RFK Jr: Teaming up With Trump, Pavel Durov’s Arrest, CIA, and the Fall of the Democrat Party

Summary

In a compelling interview, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses his endorsement of Donald Trump, expressing concern over the Democratic Party's shift towards elitism and its departure from traditional environmentalism. He criticizes the party's focus on carbon orthodoxy, the suppression of dissenting voices, and the impact of these changes on democracy and the environment. Kennedy Jr. also shares his views on the importance of nature conservation and the spiritual connection to the environment, advocating for a return to the core values of the environmental movement.

Takeaways

• 🎟️ J.D. Vance, the vice presidential nominee, is confirmed for a live tour stop in Hershey, Pennsylvania, with tickets available at Tucker Carlson's website.
• 🗣️ Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s interview discusses his endorsement of Donald Trump, highlighting a shared theme of challenging corruption within the American ruling class.
• 🔄 Kennedy Jr. speaks on political realignments throughout American history and the current transformation of both the Republican and Democratic parties.
• 🏭 He criticizes the Democratic Party for its focus on carbon orthodoxy, benefiting oil companies and financial institutions, rather than true environmental conservation.
• 🤝 Kennedy Jr. aligns with Trump due to their mutual disdain for the corrupt merger of state and corporate power, and the subversion of democracy by industry-influenced regulatory agencies.
• 👴 Reflecting on his family's values, Kennedy Jr. emphasizes the importance of defending policies eloquently and the dangers of a presidential candidate unable to do so.
• 🌎 He discusses America's role as a template for democracy and the current perception of its democratic practices, influenced by the selection of candidates and their ability to articulate a vision.
• 💬 The conversation touches on the Democratic Party's shift towards censorship and control, which Kennedy Jr. sees as incompatible with democratic values.
• 🔒 Kennedy Jr. expresses concern about the loss of online privacy and the power of tech companies and governments to access and sell personal data, advocating for strong encryption as a solution.
• 🤝 The interview concludes with Kennedy Jr.'s commitment to work towards the election of Donald Trump, focusing on policy issues and the potential role in a unity government.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the interview?

The main topic of discussion in the interview is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s endorsement of Donald Trump, his views on the current state of American politics, and his concerns about environmental issues, censorship, and the health of American children.

Why did Robert F. Kennedy Jr. decide to endorse Donald Trump?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. decided to endorse Donald Trump due to shared concerns about political corruption, the need for environmental protection beyond carbon orthodoxy, stopping censorship, and addressing the chronic disease epidemic among children.

What does Kennedy see as the current corruption within the American ruling class?

Kennedy sees the current corruption within the American ruling class as a corrupt merger of state and corporate power, with regulatory agencies being manipulated by industries they are supposed to regulate, leading to a subversion of democracy.

What is Kennedy's view on the Democratic Party's stance on environmental issues?

Kennedy believes that the Democratic Party has become subsumed in carbon orthodoxy, focusing only on carbon capture and offshore wind projects that benefit certain corporations rather than true environmental conservation and habitat protection.

How does Kennedy describe the transformation of the Republican Party?

Kennedy describes the transformation of the Republican Party into the party of environmentalism, which he sees as a significant realignment in American political history.

What does Kennedy see as the role of the CIA in American politics today?

Kennedy sees the CIA as being involved in American politics, including the censorship of political speech and the tampering of the 2020 presidential election through the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

Why does Kennedy believe the CIA is implicated in his uncle's murder?

Kennedy believes the CIA is implicated in his uncle's murder due to the continued classification of documents related to the assassination, which he sees as an attempt to protect the agency rather than national security.

What is Kennedy's view on the current state of free speech in America?

Kennedy is deeply concerned about the censorship of free speech in America, particularly the suppression of political speech by federal agencies and big tech companies, which he sees as an existential threat to democracy.

How does Kennedy perceive the use of the judiciary against political candidates?

Kennedy perceives the use of the judiciary against political candidates, such as attempts to remove him from the ballot or to jail President Trump, as a weaponization of the courts for political purposes.

What does Kennedy suggest as a solution for climate change?

Kennedy suggests that the best solution for climate change is to restore the soils, which can absorb carbon, prevent flooding, and provide healthy food, rather than focusing solely on carbon capture technologies.

What is Kennedy's perspective on the current environmental movement in the United States?

Kennedy feels that the current environmental movement in the United States has strayed from its roots, focusing on profit-driven projects that harm the environment rather than true conservation and protection of natural habitats.

Outlines

00:00

🎉 Announcement of J.D. Vance's Tour and Interview with Bobby Kennedy Jr.

The script begins with an announcement of a live tour stop featuring J.D. Vance, the vice presidential nominee, in Hershey, Pennsylvania, with tickets available at Tucker Carlson's website. The announcement is followed by an interview with Bobby Kennedy Jr., his first since endorsing Donald Trump. The interview delves into political realignments, corruption within the American ruling class, and the transformation of political parties, particularly the Democratic Party's shift towards environmentalism that benefits large corporations rather than focusing on habitat protection and wildlife conservation.

05:01

🔍 Discussion on Democratic Party's Transformation and Censorship

This paragraph continues the conversation with Bobby Kennedy Jr., discussing the Democratic Party's transformation and its move towards a more corporate and less democratic structure. The discussion highlights the party's shift away from its traditional base and the rise of a corrupt merger of state and corporate power. The conversation also touches on the importance of free speech and the dangers of censorship, which are seen as incompatible with democracy. The paragraph concludes with a critique of the Democratic Party's handling of the nomination process and its lack of transparency and faith in the people.

10:02

🗣️ Concerns Over Free Speech and Censorship in Democracy

The third paragraph focuses on the critical issue of free speech and censorship within democratic societies. It emphasizes the incompatibility of censorship with democratic values and the historical precedent of censorship leading to totalitarianism. The conversation includes the role of social media platforms and the government's influence over them, as well as the importance of encryption in protecting online privacy. The paragraph also mentions the use of strong encryption tools like ExpressVPN to safeguard online activities from prying eyes, including those of the government and foreign entities.

15:03

🤔 Reflections on Political Tribalism and the Impact on Democracy

In this paragraph, the discussion turns to the topic of political tribalism and its effects on democracy. It explores the biological and psychological underpinnings of tribalism and how it influences political beliefs and behaviors. The conversation delves into the challenges of breaking free from established orthodoxies and the potential for polarization to be exacerbated by social media algorithms. The paragraph also touches on the personal implications of political decisions, as illustrated by the speaker's endorsement of Donald Trump and the subsequent impact on his family and personal life.

20:05

🏛️ Concerns Over Government Overreach and the Erosion of Democratic Values

The fifth paragraph discusses the perceived overreach of government agencies and the erosion of democratic values. It talks about the use of government power to target political opponents and the potential dangers of government surveillance. The conversation also addresses the issue of government-mandated censorship and the potential for it to be used as a tool for political control. The paragraph highlights the importance of protecting democratic institutions and the need for vigilance against their subversion.

25:05

🌱 A Call to Protect Nature and the Environment

This paragraph shifts the focus to environmental issues, emphasizing the spiritual and intrinsic value of nature and the environment. It criticizes the current approach to environmentalism that focuses on carbon footprints and quantification, arguing that it misses the deeper spiritual connection humans have with nature. The speaker advocates for a holistic understanding of environmental protection that respects the interconnectedness of all life and the divine presence in nature.

30:07

🛑 The Perils of Chemical Disruptors and Their Impact on Health

The sixth paragraph discusses the harmful effects of chemical disruptors on human health and the environment. It highlights the role of these chemicals in causing hormonal changes, affecting fertility, and potentially leading to early puberty in children. The conversation underscores the need for greater awareness and action against the use of such chemicals, which are pervasive in the environment and pose a significant threat to public health.

35:09

🤝 Collaborating for Change: Working with Trump's Campaign

In this paragraph, the speaker describes his collaboration with Donald Trump's campaign, focusing on shared policy goals and the intention to work together for the betterment of the country. He mentions his involvement in the transition team and the opportunity to help select key government officials. The speaker expresses his commitment to working towards the election of Donald Trump, despite potential personal risks and the challenges that may arise from differing political views.

40:11

🌳 The Importance of Soil Restoration in Climate Policy

The final paragraph emphasizes the critical role of soil restoration in addressing climate change. It argues that focusing on soil health can help absorb carbon emissions, prevent flooding, and promote the growth of healthy food. The speaker advocates for national policies that prioritize soil restoration as a sustainable and effective solution to environmental challenges.

Keywords

💡Vice Presidential Nominee

A vice presidential nominee is an individual selected by a political party to run alongside the presidential candidate. In the context of this video, J.D. Vance is mentioned as the confirmed vice presidential nominee, indicating a significant role in the political campaign and the party's strategy to appeal to voters, as seen in the announcement of a live tour stop in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

💡Endorsement

Endorsement in politics refers to a public declaration of support for a person, cause, or organization. The video discusses Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s endorsement of Donald Trump, which is a significant political gesture, especially considering his history and the shock it caused among those who knew him well.

💡American Ruling Class

The term 'American ruling class' refers to the elite group of individuals who hold significant power and influence in the United States, often through wealth, political connections, or social status. The script mentions both Kennedy Jr. and Trump as having spent a majority of their lives within this class, but ultimately deciding to challenge its perceived corruption.

