The Ptolemaic and Copernican Models

Jim Hamm
1 Feb 202224:16

Summary

TLDRThis video explores the Ptolemaic and Copernican models of the universe. The Ptolemaic model, refined by Claudius Ptolemy, was geocentric and used epicycles and deferents to explain planetary motion, including retrograde motion. It was widely accepted for over a thousand years. The Copernican model, proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus, was heliocentric, placing the Sun at the center and simplifying the explanation for retrograde motion. Despite being more intuitive, it was not significantly more accurate than the Ptolemaic model without additional modifications.

Takeaways

  • 📚 The Ptolemaic model was a geocentric system that placed Earth at the center of the universe and was accepted for about 1400 years.
  • 🌌 The Ptolemaic model used deferents and epicycles to explain the motion of planets, including the complex retrograde motion.
  • 🔄 Retrograde motion is when a planet appears to move backward in the sky, which the Ptolemaic model attempted to explain.
  • 🌞 The Copernican model, proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus, was a heliocentric system that placed the Sun at the center of the universe.
  • 📈 Copernicus's model offered a simpler explanation for retrograde motion as a result of Earth overtaking other planets in its orbit.
  • 📘 Claudius Ptolemy, the author of the Almagest, refined the geocentric model for better planetary predictions.
  • 🌐 The Ptolemaic model was almost geocentric, with Earth being slightly off-center, and all celestial bodies orbiting around points near the Earth.
  • 📊 The equant was a concept in the Ptolemaic model where the center of a planet's epicycle appeared to move with constant angular speed from a certain point.
  • 📚 The Copernican model was not significantly more accurate than the Ptolemaic model initially, and Copernicus added epicycles to improve its accuracy.
  • 📖 The transition from the Ptolemaic to the Copernican model was influenced by scholars like Galileo, who supported and expanded upon Copernicus's ideas.
  • 📚 The script also suggests readings for those interested in the history of these models, including books by Davis Obel, Arthur Koestler, Owen Gingerich, and Timothy Ferris.

Q & A

  • What are the two main models of planetary motion discussed in the video?

    -The two main models of planetary motion discussed are the Ptolemaic model and the Copernican model.

  • What is the Ptolemaic model and when was it published?

    -The Ptolemaic model is a geocentric model of the universe that was a refinement of early Greek models. It was published around 150 AD.

  • How long was the Ptolemaic model accepted before being succeeded?

    -The Ptolemaic model was accepted for approximately 1300 to 1400 years before being succeeded by the Copernican model.

  • What is retrograde motion and which planet's motion does the video use to explain it?

    -Retrograde motion is when a planet appears to move backward in its orbit against the background stars. The video uses Mars' motion to explain this phenomenon.

  • What is the term for the circular orbit of the sun around a point near the earth in the Ptolemaic model?

    -In the Ptolemaic model, the circular orbit of the sun around a point near the earth is called the deferent.

  • What is the term for the small circles that planets move along in the Ptolemaic model?

    -In the Ptolemaic model, the small circles that planets move along are called epicycles.

  • Who was Claudius Ptolemy and what did he contribute to the Ptolemaic model?

    -Claudius Ptolemy was an ancient astronomer who authored the Almagest, which refined the geocentric model for better planetary predictions.

  • What is the equant in the context of the Ptolemaic model?

    -The equant is a point from which the center of a planet's epicycle appears to move with constant angular speed in the Ptolemaic model.

  • What is the Copernican model and how does it differ from the Ptolemaic model?

    -The Copernican model is a heliocentric model where the sun is at the center of the universe. It differs from the Ptolemaic model by placing the sun, not the earth, at the center.

  • What was the profession of Nicolaus Copernicus and when did he live?

    -Nicolaus Copernicus was a canon of the Catholic Church and lived from 1473 to 1543.

  • How did the Copernican model explain retrograde motion?

    -The Copernican model explained retrograde motion by the relative positions and speeds of the planets as they orbit the sun, causing the apparent backward motion from Earth's perspective.

