Picu Demo Peringatan Darurat, Kenapa DPR dan Pemerintah Tabrak Putusan MK?
Summary
TLDRThe video discusses the recent political tension in Indonesia following a controversial ruling by the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the 2024 regional elections (Pilkada). The court revised the requirements for political party support and candidate age, sparking opposition from the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR). The DPR's move to reverse MK's decision has led to widespread concern and protests, as it is seen as politically motivated. The situation is further complicated by the potential candidacy of President Jokowi's son, Kaesang Pangarep, raising questions about the integrity of the election process.
Takeaways
- 📢 The video discusses the increasing tension in Indonesian politics as social media buzzes with emergency warnings, particularly related to the upcoming regional elections (Pilkada) in 2024.
- ⚖️ The Constitutional Court (MK) recently made a ruling on August 20, 2024, which included changes to the requirements for candidates running in the Pilkada, such as political party support thresholds and candidate age requirements.
- 🗳️ The MK ruling reduced the political party support threshold required to nominate a candidate in regions with a smaller electorate, which could affect smaller parties' ability to participate without forming coalitions.
- 🎂 The MK also ruled that the minimum age requirement for candidates should be calculated at the time the Electoral Commission (KPU) finalizes the candidate list, rather than at the time of inauguration.
- 🏛️ Despite the MK's ruling, the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) and the government later held a meeting on August 21, 2024, where they proposed revisions that contradict the MK's decisions, such as reverting the threshold back to 25% and changing the age requirement calculation to the inauguration date.
- ⚠️ The DPR's actions are seen as politically motivated and have sparked public concern and resistance, with civil society and grassroots movements beginning to mobilize.
- 🔍 Critics argue that the DPR and government's revisions are intended to serve the interests of the political elite, rather than uphold democratic principles.
- 🤝 A large coalition, named Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus, has formed to support prominent candidates in the upcoming Pilkada, including Ridwan Kamil for governor and Suswono as his running mate.
- 🚫 The MK ruling initially provided hope for the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) to run in the Pilkada without needing to form a coalition, but the DPR's revisions have dashed those hopes.
- 👶 Speculation arises that the age requirement revision was made to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, who will turn 30 just before the 2024 Pilkada, to run for vice governor in Central Java.
Q & A
What triggered the recent social media outcry and civil society protests in Indonesia?
-The social media outcry and protests were triggered by the delay in the parliamentary session by the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), which was supposed to pass the Regional Head Election Law (RUU Pilkada). The delay and subsequent political maneuvers have led to widespread dissatisfaction among civil society and grassroots movements.
What was the key ruling made by the Constitutional Court (MK) on August 20, 2024, concerning the Pilkada?
-The Constitutional Court (MK) ruled to amend the requirements for candidates in the 2024 Regional Head Elections (Pilkada). The key changes included adjusting the threshold for political party support based on population size and setting specific age requirements for candidates at the time of their official candidacy by the KPU.
How did the DPR RI respond to the Constitutional Court's ruling on the Pilkada law?
-The DPR RI held a working committee meeting where they reversed the Constitutional Court's decision by reverting the political party support threshold back to the original 25% and changing the age requirement for candidates to be calculated from the time of their inauguration rather than their official candidacy.
Why is there tension between the DPR RI and the Constitutional Court (MK) over the Pilkada law?
-The tension arises because the DPR RI's actions are seen as defying the Constitutional Court's final and binding decision. This has led to concerns about the rule of law and the potential for political manipulation by the ruling elite.
What specific changes did the Constitutional Court (MK) make regarding the candidacy requirements in the Pilkada?
-The Constitutional Court (MK) altered the political party support threshold for candidates based on the number of eligible voters in a region and set the age requirement for candidates to be calculated at the time of official candidacy, not at the time of inauguration.
What are the potential consequences if the DPR RI passes its version of the Pilkada law?
-If the DPR RI passes its version of the Pilkada law, it could undermine the authority of the Constitutional Court and lead to increased public distrust in the political process. It might also provoke further civil unrest and legal challenges.