💡Political Realignment

Political realignment denotes a shift in the political landscape where alliances, party loyalties, or the issues that dominate political discourse change significantly. The video speaks of historical realignments and suggests that the current era is undergoing one, particularly highlighting the transformation of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party's stance on environmental issues.

💡Carbon Orthodoxy

Carbon orthodoxy refers to the dominant belief or policy that focuses on carbon emissions as the primary concern in environmental politics, often to the exclusion of other environmental issues. The script criticizes this focus as being too narrow and benefiting large corporations rather than addressing broader environmental concerns.

💡Censorship

Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered politically unacceptable or offensive. The video discusses censorship in the context of social media and the perceived control of information by the government, which is seen as a threat to democracy and free speech.

💡Democracy

Democracy is a system of government where power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or through elected representatives. The script frequently returns to the theme of democracy, discussing its subversion by corporate interests, the importance of free speech within a democratic society, and the perceived undermining of democratic processes by the current Democratic Party.

💡Environmental Movement

The environmental movement encompasses a broad range of efforts to protect and improve the quality of the natural environment. The script mentions the movement's shift away from habitat protection and wildlife conservation towards a focus on carbon emissions, which Kennedy Jr. criticizes as a departure from the movement's original goals.

💡Neocons

Neocons, short for neoconservatives, refers to a political group that advocates for a more aggressive U.S. foreign policy, often including military intervention. The video suggests that the Democratic Party has become aligned with neoconservative figures, which is seen as a departure from the party's traditional anti-war stance.

💡Habitat Protection

Habitat protection involves measures taken to preserve and maintain the natural environments in which plants and animals live. The script contrasts the original mission of the environmental movement, which included habitat protection, with the current focus on carbon emissions, indicating a shift away from direct conservation efforts.

💡Chronic Disease Epidemic

A chronic disease epidemic refers to a significant increase in the occurrence of non-communicable diseases in a population over time. The video mentions an 'exploding chronic disease epidemic' among children, which is one of the key issues that motivated Kennedy Jr. to run for office, highlighting the urgency of addressing environmental and health factors contributing to this trend.

Highlights

Announcement of J.D. Vance's confirmed live tour stop in Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Tickets for the event are available on Tucker Carlson's website.

Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s first interview since endorsing Donald Trump.

Discussion on political realignments throughout American history and the current state of both political parties.

Critique of the Democratic Party's stance on environmental issues, particularly carbon orthodoxy.

Allegations of corruption within the American ruling class and the impact on democracy.

Kennedy Jr.'s views on the transformation of the Republican Party and its focus on environmentalism.

Concerns about the Democratic Party's selection process for presidential candidates.

Analysis of the importance of free speech in a democracy and the current state of censorship.

Kennedy Jr.'s reflections on his family's political history and the role of debate in democracy.

Criticism of the Biden administration's approach to speech censorship and its implications for democracy.

Kennedy Jr.'s lawsuit against the Biden administration for censorship of speech.

Discussion on the role of social media algorithms in polarizing society.

Kennedy Jr.'s personal decision to endorse Trump and its impact on his family and political standing.

Concerns about the rising chronic disease rates among children and potential contributing factors.

Kennedy Jr.'s campaign focus on ending foreign wars, stopping censorship, and protecting children's health.

The significance of the Country of Origin Labeling Act repeal and its impact on consumer choices.

Kennedy Jr.'s views on the current state of the American environmental movement and its departure from nature conservation.

Plans for a nationwide tour to promote free speech and engage with the public directly.

Transcripts

We're honored to announce that J.D.

Vance, the vice presidential

nominee, is confirmed for a live

tour stop in Hershey, Pennsylvania,

next month.

Tickets are on sale at Tucker

carlson.com.

We hope to see you there will be in

cities all across the country

starting next week.

But first our interview with Bobby

Kennedy Jr. His first since

endorsing Donald Trump on Friday.

Here it is.

So people were shocked.

I know a lot of people you know

well, we're shocked when you endorse

Trump. I was not shocked because

for all the areas where you disagree

on specific issues, there's

a consistent theme that I've noticed

in both of your lives, which is

you've both spent the majority of

your life, well, in your case, your

whole life in the American ruling

class.

And both of you decided

that it was corrupt and that you

were going to say so out loud at

great risk, at great risk

to both of you. And so it was

probably just a matter of time

before you aligned in some way.

Is that how you see it?

Yeah. I mean, I

you know, I think there's been a

bunch of realignments about

political realignments by about 4 or

5 throughout American history.

And I think we're going through one

right now with the Democratic Party

and with both political parties

really changing in a very dramatic

way. And you and I talked,

earlier about

the transformation of a Republican

Party into the party of

environmentalism.

Yeah. And, you know, the Democratic

Party has one out, one environmental

issue, which is carbon orthodoxy,

which ends up benefiting,

you know, the oil companies and

Blackrock and, Goldman

Sachs with offshore

wind and carbon capture,

you know, $100 billion carbon

capture projects,

which is just a strip mining

in the middle class.

And that's the only issue you can

talk about in the Democratic Party.

I got into the environmental

movement to do habitat protection

and to do wildlife conservation,

to get toxics out of our kids.

Amen.

And none of these are issues

that Democrats.

It's a party itself.

Democrats care about them, but the

party itself doesn't.

There's been these big, profound

realignments. And it's not only on

that issue. It's really

the, you know, the domination

of, this,

this corrupt merger of

state corporate power.

And it's happening in Washington, DC

now, where,

our democracy has really been

subverted by

the industries that have taken over

the regulatory agencies and they

and transform them into sock

puppets or

corporate profit taking and,

and basically wholly owned

subsidiaries of the industries

they're supposed to regulate.

And the Democrats, for

a variety of reasons.

And I watch it happen over many,

many years,

have, have clung

to this

illusion of these democratic

institutions that they're still

democratic and they have a we

all have the capacity

to judge ourselves on our intentions

rather than our actions.

Right.

And I've been there.

So and the Democratic

Party judged itself.

It sees itself, my friends

who are Democrats see

themselves as part of the

the good guys, the white hats

and that, you know,

it's kind of like the, the

good guys who are in Fort Apache

surrounded by,

you know, the, the

forces of barbarism that are about

to storm the gate.

And they're the only ones the only

way to keep it at bay

is to elect a president

who, has dementia.

And because you're voting for the

apparatus.

Yes. And you're not voting for, you

know, even or another,

than to handpick a presidential

candidate without any elections,

to basically get rid of democracy

in order to save it and

handpick a candidate

who in 40

days now has not given

a single interview

on any media outlet.

And I think about one my uncle and

father would think about that.

You know, they prided themselves on

on being able to go on and

debate was the centerpiece.

You know, that a whole,

you know, function of democracy was

to a kneel ideas in the furnace of

debate and, and have

them rise up and, you know, the

marketplace of ideas

and the idea

that, you know, and

this British tradition of

Churchill and the others and the

House of Commons, you know, and,

being able to defend their policies

and being forced to defend their

policy articulately, eloquently.

And, you know, my uncle and father

just thought we should.

Ideas are important and we

should be able to defend them.

And if you can't defend them,

there's something wrong with you.

Yes. And you know why.

Oh, so we have,

a, presidential candidate

that was selected by the Democratic

Party who can't do that.

And, you know, one of the things

that my uncle and father were always

thinking about is how do we look to

the rest of the world?

Right?

They they.

Were conscious that America was

the template for democracy.

When we created our modern

democracy in 1789

or 1791, when

the Bill of rights was ratified.

We were the only democracy on earth.

I, 1865,

during that endless civil war, there

were five, and they were all modeled

on America.

And by the time my uncle took

office, it was about

150.

And by the time by the end of the

690,

they're all based on an

American model.

And, you know, we very much

were the exemplary

nation. We were the example of

democracy around the globe and

people. And they were very

conscious. They were, you know, they

were embarrassed at first by the

civil rights movement because

they said, what is the rest of the

world going to think about it?

And then they realized what we

better correct.

You know the problem.

Yeah. Because, but

they everything that they did,

they were conscious.

They were being watched.

Well, what is the rest of the world

think of American democracy right

now that, you know, we

have in one party,

selected a man with

dementia to

lead the free world

and then turned around,

and picked a person, I

mean, who cannot

give an interview.

She cannot defend American

her vision or America's

right going in the world.

And she

gave this, you know, vice President

Harris gave this speech, that

convention that

was written by neocons.

And they had CIA directors

talking at the at the Democratic

Convention, military people talking

at the Democratic convention.

My father and my uncle were the

party of anti-war.

I an uncle, was asked by his best

friend, Bill Ben Bradley,

one of his two best friends who ran

the Washington Post.

Yeah. What do you want on your

graves? On your epitaph?

And my uncle said immediately

he kept the peace.

He said the primary job of a

president of the United States was

to keep the country out of war.

He said he didn't want children

in Africa and Latin America and

Asia.

When they heard about the United

States of America to think of a man

with a gun, they wanted him

to think of a Peace Corps volunteer

and the Alliance for progress and

USAID,

which were programs that he created

to build the middle class, to end

run the oligarchs and run the

military hunters.

They used to receive U.S.

aid and it said,

go to the poor and build

institutions, education and

health and and

all of the institutions of democracy

to continue to model it for the rest

of the world and live up to what

we're supposed to be doing,

which is to encourage the growth

of, of democratic

rule. So now

you have a, you know, we have

a system that's produced,

people who, you know,

candidate in the, in the, the, the,

the Democratic Party who,

who can't even defend

America's record in the world and

who was who is parroting

this kind of war mongering,

you know, military domination

ideology that's got us in

such trouble.