Outlines

00:00

🌌 Introduction to Ptolemaic and Copernican Models

The video begins by introducing two major models of the universe: the Ptolemaic and Copernican models. The Ptolemaic model, refined from early Greek models and published around 150 AD, was accepted for approximately 1400 years. It's noted for its ability to predict the paths of the planets against the background stars, including the phenomenon of retrograde motion, where planets appear to move backward. The Copernican model, which succeeded the Ptolemaic model, is also mentioned, with a focus on its acceptance by scholars. The video uses the example of Mars' path from July 2020 to January 2021 to illustrate retrograde motion, which occurs approximately every 26 months. The script also discusses the motivations behind developing these models, including understanding the universe and casting more accurate horoscopes, as many early astronomers were also astrologers.

05:02

📚 Detailed Explanation of the Ptolemaic Model

The second paragraph delves into the specifics of the Ptolemaic model, which was nearly geocentric, placing Earth almost at the center of the universe. It describes the model's structure, which included deferents (large circles) and epicycles (smaller circles on the deferents) for each planet. The model accounted for retrograde motion through the use of epicycles. The script explains the concept of the equant, a point from which the center of a planet's epicycle appears to move at a constant angular speed. Despite its complexity, the Ptolemaic model was effective for many centuries, although it required each planet to have its own unique deferent, epicycle, and equant. The paragraph concludes with a mention of animations that simulate the Ptolemaic model, showing the motion of planets like Mars and the phases of Venus as predicted by the model.

10:04

🌉 Animation of Ptolemaic Model and Venus Phases

The third paragraph discusses an animation that demonstrates the Ptolemaic model, showing the motion of Mars against the background stars and the sun's apparent motion. It corrects a common misconception by clarifying that, in the Ptolemaic model, the sun would be inside the deferent for Mars. The animation illustrates how Mars appears to move backward (retrograde motion) and then forward again. Additionally, the paragraph explores the phases of Venus as predicted by the Ptolemaic model, which were not observable at the time of Ptolemy but later confirmed by Galileo's observations. The animation shows how Venus would appear as a thin crescent and how its phases change over time, according to the model.

15:05

🌏 The Resurgence of the Ptolemaic Model and the Copernican Revolution

This paragraph discusses the resurgence of the Ptolemaic model in Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire, which had been preserved by other cultures such as in India and Arabian countries. It then introduces Nicholas Copernicus, who proposed a revolutionary model with the sun at the center, known as the heliocentric model. Copernicus's work, 'De revolutionibus,' published in 1543, the year of his death, is highlighted. The paragraph contrasts the Ptolemaic and Copernican models, emphasizing the simplicity of the latter in explaining retrograde motion and the relative speed of planets. It also mentions that Copernicus's model was not significantly more accurate than the Ptolemaic model but laid the groundwork for future astronomical discoveries.

20:05

🔍 Copernican Model's Accuracy and Historical Context

The final paragraph addresses the accuracy of the Copernican model, noting that it was not much more accurate than the Ptolemaic model it replaced. Copernicus attempted to improve the model's accuracy by adding epicycles, but this only provided a marginal improvement. The paragraph also suggests readings for those interested in the history of these models, including books by Davis Obel, Arthur Kessler, Owen Gingerich, and Timothy Ferris. It concludes by setting the stage for a discussion of Galileo, who was a significant supporter of the Copernican model in the generations following Copernicus's death.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Ptolemaic Model

The Ptolemaic Model was a geocentric system developed by Claudius Ptolemy, which placed the Earth at the center of the universe with celestial bodies orbiting around it. This model was widely accepted for over a thousand years. In the video, the Ptolemaic Model is described as having a complex system of deferents and epicycles to explain the motion of the planets, including retrograde motion.

💡Copernicus

Copernicus was a Renaissance-era astronomer who proposed a heliocentric model of the solar system, which placed the Sun at the center instead of the Earth. His model, known as the Copernican Model, is a significant shift from the Ptolemaic Model and is discussed in the video as a model that succeeded it. It's noted for its simpler explanation of retrograde motion.

