Linguistic Relativity: Does Your Language Change How You See The World?

Summary

The video script explores the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which suggests that language shapes our perception of the world. It discusses the strong hypothesis, largely debunked, and the weak hypothesis, supported by studies like the grammatical gender influencing object perception and the Russian language's effect on color recognition. Despite some evidence, the influence is subtle and doesn't significantly alter our worldview. The script concludes that, contrary to divisive implications, language's role in shaping our understanding of the world is minimal, highlighting our shared human experience.

Takeaways

• 🌐 The idea that language shapes our perception of the world is known as linguistic relativity or the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
• 🔍 Linguistic relativity was popularized by Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, who studied indigenous languages in the early 20th century.
• 🗣️ Whorf's study of the Hopi language suggested that its lack of a concept of time meant Hopi people did not perceive time as others do.
• 📚 The strong version of the hypothesis, which claims language determines our worldview, has been largely debunked.
• 🔬 The weak version of the hypothesis suggests that language influences our worldview, which is supported by some studies.
• 🌉 A study on grammatical gender showed that speakers of different languages attribute different qualities to objects based on the language's gender assignments.
• 🎨 Another study indicated that Russian speakers can distinguish between light and dark shades of blue faster than English speakers, suggesting language's influence on color perception.
• ⏱️ The differences found in language's influence on perception are often subtle and may not significantly impact daily life.
• 🧐 Critics argue that the hypothesis can reinforce prejudices and suggest that different languages create fundamentally different worldviews.
• 🌟 Despite linguistic and cultural differences, the core human experience of perceiving the world remains largely the same.

Q & A

What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as linguistic relativity, is the idea that the structure of a language affects its speakers' cognition and perception of the world. It suggests that language can determine or at least influence thought.

Who were Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf?

Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf were linguists working in the early twentieth century. They are credited with developing the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which posits that language influences thought and perception.

What did Edward Sapir observe about the Nootka people's language?

Edward Sapir observed that the Nootka people, indigenous to Canada's Pacific Northwest Coast, had a distinctive language feature where they would say 'it stones down' instead of 'the stone falls,' suggesting a different perception of the relationship between objects and actions.

What was Benjamin Lee Whorf's study on the Hopi people?

Benjamin Lee Whorf studied the Hopi people, a Native American tribe, and determined that their language lacked grammar to deal with time, leading him to conclude that the Hopi people had no concept of time.

How did the publication of 'Hopi Time' affect the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

The publication of 'Hopi Time' in the 1980s discredited Whorf's work on the Hopi people, as it detailed many ways the Hopi do talk about time, which contradicted Whorf's claim that they had no concept of time.

What is the difference between the strong and weak versions of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

The strong version of the hypothesis suggests that language determines thought and worldview, while the weak version posits that language influences thought and worldview. The strong version has been largely debunked, whereas the weak version has some support.

What is an example of the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis being supported?

A study on grammatical gender found that German speakers, who label bridges as feminine, described them using words like 'beautiful' and 'slender,' while Spanish speakers, who label bridges as masculine, used words like 'strong' and 'dangerous.'

How does the Russian language's distinction between light and dark blue compare to English?

Russian has two words for different shades of blue: 'siniy' for dark blues and 'goluboy' for light blues. A study found that Russian speakers could distinguish between light and dark blue slightly faster than English speakers, suggesting a linguistic influence on color perception.

What is the significance of the study on Russian speakers' perception of blue?

The study indicates that language can have a statistically significant influence on color perception, supporting the existence of linguistic relativity to some extent.

What is John McWhorter's counterpoint to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

Linguist John McWhorter argues that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis can reinforce prejudices against foreign language speakers by implying that they cannot imagine the world in the same way as speakers of other languages.

What is the broader implication of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis for understanding humanity?

The broader implication is that despite linguistic and cultural differences, the hypothesis suggests that there might be a fundamental unity in how humans perceive the world, which could be a unifying factor for humanity.

