Pemkot Medan Respons Aksi Demo Seniman Tuntut Kembalikan Fungsi Taman Budaya

Tribunnews

25 Jul 202404:54

Summary

TLDRArtists in Medan staged a protest demanding the restoration of the cultural function of Taman Budaya Medan, which has recently restricted their activities or charged fees for use. During the protest on July 24, officials intervened and halted the performances. The local government, represented by Topan Obaja Putra Ginting, clarified that no official regulations require fees for artistic activities and condemned any unauthorized charges as illegal. The government promised clearer guidelines to prevent future conflicts between artists and management, and to ensure that the renovated spaces in Taman Budaya are available for artists' use without obstacles.

Takeaways

🎭 The artists of Medan city demanded the restoration of the cultural park's function.
🗣️ The government of Medan city responded quickly to the artists' demands.
🚫 The cultural park had been closed to performances due to a typhoon.
💵 Artists were previously prohibited from using the cultural park without charge and were asked to pay for activities.
📉 The fees for using the park varied from 100,000 to 500,000, depending on the space used.
🚫 The artists were frustrated as they were not allowed to use the park even after renovations.
🏛️ The park consists of 12 rooms including galleries, theaters, and libraries meant for various art forms.
🛠️ Some rooms in the cultural park were under renovation and were expected to be used for art activities.
🏢 The Secretary of Medan, Topan Obaja Putra Ginting, assured that no fees would be imposed on artists for their activities.
📜 There is no regulation (Perda) that mandates the fees mentioned by the park's management, indicating the fees were unauthorized.

Q & A

What was the main demand of the artists' action in Medan?
-The artists demanded the restoration of the original function of Medan Cultural Park, as they were previously prohibited from using it for their activities.
How did the government of Medan respond to the artists' action?
-The government responded immediately, with the Secretary of the Region, Topan Obaj Putra Ginting, visiting the site and stating that there should be no fees imposed on artists for cultural activities at the park.
What was the reason behind the artists' dissatisfaction with the management of Medan Cultural Park?
-The artists were dissatisfied because they were not allowed to use the park for free and were instead asked to pay fees ranging from 100,000 to 500,000 for using the facilities.
What were the fees imposed on the artists for using Medan Cultural Park?
-The fees ranged from 100,000 to 500,000, depending on the space or room they intended to use for their activities.
What was the status of the rooms in Medan Cultural Park after renovation?
-After renovation, only a few rooms were available for use by the artists, specifically A6, while the rest were not accessible despite being renovated.
What was the initial purpose of Medan Cultural Park according to the script?
-The park was initially designed to house various cultural activities including theater, dance, visual arts, cinema, music, and had facilities like galleries, exhibition halls, a library, a prayer room, and a canteen.
How did the Secretary of the Region, Topan Obaj Putra Ginting, address the issue of fees at Medan Cultural Park?
-He clarified that there were no regulations (Perda) that stipulated the fees mentioned by the artists, implying that the fees were unauthorized and that future use of the park would be regulated to avoid such misunderstandings.
What was the condition of Medan Cultural Park before the artists' action?
-Before the action, the park was under the management of the city government's Department of Education and Culture, and artists were restricted from using it without paying fees.
What was the outcome of the meeting between the Secretary of the Region and the artists?
-The meeting led to a commitment to resolve the issue and ensure that the park would be available for artists to use without any unauthorized fees, and that the park's facilities would be properly managed for cultural activities.
What was the role of the media, specifically Tribun Medan, in this situation?
-Tribun Medan played a role in reporting the artists' action and the government's response, providing a platform for the artists to voice their concerns and for the government to communicate its stance.

Outlines

00:00

🎭 Medan Artists Protest Cultural Park Restrictions

A group of Medan artists protested on Wednesday, July 24, demanding that the Medan Cultural Park be restored to its original function. They were met with a swift response from the city government when Topan Obaj Putra Ginting, a local government official, arrived and stopped the ongoing performance. The protest stemmed from recent restrictions that have barred artists from freely using the park, forcing them to pay fees to hold even small events or rehearsals. The artists have been frustrated by these changes, which they claim hinder their access to a space meant for cultural expression.

⚠️ Fees and Restrictions on Cultural Park Usage

The protest at the Medan Cultural Park arose due to the imposition of fees ranging from 100,000 to 500,000 IDR for using different spaces in the park. Previously, artists could use the park without charges, but recent changes have made access difficult, even for rehearsals. The park, now managed by the city government under the Department of Education and Culture, has prompted growing frustration among artists who feel excluded from a place designed for their creative activities.

📢 Medan Government's Response to the Protest

Following the protest, the Medan city government addressed the concerns raised by the artists. Topan Obaj Putra Ginting stated that there should be no charges for using the Medan Cultural Park for artistic activities, as there are no local regulations that mandate such fees. He emphasized that the fees previously collected were unauthorized and that future usage of the park would be regulated more clearly to prevent further miscommunication between the artists and park authorities.

🏛️ Renovations and Misuse of the Cultural Park

Artists have been particularly frustrated because, despite the recent renovation of several rooms in the Medan Cultural Park, they have been unable to use these spaces for their creative endeavors. The renovations were intended to improve the park for artistic activities, yet artists have faced barriers to access, with some even being charged fees. This has led to a deep sense of disappointment and dissatisfaction among the artist community in Medan.