💡Retrograde Motion

Retrograde motion refers to the apparent backward movement of a planet against the background stars when viewed from Earth. This phenomenon is explained in the video as a result of the relative positions and motions of Earth and other planets in both the Ptolemaic and Copernican models.

💡Deferent

In the Ptolemaic Model, a deferent is a large circular orbit around the Earth with the center not exactly at the Earth. The deferent, along with epicycles, helps to account for the complex motion of the planets as observed from Earth. The video explains that planets had circular orbits around points near the Earth, which were part of the deferent.

💡Epicyclic

Epicyclic refers to the small circular motion of a planet on an epicycle within the larger deferent orbit in the Ptolemaic Model. The video uses the term to describe how planets appeared to move in small circles while simultaneously moving along the larger deferent, contributing to the observed retrograde motion.

💡Equant

The equant is a point in the Ptolemaic Model from which the center of a planet's epicycle appears to move with a constant angular speed. The video mentions that the equant was used to complicate the model to better predict planetary positions, although it made the model more complex.

💡Heliocentric

Heliocentric refers to a model of the solar system where the Sun is at the center and the planets orbit around it. The video discusses how the Copernican Model was heliocentric, which was a significant departure from the geocentric Ptolemaic Model.

💡Geographic Model

The geographic model mentioned in the video refers to Ptolemy's work on mapping the Earth, which was separate from his astronomical models. It highlights Ptolemy's influence on geography and cartography.

💡Astrology

Astrology is the study of the movements and relative positions of celestial bodies interpreted as having an influence on human affairs and the natural world. The video notes that many early astronomers, including Ptolemy, were also astrologers, which was a motivation for developing detailed models of planetary motion.

💡Almagest

The Almagest is a comprehensive work by Ptolemy that detailed his geocentric model of the universe. The video describes it as a work that was highly regarded and used for many centuries due to its effectiveness in predicting planetary positions.

💡Revolutionibus

De revolutionibus is the seminal work by Copernicus that outlined his heliocentric model of the solar system. The video mentions that it was published in 1543, the same year Copernicus died, and it played a crucial role in the scientific revolution.

Highlights

The Ptolemaic model was a refinement of early Greek models and was accepted for about 1400 years.

The Copernican model succeeded the Ptolemaic model in many scholars' minds.

Planetary retrograde motion was a significant challenge for early models of the universe.

Claudius Ptolemy authored the Almagest, which refined the geocentric model for better planetary predictions.

The Ptolemaic model used deferents and epicycles to explain the motion of planets.

The equant was introduced in the Ptolemaic model to account for constant angular speed.

The Ptolemaic model predicted the phases of Venus, which were later confirmed by Galileo.

The Ptolemaic model was lost to European civilization after the Roman Empire's collapse but was preserved in other cultures.

Nicholas Copernicus proposed a heliocentric model of the universe with the sun at the center.

Copernicus's model provided a simple explanation for retrograde motion.

The Copernican model was not significantly more accurate than the Ptolemaic model initially.

Copernicus added epicycles to his model to improve its accuracy.

The Copernican model's circular orbits were not an accurate representation of actual planetary paths.

Galileo was a significant supporter of Copernicus's model in the generations after Copernicus's death.

The video also discusses the importance of understanding planetary motion for casting accurate horoscopes.

The Ptolemaic model's complexity included the Earth being slightly off-center in the universe.

Copernicus's work 'De revolutionibus' was published shortly before his death in 1543.

The video includes animations to illustrate the Ptolemaic and Copernican models' explanations of planetary motion.

The Copernican model's simplicity and placement of the sun at the center was a significant shift from the Ptolemaic model.