Why is the age requirement for Pilkada candidates a contentious issue?
-The age requirement is contentious because it is perceived as being politically motivated. Specifically, there are suspicions that the DPR RI's version of the law was designed to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, who would not meet the age requirement at the time of candidacy, to run in the Pilkada by calculating the age requirement at the time of inauguration.
What was the role of the Constitutional Democracy Initiative in the debate over the Pilkada law?
-The Constitutional Democracy Initiative, led by Kolil Pasaribu, criticized the revisions to the Pilkada law, arguing that they were driven by pragmatic political interests and reflected the power struggle among the elite.
How has the public reacted to the ongoing debate and changes to the Pilkada law?
-The public reaction has been one of dissatisfaction and concern, leading to social media campaigns and protests. There is growing fear that the changes are eroding democratic principles and favoring political elites over the public interest.
What is the significance of the coalition 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus' in the Jakarta Pilkada?
-The 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus' is a significant political alliance consisting of 12 parties.
Outlines
🗳️ Political Turmoil and MK's Ruling Impact on Pilkada
The first paragraph discusses the political unrest in Indonesia triggered by social media outcry and grassroots movements. It explains how the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) postponed a plenary session to pass the Pilkada Law, ignoring the Constitutional Court's (MK) ruling on regional elections. The MK had altered rules regarding party support and candidate age requirements for the 2024 Pilkada. The MK's ruling included changes like reducing the candidacy threshold based on population and adjusting the age requirement for candidates. Despite the MK's decisions, the DPR opposed the changes, proposing new calculations and reverting to the previous thresholds.
🔍 DPR's Political Maneuvering and Social Response
The second paragraph delves into the DPR's and the government's political interests in manipulating the MK's decision, which has sparked widespread public dissatisfaction and resistance. It highlights the revision of the Pilkada Law, reflecting the influence of political elites. The paragraph also describes the formation of a political coalition, 'Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus,' for the Jakarta Pilkada, consisting of 12 parties supporting prominent candidates. The potential of facing an empty box in the election is discussed, as well as the implications for PDIP and other political actors, especially concerning age requirements designed to favor specific candidates, such as the President's youngest son.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK)
💡Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR)
💡Pilkada 2024
💡Threshold (Ambang Batas)
💡Koalisi Indonesia Maju Plus
💡Usia Pencalonan (Age Requirement)
💡Konflik Politik (Political Conflict)
💡Koalisi Gemuk
💡Putusan MK
💡Kepentingan Politik (Political Interests)
Highlights
Social media has been flooded with emergency warnings and civil society has united to protest against political elites.
The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) delayed the plenary session for the approval of the 2024 Pilkada bill.
The Constitutional Court (MK) issued a ruling on August 20, 2024, regarding the requirements for regional election candidates.
The MK ruling included changes to two key requirements: political party support and age eligibility for regional election candidates.
The MK ruling adjusted the threshold for political party support based on the population of the electorate.
The age requirement for gubernatorial candidates remains at 30 years, while for regent and mayoral candidates, it's 25 years.
The MK emphasized that age requirements must be met when the General Elections Commission (KPU) sets the candidates.
Despite the MK ruling, the DPR RI amended the age requirement calculation to begin from the date of inauguration.
The DPR RI returned the threshold for political party support to the original 25% for individual parties or coalitions.
There is concern that the DPR's actions are politically motivated and intended to counter the MK's decision.
The Jakarta gubernatorial election sees the emergence of the Indonesia Maju Plus Coalition, consisting of 12 parties.
The coalition supports candidates Ridwan Kamil for governor and Suswono for deputy governor.
The MK's decision could have favored PDIP, allowing them to participate in the Pilkada without forming a coalition.
There is speculation that the new age rule was designed to allow President Jokowi's youngest son, Kaesang Pangarep, to run in the Pilkada.
Concerns are raised that the laws are being manipulated for political gain, leading to unrest among the public.
