AP Seminar Performance Task 2: Aligning the Purpose of Your Argument
Summary
TLDRIn this educational video, Jerry Gonzalez from Lane Tech College Prep discusses the importance of alignment in argumentative writing. He emphasizes the need to align the research question, argument, and conclusion for a high-scoring paper. Gonzalez introduces the concepts of 'lenses' and 'perspectives' as crucial for examining topics and conveying viewpoints. He differentiates between position-based and solution-based research questions, explaining how each leads to different argument outcomes. The video also covers strategies for incorporating objections, limitations, and implications into arguments, tailored to the type of research question posed. Gonzalez advises staying within the theme of stimulus sources and provides guidance on maintaining alignment throughout the research and writing process.
Takeaways
- 📚 The video focuses on the importance of alignment in academic writing, specifically in developing research papers.
- 🧐 Jerry Gonzalez, the instructor, teaches at Lane Tech College Prep and aims to help students incorporate implications, limitations, and objections into their papers.
- 🔍 The video emphasizes the need for proper alignment between the research question, argument, and conclusion for a high-scoring paper.
- 🕵️♂️ The concepts of 'lens' and 'perspective' are crucial for the writing, researching, and reviewing process; a lens is a filter for examining an issue, while a perspective is a point of view conveyed through an argument.
- 👀 It's recommended to watch the AP seminar video on lenses and perspectives for a better understanding of these concepts.
- 🎯 The end goal of an argument can be a conclusion, a resolution, or a solution, and this goal should guide the type of research question developed.
- 🤔 There are two types of research questions: position-based and solution-based, each leading to a different end goal and argument structure.
- 🔄 The video stresses the importance of regularly reviewing and realigning the argument with the research question throughout the writing process.
- 🌐 The alignment should be maintained from the introduction to the conclusion, ensuring the paper answers the research question effectively.
- 🔄 Revisions might be necessary if the paper diverges from the original research question, and it's important to revise the question if needed to maintain alignment.
- 📝 Stronger arguments should consider objections, limitations, and implications, which are dependent on the type of research question and argument being made.
- 📚 For a detailed overview of objections, limitations, and implications, the video suggests checking out ESA videos 6 and 7.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video by Jerry Gonzalez?
-The main focus of the video is on alignment in argumentative writing, specifically how to align the purpose of an argument with the research question and conclusion to achieve a high-scoring research paper.
What are lenses and perspectives in the context of writing and researching?
-A lens is a filter through which an issue or topic is considered or examined, while a perspective, which is emphasized in AP Seminar, is a point of view conveyed through an argument.
Why is it important to watch the UAP video one on introducing lenses and perspectives?
-It is important to understand the differences between lenses and perspectives as they are key concepts that one needs to consider during the writing, researching, and reviewing process.
What are the three options for the end goal of an argument according to the video?
-The three options for the end goal of an argument are to produce a conclusion, reveal a resolution, or present a solution.
What is the difference between a position-based research question and a solution-based research question?
-A position-based research question leads to an argument that presents a conclusion or resolution, while a solution-based research question produces an argument focused on proposing a solution.
Why is it necessary to review and realign the argument with the research question during the research process?
-It is necessary to ensure that the paper remains focused and aligned from the introduction to the conclusion, which helps in maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the argument.
What should one do if they realize their paper might better fit a different research question during the writing process?
-If the paper seems to fit a different research question, one should revise the research question to ensure that the argument and the research question are aligned.
How does the type of research question influence the end goal of the argument?
-The type of research question (position-based or solution-based) will lead to a specific end goal, with position-based questions leading to conclusions or resolutions and solution-based questions leading to proposed solutions.
What are the implications of choosing a broad research question or attempting to do multiple things in a paper?
-Choosing a broad research question or attempting to do multiple things can lead to a lack of focus and alignment, potentially resulting in a lower-scoring paper.
Why is it important to consider objections, limitations, and implications when developing an argument?
-Considering objections, limitations, and implications strengthens the argument by addressing potential counterarguments, acknowledging the scope of the argument, and exploring the consequences of the argument's position or solution.
How can one ensure their revisions and arguments remain grounded within the theme of the stimulus sources?