Transcripts

play00:00

in this video we're going to look at the

play00:02

ptolemaic and the copernican models

play00:06

the ptolemaic model was a refinement of

play00:09

the early greek models

play00:11

and it was published in about 80 150 or

play00:15

so

play00:17

it was the model that worked or was

play00:20

accepted for about the next

play00:23

13 or 1400 years so for quite a long

play00:27

time

play00:28

the copernican model is the model that

play00:31

succeeded the ptolemaic model at least

play00:34

in

play00:35

many scholars minds after this we'll

play00:37

learn about more people's models but

play00:40

we'll start with this one for reminders

play00:42

you may have watched the video that i

play00:44

made on

play00:45

the paths of the planets against the

play00:48

background stars

play00:49

here's the path of mars back in july

play00:53

2020 to about january 2021 so for about

play00:56

a six month period

play00:58

and it would

play01:00

be the yellow line that starts over

play01:02

there

play01:03

to the right of the center

play01:05

and then

play01:06

most of the time mars will be moving

play01:09

from left to right against the

play01:10

background stars that's toward the east

play01:13

but every once in a while it does this

play01:15

weird little

play01:17

backwards loop

play01:19

and it's hard to see that as a loop if

play01:21

we were viewing this from a different

play01:23

angle you'd be able to tell but it does

play01:25

something like that

play01:27

and

play01:28

the backwards part of it is called

play01:30

retrograde motion

play01:33

here's the path mars will take from

play01:36

november 2026 to july 2026

play01:40

the start of this in november 2026 would

play01:44

be up at this end and

play01:46

for most of the time it's moving from

play01:49

west to east against the background

play01:51

stars but then it reverses direction

play01:54

retrograde motion here

play01:56

then it goes back to pro-grade motion

play02:00

heading from west to east again

play02:03

and so

play02:04

that is the motion

play02:07

of mars against the background stars it

play02:09

repeats its retrograde motion about

play02:12

every two years and two months so about

play02:14

every 26 months or so again and again

play02:17

the other planets do this as well

play02:19

sometimes in more complicated ways

play02:21

especially for mercury and venus

play02:25

understanding and predicting this stuff

play02:28

was

play02:28

a big challenge for early models of the

play02:31

universe this motion looks complicated

play02:34

and it is

play02:36

they had a couple of incentives one was

play02:39

just understanding

play02:41

how the universe worked

play02:43

and another one

play02:44

another reason for doing so was so that

play02:47

more accurate

play02:49

horoscopes could be cast by the early

play02:52

astronomers virtually all of them

play02:54

up through galileo and kepler

play02:57

were

play02:59

let's see copernicus probably wasn't but

play03:01

most of them were astrologers as well as

play03:04

being astronomers

play03:06

so first claudius ptolemy we have no

play03:08

idea what he looked like but

play03:11

this is a picture someone did hundreds

play03:13

of years after his death

play03:18

lived from about 85 to 165 we don't know

play03:21

for sure when he was born or when he

play03:23

died

play03:26

he was the author of

play03:27

something that became known as

play03:30

almagest

play03:31

and that's a combination of arabic and

play03:34

greek the al is

play03:36

arabic for the the majest is

play03:41

greek for

play03:42

the majestic or majestic

play03:45

it was talking about the majestic things

play03:47

in the heavens and their motions

play03:50

but people

play03:52

also thought of the book itself

play03:54

as pretty majestic

play03:56

because

play03:58

it worked pretty well for a long time as

play04:01

long as you didn't need to be closer

play04:03

than about 10 degrees to the actual

play04:05

position of something

play04:07

10 degrees on the night sky is about the

play04:10

width of your fist held at arm's length

play04:14

in it ptolemy refined the

play04:17

geocentric model for better planetary

play04:20

predictions geocentric means

play04:22

earth-centered you'll see as soon as we

play04:25

look at ptolemy's actual model that it

play04:27

was not actually earth-centered earth

play04:30

was a little bit off-center

play04:33

but things orbited the earth more or

play04:35

less ptolemy was also known for a book

play04:38

on geography mapping

play04:40

and another on astrology i'm guessing

play04:43

that is pronounced tetrabiblus or