It's it's caused a calamity in

our country.

It's gutted the middle class.

It's made us a pariah around the

globe. It's great.

And it led to the rise of

BRICs.

It's leading to the rise of

totalitarianism all over the world.

And, you know, I'd say this

finally at them,

if you really look at what's

happening in the Democratic Party

today, it's a party

that the word diem us in

Greek means people,

but it's a party that has faith in

the people.

It's a party that needs.

Ironclad control.

So they didn't trust anybody

to have a real election.

They got rid of the primaries

because they didn't trust the

people.

They then picked hand-picked

Vice President Harris.

With no election and even pretense

of election. Because they didn't

trust the people.

And, you know, you have

and they're the party now of

censorship.

And how can you.

Have a democracy with censorship?

You cannot have a democracy.

And they're absolutely

incompatible. And everybody knew

that. Everybody, you know, you and I

were raised reading or.

Well, and Alice Huxley

and, and,

you know, Robert Heinlein and

Alexander Solzhenitsyn and,

and all of these other books that

were part of classical literature

that was taught in every American

classroom.

It said the first step to

totalitarianism is always

begins with censorship.

It's the first step down that

slippery slope.

And there's no time that we look

back in history and say that people

who are censoring speech were the

good guys, are always

the bad guys, because we

knew, you know, we know they're the

guys who are going to end up

cracking the whip on us all.

And and you know, being our,

our overlords.

And so and then, you know,

a whole thing about like

you and I talked about

that clip of,

of, Tim what

I'm saying that

government should be the ultimate

arbiter of what is

protected speech and what is not.

You know, he's a if something that

the First Amendment does not protect

misinformation and disinformation,

but it does.

The First Amendment was was

written to protect

not only true speech, but false

speech and speech.

I not not it wasn't

there. And it's unnecessary

to protect the kind of speech that

everybody wants to hear.

It's there to protect the kind of

speech that nobody wants to hear.

Right. And especially speech

that is critical of the people in

charge.

Exactly. So in their current

formulation, misinformation is

defined as any speech that

criticizes the guard that they're

doing. So with that in mind, you

see the Biden administration

encouraging France, Macron

to arrest the

owner and founder of telegram, Pavel

Durov, who's now as right now

in a French prison.

That seems like I mean,

that's the hallmark of dictatorship,

it sounds to me.

Yeah. Well, you know, we've

lost Europe.

Europe is now had

does not have free speech.

You know, look what's happened to

Elon Musk. And here Elon Musk should

be here. Or the Democratic Party,

the old Democratic Party would be

the hero.

Somehow he became a villain because

he was actually the only

the only platform that would allow

this free speech on his platform.

And he's now become a villain

because of it, because the

Democratic Party does not believe in

the people. If you don't, if you

if you if you don't believe in free

speech, it means because you don't

trust the people, you don't trust

them to figure

it out on their own in order to

to have information

on which they can base their ideas

and their notions and their beliefs.

And their votes.....

And their votes.

And that the government has to,

has to protect them from dangerous

information, things

that might put bad ideas into their

heads.

And it's very patronizing, but it's

also very

manipulative and conniving.

And really, it's exactly

the opposite of democracy.

And you will not find

a single Democrat

who will, who will

criticize. It's really astonishing

to me because.

The Democrats always liked them.

You know, when I endorsed

Trump, the big, you know,

kind of the the fulcrum at the

centerpiece of that tax of

hatred that I just kind of

seething anger

I'm so many Democrats was well, look

what he did on January 6th.

Okay. January 6th

was a bad day in American history.

And what President Trump did

and my view was, was,

was very bad.

It was reprehensible.

But it was was

the Republic really at risk?

You know, we have the U.S.

military with the National

Guard. You have you know, they have

all the institutions.

We have Congress, we have

all these institutions of

government. And and there was a mob

people, most of them

probably didn't know what was

happening. Some of them were very

badly intentioned.

We're breaking the law,

but it wasn't

a threat to the Republic.

What is a threat?

And this is what I you cannot

explain to a Democrat now.

And it's astonishing to me

what is threat is when the

government is censoring your speech

or political speech.

And, you know, I just won Tucker

last week, but that.

Was the centerpiece of

democratic ideology, was free

speech.

Exactly. I mean, the word liberal

means free speech.

That's where it comes from.

Oh, is that must be weird for

you being named Robert

F Kennedy Jr and spending your

entire life in this world like

what he said, like.

It, it.

I mean, I you know, I.

Let me just say this.

I won a lawsuit.

I want a new

judgment. And my lawsuit.

Kennedy versus Biden last week.

And and Kennedy versus Biden

is part of two lawsuits

that were brought, one

by the attorney generals of Missouri

and Louisiana and the other by me

for the same issue, which was the

Biden administration's censorship

of speech. And so there's a series

of decisions.

There's a 155 page decision,

the the attorney general's case,

one up to the Supreme Court

and was rejected because they,

the Supreme Court found that those

attorney generals didn't have

standing to. So because they weren't

directly arm my

case this week, the federal judge

Doty said Kennedy doesn't

say any to so, and

he reinforced recently

issued his injunction against the

Biden administration.

So I have an administrative,

an injunction right now against the

Biden White House and join

them from censoring me, which

they've been doing.

They the the 155

page decision by Judge Doty details

everything that happened

37 hours after he took the

oath of office.

President Biden's White House opened

up a portal for the FBI

to begin to

have access to social media

posts on all the different social

media sites, and

they the FBI, then invited

in the CIA.

DHS, the

IRS, and

PSI.

PSI say is this new agency

that is the center of the

censorship industrial complex

that is in charge of making sure

Americans don't hear things that

their government doesn't want them

to hear?

And those agencies

and other agencies, including

the health agencies like CDC,

were given access to go into

the social media sites and change

posts and slow

walk things and, and

shadow ban

pose that it was part of that

effort. And they removed my

Instagram account.

I had almost a million followers.

I they say it was for

misinformation, but they could not

point to a single post

that I ever made that was

factually erroneous.

And they actually

Facebook pushback and the email

chain. You can see Facebook pushing

back at the white House and saying,

well, wait a minute.

He's not this

isn't misinformation and this

is not actually erroneous.

What they're saying is actually

true.

And they had to invent a new word

which is called mal information,

which is information that is

factually true but nevertheless

inconvenient for the government.

And that became disinformation,

misinformation and mal information.

That's what that is.

So that everybody

and-

Isn't that that's a lie.

And yet and the emails show

that Facebook the people

said this these they were

saying about the white House in

their private emails with each

other.

These people are cynical,

you know, terrible people.

And they knew what they were doing

was breaking the law,

but they were under tremendous

pressure. Facebook has all these

deals with the government and, you

know, as do all the media companies

with the intelligence agencies

and and elsewhere.

Last they were the

white House was

overtly telling them

that they were going to,

if they didn't comply,

that their section 230

immunity was in jeopardy.

A section 30 immunity, as

they, you know, is, is,

and just so that your listeners

know what it is,

I used to write for the New York

Times regularly.

Every time I wrote

an article, lawyers would call

me and fact check everything

in that article, because

if I wrote something that was the

obituary in that article

and somebody was defamed,

that person could sue me.

But they could also say The New York

Times.

Oh, the social media side

said, we cannot hire lawyers

to look at every post

and call the people and check on it

when, you know, on Facebook or

Instagram.

So if this industry is going to

function, we need to

be able to not be liable

for what is published on our site.

And that is called section 230,

the Communications Act,

a Congress that if you are just

a platform, a media platform

that, for other

people to publish, like Facebook

is like Instagram, like Twitter

or act that

you you're immune.

Nobody can sue you.

They can sue the person who wrote

the post.

They can't sue.

Facebook CEO

Mark Zuckerberg said if they take

away our Facebook, our section

230 immunity, it is existential,

meaning we will no longer exist.

And so they were terrified because

Congress was actually considering

removing section 230 immunity,

and the white House was telling

them, if you don't censor our

political critics,

we're going to take away your

section 3230 a minute

if President Trump did that.

The Democrats would go berserk.

Well, that's criminal behavior.

It's criminal. Does that is a

criminal right there.

Right there, violating the

First Amendment of the Constitution,

for starters.

Yeah.

And, so that's what

happened. And

the you know, my my

idea is that if somebody does

something bad, it shouldn't matter

whether they're Democrat or

Republican. I agree it is.

You know, we should all be going

after them and we should be going

after them as a society.

How much does it cost you to use

the internet?

Well, it's free, right?

Google's free.

Facebook is free.

Instagram totally free.

That's what you've been convinced

of. But it's a trick.

None of it is free.

In fact, you are paying

with your data.

Everything you do online can

be seen and sold

not just to companies, but to

governments, including foreign

governments, and often is.

So how do you reclaim your online

privacy? It's important.

Well, there is one way.

It's called encryption.

Strong encryption protects your

right to privacy online and

defends you from your many potential

enemies online, including your own

government.

And it gives you back the freedom

to read what you want right what

you want, without prying

eyes spying on you.

So how do you get this freedom

through encryption?

We'll tell you how we do it.

ExpressVPN

ExpressVPN reroutes

100% of our online

activity to secure encrypted

servers.

Now, normally, if we didn't use it,

internet providers would be able to

read and see everything

that we do online in the United

States. They could even sell it, as

we said.