Outlines

00:00

🌐 Linguistic Relativity: The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

The paragraph introduces the concept of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which suggests that the language we speak can affect the way we perceive the world. It discusses the origins of the hypothesis with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, and their studies on the Nootka and Hopi languages. The paragraph also mentions how Whorf's conclusions about the Hopi people's concept of time were later discredited by linguist John F. Carranza in his book 'Hopi Time'. It contrasts the strong hypothesis, which claims that language determines our worldview, with the weak hypothesis, which suggests a more subtle influence of language on perception. The paragraph concludes by highlighting studies that support the weak hypothesis, such as the influence of grammatical gender on object perception and the ability of Russian speakers to distinguish between different shades of blue.

Keywords

💡Linguistic Relativity

Linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, is the idea that the language one speaks can affect the way one perceives the world. In the video, this concept is introduced with the example of the Nootka people, where the language's structure implies a different conceptualization of relationships between objects and actions compared to other languages.

💡Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is named after linguists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, who proposed that language determines thought. The video discusses how Whorf's study of the Hopi language led to the hypothesis that the Hopi people, lacking a concept of time in their language, might perceive time differently.

💡Nootka People

The Nootka people are an indigenous group from Canada's Pacific Northwest Coast. The video uses them as an example to illustrate how their language's structure might lead to a different perception of the world, specifically in terms of the relationship between objects and actions.

💡Hopi People

The Hopi are a Native American tribe living in northeastern Arizona. In the video, Whorf's study of their language is mentioned as a basis for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, suggesting that the Hopi's lack of grammatical tense might affect their concept of time.

💡Grammatical Gender

Grammatical gender is a linguistic feature where nouns are assigned a gender (masculine, feminine, or neuter). The video discusses a study that shows how the grammatical gender of a noun in different languages can influence speakers' descriptions of objects, such as bridges.

💡Strong Hypothesis

The strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis posits that language strictly determines thought and worldview. The video explains that this version has been largely debunked, as evidenced by the book 'Hopi Time' that refuted Whorf's conclusions about the Hopi people.

💡Weak Hypothesis

The weak hypothesis suggests that language influences thought rather than determining it. The video supports this view with examples, such as how grammatical gender affects descriptions of objects in different languages.

💡Cognitive Science

Cognitive science is the study of the mental processes underlying behavior, including perception, memory, and language. The video touches on cognitive science when discussing how language might affect perception and thought processes.

💡Neo-Whorfianism

Neo-Whorfianism refers to modern researchers who continue to explore the links between language and thought as proposed by the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. The video mentions these researchers and their attempts to establish concrete connections between language and worldview.

💡Cultural Differences

Cultural differences are variations in customs, beliefs, and social behaviors among different societies. The video implies that while language can reflect and reinforce cultural differences, it also highlights our shared human experience across different cultures.

💡John McWhorter

John McWhorter is a linguist mentioned in the video who critiques the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. He argues that it can reinforce prejudices and suggests that language does not necessarily divide people into separate worldviews.

Highlights

The concept of linguistic relativity suggests that language can affect how we perceive the world.

Linguistic relativity is also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, named after Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf.

Sapir's study of the Nootka people's language revealed a distinctive feature in how they described actions.

Whorf expanded on Sapir's ideas with his study of the Hopi people, suggesting their language lacked a concept of time.

The idea that Hopi people have no concept of time was largely discredited by the 1980s.

The strong version of the hypothesis claims that language determines our worldview.

The weak version of the hypothesis suggests that language influences our worldview.

A study on grammatical gender showed how language can influence perception of objects.

In the study, German speakers described bridges with feminine attributes, while Spanish speakers used masculine attributes.

Another study explored whether Russian speakers perceive the color blue differently due to linguistic distinctions.

Russian speakers were found to distinguish between light and dark blue slightly faster than English speakers.

The influence of language on color perception is statistically significant but minimal in daily life.

Neo-Whorfianism attempts to demonstrate links between language and worldview with limited concrete connections.

Linguist John McWhorter argues that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis can reinforce prejudices against foreign language speakers.

Language does not necessarily divide the world into separate worldviews but can teach us about humanity.