play04:46

something to that effect

play04:50

so here's the ptolemaic model

play04:52

and this is a fairly simplified version

play04:55

of it but

play04:57

it'll have the main features that we're

play04:59

concerned with i'll show you a somewhat

play05:01

more complicated model here in a minute

play05:04

if you can contain this model in your

play05:06

brain and describe it well

play05:08

you'll have the hang of the ptolemaic

play05:10

model first of all the ptolemaic model

play05:13

was almost geocentric the earth was

play05:16

almost at the center

play05:18

but if you look at the

play05:20

circles that are drawn for mercury's

play05:23

orbit and venus and the sun and then

play05:26

mars jupiter and saturn you may start to

play05:29

notice that they're not exactly centered

play05:31

on earth the sun had a circular orbit

play05:35

around a point near the earth

play05:38

and all of the planets had circular

play05:40

orbits

play05:42

around points

play05:43

near the earth

play05:45

and they all had epicycles epicycles are

play05:48

the small

play05:49

circles

play05:51

that are on the larger circles the

play05:53

larger circles are called deference and

play05:56

the smaller circles are called epicycles

play06:01

venus and mercury had interesting orbits

play06:04

both of them orbited points on a line

play06:08

between the earth and the sun

play06:11

now the earth stayed fixed in the middle

play06:13

of this thing

play06:14

all of these things orbited around the

play06:17

earth turned around the earth once a day

play06:19

in fact

play06:20

while continuing their motion along the

play06:23

deference and the epicycles here's a

play06:26

more complete picture of what a

play06:28

planetary orbit would look like

play06:31

here's the earth

play06:33

right there

play06:34

this is the center of the larger circle

play06:37

here which is the deferent

play06:41

there's an equine point

play06:44

here and i'll talk about that in a

play06:45

little bit

play06:46

the planet itself is up here

play06:49

and it moves around

play06:52

the epicycle circle at the same time

play06:54

that the epicycle circle

play06:57

is moving around the deferent

play06:59

and so this is pretty complicated

play07:05

the point marked center

play07:07

is the center of the deference circle

play07:10

that puts the

play07:11

deferent off center from the earth or

play07:14

eccentric as a way of describing that

play07:20

and the epicycle is a small circle

play07:23

the planet moves along that at constant

play07:25

speed

play07:27

and that provides the appearance of

play07:28

retrograde motion

play07:31

if you look up there at the epicycle

play07:33

circle the point marked x

play07:37

when the planet is there

play07:39

it'll be moving on the epicycle in the

play07:41

same direction that the epicycle is

play07:43

moving on the deferent

play07:45

and so

play07:46

the planet will appear to be moving in a

play07:49

counterclockwise circle around the earth

play07:52

but when the

play07:54

planet is down here at point y or near

play07:57

why

play07:58

it'll be going on the epicycle in a

play08:00

direction opposite the direction of the

play08:02

deferent that motion can

play08:05

produce an appearance that the planet is

play08:08

moving backwards in space now a

play08:10

complication tossed in here from earth's

play08:13

viewpoint the epicycle does not move

play08:16

along the deferent at constant speed

play08:19

this would be something you wouldn't

play08:21

actually try to produce an animation

play08:24

with this thing or at least the ancient

play08:25

greeks would not have done so

play08:28

what they would do is have an equation

play08:30

that described the speed of the center

play08:33

of the epicycle

play08:35

moving along the deferent they could

play08:37

calculate all this stuff

play08:43

the equant

play08:46

equint the equint is a point

play08:49

from which the center of the planet's

play08:51

epicycle appears to move with constant

play08:54

angular speed so if you were standing

play08:57

there on the equine looking at the

play08:59

epicycle and you were able to see the

play09:01

center of the epicycle

play09:03

that epicycle

play09:05

would move along the deferent in such a

play09:08

way that it looked to you like it was

play09:11

always moving at the same speed to make

play09:13

things worse each planet has to have its

play09:16

own deferent

play09:17

its own epicycle

play09:19

and its own equine

play09:22

so that was the ptolemaic model pretty

play09:25

complicated

play09:26

we can look at a couple of animations

play09:28