🎤 Interview with Topan Obaj Putra Ginting

In a recorded interview, Topan Obaj Putra Ginting discussed the government's efforts to address the artists' concerns. He acknowledged the artists' complaints and reiterated the government's commitment to resolving the issue. He also noted that before the city government took over, the cultural park had 12 different spaces dedicated to various art forms, such as theater, music, and visual arts. However, only six spaces remain accessible, further compounding the artists' frustrations. Ginting affirmed that efforts are underway to ensure that these spaces are once again available for artistic use.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Artists' Action

The term 'Artists' Action' refers to the collective protest or demonstration by artists, demanding a particular cause or change. In the context of the video, artists in Medan city are protesting against the restriction and commercialization of cultural activities in Taman Budaya Medan. They are demanding the restoration of the cultural park's original function to serve as a free space for cultural expression and activities.

💡Taman Budaya Medan

Taman Budaya Medan is a cultural park in Medan city, which is a hub for various artistic and cultural activities. The park is mentioned in the script as a place where artists have been restricted from conducting their activities freely. It is the central location around which the artists' action is taking place, highlighting the importance of such spaces for cultural expression.

💡Cultural Activities

Cultural activities refer to a range of events and practices that express a group's shared culture, such as theater, dance, music, and visual arts. In the video, these activities are being restricted in Taman Budaya Medan, leading to the artists' action. The script mentions that artists are not allowed to use the park's facilities for free, affecting their ability to practice and perform.

💡Protest

A protest is a public expression of objection to a perceived injustice. In this video, the artists' action is a form of protest against the government's policies regarding the use of Taman Budaya Medan. The protest is a means for the artists to voice their grievances and seek a resolution to their issues with the park's management.

💡Government Response

The government response refers to the reaction of the authorities to the artists' action. In the script, the government's response is immediate and involves high-ranking officials, indicating the seriousness with which the government is addressing the artists' demands. The response is crucial as it shows the government's willingness to engage with the concerns of the artistic community.

💡Cultural Park's Function

The cultural park's function is its intended purpose or role in society, which typically includes promoting and facilitating cultural expression and activities. The artists are demanding that Taman Budaya Medan's function be restored to its original state, emphasizing the importance of such spaces for the community's cultural life.

💡Commercialization

Commercialization refers to the process by which something becomes a commodity or is treated as a business venture. In the context of the video, the artists are protesting against the commercialization of Taman Budaya Medan, where they are being charged fees to use the park's facilities, which they see as a barrier to their cultural activities.

💡Renovation

Renovation is the process of improving or restoring a building or space. The script mentions that some rooms in Taman Budaya Medan have been renovated but are not being made available to artists for their activities. This highlights a discrepancy between the park's physical improvements and its accessibility to the cultural community.

💡Regulations (Perda)

Perda, short for 'Peraturan Daerah', refers to local regulations in Indonesia. In the video, the government official mentions that there is no Perda that regulates the fees being imposed on artists for using Taman Budaya Medan, suggesting that the fees are unauthorized. This point is crucial as it supports the artists' claim that the fees are unjust.

💡Miscommunication

Miscommunication refers to the failure to convey or understand the meaning of a message. The script implies that there has been miscommunication between the park's management and the artists, leading to conflicts over the use of the park's facilities. The government's response aims to resolve these misunderstandings and prevent future conflicts.

💡Artistic Community

The artistic community refers to the collective group of artists and cultural workers in a particular area. In the video, the artistic community of Medan is actively engaged in advocating for their rights to use Taman Budaya Medan for their cultural activities. Their action reflects the importance of cultural spaces for the community's identity and expression.

Highlights

Artists in Medan city demand the restoration of the function of Medan Cultural Park.

The government of Medan city responded directly to the artists' demands on July 24th.

A performance at Medan Cultural Park was disbanded by Topan, the acting Secretary of the Region.

Artists have been banned from using Medan Cultural Park for activities in recent times.

Artists were forced to pay for using the Cultural Park, even for small performances and practices.

The fees demanded by the staff ranged from 100,000 to 500,000, depending on the space used.

Artists are anxious about the policies made by the government, which manages the park through the Department of Education and Culture.

The government clarified that there are no fees imposed on artists for cultural activities in the park.

The acting Secretary emphasized that there is no legal regulation for the fees mentioned.

The use of Medan Cultural Park will be regulated to avoid miscommunication and conflicts between staff and artists.

Some rooms in the Cultural Park have been renovated and are ready for cultural activities.

Artists are disappointed that after renovation, the spaces are not available for their use, even for practice.

The acting Secretary and the chairman of the Medan Artists Consortium discussed the issue and showcased the park's facilities.

Previously, there were 12 rooms for various art forms, but now only A6 is available for artists' use.

The government appreciates the artists' expression of their problems and is working to resolve the issue.

The acting Secretary was instructed by the Regent to solve the problem regarding the use of the buildings.

The park's renovation is part of the efforts to make it accessible for artists' activities.