Despite linguistic and cultural differences, the world is perceived similarly, which might unite us.

Transcripts

have you ever wanted to see what the

world looks like in French boy have I

whoa it's pretty much the same have you

ever heard the people who speak other

languages literally see the world

differently it's a common idea and it

goes by the name linguistic relativity

or the sapir-whorf hypothesis the name

comes from Edward cipher and Benjamin

Lee Whorf for two linguists working in

the early twentieth century

in 1931 Schaefer studied the language of

the Nootka people or a group indigenous

to Canada's Pacific Northwest Coast he

observed that the grameen people had a

distinctive feature instead of saying

the stone falls they would say it stones

down they proclaimed this small

distinction meant that the new peoples

saw a relationship between the objects

and the objects action differently than

speakers of other languages Benjamin Lee

Whorf one of Sapor students expanded on

this idea he did a study of the Hopi

people a Native American tribe living in

northeastern Arizona Worf determined

that the hopi language had no grammar to

deal with time and so the Hopi people

then had no concept of time it's like

time doesn't exist this conclusion would

mean that the Hopi people think of the

world just entirely differently and from

this the saber Whorf hypothesis was born

only one problem not everyone was buying

this akarma latke only most working in

the second half of the 20th century

wrote a book called hopi time in which

he went into a lot of detail about the

many many ways the Hopi people actually

do talk about time when this book was

published in the 1980 is it largely

discredited this part of wharfs work and

was kind of the final nail in the coffin

for the safer web hypothesis or was it

well pretty much everyone agrees that

it's impossible for your very concept of

time to be changed by native language

there is a version of this hypothesis

that does have some support the old

mostly debunked version of this is

called the strong hypothesis which says

that our language determines how we see

the world kind of like the famous livid

Dickinson quote the limits of my

language means the limits of my world

the newer more accepted version is the

weak hypothesis which says that our

language just influences how we see the

world there is evidence for this one

study looked at grammatical gender which

is when a language labels

noun to be masculine or feminine or

whatever as an aside English doesn't

really have this this study asked people

who spoke different languages to

describe various objects like a bridge

in German bridges feminine Deluca and

German study participants used words

like beautiful and slender more often to

describe it in Spanish for bridges the

masculine el puente attitudes tended to

be things more like strong and dangerous

this study though not entirely

conclusive seems to show that a

languages grammatical gender can

influence how people think about objects

that bridge over there is just so sexy

another study that took on the subject a

little more vigorously exploring how

Russian people see the color blue while

English has one basic word for all the

shades of blue Russian has two Shanee

for dark blues and gula boy for light

blues the format of the study is a bit

complicated but basically they were

trying to find out if Russian speakers

could actually see a difference between

genie and Goa Boyd the English speakers

don't and they found that yes the

Russian participants were able to tell

the difference between light blue and

dark blue slightly faster and so the

researchers concluded that the language

then had a statistically significant

influence on the way Russian see color

so speaking purely scientifically

linguistic relativity does exists but

before we go too far the difference

between English and Russian responses in

this study was mere millisecond which

probably means it doesn't have much of

an effect on day-to-day life and while

there have been quite a few studies by

researchers who have dubbed themselves

neo orphans that have tried to show

links between language and worldview

there have been very few concrete

connections but there is something

inherently compelling in this idea that

language can make us engage as the world

differently we almost want to believe

that a person who speaks a different

language must have a different

experience a strong counterpoint to the

super where hypothesis has been made by

present-day linguist John McWhorter he

argues that by pollicis actually

reinforces certain prejudices against

foreign language speakers after all when

someone says people who speak language

acts are better at doing lie that also

means inversely that there are other

people who are worse at doing lie paper

war food also implied the people who

speak a different language from you are

somehow not even able to imagine the

world the same way that you do that's

not great language doesn't have to

divide the world into neat separate

worldviews for it to teach us something

important about humanity

so refreshing that really that world

here seen the world pretty much the same

in spite of our linguistic and cultural

differences in fact it might be the one

thing that truly unites us

[Music]

[Music]