But because we use ExpressVPN, they

can't see any of it 0%

approximately.

We also use it when we travel

abroad, because that same encryption

shuts out hackers who might try and

steal what we're doing things like

passwords or credit card details

over sketchy Wi-Fi free Wi-Fi

that's not free, either.

It also shuts out foreign

governments. It might try and spy on

us or censor what we're doing

online.

What we especially like about

ExpressVPN is there not a

black box?

It promises privacy and tech

solutions. We have to trust them.

They've actually opened up their

servers to professional auditors at

UC and KPMG, as well

as independent security experts, to

evaluate the claims they're making

about what they're doing, their

privacy policy and their trusted

server technology.

So people are watching them.

So it's a carefully designed

server architecture that runs on

volatile memory only.

That means it never stores user data

because it cannot store user

data. It's impossible.

It's private by design.

They couldn't keep your stuff if

they wanted to.

So in a world where it seems like

every corporation wants more and

more of your private information to

sell and manipulate,

it's nice to find a company that

actually goes the extra mile to

protect it. That's their business.

Protecting your privacy.

So if you want freedom online

and freedom means privacy.

There's never been a better time to

get it through ExpressVPN.

You can use our special links to get

three extra months of ExpressVPN

for free.

Expressvpn.com/trucker.

That's Express Xpress

vpn.com/tucker.

What I don't understand, and it is

baffling to me having known a lot of

Democrats.

But you've been in that world your

whole life.

Like how do they not see that?

How do people who say

they believe in civil liberties

suddenly think it's okay

for the government to

prosecute its political opponents

and silence them?

How do they think that?

You know, to me, it's a it's

a I've, I've thought a lot about

that I bet.

And it's about it's

about tribalism and,

you know, that people put themselves

in these tribal categories and we're

hardwired for tribalism.

That's why orthodoxies are so

popular that, you know, people

get sucked into various kinds of

orthodoxies, whether it's

ideological orthodoxy or religious

orthodoxies.

And, and that impulse

is really is not a religious

impulse. It's a biological

handballs. And it's an impulse

that's hard wired in us.

On the 20,000 generations

we spent wandering the African

savanna and tiny little groups that

were warring each other, where there

was always a male leader,

where at where, you know, the women

were traded as chattels because you

couldn't marry your sister.

So you knew from the beginning she

was going to be a trade.

Good.

And you were going to trade her for

somebody else.

She was had no power.

And, and where

you all had to ascribe to an

orthodoxy and see no problems

with people who were within your,

your in-group and

people who were outside were

subhuman, and they could be killed.

And if they made a mistake, you

know, you wanted to talk about,

everybody would talk about it.

We're all hardwired that way

because that's where our, you know,

our, our wiring comes from.

And when somebody gets subsumed in

our orthodoxy,

it's very, very difficult to

unravel. And there are all kinds

of psychiatric

treatises about how do you

deprogrammed somebody, you know,

how do you,

how do you talk somebody out of an

orthodoxy and and you know

what, the little that I know about

it is that if

you challenge them directly,

you challenge their beliefs, and it

puts concrete on it, and it

makes them less

able to move off,

they get very defensive.

And, you know, the way to approach

them, there are ways to approach

them. There's deprogramming,

protocols.

And they usually include a lot of

Socratic method of asking them

questions about their belief.

But it's a one on one,

it's one on one project enterprise.

And it's not something that you can

do the whole Democratic Party

overnight. Something has to happen

that's going to make this, you know,

this, this tribal thinking

unravel because it's really

destroying our country.

And the polarization which is

happening on both sides

is, is put on steroids

by these social media

algorithms that,

that reward people

for staying on the

side as long as possible.

So they the algorithm or

the algorithm knows this.

I've got to keep as many

eyeballs on that side as possible.

It turns out that the way

people stay on this site is if you

fortify their existing opinion.

Of course, if you feed them and

if you feed them information that

consolidates their worldview.

Yes. And so, you know,

we have this problem now where it's

not just polarization like the Civil

War, but it's polarization on

steroids, because you've got

machines that are

that are manipulating us to hate

each other more every single day.

So knowing all this as you do and

have for a long time, the,

you know, the most radical step

you can make if you're a Democrat

is endorsing Donald Trump.

So there are political calculations

involved. There are ideological

calculations, but they're also, of

course, personal calculations.

How you so, you know, once

you do that, you've burned your

boats like that's it.

You're not going back to wherever

you were ten years ago.

How hard a decision was that for you

personally?

It was a very it was an obvious

decision for me.

It should have been.

But it was a very, very difficult

decision. And we had you know, I

have a very, very good team around

me. And,

I was most worried about my

wife.

What was I about, Sheryl?

You know,

well, you know, it was

not comfortable, but.

And she is a, you know,

a lifelong Democrat, she comes from

not the aristocracy.

She comes from a very, you know,

I would say poor family

and in Florida.

But she.

She found her way through.

Through idealism to the

Democratic Party.

And that And

she shares a lot of those values.

And her industry is very,

very much,

aligned with the Democratic Party,

probably more than any industry in

our country and more than any,

town in our country.

This, but

for me was like, you know, have huge

impacts on her. And ultimately, if

she had told me

you can't do this, I wouldn't have

done it.

So, but,

I'm very I'm very

grateful

that she overcame.

She allowed me to do what she was,

embracing it.

But she said, I understand

why you have to do this.

And,

her. And we had a four

day meeting and up in Hyannis

Port, my, my aunt, everybody,

my family members, my kids,

many other people, Tony

Robbins,

attended remotely and

a number of other kind of spiritual

leaders, just

people who cared deeply about our

country,

chimed in and and made

the case on both sides.

And people from the organizers that

campaign organization that,

he here was a calculus that

ultimately was persuasive for me.

My, if

I all of our internal

polling showed from the outset

and if I say in, in the Democratic

Party, I was going to

get, president, vice

President Harris elected

57 to 60% and

even more, sometimes

up to 66%

of my voters.

My followers said that if

I withdrew from the election, they

were going to vote for Trump,

which is ironic, by the way, Tucker,

because President Trump

and the RNC did nothing to prevent

me from being on the ballots.

They didn't have a big

major organization and

Senate private and private eyes

out. You know, I the Democratic

Party was interviewing

literally everybody I've ever

met in 70 years.

It dawned on me, I,

I got a.

Call. They've been doing that.

I know for a fact for over a year,

as you know.

Yeah. And they had they were open

about this. What we're going to do,

they put a person in charge of it

named Liz Smith, who is, you

know, who's

I just the kind of person she is.

She. This is what she know.

She does negative research on people

and tries to characterize Smith.

Eliot Spitzer's old girlfriend.

Yes.

And she was in charge of that team.

And then there was other people as

well. Mary Beth Cahill and my Uncle

Daddy's chief of staff, who I know,

and Liz Smith was in charge of that.

You know, the negative reviews or

what they call negative research

euphemistically.

And I got calls from,

you know, for example, a guy that I

met at an AA

meeting 40 years ago

and he received a call.

Oh, most of my family members

received calls on contacts, either

texts or telephone

calls from people who said, I'm

doing intelligence for the DNC.

And, you know, we'd like to

talk to you about Robert Kennedy and

if you have any negative information

about him.

Oh, I was getting of,

you know.

What could possibly the

justification for that?

Well, they didn't want me running.

And that's the thing is, it's not

democratic.

It wasn't. You know.

That's such a mafia tactic.

Yeah.

Yeah. So I mean,

but the point is,

it was weird.

It was it was not smart because

I was actually helping the

Democrats. And if they just let me

stay and they didn't run

this campaign against me, they

probably would win this election.

And because I was hurting

Trump, oddly,

Trump didn't do anything about it.

He's you know, he was kind of,

he made a couple of statements about

me that I was a communist, etc.,

that they were sort of good natured,

you know, the stuff that you

that you're like, okay, that's

okay.

They weren't like calling my old

girlfriends, saying, you know.

What? You know, what did he tell

her? Or, you know, whatever

what they were, ask him.

Oh,

but the DNC was up to

that.

And.

And were you shocked by

that?

Was I shocked?

I don't know.

I mean,

I feel like I'm

in a place now.

Nothing surprises me.

I bet you are.

oh.

But.

I don't know. I mean, I, I anyway,

so they're going to.

Drop all that stuff now, obviously.

Right.

What?

You know, get rid of Liz Smith and

put her on some other project.

I don't know.

I just you sort of wonder how will

Smith live with her.

I mean, that's so repulsive.

Like, how does she justify that to

herself?

I have to. I mean, I matter,

she's not stupid.

But that is disgusting.

No, I mean, you've

lived a life famously, and

if you have a team of researchers

digging into it, and.

I have not led a careful life, by

the way. I know.

I said, you know, my first.

I was mad during my announcement

speech. I said, you know, I had told

my wife and Charlotte a couple

days before. I said, I have so many

skeletons in my closet that if they

could vote, I could run for the

world.

Oh, I know, I know, stuff

is going to come out about maybe

because I let let me put it a

colorful life.

Yeah.

And, and, you know, people

have all kinds of stories about me,

but so I was I'm

ready for, you know, I'm ready

for I was I never done anything

criminal in terms of, like,

stealing money or self-enrichment.

I did a lot of stupid stuff and a

lot of.

Have you gotten rich off pointless

foreign wars?

No, I have not done that.