that simulate things in the ptolemaic

play09:31

model

play09:32

here's the simulator

play09:34

there are

play09:36

links to this in your textbook if you

play09:38

read the chapter section on this this is

play09:41

the ptolemaic model earth is the blue

play09:43

dot here

play09:44

the gray dot is the center

play09:48

of the deferent which is this circle

play09:52

the green cross here

play09:54

is the equine

play09:56

and then

play09:57

this circle is the epicycle

play10:00

and then this red dot here represents

play10:03

mars and that's just the one that we'll

play10:05

happen to look at

play10:07

and i'll start the animation

play10:09

oh we need to back out here a little bit

play10:12

we want to be able to see this zodiac

play10:14

strip down here

play10:16

and

play10:17

the zodiac strip is where you'll be able

play10:20

to see the apparent motion of mars

play10:23

against the background stars

play10:25

and in this case it actually is caused

play10:27

by mars moving around this fixed earth

play10:30

in the center

play10:31

you can also see the apparent motion of

play10:33

the sun

play10:35

against the background stars now one

play10:37

thing about this animation that isn't

play10:40

correct is that it has the sun outside

play10:43

of mars

play10:44

the sun in the ptolemaic model would

play10:46

actually be inside

play10:49

the deferent for mars so it would have

play10:51

been inside this circle

play10:54

but appearance wise this will produce

play10:57

exactly what the ptolemaic model would

play11:02

show for a view so let's start the

play11:04

animation

play11:05

at times i'll slow this thing down

play11:08

and so you can

play11:10

see something

play11:11

so here's just what the model looks like

play11:15

you can see mars moving along that

play11:17

epicycle while the epicycle is moving

play11:20

along the deferent

play11:24

and

play11:25

you can watch that for a couple turns

play11:27

here

play11:29

and then down here on the zodiac strip

play11:32

you can watch the sun moving against the

play11:35

background stars with pretty constant

play11:38

speed

play11:39

you can have mars moving against the

play11:41

background stars but every once in a

play11:43

while it does something kind of weird so

play11:45

i'm going to slow it way down

play11:47

the next time

play11:55

it starts getting close to

play11:59

the sun here

play12:02

mars is falling behind the sun by quite

play12:05

a bit but it's reversing direction right

play12:07

now

play12:08

it's doing its weird little thing on the

play12:10

epicycle

play12:14

now the sun's going to catch up to and

play12:16

past mars

play12:25

now mars is going to be starting on that

play12:28

part of its epicycle where it's moving

play12:30

in toward the earth and it's when it's

play12:32

along this part that it looks like it's

play12:34

going backwards

play12:40

against the background stars

play12:45

there down here on the zodiac strip you

play12:48

will soon see mars stopping

play12:51

reversing direction

play12:54

and then going forward again

play12:56

that is the

play12:58

retrograde motion

play13:00

that you could see for mars

play13:02

a simulation of that now there's one

play13:05

more thing that i want to show you

play13:07

with the ptolemantic model

play13:09

and that is the phases of venus now at

play13:12

the time ptolemy developed the model

play13:15

the telescope was still let's see about

play13:18

1

play13:19

1450 years in the future they didn't

play13:22

have any idea that there might be phases

play13:25

of venus when galileo came along

play13:28

he could talk about the phases of venus

play13:31

that would be predicted by the ptolemaic

play13:33

model and compare them to what he

play13:35

actually saw in the sky

play13:38

this time we're just looking at venus

play13:40

and here we do have the correct geometry

play13:42

we have earth here

play13:45

venus is

play13:47

deferent here and venus's epicycle here

play13:50

and then the sun is outside of that

play13:53

and

play13:54

if things aren't lined up just perfectly

play13:57

with earth venus and the sun

play13:59

you can see a

play14:00

small crescent extremely thin crescent

play14:04

along the right side of venus there

play14:06

so let's start the animation

play14:13

and if you look at the bottom picture

play14:15

here you can see

play14:17

it's weird venus is a growing crescent

play14:19

and it always pauses before it gets to a

play14:22

half venus and then

play14:24

disappears and goes back to

play14:27

a crescent on the opposite side

play14:31

this is what the ptolemaic model would

play14:33

