Krashen's Input hypothesis | Comprehensible input | Part 4 Ep #7

Summary

La hipótesis de la entrada es una teoría de Stephen Krashen que explica cómo se adquiere una segunda lengua. Esta hipótesis enfatiza la importancia de la exposición a una entrada comprensible (I+1) para el aprendizaje de una lengua. Según Krashen, la fluidez en el habla no se puede enseñar directamente, sino que surge con el tiempo. La hipótesis también sugiere que la enseñanza debe centrarse en la comprensión del mensaje y no en la estructura gramatical, y que la producción del lenguaje emerge naturalmente.

Takeaways

• 📚 La hipótesis de la entrada es parte de la teoría de adquisición de segundas lenguas de Stephen Krashen.
• 🌟 Se adquiere un segundo idioma a través de la comprensión de mensajes que están ligeramente más allá del nivel actual del aprendiz (I+1).
• 🔗 La hipótesis de la entrada está vinculada a la hipótesis del orden natural, que afirma que se adquiere un segundo idioma siguiendo un orden natural de desarrollo.
• 🗣 La fluidez en el habla no se puede enseñar directamente, sino que emerge con el tiempo y la exposición adecuada.
• 👂 La exposición significa el contacto que tienen los aprendices con el idioma objetivo que están intentando aprender.
• 📈 La hipótesis enfatiza el papel de la exposición a una entrada comprensible en la adquisición de un segundo idioma.
• 🚫 La entrada que es demasiado simple o demasiado difícil no es útil para la adquisición del lenguaje.
• 📖 La entrada comprensible (I+1) es esencial para que el aprendiz pueda entender lo que se dice sin ser abrumado por demasiada información lingüística nueva.
• 👨‍🏫 Según la hipótesis, el aprendiz mejora y progresa siguiendo el orden natural cuando recibe una entrada de segundo idioma ligeramente más allá de su nivel actual.
• 🏫 La enseñanza de estructuras gramaticales de manera deliberada no es el enfoque, sino que se proporciona de forma natural cuando la entrada es comprendida.
• 🌱 La habilidad de producir lenguaje emerge con el tiempo y no se enseña directamente.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Hipótesis de la Entrada

El vídeo trata sobre la Hipótesis de la Entrada, parte de la Teoría de la Adquisición de Segundos Idiomas de Krashen. Esta hipótesis explica cómo ocurre la adquisición de un segundo idioma a través de la exposición a una entrada comprensible. La clave es que la persona aprende primero el significado y luego la estructura. La entrada comprensible es necesaria para adquirir cualquier idioma y debe ser relevante y ligeramente más compleja de lo que el aprendiz puede manejar actualmente (I+1). La hipótesis enfatiza que la fluidez en el habla no se puede enseñar directamente, sino que surge con el tiempo. La exposición a este tipo de entrada ayuda a los aprendices a avanzar en su nivel lingüístico de manera natural.

Highlights

The Input Hypothesis is part of Krashen's theory of second language acquisition.

It explains how learners acquire a second language.

Learners acquire language by starting with meaning.

Comprehensible input is essential for language acquisition.

The Input Hypothesis is linked to the Natural Order Hypothesis.

Language development occurs through receiving comprehensible input.

Exposure to comprehensible input is key in second language acquisition.

Speaking fluency emerges naturally over time, not directly taught.

Language acquisition occurs when learners understand input slightly beyond their current level.

Comprehensible input is defined as input just beyond the learner's current competence.

Krashen suggests providing input that is 'i plus 1'.

The input should be relevant and not grammatically sequenced.

Input that is too simple or too difficult is not useful for acquisition.

People acquire language best from messages just beyond their current competence.

Learners improve and progress along the natural order when exposed to 'i plus 1' input.

The Input Hypothesis is concerned with acquisition, not learning.

The focus is on understanding the message, not on teaching structure.

Production ability emerges naturally over time without direct teaching.

Transcripts

in today's video we will discuss the

input hypothesis which is a part of the

questions theory of second language

acquisition

so let's dive in

the input hypothesis is krashen's

attempt to explain

how the learner acquires a second

language or in other words

how second language acquisition takes

place the input hypothesis states

that we acquire by going from meaning

first and as a result to acquire

structure the comprehensible input is

the crucial and necessary ingredient for

the acquisition of

any language we can say that the input

hypothesis

is linked to the natural order

hypothesis

the natural order hypothesis claims that

we move along the developmental

continuum

by receiving the comprehensible input

this hypothesis emphasizes the role of

exposure

to comprehensible input in second

language acquisition

it also states that speaking fluency

cannot be taught

directly but it emerges over time

on its own the exposure here means the

contact that the learners have with the

target language

that they are attempting to learn that

is to say

we acquire language only when we

understand language that contains

structure that is a little beyond where

we are now

to say it using different words

comprehensible

input is defined as the l2 input

just beyond the learner's current

ultracompetence in terms of its

syntactic complexity

crushing believes that comprehensible

input that

is i plus 1 should be provided and the

input should be relevant and not

grammatically sequenced

the input which is either too simple or

too

difficult will not be useful for

acquisition

so the comprehensible input hypothesis

states

that people acquire language best from

messages

that are just slightly beyond their

current

competence that is i plus one

comprehensible input i plus one is

highly required so that a learner

can understand what is being said

without

being overwhelmed with too much new

linguistic information i represents what

the learner already knows in the target

language

and plus one represents what is being

taught

as we already stated before according to

this hypothesis

the learner improves and progresses

along the natural order when he or she

receives

second language input that is one step

beyond his or her

current level or current stage of

linguistic

competence for example if a learner is

at stage i then acquisition takes place

when he or she is exposed

to comprehensible input so that is a

little beyond

his current level that is i plus one we

can say that the

input hypothesis is only concerned with

acquisition

not learning and the most important

point

is to provide acquirers with

comprehensible

input and in a neutral we can say that

we acquire by comprehensible input which

is i plus 1

the input hypothesis relates to

acquisition not learning

the focus is not on the structure but on

understanding the message

teachers should not teach structure

deliberately

but rather i plus 1 is provided

naturally

when the input is understood and finally

production ability emerges over time

and it's not taught directly

and that's it i hope it was clear enough

thank you for watching

and see you in another video