Oh you haven't. Okay.

You haven't force people to inject

substances in their bodies.

Okay. I've never done that.

But anyway, so

it became clear to me that.

If if Kamala got elected,

the issues that I cared about, which

is ending the foreign wars,

you know, the the unjust wars

in World war is the wars of choice,

like Ukraine.

Stopping the censorship, which I

think is existential for our

democracy and then

protecting children from this

extraordinary exploding

chronic disease epidemic.

Those are the three reasons that got

me into the campaign.

That's why I ran for president.

Those three reasons.

I think if you got elected, I'm

70 years old, that

eight years from now, our kids are

going to be lost and that

and if she's president for eight

years, my chance to do anything

about it would be gone.

Yes. And that.

And then I got

a contact from Kathleen Means who

you know. Well, you've, you know,

made one of the best of the best

shows, ever put

on TV ever aired.

Was your interview with Galloway and

his wife, Casey

and Carly? For those of you who

haven't seen this,

his show is a,

is an expert, a genius,

brilliant, articulate,

eloquent, and

incredibly encyclopedic knowledge

on the food system and what is

corrupting it. What is causing the

corruption at FDA,

at USDA,

that the capture of those

agencies by the processed food

industry, by the chemical industry,

by that pharmaceutical industry

that actually on sick children,

one of the things that Carly says,

there is nothing more profitable

in our society in a sick child

because it all of these

entities are making money on them.

The insurance companies, the

hospitals, the medical cartel,

the pharmaceutical companies have a

lifetime annuities.

I mean, any child that and their

earlier that kid is sick.

They don't want to kill them.

I want them sick for the rest of

their lives. And we have now a whole

generation. When my uncle was,

6% of Americans had chronic

disease. They had 60%

when my uncle was president.

You know what the

the, the cause, the annual

cost of treating chronic diseases

was in this country.

Zero.

There weren't even any drugs

invented for it.

Zero.

Today, it's about $4.3 trillion.

When your uncle-

Is President, none of it is

necessary.

What was the autism rate in 1962?

Now, in 1960, the autism

rate was about

four five stories.

And the the the the

highest rates say about 1

in 25, 1 in 1500,

1 in 2500, 1 in

10,000.

oh.

So that, you know, it was it was

somewhere between one 1501,

in 10,000.

Today, it's one in every 34 kids,

according to the CDC.

And in some states, like California,

I think maybe Utah and New Jersey,

one at 22, 1 in

22 kids. And, you know,

these kids should be healthy.

These kids shouldn't be harmed.

Our highest performing kids and

A and Z are,

you know, have this extraordinary

disability that's going to give them

dependance, and

not, you know, a lot of these

if you're full blown autism,

you know, it's a nonverbal, non

toilet trained, headbanging,

stimming, talking.

These are kids that will never, ever

throw a baseball.

They'll never graduate high

school. They'll never go out.

Take a girl on a date.

I'll never use the toilet alone.

They'll never write a play.

They'll never write a poem.

They'll never vote.

Never have children.

Never pay taxes.

Here's something you may not have

known. Back in 2015,

the Congress of the United States

repealed something called the

Country of Origin Labeling

Act. Now, why is this relevant to

you?

Well, it means, among other things,

that when you buy beef at the

supermarket, it says made in the

USA, it may not

actually be.

In fact, it could be likely is

from a foreign country.

It means that repackaging foreign

meat can be enough

to get the made in USA designation.

It's a lie.

It's an absolute lie.

Most people don't even know what's

happening.

So how can you be sure that the meat

you're eating is from the United

States and has been raised with the

highest quality standards, and is

the tastiest.

It's truly made here.

Well, it's simple.

You can go to our friends at

Merriweather Farms.

Merriweather farms is an American

small business that's based in

Riverton, Wyoming.

We know the people run it, and

they're great people and they have

great meat.

They shipped the highest quality

meat, raised free from growth

hormones and antibiotics

directly to your doorstep.

It's delicious. We eat it a lot,

including at this table.

These are Americans.

These are American made products.

And because you're cutting out the

grocery store middlemen, their

prices are actually cheaper.

10 to 30% cheaper for the best

meat. They are the real deal.

Again, we eat that meat at this

table from Riverton, Wyoming.

They're the best. Meriweather

farms.com.

Use the discount code Tucker ten

and you get an extra 10% off.

Again, that's Meriwether Farms

MERS.

I ate

air farms.com.

It's worth it.

So that just seems like such

an emergency for me.

For me? Like, if I could save one

of these kids, it would be worth

giving my life for.

I'm 70 years old.

To save one kid at birth.

It would be worth dying for.

And the opportunity

and it need

are made to save all of these

kids.

I would do anything for.

I would literally do anything for

it.

We are talking breakfast.

I'm sure your perception is

different because we're talking

about you.

But, you know, for 15

years anyway, there was not a single

story about you that didn't

dismiss you as a dangerous crackpot

for questioning why

autism is much more common than it

once was. Much more, I mean,

exponentially more common.

And you've written a lot about this,

and you were attacked.

I don't see those attacks very much

anymore.

Well, they're still in the

mainstream media.

That's still part of the,

you know, the litany of, of

of my crimes.

But, you know, anybody who uses

their any innate and that's one

of the reasons they won't let me

speak on the media.

I mean, when, when Ross

Perot ran, he

he was running for ten months.

He was on mainstream media 34

times. Interviews.

And you remember him?

He was on it seemed like he was on

Larry King every week.

Worse.

But. And I in 16

months, I had to have interviews on

all of those networks ABC, NBC,

CBS, CNN, MSNBC,

two, and

I and the and,

you know, they're just basically

mouthpieces now for the DNC.

And there was this obligatory

litany of defamation and pejorative

that were used to describe me

anytime I mentioned my name was

mentioned, you know, and I was I'm

not a crackpot.

And, you know, it's like a

supervillain.

And I'm not complaining because

that's that's just, you know,

I knew what I was getting into.

But anyway, the idea

had, you know, I had these

meetings with President Trump, and

they were partly because of you,

you know, you were the one who I,

Carly Maines, called me about.

I'd say three hours after

President Trump was shot.

Ally means call, although it doesn't

seem possible because

I think it was only three hours

after the shooting.

And Saturday night.

Yeah. Saturday night.

And and and Kelly

said to me,

you know, he told me he'd call.

He'd been advising me for a long

time.

And my campaign, he

told me that night, I've also been,

I've been advising President

Trump, which

delighted me because I thought, oh,

my gosh, there's another candidate

beside me that is is listening

to the truth.

And, he

said that, that there

was interest in the Trump

campaign by the press and of,

of including me and it

he talked about vice president.

Which I wasn't interested in.

And but he

said, you know, would you be

interested in talking with the

Trump, with President

Trump?

And I said, I don't think so.

And then and part of this was I

just thought it was an onslaught.

It was Cheryl and

I called Cheryl up and she,

said to me,

you should hear them out.

I immediately called Carla.

I texted Carly back and said,

I'm interested.

And then I got a text from you.

Well, then you and I have each other

cell phones.

And you had an unknown cell phone

number, which you would like me

into, which was President Trump's

number. And you said, you know, he's

waiting for your call.

And so I called him and I had a

great conversation with him.

And,

he and he has

we decided to talk.

And I met him the next day.

He was at that point at,

Bedminster, which is, is

golf course and home

in new Jersey.

And he had he driven there from

Butler where he had been shot.

And then I went to,

and so I flew out to many

Minneapolis the next day,

and I had a,

probably a two hour meeting with

him.

And Amaryllis is my daughter in law

who is running my campaign, the

smartest person I've ever met,

and Cheryl and Susie Wiles

and and it was a really

interesting meeting because

he was so open

about.

I'm about, first of all,

not liking the neocons.

Yeah.

And, you know, I never imagined that

because I, you know, for me, he was

the guy who brought John Bolton and

Mike Pompeo into office

and, you know,

but he was,

really, disillusioned

with them, to say the least,

you know?

And then, you know, he was

he was, deeply interested

and and well-informed,

as he is on, you know,

as much as he is on any subject,

about what was happening to our

kids, chronic disease.

And then he was absolutely adamant

about stopping that censorship

and, you know, and making sure

that we had free speech.

And so we talked a little

then and,

didn't really come to any, you

know, talked about the possibility

of working together

after that and that.

But then we we put it

on hold. They wanted me to do

something. I had the convention.

I said, now I'm not going

to do that.

And and we

still at that point, there was still

a chance that I could get into the

debate, although

I chance was diminishing

and because I was not allowed on

any media and

because, you

know, my really my only chance of

winning the election, I believe I

would want to find him on the debate

stage.

And my only chance was again on the

debate stage.

And it was that was that,

possibility was vanishing.

And, so I

was looking at kind of my options.

I then contacted

Harrison's campaign because I

thought I should talk to

them and see if they're interested

in any of these issues, which I

suspect they were not, because

a camera is still an empty,

you know, an empty slate.

Kamala. Excuse me?

It was empty slate.

So, you know, it just.

Pronounced it both ways herself.

So it's okay.

It's it's,

you know, I want to.

I want to respect people

and give them. Yes.

You know,

so.

I reached out to

her and I reached

out through a number of people,

including some relatives of mine,

very, very close

to her personally and at the

Democratic Party.

And they just said, that's a

nonstarter.

There's no way in the world that

she's going to talk to you. And they

said, you can.