Transcripts
[Musik]
[Musik]
ones sosial media telah dibirukan oleh
seruan peringatan darurat bergambar
burung gar
mahasiswa masyarakat sipil dan akar
rumput juga telah bersatu untuk turun ke
jalanan memantik titik-titik perlawanan
kepada para elit politik sementara di
Senayan DPR RI menunda-nunda rapat
paripurna dengan agenda tunggal
mengesahkan rancangan undang-undang
Pilkada pada saat yang sama Keputusan MK
menjadi pertaruhan Senayan enggan
menganggap keberadaan putusan MK dalam
revisi undang-undang Pilkada 2024
Lantas apa sebenarnya yang sedang
terjadi di Indonesia dan Kenapa badan
legislasi DPR melawan keputusan MK yang
final dan
mengikat kita mulai dari hari di mana
Mahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan aturan
terkait syarat-syarat dalam
pilkada Selasa 20 Agustus 2024 MK
mengeluarkan putusan nomor
60/puu-22 romawi/
20024 dalam putusan MK itu ada beberapa
yang diubah seperti dua syarat untuk
maju sebagai calon kepala daerah di
Pilkada
2024 pertama soal Dukungan partai
politik di pilkada dan kedua tentang
syarat usia pencalonan
Pilkada dalam pasal 40 ayat 3 UU Nomor
10 tahun 2016 soal ambang batas
pencalonan disebutkan bahwa sebuah
parpol atau koalisi partai politik baru
bisa mengajukan calon kepala daerah
mereka kalau mengantongi 25% perolehan
suarasah namun MK kemudian mengubah
ambang batas pencalonan Pilkada sesuai
jumlah penduduk yang memilih dan ini
formulanya nah ini maksudnya bagaimana
kita ambil contoh di Pilkada provinsi
dengan penduduk dalam DPT kurang dari 2
juta untuk bisa ikut Pilkada di provinsi
ini sebuah partai harus mengantongi
suara sebesar 10% pada pemilihan
legislatif 2024 yang
lalu tapi kan tidak mungkin semua partai
mengantongi 10%. Nah makanya
partai-partai akhirnya bergabung
membentuk koalisi untuk memenuhi ambang
batas
10%. kemudian MK juga memutuskan soal
syarat usia pencalonan
Pilkada kalau di pasal 7 ayat 2 huruf e
UU Nomor 10 tahun 2016 seorang calon
gubernur dan calon wakil gubernur harus
berusia minimal 30
tahun sementara untuk calon bupati dan
wakil bupati minimal 25
tahun nah di dalam keputusan MK
ditegaskan bahwa mereka yang dicalonkan
harus memenuhi syarat usia itu saat KPU
menetapkan mereka sebagai calon kata
kuncinya adalah saat ditetapkan
MK sudah ketok palu dan putusan pun
telah diambil namun keesokannya pada
Rabu 21 Agustus 2024 badan legislasi DPR
RI mengadakan rapat panitia kerja atau
Panja RUU
Pilkada dalam rapat itu balek DPR RI dan
pemerintah menyepakati norma baru
terkait aturan syarat usia calon kepala
daerah dan wakil kepala
daerah kalau di Keputusan MK disebutkan
bahwa penghitungan syarat usia minimal
calon kepala dan wakil kepala daerah
baru dilakukan saat KPU menetapkan calon
nah DPR kemudian menganulir keputusan
itu kemudian mengubah aturan perhitungan
syarat usia minimal calon kepala dan
wakil kepala daerah terhitung sejak
pelantikan pasangan terpilih sesuai
dengan Keputusan Mahkamah
Agung sementara soal ambang batas atau
threshold DPR mengembalikannya ke aturan
semula yaitu 25% untuk parpol atau
gabungan parpol atau 20% untuk jumlah
kursi
DPRD kemudian Skenario apa yang akan
terjadi kalau DPR mengesahkan UU Pilkada
itu dan kenapa DPR bersama pemerintah