predict if you could watch venus for a

play14:36

long enough time

play14:37

now you'd have to be watching it for

play14:40

long periods of time to be able to see

play14:42

this

play14:47

i'll slow it down a bit

play14:50

but it's interesting the path of venus

play14:53

or the phases of venus that would be

play14:55

predicted by this okay let's move on to

play14:58

the next model the ptolemaic model was

play15:02

lost to european civilization after the

play15:05

collapse of the roman empire

play15:07

but other cultures in the world kind of

play15:09

kept it alive in india and in

play15:13

the arabian countries they hung on to it

play15:17

translated it into their own languages

play15:20

sometimes modified things a little bit

play15:23

in the early years of the renaissance or

play15:26

shortly after 1200 a.d it worked its way

play15:29

back into european countries

play15:32

people started copying it spreading it

play15:34

around

play15:35

it made its way back there

play15:38

eventually someone comes along nicholas

play15:41

copernicus who proposes a different

play15:44

model of the universe

play15:49

he lived from 1473 to 1543

play15:54

he was a cannon of the catholic church

play15:58

that's a

play15:59

like an administrative position

play16:01

a clerical position kind of thing not

play16:04

clerical he actually had

play16:06

administrative powers he would be

play16:08

responsible for

play16:10

seeing that taxes were collected in some

play16:12

area

play16:13

in those

play16:15

years the catholic church was the

play16:17

government in many places in europe and

play16:20

so

play16:21

they would have to collect taxes

play16:23

uh

play16:24

provide for the defensive areas from

play16:27

marauding nights or something like that

play16:30

have some way of delivering charity to

play16:32

the poor all those sorts of things

play16:37

his great

play16:38

work called the revolutionibus it had a

play16:41

longer title in that but the

play16:44

revolutionibus is

play16:46

good enough

play16:47

it was published in 1543 you may notice

play16:50

that there's a coincident date with the

play16:53

top line and

play16:55

that bottom line there

play16:57

he may not have been aware of his book's

play17:00

publication i bought a a new well new to

play17:03

me book on copernicus it was actually

play17:06

written in about 1970 i think the author

play17:10

of this book i'll mention a bit later

play17:11

you'll see his name here copernicus may

play17:14

not have been aware of the publication

play17:16

when the last parts of it were

play17:18

delivered to where he was living and

play17:21

working at the time he had had a

play17:23

cerebral hemorrhage a few months before

play17:26

it arrived

play17:27

and one of his co-workers in a letter to

play17:30

their local bishop said his memory and

play17:34

mental powers had abandoned him but

play17:36

here's the copernican model

play17:39

in the simplified version he made it

play17:41

more complicated later and i'll mention

play17:43

those things but

play17:45

it has the sun at the center it'll look

play17:47

familiar it's got mercury venus earth

play17:50

the moon mars jupiter and saturn

play17:53

it had the approximate correct spacing

play17:57

for these planets this is a simplified

play18:00

version of it where

play18:02

the planets seem to increase in orbital

play18:05

diameter in a regular way but

play18:07

copernicus's model wasn't that simple

play18:10

still

play18:11

they're all circles

play18:13

but it's got the sun at the center we

play18:15

call that

play18:16

heliocentric helios is an ancient word

play18:20

for the sun it had circular orbit it had

play18:23

a simple explanation for retrograde

play18:25

motion

play18:26

let's look at another computer animation

play18:28

for that here we have the sun at the

play18:31

center we have an observer planet which

play18:33

will be earth

play18:35

we'll have a target planet which for

play18:38

this one will be mars

play18:40

it's got uh we haven't learned what

play18:43

these are yet but uh

play18:45

an au is an astronomical unit

play18:48

it happens to be the diameter or the

play18:50

radius of earth's orbit pretty close to

play18:53

it

play18:54

and then mars orbit is has an orbital

play18:58

radius of about 2.4 astronomical units

play19:02

let me slow down the animation a little

play19:04

bit for starters

play19:06

and

play19:08

again you can watch the motion up here

play19:11

or you can watch the apparent motion of

play19:13

the planet against the background stars

play19:17

as

play19:19

they're traveling around the center of

play19:21

this thing

play19:28