We can get you a meeting with a low

level campaign official.

And I said I'm

okay.

I'm not interested in that.

Why wouldn't that's.

That's interesting. Why wouldn't

Kamala Harris meet with you?

Maybe the same reason that she

hasn't given an interview.

And I think it seems to me

that there's a lot of handlers

involved and

that and, you know, even when you

talk to Democrats about,

you know, do you really think it's a

good idea to be electing

somebody who can I give an

interview?

They say, well, you're not electing

or you're electing the people around

here. You're letting the apparatus

and the apparatus, but the

apparatus, apparatus I don't have

any faith in. It's an apparatus

running that are neocons, like,

you know, like

Anthony Blinken and,

and who are, you know, running us

right up into a World War three,

and they're people who, you know,

who masterminded the censorship from

inside the white House.

That's the apparatus

that they want to reelect.

And to me, that's an apparatus

that has no it believes that people

are censoring the people who try to

throw me out of the party who

canceled the primaries.

That's the apparatus.

You know, if it was a Democrat who's

had I can think on my own.

I understand what this country is

supposed to look like, understand

what democracy is supposed to look

like.

And I, you know, and I think that's

great. Great.

Let's do.

That. But it's just it's strange

from her perspective.

First of all, electing apparatus is

not how democracy works.

That's an oligarchy, just in

point of fact.

But as a political calculation,

your presence in the race running

third party hurt Trump.

No one disputes that.

The polling is really clear on that.

So if you're the Harris campaign,

kind of a win, right, to get

some alignment with you,

why even human

curiosity you'd think would compel

her to want to meet with you, like

take a meeting, like, why do you

care?

But she didn't even talk to you.

I think that's I think it's very

weird.

It's weird, but not I mean,

I can't stress that not not

being able to give an interview.

I mean, your

your whole life is in public life.

That's what you do.

That is the.

Currency.

Right? I give, I

give, you know, this day

is a religious holiday because I'm

doing one interview with, you know,

and on a typical day I do about

7 or 8 interviews, some days

10 or 12.

And I do that every day and

every 16 months.

I if anybody else wants

me, I mean, we have less now 4000

people. I interview me, but we're

I'm interviewing as many people

as possible.

So I want to get my voice out, my

vision out, my concerns out.

And I

it's incomprehensible to me,

that you would be

in public life.

And President Trump does the same

thing.

He's not scared of an interview.

No.

He likes to see of on.

Yeah, he's on you.

He said he does.

Anybody he does.

People who don't agree with them.

He's not he's not censoring.

You know he's

doing you know, he's talking to

reporters who write

crappy articles about him all the

time, you know, from,

New York Magazine.

Maggie Haberman at the New York.

Times, New York Maggie Haberman

has never written a nice word about

Donald Trump, and he talks to her.

I often a lot.

Yeah, a lot.

So, you know,

it's an.

You know, my Uncle daddy,

who was exactly

opposite of Ronald Reagan

ideologically.

And he ran against Carter.

Yeah. Daddy, dad and Carter.

And he had an antipathy

toward each other that was almost

like nothing I'd ever seen.

Teddy. Really?

That he didn't hate people, but

he really, I would say, loathed

Carter. He just had.

He had complete disdain for him and

I. And he.

Then why he liked Reagan

and because I was more ideologically

aligned at that point.

I was I'd say, you know, why

do you like Reagan?

And he said, because

even though I don't agree with

anything, he said he was able to

invigorate our country.

He was able to inspire people.

He got people

excited about his vision and proud

to be Americans.

And that is one of the functions

of a president is

to explain to us why

we should be proud of each other,

and why we are part of a community,

and why our country is great.

And you know what

our future is going to look like and

get us and, you know, inspire

all of us with that vision.

And that is what a real leader

does.

How in the world can you do that if

you cannot give an interview

to it, to a news

worker, to a.

Friendly news, or to a.

Friendly news?

It can't even do a set up interview

in 40 days.

I saw the only interview

she did that was unscripted

was when she got off a plane.

I think it was the Andrews Air Force

Base. And and so there

was a reporter waiting there and

that, you know, and one question,

what are you going to do an

interview? She said, I've told my

team that to try to get one done

before September.

This was the 3rd of August.

And I'm doing, I'm doing, you

know, 7 or 8 interviews a day.

Tells you a lot.

And I'm.

And I'm not, you know, blowing

my own horn or anything.

I'm just saying that's what you do

if you're in public life.

And what's the point of being in

public life if you don't want to

promote your vision,

if you have other people?

Yeah.

Well, that I mean, so,

it yeah, I, I'm sure this

is a sense of shock, but I can't

help but notice that you

ran for 15

months with no Secret Service

protection role. You were denied

that by the Biden administration.

Yeah.

Trump during the convention in

Milwaukee last month noted

that in public they immediately

under pressure responding, gave you

Secret Service. Yes.

Now they've withdrawn it.

You're without it again?

Yeah. Is that true?

Yes. Meanwhile, Tony

Fauci has it.

He's not a federal employee anymore.

I think Mike Pompeo has Secret

Service protection.

Former CIA director.

But you don't.

How is that?

I think the,

you know, I'm technically still

running for president.

I'm running for president in 30,

say, 40 states.

So, I'm not

you know, I did not,

I did not terminate my

my campaign.

Did you know.

That? No, I didn't.

Yeah. So, you know, I'm

running in the I

there's there's ten states where I

heard President Trump and they're

battleground states.

Oh, I've taken my name off the

ballot in those ten states.

But in the blue states, all blue

states are red states.

I'm on the ballot.

And I could technically win a

contingency election if the other

two vote, you know, and and

a the other two get

269 apiece.

And, and then Congress

cannot work out a compromise, which

is entirely possible.

They have to go to the third vote

getter, which would be me.

And that's why I left my name on the

ballot in those states.

And so,

you know, that's highly unlikely to

happen, but it has happened

twice before in American history.

And actually and our polling

now shows them at exactly

269 to 269.

Oh, it is possible that it would

happen in this.

So and so.

All right. So and I you know, we

work this out with the Trump

campaign. They only want it off in

ten states.

That's what you heard.

I mean the other states

people can vote for me.

And and they're not going to hurt

their candidate.

They if they can vote for me, even

if they like president Vice

President Harris and without her

hurting her.

And they can vote for me if they

like President Trump without hurting

em, because we already know what's

going to happen in those states.

Yes.

I'm.

So all the more reason that you

should have what Tony Fauci has

and what Mike Pompeo has in a lot

of other, by the way, non-current

federal employees have, which is

government bodyguards, but they

withdrew them immediately from you.

So what's the message of that?

Well, the message, I think is a bad

message, which is

that our of our

federal enforcement agencies have

been weaponized against the American

people.

I mean, again, politically

weaponized politically, not against

the American people, politically.

When my father took

office in the Justice Department,

and my father was appointed

U.S. Attorney general in 1961

by my uncle, his brother

and my father, the first week in

office, he had run my uncle's

campaign. So he was a political guy.

He called together all the division

chairs, all the, branch

chiefs in the DOJ.

And he made it into his big,

cavernous office.

And he said to them, we're going

to make one rule here, which is

there is no politics.

We never ask whether a potential

defendant is Democrat or Republican.

The people of this country have to

know that

they're enforcement institutions,

the Department of Justice, as are,

our are the justices blind?

Here we are,

free of any kind of political

prejudice or Ipob

or bias or

favoritism.

And they started putting in jail.

He prosecuted my uncle on

my mother's side, for

antitrust violations.

And he prosecuted

friends of his friends of his

father's. And father did not want

him to prosecute.

And they just said it doesn't

matter. We've got it.

We've kind of applied it even

handily, because the American people

need to understand

that their institutions are

are free. We need to respect

them and know that they're not

biased in one way.

And we're losing that now in our

country. And the Biden

administration has

really accelerated at the most.

The most shocking thing to me, and

Democrats can't even hear this story

because it touches

so many sort of culture war buttons.

But it's it's a true story.

People, we don't need to understand

it and appreciate it.

In a 2020 election,

when,

when a Hunter Biden's laptop a

week before that

and we only know this, this whole

story.

Recently, because of a release

of documents.

But the one

President Biden's 100

by Biden's laptop suddenly became

an issue about a week before the

debate.

And Anthony Blinken

was now that secretary of state

and who was then the director

of President Biden's campaign,

went to Gina Haspel,

who is the head of this director of

the CIA, and and said to

her, we need help with this.

She then got 51

CIA, current and former

CIA officers

to sign a public letter, which they

published, I think, in The New York

Times. But they published it

somewhere that,

that said that Hunter Biden's laptop

was a Russian hoax.

That was part of a Russian

discernment, disinformation effort

to tamper with the,

with the presidential election

campaign.

So you had the CIA,

which is forbidden by its charter.

From involving itself in

any American politics.

And you had 51 top

officers, former and

current,

who now do a disinformation campaign

against the American public to

tamper with the election while

accusing the Russians of tampering

with the election.

And then a week later,

President Biden, when he's asked

about his laptop on the

debate, he says that has

been debunked by the CIA.

I think you CIA officers.

And that was the end of the issue,

as it was about all the newspapers

picked that up.

And it's highly likely that that

had an impact on the election.

So, you know, we

that was the on tray of President

Biden getting into office.

And again, there's you know,

Democrats who hear me say that story

are going to say, oh, he's just

saying that because, you know, he's

a Republican now right.

