Cognitive Dissonance | Concepts Unwrapped
Summary
TLDRCognitive dissonance arises when we hold contradictory beliefs, causing psychological discomfort. This is particularly pronounced in moral dissonance, where our actions conflict with our ethical values. The script explores how individuals resolve this dissonance, often through rationalization, which can lead to accepting unethical behavior. It suggests strategies to combat dissonance, including acknowledging guilt, understanding rationalizations, and being vigilant against them to maintain ethical standards.
Takeaways
- 🤔 Cognitive dissonance arises when we hold two contradictory beliefs or when our actions conflict with our self-image.
- 🔍 When the dissonance involves ethical beliefs, it's termed moral or ethical dissonance.
- 👤 People generally have a mental image of themselves as ethical, which can be challenged by unethical actions.
- 🛡 Resolving moral dissonance is crucial, as it can lead to guilt and discomfort if not addressed.
- 🙅♂️ Some individuals might resolve dissonance by justifying unethical actions or shifting blame, rather than acting ethically.
- 🧠 Our brains are adept at rationalizing our actions to align with our self-perception as good people.
- 📚 Professor David Luban's research indicates that our beliefs often conform to our actions, rather than the other way around, without our awareness.
- 🚫 Common rationalizations include 'no one will know,' 'everyone else does it,' and 'it's for the greater good,' which can be misleading.
- 🔑 To combat cognitive dissonance, it's advised to acknowledge and analyze feelings of guilt, understand mental mechanisms that distance us from immoral actions, and be wary of common rationalizations.
- 💡 Being aware of our brain's tendency to rationalize can help us make more ethical decisions and avoid self-deception.
Q & A
What is cognitive dissonance?
-Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort experienced when one holds two contradictory beliefs or behaviors simultaneously, such as enjoying smoking while knowing it causes cancer.
How is cognitive dissonance related to ethical behavior?
-When cognitive dissonance involves ethical implications, it is referred to as moral or ethical dissonance, such as when one's actions conflict with their moral values.
Why do people experience moral dissonance?
-People experience moral dissonance when they act in ways that contradict their self-image as ethical individuals, leading to psychological and emotional discomfort.
How do individuals typically resolve moral dissonance?
-Individuals may resolve moral dissonance by either acting in alignment with their ethical standards or by rationalizing their unethical behavior to reduce guilt.
What is an example of rationalization mentioned in the script?
-An example of rationalization mentioned is deciding that product misrepresentations are not unethical because customers should be able to look out for themselves.
Why is it important to recognize and address cognitive dissonance?
-Recognizing and addressing cognitive dissonance is important to maintain a consistent self-image and to prevent the normalization of unethical behavior.
According to Professor David Luban, how do people's beliefs often change to conform with their actions?
-Professor David Luban notes that people's beliefs often change to conform with their actions without them noticing, leading them to justify their conduct based on their self-perception as good people.
What are some common rationalizations people use to excuse unethical behavior?
-Common rationalizations include 'no one will know,' 'everyone else does it,' 'it's for the greater good,' 'these things happen,' and 'it's not illegal.'
What are three suggestions to minimize or combat cognitive or moral dissonance?
-Three suggestions are: 1) Never ignore the feeling of guilt and analyze its cause, 2) Study the mind's mechanisms for distancing from immoral actions and guard against them, and 3) Recognize common rationalizations and use them as warnings when you notice yourself using them.
How does cognitive dissonance affect moral decision-making and actions?
-Cognitive dissonance can lead to rationalization and a shift in beliefs to justify actions, potentially normalizing unethical behavior and impairing moral decision-making.
What is the role of self-awareness in managing cognitive dissonance?
-Self-awareness plays a crucial role in managing cognitive dissonance by allowing individuals to recognize when they are rationalizing and take steps to align their actions with their ethical standards.
Outlines
🤔 Cognitive Dissonance and Ethical Dilemmas
The first paragraph discusses cognitive dissonance, a psychological discomfort that arises when one holds two contradictory beliefs. It explains how this discomfort, particularly when ethical implications are involved, can lead to moral dissonance. The paragraph uses examples such as a Catholic going to war and a person considering themselves ethical but being asked to mislead customers. It emphasizes the importance of how individuals resolve this dissonance, with some choosing to act ethically despite the discomfort, while others rationalize their unethical actions. The paragraph also touches on common rationalizations people use to justify their behavior and the unconscious conformity of beliefs to actions, as noted by Professor David Luban. It concludes with three suggestions to combat cognitive or moral dissonance: acknowledging guilt, understanding mental distancing mechanisms, and recognizing common rationalizations as warnings.
🧠 The Human Tendency to Rationalize Decisions
The second paragraph explores the human tendency to rationalize decisions to maintain a positive self-image. It acknowledges that it's natural for people to want to feel good about their decisions and to judge themselves favorably. The paragraph suggests that being aware of this tendency can help individuals avoid rationalizing bad behavior. It encourages self-reflection to identify and challenge the fastest, but potentially unethical, route one might take. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not falling into the trap of easy rationalization and instead striving to make decisions that align with one's ethical standards.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Cognitive Dissonance
💡Moral Dissonance
💡Ethical Standards
💡Rationalization
💡Self-Image
💡Guilt
💡Rationalizations
💡Conformity
💡Ethical Decision Making
💡Awareness
💡Resolution
Highlights
Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort from holding two contradictory beliefs.