-One should regularly review the stimulus sources and ensure that any revisions or developments in the argument maintain a thematic connection to the original theme identified.
Outlines
📚 Introduction to Alignment in Argumentative Writing
In this introductory segment, Jerry Gonzalez, a teacher at Lane Tech College Prep, sets the stage for a video on argument alignment. He emphasizes the importance of aligning the purpose of an argument with its conclusion and research question to achieve a high-scoring paper. Jerry introduces the concepts of 'lenses' and 'perspectives' as critical components in the writing, researching, and reviewing process. A lens is described as a filter to examine an issue, while a perspective is a point of view conveyed through an argument. The audience is encouraged to watch a related video for a better understanding of these terms before proceeding. The main focus then shifts to the alignment of an argument's end goal, which can be to produce a conclusion, a resolution, or present a solution. The type of research question developed will influence this end goal, with position-based and solution-based research questions leading to different argument outcomes.
🔍 Navigating Research Question Alignment and Revision
This paragraph delves into the nuances of aligning research questions with the overall argument of a paper. Jerry explains that a paper's research question should guide the entire writing process, from introduction to conclusion. If the paper's direction changes during research or writing, the research question may need to be revised to maintain alignment. Two types of research questions are discussed: position-based and solution-based. Position-based questions lead to arguments that conclude or resolve an issue, while solution-based questions result in arguments proposing a specific strategy or plan. Examples are provided to illustrate how different positions and solutions can be derived from a general research question, such as colonizing Mars. The paragraph concludes with a caution about staying true to the theme of the stimulus sources to avoid going off-task.
🚀 Advanced Alignment Strategies: Objections, Limitations, and Implications
In the final paragraph, Jerry discusses advanced strategies for strengthening arguments by considering objections, limitations, and implications. He explains that a robust argument should address these elements, which are contingent on the type of research question posed. For position-based questions, objections might involve presenting a counter-argument or discussing concerns, while limitations require the writer to make concessions about their argument's validity. Implications, in this context, refer to the consequences of accepting the argument's position. For solution-based questions, objections could present alternative solutions or critiques, limitations might highlight aspects of the problem not addressed by the proposed solution, and implications would forecast the short-term and long-term effects of implementing the solution, as well as its impact on stakeholders. Jerry suggests reviewing additional resources for a more in-depth understanding of these components and their role in argument alignment.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Alignment
💡Lens
💡Perspective
💡Research Question
💡Position-Based Research Question
💡Solution-Based Research Question
💡Implications
💡Limitations
💡Objections
💡Stimulus Sources
💡Concert Argument
Highlights
Jerry Gonzalez teaches at Lane Tech College Prep and focuses on the alignment of argument purpose in research papers.
The video discusses strategies to incorporate implications, limitations, and objections into research papers.
Alignment between research question, argument, and conclusion is emphasized as crucial for high-scoring papers.
The importance of understanding the difference between lenses (filters) and perspectives (points of view) is stressed.
The audience is urged to watch a specific video on lenses and perspectives for a deeper understanding.
The end goal of an argument can be a conclusion, a resolution, or a solution, which should be clear from the outset.
Broad research questions might indicate a need for a more focused paper or argument.
Differentiating between position-based and solution-based research questions is key to setting an argument's direction.
The type of research question asked will lead to a specific end goal for the argument.
Maintaining alignment of the argument with the research question throughout the writing process is critical.
If the paper veers off track, it's necessary to make changes to realign the paper's contents with the research question.
Examples of alignment are given for both position-based and solution-based arguments, using the topic of colonizing Mars.
Implications, or the consequences of an argument, are typically addressed in the conclusion.
The importance of staying within the theme of the stimulus sources to avoid being marked as off-task is highlighted.
Stronger arguments consider objections, limitations, and implications, which are examined based on the research question posed.
Incorporating objections, limitations, and implications is essential for achieving a high score on the rubric.
The way objections, limitations, and implications are discussed depends on the type of argument being made.
The video concludes with a reminder to reflect on how to incorporate objections, limitations, and implications into the argument.