Which I'm not. But that's what they

say.

But it's not that.

It's just that this was wrong.

The big tech companies censor our

content.

I hate to tell you that it's still

going on in 2024, but you know what?

They can't censor live

events.

And that's why we are hitting the

road on a full tour

for the entire month of September.

Coast to coast will be in cities

across United States.

We'll be in Phenix with Russell

Brand, Anaheim, California, with Vic

Ramaswamy, Colorado Springs

with Tulsi Gabbard, Salt Lake

City with Glenn Beck, Tulsa,

Oklahoma, with Dan Bongino, Kansas

City with Megan Kelly, Wichita

with Charlie Kirk, Milwaukee, with

Larry Elder Rosenberg, Texas,

with Jesse Kelly, Grand Rapids,

with kid Rock, Hershey,

Pennsylvania, with JD Vance.

Redding, Pennsylvania, with Alex

Jones. Fort Worth, Texas, with

Roseanne Barr.

Greenville, South Carolina, with

Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Sunrise, Florida, with John Rich.

Jacksonville, Florida, with Donald

Trump, Jr.

You can get tickets at Tucker

carlson.com.

Hope to see you there.

And so the CIA, I mean, a lot of

roads lead back, unfortunately,

to our most powerful intelligence

agency would, if you were

asked, would you run it?

Would you become CIA director?

If you were.

Asked, I would never get,

yes, I would, but I would never get

Senate confirmation.

As you know, the intelligence

agency, are protected

by, by very,

very powerful committees in the

Senate and in the House

that are already into the project.

And the people who serve on those

committees are,

are are people who wouldn't,

you know, they would not they they

would. There's a safeguarding that

director. I mean, I would be very,

very dangerous for those,

this committee. So I don't think

that, and yet.

In his, you know,

in your joint, appearance on Friday,

President Trump introduced you by

saying that he plans

to, if elected,

establish a commission to declassify

the remaining documents on your

uncle's murder in 1963.

Yeah.

And I and I think everyone at this

point knows the truth, which is the

CIA is implicated in that.

Those documents protect CIA, maybe

among others.

Well, whether they do or not,

I mean, it's odd that they've not

allowed them to be released,

because.

What could possibly be.

The case more than six years after

my uncle's 65 years,

oh, 62 years after his death,

and none of the people

who were implicated

in that crime are alive now.

Yeah, the last ones have died

off as a year or so

and so

and it clearly is.

And, to protect the institution.

Yes. And that's wrong.

Is is wrong and as wrong

for a Democrat as wrong for

Republic.

It's just interesting, though, that

a bipartisan list

of presidents lo these, these six

decades have kept those

files classified.

Well, you and I have both.

I was astonished that Trump,

didn't declassify him because he

promised during the campaign.

That was Mike Pompeo who did that.

Yeah. And that and that.

I talked to President Trump for the

first time about that this week.

And what do you say?

He said that,

he said that Mike Pompeo

begged him to,

and I don't think I'm telling tales

out school. No, I think they told

the same thing to you.

That's true.

But he said Mike Pompeo had called

him and said this wouldn't be a

catastrophe. To release it, you

need to not do it.

And that and.

I want to say again, I think Mike

Pompeo was a criminal.

So that's my view.

He threatened to sue me for saying

that, but I hope he will, because

it's true.

But that that kind of tells the

whole story right there, right?

That the CIA.

Is. Oh, yeah.

So that's why would the CIA be

trying to keep these files

classified if they had nothing to do

with the murder? I don't really get

that.

Yeah. And the subject we were

talking about was the weaponization

of federal agency, and that's just

one of them. And then

then they get, you know,

then they open up these censorship

portals. The 37 hours

after President Biden takes office,

where how are you of the FBI

involved in American politics?

And, you know, which, we ran them

out in the 60s, you know, because

we were outraged that they were even

or bugging Martin Luther King

in the Black Panther Party.

And Americans were indignant

about that.

Why are they think there's I mean,

why have we gotten to the

point where it's so normalized and

now we're okay with the FBI

running a portal to censor

political speech our country and

then inviting him, the CIA and

say, I and the IRS,

I don't know what they were doing in

there.

And I h and, you know, CDC

and all these other agencies,

DHS,

which all had a hand in censoring

American speech.

So that was another thing.

And then the

use, you know, which we saw

for the first time in American

history of the, of

the judiciary, to,

to to get rid of candidates,

you know, what they tried to do to

me? They're suing me now, and I and

a dozen states I've,

I've been in trials for the past

three weeks.

You know, I've spent most of my time

not campaigning,

but being a sitting in court,

in cases that are trying to get me

off the ballot. So, like, well, I

had a million people, a

million American citizens

sign petitions,

more than any candidate in history.

Everybody said, I'd never do this.

The impossible would be in the

ballot in $0.50.

Well, guess what we got on the

ballot in 50 states,

and we did it by getting a

million citizens

to sign a petition saying that they

wanted to vote for me.

And the Democratic Party now

is suing me. And although stage,

to make sure that those people

cannot vote for the person they

wanted. When I was growing up, the

Democratic Party, oh,

well, RFK and

JFK was the

party that was fighting for voting

rights. It was.

Heading to make sure that every

American could vote

for the candidate of their choice,

no matter whether you're black or

white, or whether they lived a

Democrat. Republican.

Now the Democratic Party, today's

Democratic Party,

feels so unconfident

about the candidates that it's

putting forward,

and it feels the only way it can win

the election is by getting

rid of the opponents.

And, and, you know, either using

the courts against President Trump

to lock him in jail and

embarrass and humiliate and

discredit him, or

using the courts against me

to, just to throw me off

the ballot. Even though

the voters in New York said

I had to get 45,000

ballot signatures and

13 congressional districts, I

got, I got

137,000

and all,

26 congressional districts.

I did twice what anybody wants.

And we did it easy because people

wanted to see him on the ballot.

New Yorkers wanted to see me on the

ballot.

Why is the Democratic Party suing

me in frivolous cases?

What? And a whole week in in

a trial for that case,

for two cases they brought and

another week in another trial or

another.

Can you to pay for this?

It's causing me $10 million

to defend myself.

But on what grounds are they suing

you like you don't?

They don't like you. So you don't

have a right to be on the ballot or

what?

What where in New York State

are suing me

by they they can't challenge

our signatures because we got five

times as many signatures as we

required. So, you know, normally

what they were doing in the first

place or taking

out the signatures and they were

calling everybody,

they can get their numbers and they

can get their, you know, cell

phones, etc.

and we're contacting everybody in

the segment and trying to talk them

out of it, trying to say, get them

to say, you know, you're hurting

democracy.

And, you know, you should, you know,

weren't you fooled when you did as

to try to, they they never

succeeded.

Oh, they're they're in New York

State.

They're suing me because they

say that I did not.

I don't live in New York State.

I don't I have

three residences.

One is in New York, one

is in my home in Massachusetts,

which, you know, is part of my

family compound that we've on for,

you know, 100

years and,

and, and in

California, where I live,

which I also I moved to Charlotte,

California in

2014.

So ten years ago

an I lived in New York all my

life. I lived there since I was ten.

My father ran for Senate there and

was the senator.

I moved there when I was ten.

I've only voted in New York.

I've always considered myself a New

York resident. I've lived in the

same town

for 40 years in Bedford.

I've lived in 13 different residents

in that town at various times.

And but I always wanted to stay

there. And when I moved out west

with Cheryl,

I made an agreement with her

that, you know, when she retires,

I'm back to New York because I feel

like I'm a New Yorker.

I didn't I didn't want to vote in

California because I don't know

anything about the politics of.

I was raised in New York.

I know all the politics, all the

politicians.

And so I wanted to vote.

I kept an address there.

I voted that address.

That's my only place I've ever

voted.

I my car is registered

there, my driver's license is

there, my

law office is there.

I pay income tax almost

all my entire income taxes from

New York State.

My all licenses there.

I don't have a law license in

California.

And, my hunting license

is there, my fishing license.

Most importantly, I-

Falconry license there.

So I have all my birds

there. You know, I keep them there.

And so, you know, there's

telling me saying I'm not a real New

Yorker. I'm, I'm, you know,

I can drive the address out

of fraud and it's a sham.

And, here's

the thing is, and

I consulted a lawyer when I, when

we declared independent, began

getting ballot signatures, I consult

the best ballot access attorney

in the country, Paul Rossi.

And I said, I get these three

different residences.

Which one do I put on the ballot?

You have to put the same residents

in all 50 states.

So you can't choose another

resident. You know you can't.

I can't put California in one state

and Massachusetts and others in New

York. I have to tell the people.

Otherwise I'm lying to somebody,

right? Right.

So in a couple of states,

for example, Maine, where we are

right now, and

in New Hampshire, those states

say the only place you can put down

is your domicile is the place where

you vote.

And in New Hampshire, I actually

had to take an oath

in front of a notary

that I voted in New York

because otherwise I could not put it

down.

So I had to put New York in

every state, because I had to put it

in Maine and New Hampshire and a

bunch of others, because you have to

put the place you vote.

Anyway, the DNC is suing me,

saying I defrauded the public

because I really live in California.

And they got a, you know, they

got a judge who is,

you know, right out of the

Democratic machine

and who violated the Constitution

and every president

to say, yeah, they're right.

So, you know, I lodged in the lower

court, which is what happens.