melawan keputusan
MK dikutip dari harian Kompas menurut
Direktur eksekutif pusat studi
konstitusi atau Pusako Fakultas Hukum
Universitas Andalas Charles sabura DPR
dan pemerintah jelas memiliki
kepentingan politik sehingga dengan
mudahnya mengakali Keputusan
MK ketidakpuasan masyarakat akan
fenomena itu lantas menimbulkan
kekhawatiran dan perlawanan dari masa
yang mana sudah mulai terlihat dari
ramainya sosial media akan peringatan
darurat sementara menurut ketua the
constitutional democracy Initiative atau
kit kolil pasar ribu revisi UU Pilkada
sarat dengan muatan politik pragmatis
dan menggambarkan kepentingan elit
penguasa yang
terganggu nah situasinya adalah di
Pilkada Jakarta saat ini terbentuk
sebuah koalisi gemuk bernama Koalisi
Indonesia maju plus atau Kim plus
koalisi ini terdiri atas gabungan 12
partai pendukung pasangan prabuo
Subianto Gibran rakabuming dan pasangan
Anis Basu dan Muhaimin Iskandar
mereka mencalonkan rituan Kamil sebagai
calon gubernur dan mantan menteri
pertanian sekaligus elit PKS suswono
sebagai calon wakil
gubernurnya kemudian tinggal PDP saja
yang belum mencalonkan karena suara
perolehannya dipilh kemarin hanya 15%
dan ritwan Kamil suswono berpotensi
untuk melawan kota kosong tapi karena
mungkin saja kota kosong yang menang
tiba-tiba munculah pasangan dharmma
pongrekun dan Kun Wardana yang maju
sebagai calon independen
sebenarnya Keputusan MK pada Selasa 20
Agustus 2024 bisa saja menjadi angin
segar untuk PDIP karena dengan aturan
dari MK PDIP bisa melenggang sendirian
ke Pilkada tanpa harus
berkoalisi namun harapan PDIP untuk maju
di Pilkada seolah dipupuskan oleh hasil
kesepakatan delapan fraksi di DPR dan
pemerintah yang menyetujui RUU Pilkada
versi DPR RI sementara untuk syarat usia
banyak pihak yang menduga bahwa Aturan
ini sengaja dibuat agar anak bungsu
Presiden Jokowi kaang Pangarep bisa maju
di Pilkada sebagai calon wakil gubernur
Jawa
Tengah pasalnya Kaesang baru berusia 30
tahun 25 Desember 2024
esok Kalau mengikuti aturan MK kesang
tidak bisa ikut Pilkada karena saat
penetapan calon oleh KPU pada 22
September 2024 Ketum PS itu belum genap
30 tahun sementara Kalau mengikuti
aturan DPR maka k bisa-bisa saja
melenggang ke Pilkada karena pelantikan
Pilkada dilakukan pada 7 Februari
2024 undang-undang bukanlah Lego yang
bisa dipasang dilepas dan direkayasa
sesuka hati dan kursi jabatan bukanlah
milik sekelompok elit maupun sebuah
keluarga lantas apakah para pembuat
aturan di negeri ini hendak membuka mata
dan telinga atas turbulensi yang telah
terjadi di masyarakat simak terus
perkembangan nya hanya di kanal YouTube
kompas.com
[Musik]
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
DARURAT ANOMALI !! PERDEBATAN UU PILKADA DPR VS MK MA INDIKASI JOKOWI DIKTATOR 2.0? - Mardigu Wowiek
Rakyat Gelar Aksi Besar Besar Kepung Gedung DPR - [Metro Pagi Primetime]
Memahami Peringatan Darurat di Indonesia
Penyebab Demo Peringatan Darurat Indonesia di DPR, MK, dan Kota-kota Lainnya
RAKYAT AKAN MARAH DAN MELAWAN, JIKA DPR MELALUI BALEG NEKAD BATALKAN PUTUSAN MK
¿Por qué MADURO NO PUEDE frenar la transición democrática en VENEZUELA? - @SoloFonseca
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)