Transcripts
hey and welcome to another video on pt2
my name is jerry gonzalez i teach at
lane tech college prep
in this video we'll be taking a look at
alignment
specifically aligning the purpose of
your argument
so in this video we'll be developing
strategies
to incorporate implications limitations
and objections into our research papers
and then we'll be taking a look at
reviewing the need
for proper alignment between your
research question
your argument and your conclusion
because that alignment is really going
to be something that's necessary
to make our paper reach that high
scoring threshold
now i want to take a moment here before
um getting into that
to review lenses and perspectives
because those two terms are going to be
something that you
are needing to consider in the writing
researching and reviewing process
so a lens is a filter through which
an issue or topic is going to be
considered or examined
and a perspective which is really what
we're emphasizing in ap seminar
perspective is going to be a point of
view conveyed through an argument
now i want to really make sure that at
this point before
we move on that you're taking a moment
to watch
uap video one which is on introducing
lenses and perspectives have a qr code
here
which if you scan with your phone will
take you to
these this ap daily video specifically
so i really really really cannot
emphasize enough
that you in that you watch this video to
understand
what the differences between lenses and
perspectives are
i'm gonna move forward operating under
the assumption that you can
that you understand that difference
so in thinking about alignments the big
picture
you need to think about what is the end
goal
of your argument what do you want to
accomplish
and as part of your argument you have
three options
you can have an argument that produces a
conclusion
you can have an argument that produces a
revel a resolution
or you can produce an argument that
presents
a solution successful papers
will do one of these things if you have
a paper that attempts to do
multiple that might be an indication
that you have too broad of a paper
or too broad of a research question
in terms of alignment in terms of this
end goal your decision
on what you want to do producing a
conclusion
which is a final understanding resulting
from analysis or
evidence of evidence producing a
resolution
which is declaration proposing
action to solve a problem or dispute
or producing a solution depending on
what you want to do
it will lead you to a specific type of
research question
we have two different types of research
questions that you can develop
we have position-based research
questions or solution-based research
questions
the type of research question that you
ask will lead you to a specific
end goal a solution-based research
question
will produce a solutions based argument
a position-based research question will
lead to an argument
that presents a conclusion or resolution
it's important that you understand this
because we want to make sure
that your paper that your argument is
aligned
from the beginning of the introduction
all the way through that last paragraph
in the conclusion
so throughout that research process it's
going to be critical that you review
and that you re-review your argument to
ensure that it remains
aligned with your research question
if your paper gets off track you need to
make the necessary changes
to realign the contents of the paper
you always have to go back to your
research question
you always have to go back to reviewing
is my paper is my argument actually
answering my research question
so from research question development
which we covered in earlier videos
from that development once you have that
research question
that's the question that you need to
research that's the question that you
need to answer
that's the question that you're writing
your paper about
if at one if at some point in the
research in the
in the writing process you realize that
your paper
might better fit a different research
question
that's when you need to go and revise
the research question
because as a reader we're looking to
make sure
that you're answering that question
we're looking to make sure that the
quality of your argument
is aligning with that research question
that you made
so make sure throughout the research
process
throughout the writing process that
you're reflecting back
on whether or not your research question
is aligned
so let's take a look at a couple of at
two examples of alignment here
so this first example is a
position-based alignment
okay and i have my position-based
question here
very generally should the united states
colonize
mars that is my research question in the
yellow box
and some different positions some
different stances
that we can take to that research
question we can say
yes we can say yes but only if
or we could say no those are three
very generally three different ways that
we can answer the research question
that is what the position is yes no
maybe so in the broad sense those are
our positions
now we know that that's not specific
enough
but if we start thinking about the
consequences
okay what are the consequences of us
doing that
thinking about those implications if we
argue
that we should colonize mars
what would need to happen to do that
investments in technology would need to
be made to make it possible
international agreements would need to
be made to ensure cooperation
on the other hand if we argue no we
shouldn't
the consequences or the implications of
that would be
a greater risk of other countries
beginning the process before the united
states
which could weaken the position of the
us
so positions and a position-based
question
still requires to talk about
implications on the end
those implications will usually be
seen within the conclusion of an
argument
in this case that middle part