now i maybe slowed it down way too much

play19:31

but you can see that the sun

play19:34

has a pretty constant motion

play19:36

against the background stars

play19:40

now

play19:41

earth is going to

play19:42

be moving into such a position that

play19:45

mars will be behind the sun at this time

play19:50

and the sun catches up to and passes

play19:52

mars

play19:54

i'll speed this up a bit so you don't

play19:56

fall asleep

play20:02

we're soon going to have i paused it

play20:05

here we're soon going to have

play20:07

earth catching up to and passing mars in

play20:09

its orbit

play20:11

and watch the bottom as that's occurring

play20:17

mars stops

play20:19

moves backward for a time

play20:22

and then moves forward

play20:25

and that is the simple explanation for

play20:28

retrograde motion

play20:30

copernicus said

play20:32

the narrower a planet is to the sun the

play20:34

faster it travels

play20:36

and just by saying that

play20:39

it takes care of explaining the

play20:41

retrograde

play20:43

the retrograde motion of mars jupiter

play20:45

and saturn it also explains the weird

play20:48

behavior of mercury and venus that we

play20:51

can see

play20:53

not perfectly however

play20:56

so that's something that we'll have to

play20:59

concern ourselves with let's have it

play21:01

catch up earth catch up again and then

play21:03

i'll

play21:04

slow things way down

play21:09

okay mars appears to be frozen in space

play21:12

but as earth

play21:14

passes it it looks like it moves

play21:16

backwards for a time

play21:20

against the background stars

play21:25

at some point it freezes in space again

play21:28

and then starts going forward

play21:32

or

play21:33

eastward against the background stars

play21:35

again

play21:37

so that's the copernican explanation for

play21:40

retrograde motion

play21:42

simple explanation

play21:44

accuracy well

play21:47

for starters the copernican model was

play21:51

hardly any better than the old ptolemaic

play21:54

model which over the years had gotten

play21:57

less and less accurate

play21:59

as far as predicting planetary positions

play22:02

people had tried to update it from time

play22:04

to time

play22:05

but still it suffered from that and

play22:08

copernicus's model did as well

play22:10

and so to improve the accuracy of his

play22:13

model

play22:15

he made it more complicated he added

play22:17

epicycles for the planets

play22:20

and

play22:21

it only slightly improved things if he'd

play22:24

spent enough time on it he might have

play22:27

narrowed it down made it a bit more

play22:30

accurate but

play22:31

the problem was you're trying to say

play22:34

that things are traveling in circular

play22:36

orbits and they're not doing that so

play22:39

that's just the way it goes by the way

play22:41

if you like reading about history

play22:44

here's some books that i've read dealing

play22:46

with this era galileo's daughter by

play22:49

davis obel

play22:51

interestingly

play22:53

galileo and one of his daughters maria

play22:55

celeste will learn about

play22:57

her or him later

play23:00

but

play23:01

she appeared to have been his

play23:03

intellectual equal

play23:05

and they wrote letters back and forth

play23:08

for many years galileo's copies of those

play23:11

letters were saved but they'd never been

play23:13

translated to english until

play23:16

just the first part of the 2000s when

play23:19

davis obell did that

play23:21

letters to my father is the letters

play23:23

themselves galileo's daughter is

play23:26

in large part a biography of galileo

play23:29

the sleepwalkers by arthur kessler

play23:32

is kind of a complete history it's

play23:35

tough going it's not a really exciting

play23:38

book

play23:39

the book i really enjoyed was the great

play23:41

copernicus chase by owen gingrich

play23:44

and the book no red nobody read by owen

play23:47

gingrich

play23:48

and another coming of age in the milky

play23:51

way by timothy ferris i really enjoyed

play23:53

that last book i read it close to 30

play23:56

years ago and i've re-read it two times

play23:59

since then he has a a way with words in

play24:02

writing about history

play24:04

okay next up will be galileo

play24:08

galileo was the big supporter of

play24:11

copernicus in the generations after

play24:14

copernicus died

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Astronomy ModelsPtolemaic SystemCopernicusRetrograde MotionPlanetary MotionHistorical ScienceGeocentric ModelHeliocentric ModelAstrology InfluenceScientific Revolution
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?