Moral dissonance arises when actions conflict with ethical values.
People generally view themselves as ethical, leading to dissonance when they act unethically.
Resolving moral dissonance is crucial for psychological comfort.
Examples of moral dissonance include misrepresenting a product's reliability or skipping class.
Guilt often results from cognitive dissonance and motivates resolution.
Some resolve dissonance by rationalizing unethical actions.
Rationalizations can include blaming others or minimizing the impact of actions.
Ignorance can be used as a rationalization for unethical behavior.
Common rationalizations include 'no one will know' and 'everyone else does it'.
Our beliefs often conform to our actions rather than vice versa.
The human ability to rationalize is vast and can lead to accepting wrongdoing.
The brain seeks the easiest narrative, which can involve rationalizing unethical behavior.
Three suggestions to combat cognitive dissonance: acknowledge guilt, understand rationalizations, and guard against them.
Being aware of the brain's tendency to rationalize can help in making ethical decisions.
It's important to reflect on decisions to avoid falling into the trap of rationalization.
Transcripts
Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort that we feel when our mind entertains
two contradictory concepts at the same time.
For example: I should smoke because I enjoy it, and I shouldn’t smoke because it causes cancer.
When the concepts have ethical implications, this discomfort is called moral dissonance
or ethical dissonance.
Growing up Catholic and holding the value of life so sacred, but also going to a combat zone.
You know, I have a duty to the country and I also have a duty to myself as a person who
believes in the value of life.
Almost all people except psychopaths have a mental picture of themselves as ethical
people.
But sometimes people find themselves acting in unethical ways.
This creates cognitive dissonance.
The important thing is how people resolve that moral dissonance.
For example, suppose you think of yourself as a good person, but your boss asked you to mislead customers
about the reliability of your company’s new product.
This situation creates cognitive dissonance that is psychologically and emotionally uncomfortable.
In this context, the dissonance seems to manifest as guilt, an unpleasant emotion that you wish to resolve.
Now some people will react to this dissonance by refusing to mislead customers, opting to
resolve the conflict by acting honestly in order to preserve their self-image.
Unfortunately, many people will resolve the dissonance without doing the right thing.
For example, they may decide that product misrepresentations
are not so unethical after all, because well, customers should be able to look out for themselves.
Or they may rationalize that they are only doing what they’ve been ordered to do
so it’s someone else’s fault.
Or they may try to learn as little as possible about the product so that they can view their misrepresentations
as innocently ignorant rather than intentionally dishonest.
So I like to think of myself as someone who's very responsible with academics, I go to class,
I show up, I complete my assignments.
But every once in a while I decide not to go to class so sometimes I'll tell them I'm
not feeling well or some other excuse that may or may not be completely true.
So that's definitely an ethical issue and it's something that brings me a lot of guilt afterwards.
But then I also do a lot of rationalizing of it away and thinking,
"Oh everyone does it, it's not a big deal ."
Professor David Luban has noted: “In situation
after situation, literally hundreds of experiments reveal that when our conduct clashes with
our prior beliefs, our beliefs swing into conformity with our conduct, without our noticing
this is going on.”
In other words, too often we remind ourselves that we are good people and conclude that
what we are doing must not be bad because we are not the kind of people who would do bad things.
The human ability to rationalize or in other ways distance ourselves from our bad acts
sometimes seems unlimited and unfortunately we can quickly begin to see our wrongdoing
as acceptable.
It's just where your brain goes, your brain is trying to help you tell the easiest story.
I think some of the most common rationalizations are, "no one will know."
"Well everyone else does it."
"I know I shouldn't do this but it's for the greater good."
"These things happen."
"It's not illegal."
So I think those are common excuses, I don't know that people usually believe them.
There are no easy answers to cognitive dissonance’s potential for adverse effects upon our moral
decision making and actions.
But here are three quick suggestions to help minimize or combat cognitive or moral dissonance.
First, never ignore that guilty feeling you sometimes get.
Stop and honestly analyze why you are feeling it.
Second, study the many means our minds use to distance us from our immoral actions and
guard against them.
Third and last, get to know the most common rationalizations that people use to excuse
themselves from living up to their own ethical standards and let those rationalizations be
a warning to you whenever you hear yourself using them.
I think everyone wants to feel like we make good decisions all the time, which cant happen.
You know, you want to feel better or good or positive about the decisions you're making so...
It's always easy for us to judge ourselves in a good way and rationalize the things we do.
But if you're aware that that's where your brains is gonna take you, if you're aware
that its so easy to say well this is why I chose to do something, then you can be willing
to take the time to say "Ok, I know that's what's the fastest route, but if I'm gonna
reflect on this how can I not rationalize?
How can I not choose to do that bad behavior?"
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
Cognitive Dissonance Theory: A Crash Course
Attitudes and Cognitive Dissonance
21 Mind Traps : The Ultimate Guide to your most common Thinking errors
Body Language: The Key to Your Subconscious | Ann Washburn | TEDxIdahoFalls
The Psychology of Obedience and The Virtue of Disobedience
Why you may not be as ethical as you think | Michael Hood | TEDxUniversityofMississippi
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)