that middle chunk will be the actual
argument
the green part is going to be the so
what
now we see that
in a separate example here for a
solution based alignment
similar topic similar content but
instead of arguing
whether or not we should colonize mars
in this example we are evaluating how
should we colonize mars
and so in this case for alignment
instead of seeking to take a position
our position here is what is the
solution that you are
arguing for so in this case
the alignment is i believe that this
solution
is the best strategy to colonize mars
so the united states should aim to
colonize mars without the aid of other
countries
or the united states should work with
other countries to colonize mars
those are two different strategies to
colonize mars
and so for the implications for this
consequences of this
what are the consequences of
implementing your solution what will
happen
if we follow your plan what will happen
if we take your plan seriously and go
through with it
well if we aim to colonize mars without
the aid of other countries
this approach would allow the united
states to set the terms for colonization
of mars
and ensure the united states be in a
position of power on the new frontier
on the other hand if the united states
works with
other countries this approach would
prevent colonial rivalries that have
historically led to deathly conflict
notice those two those two green boxes
once again
would be positioned more toward the
consequences more toward the
the so what happens now kind of idea
now with all of this in mind you have to
be
mindful of the stimulus sources
because i mentioned how revision
might impact the overall alignment of
your research question
it might take you in a different
direction than you had originally
anticipated
but you have to remain grounded within
the theme of the stimulus sources for
this paper
so it is possible in making revisions
that you originally started out within
the theme of the stimulus sources
but that through revision you eventually
are too far away from that thematic
connection
that strain away from the stimulus
sources
has the potential to
having your response being marked as off
task
and you don't want that right you want
to make sure that you
are remaining within that theme that you
identified originally
for those stimulus sources
some other things that you need to
consider in thinking about alignments
remember that stronger arguments will
consider
objections limitations and implications
and the way that you're going to be
examining these elements are going to be
highly dependent on the research
question that you posed
for a general overview of objections
limitations and implications
you should check out esa videos 6 and
esa video 7
where we go into detail on um reviewing
these three components
for both position based and solutions
based questions
so let's review a little bit
in thinking about position based
questions
there are a couple of strategies that
you can consider when thinking about
how you will incorporate objections
limitations
and implications because you need to do
all three to be able to score high
on the rubric and thinking about
objections
the concert argument would be sort of
like an opposite position
right so if you say yes to something a
concert argument might be saying no to
something
it could also be seen in terms of a
discussion of concerns
a concern of concerns or objections
there
or if you have like a to what extent
type of research question
a contour argument could fall somewhere
else along the spectrum of possible
arguments
so this is where having that gray area
within your research question is
beneficial
in thinking about limitations what are
some concessions that you're willing to
make
concerning the argument that you're
advocating for
and what are some of the factors that
might influence or limit the overall
validity of your argument
and finally in thinking about
implications
so what now i started think talking
about that a little bit
when i was discussing alignment but a
solution type of paper
would typically follow the argument that
you make
in a position-based paper so what should
a solution
consider if we take your argument
seriously
and finally for a solution based
question
objections are likely going to be seen
as an alternative approach so it might
be people who don't agree with your
proposed solution who might offer
up another solution or who might offer
up
a critique or criticism of the solution
that you are proposing
in thinking about limitations what
aspects of the problem
that you identified in the introduction
is not considered by the solution that
you are advocating for
are there any new issues raised by the
implementation of your solution
what factors might uh make this solution
too difficult to implement
finally on the implication side what
will happen in the short term if your
solution is implemented
what's going to happen in the long term
if that solution is implemented
and how will your targeted stakeholders
be impacted for better or for worse
there's a lot to consider here so you
should take a moment to sort of reflect
on
how you're going to incorporate all of
these just always keep in mind
that these three aspects objections
limitations implications the way that
you discuss them
will be highly dependent on the type of
research question
the type of argument that you're making
thanks for watching
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
AP Seminar Performace Task 2: Developing a Research Question
AP Seminar: Developing a Research Topic within Context of Stimulus Materials
AP Seminar: Finding Evidence for Your Topic and Moving to a Research Question
AP Seminar Performance Task 2: Doing an effective IMP and Oral Defense
AP Seminar: Submitting the Individual Written Argument
The ONLY WAY to Make YOUR Argument Thesis COMPLEX!
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)