut Dinilai Janggal

Summary

The debate over the construction of a sea fence along Indonesia's northern coast continues to stir controversy. Fishermen from Pantura claim the bamboo fence was built as a disaster mitigation measure for tsunamis and coastal erosion, funded by the community. However, maritime expert Captain Marcelus Hakeng doubts this claim, stating that the scale and cost of the project, potentially in the billions, make it unlikely to be funded by local fishermen. Calls are growing for the government and stakeholders to investigate and dismantle the structure, holding accountable those responsible for its construction, to avoid public funds being used.

Takeaways

• 😀 The ongoing debate about the construction of a sea fence along the northern coast of Indonesia is still unresolved.
• 😀 Fishermen from the Rakyat Network in Pantura claim that the sea fence was built by local communities as a tsunami and coastal erosion mitigation measure.
• 😀 The sea fence, primarily made of bamboo, stretches across several coastal areas and was constructed with the community's own resources (Swadaya).
• 😀 Maritime expert Captain Marcelus Hakeng doubts the feasibility of local fishermen constructing the sea fence due to the high costs involved, which could reach billions of rupiah.
• 😀 Hakeng argues that the long sea fence construction would require significant funding and that the local fishermen could not afford such an investment.
• 😀 He provides an example of the costs involved in smaller-scale projects, like cultivating green mussels, which cost around 40 million rupiah for a 2-meter area.
• 😀 Hakeng suggests that the cost of the sea fence, extending for tens of kilometers, is too high for local fishermen to manage.
• 😀 He urges the government, specifically the Ministry of Marine Affairs (KKP) and other related stakeholders, to investigate the origin of the sea fence and identify the responsible parties.
• 😀 The public's concern is whether the sea fence is part of a larger practice of privatization along the coast and small islands, with traditional fishermen potentially being misrepresented.
• 😀 There is a call for transparency regarding the construction of the sea fence in Tangerang, which spans across 16 villages in 6 subdistricts, to identify the real culprits behind the project.

Q & A

What is the controversy surrounding the sea wall project?

The controversy centers around the construction of a sea wall or 'pagar laut' along the northern coast of Indonesia, with local fishermen claiming it was built by the community for disaster mitigation. However, maritime expert Captain Marcelus Hakeng disputes this claim, suggesting that the scale of the project is beyond what the fishermen could afford.

Who are the main parties involved in the debate over the sea wall?

The main parties involved are local fishermen from the Pantura region, who claim the sea wall was built for disaster mitigation, and maritime expert Captain Marcelus Hakeng, who questions the feasibility of such a large-scale project being funded by the fishermen.

What is the purpose of the sea wall according to local fishermen?

Local fishermen argue that the sea wall, made of bamboo, was built as a form of disaster mitigation against tsunamis and coastal erosion in the northern coastal areas of Indonesia.

Why does Captain Marcelus Hakeng doubt the fishermen's claim?

Captain Marcelus Hakeng doubts the claim because he believes the costs involved in building a sea wall spanning dozens of kilometers would be too high for local fishermen to afford, citing an example of a smaller project involving bamboo costing millions of rupiah.

How much would it cost to build a smaller project similar to the sea wall?

Captain Marcelus Hakeng mentions that even a smaller project, where green mussels are cultivated on bamboo structures in the sea, costs around 40 million rupiah (approximately $2,600 USD). This illustrates the high costs involved in large-scale sea wall construction.

What is the estimated cost of the sea wall project?

The sea wall project, given its massive scale of several kilometers, is estimated to cost billions of rupiah, far beyond the financial capacity of the local fishermen.

What is the position of the 'Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan' (Coalition for Justice) on the sea wall?

The Coalition for Justice (Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan) strongly opposes the construction of the sea wall, viewing it as part of a broader trend of privatization along the coast and small islands, and urging that those responsible for the project be held accountable.

What does the public expect from the authorities regarding the sea wall?

The public expects the government, including the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP), to dismantle the sea wall and identify those responsible for its construction. They want the cost of dismantling to be borne by the perpetrators, not the state.

What specific action does the public want from the government in relation to the sea wall?

The public is calling for the immediate dismantling of the sea wall and for the authorities to uncover the identities of those behind the construction, ensuring that the responsible parties, rather than taxpayers, cover the dismantling costs.

How does the controversy over the sea wall impact local fishermen and their community?

The controversy affects local fishermen by putting them in the spotlight for a project that many believe they could not have financed. It also raises concerns about the impact of privatization on coastal communities and the potential for further privatization of common marine resources.