We're doing that we're losing in

these lower courts. And then we

within the appeals, there's a 100%

chance of winning the appeal.

But they don't care because

it's going to take me a while.

And they got the headlines and he

was thrown off for fraud.

So these I mean, I saw Kamala

Harris just the other night, and her

convention speech, talk about how

voting access is like a.

I know

that I was in court in New

York, you

know, trying to get on a ballot

while she.

Well, that are the tired

the judge.

The John Lewis voting access Act

we're going to get through.

Everybody has a right to vote.

Yeah.

It's not except for their opponents.

So does this.

It feels to me like this is,

you know, obviously it's a big

political story. You're endorsing

Trump. It's a big, big change

in your life as a lifelong Democrat,

still a Democrat.

But, it also feels

like, as you said at the outset.

I'm an independent Out.so,

I registered as an independent when

I ran. And when I talk with

President Trump, the

you know, the thing that we talked

about is that,

you know, we were going to do a

unity government,

with the independent,

not not the kind of endorsement that

a lot of people make

on an endorsement, like

Abraham Lincoln's team of rivals,

where we would be able to continue

to differ publicly on issues,

but that we would on the issues

that we agree on, that

we were going to strive to get into

government together in order to make

sure that those issues are,

you know, or, you know, are the

priority for our country.

And, you know, he was really good

about that and about, you know, me

being able to continue on.

There's some issues.

There's a lot of issues like the

border where we agree and,

you know, censorship, the wars,

the neo cons that, you know, forever

wars, child

health epidemics, those are the most

important issues.

There's other issues that I and I'm

going to disagree on with President

Trump. But he was happy with that.

And that's how our country ought to

be. We ought to be able to.

So what is this realignment that you

mentioned at the outset?

Because this does feel like

it's bigger than just this November?

Yeah, I mean, there's been a series

of these realignments

throughout American history.

And, you know, there there's history

books that are written about, you

know, the the realignment of I

think there's about five of them.

And, and

I one of those is clearly happening

now because you,

you see, on so

many issues, you know, the

he you've had an inversion.

The Democratic Party has become the

party of the elites,

used to be the party, the poor and

the working class.

In fact, there was a study

that came out just recently that I,

saw that showed

that 70% that the people

who voted for Biden on 70%

of the wealth in this country, the

people voted for Trump on 30%.

And, and so.

I believe.

That. Right.

So you're seeing this realignment

happened where the elites where

Wall Street or the big tech,

big pharma,

the big banking houses are all

now democratic,

and that the,

and that the working class, the

middle class, the cops, the

firefighters, Sean

O'Brien out of the Teamsters union.

You know, this guy had just that

great guy, great, great guy.

Really love him.

But he he spoke at the Democratic

convention, I mean, the Republican

convention, rather the Democratic

convention. So you're

seeing this just this bigger

alignment and even on environmental

issues, it's so

weird to me because

the Democrats have become subsumed

in this carbon orthodox in you.

And I have talked about this,

that the only issue is carbon.

And what that's.

One is, it's forced them to do

something that you should never do.

If you're an environmentalist,

which is to commoditize and quantify

everything. So everything is

measured by its carbon footprint,

how many tonnes of carbon it

produces. And,

you know, you're basically,

you're, you're putting everything in

that kind of

box of of being able to

quantify it and explain its value

by, you know, by a

numerically.

And the reason that we protect the

environment is just the opposite of

that. The reason that we protect the

environment is because there's a

spiritual connection.

There's a, you know,

there's a love that we have we

you know, I got into the environment

because I

wanted, you know, this connection

to the fishes and the birds and the

wildlife and, and the whales

and,

and the purple mountains, Majesty.

And that, you know, I understood

that the way, you know, God

talks to human beings.

There are many factors through each

other, through organized religion,

through the great prophets or the

wise people, the great books

of those religion and nowhere

with the kind of detail on

texture and grace and joy

as through creation.

And when we destroy nature,

we diminish our capacity to sense

the divine, understand

who God is and what our own

potential is and duties

are as human beings.

And that I hope what you

just said, by the way, is chopped up

and put all over every social media

platform in the world.

When we destroy nature, we degrade

our own ability to experience

the divine.

Yeah. And that that, you know,

it's not about quantifying stuff.

That's what the devil does.

He quantifies everything.

Right? And that is, you know, what

he wants us doing with a number

on it.

And the reason we're preserving

these things is not is

because we love our children,

you know, and it's because

we we get nature

enriches us rich as economically

and spiritually and culturally and

historically.

It connects us to those 10,000

generations of human beings that

were here before there were laptops.

And, you know, and it connects us

that the most important

spiritual asset of everything,

every all

of the organized religions

in, you know, that that we know

of today, the central

revelation of every one of those

religions always occurred in the

wilderness.

You know, Moses had to go into that

wilderness to, to

to listen, to hear God's voice

and see the burning bush.

He had to go to the wilderness at

Mount Sinai

to get the commandments.

Muhammad had to he was a city boy

from Mecca, had to go to the

wilderness and Mount Harar on a

camping trip with its kids

and wrestle the angel Gabriel in the

middle of the night. Have the first

stanzas of the series

of the Koran squeeze from an

Buddha had to go into the wilderness

to sit under the, you know, and

wander for years, and then sit

under the buddy guy a tree

to get his first revelation of

nirvana.

And Christ had to spend 40

days. And I want this

to discover its divinity for the

first time.

And his mentor was John the Baptist,

who lived in a cave in the Jordan

Valley, a honey of

wild bees and locusts and,

you know, and then all of Christ's

parables come from nature.

I'm the vine. You are the branch

mustard seed, the little swallows,

the scattering seeds on the ground,

because that is where we center the

divine. God talks to us through

the fishes, the birds, the leaves.

They're all, you know, words from

our creator.

And that is why we preserve

nature. Yes.

It's not because of that,

you know. It's not because that

you know the quantity of carbon.

And by the way.

I feel what you said so deeply, I

can hardly even express it.

And thank you for saying that.

And by the way, we,

the best thing that you can do for

climate is to restore

the soils.

The soils are the solution.

Everything.

The soil will absorb all that

carmine. If you know if

and it'll absorb the water, it'll

stop the flooding.

It'll give us healthy food.

And that's what our national policy

has to be. It has to be restoring

the soil. And that is, you know,

everybody listen.

If you talk, if you want to unite

America and

talk about these things, talk about

the fishes, the bird, the wildlife,

and talk about ending

mountaintop removal mining,

talk about ending that mountain

cutting, talk about

getting rid of, you know, the

Democrats are putting these

these offshore wind

farms that are exterminating

the whales. I know most of us got

into this because of the whales,

and they're about to extinguish the

right whales, the last

ones on Earth

with these monstrous.

And he just that, you know that our

cost has three times the amount.

We don't need them.

It costs $0.33 a kilowatt

hour when you can get an onshore

wind for $0.10 a kilowatt hour.

And who's making the money?

Goldman Sachs, Blackrock,

foreign governments.

And the other thing that they're

funding hundreds of billions of

dollars. This is what they're

calling. This is what climate has

turned into is these

climate capture pipelines

and are wreaking havoc with the

agricultural lands across the

Midwest, stealing people's property

rights with, you know, eminent

domain and who's

making the money?

Blackrock. And it's a useless

technology that does not work.

It's just all a boondoggle.

And that's what's become the

environmental movement in this

country. And if you depart from that

orthodoxy, you're expelled from it.

If you if you want to make

Americans fight each other,

talk about carbon.

If you want to bring Americans

together, talk about habitat

protection.

Yeah, nature.

And, you know, it's.

A little weird.

I mean, you literally spent your

life Riverkeeper as an

environmentalist, environmental

lawyer in the environmental

movement. I mean, that that's the

that's that's your life work

product.

All right. Have you been expelled

from the movement?

Pretty much.

Yeah.

You know, the weird thing is I think

of you as a radical

environmentalist.

Well, I definitely am.

Yeah.

You are.

I haven't showered inside in ten

years. Yeah, yeah. No, I feel it so

strongly.

Also, you know, you love nature.

You're against these big projects

that are destroying it.

And, you know, you you

talked about toxics and the American

environmental movement no longer

talks about toxics anymore.

They don't care about it.

I don't care that we're mass

poisoning our children.

It's so weird to me.

And a.

And, you know, I saw you,

I for for

40 years I've been fighting

to get against

crime disruptors.

And disruptors are a class

of chemicals that

can they alter us

hormonally and they change

our.

I can change sexual conduct.

I can change,

sexual development.

They can affect, fertility.

And we've already lost 50% of our

sperm count.

You know, we're having, girls

in this country that are achieving

puberty, on average, between 10 and

13 years old. That's six years

less younger

than they were, you know, 80

years ago.

We we we have the lowest

puberty levels on any continent

in the world here because we're

just bombarding our children with

crying disruptors.

And, and, you know, they're,

they're chemicals like

he Seabees.

I like chlorinated IV and also

atrazine, which can turn

male frogs into

females and produce

fertile eggs.

That's how potent they are

as an underground disruptor.

And it's in 63% of our water

supply,

PCBs, which I've been fighting

since the day I became an

environmental lawyer and getting

them out of the Hudson.

So. And and for 40

years, I've been trying to get

Republicans to talk about it.

I talk with Roger Ailes all

the time of both of us now.

oh.

Who would let me occasionally on to

Fox News to talk about it.

But there was so much hostility from

the Republican Party because it was

like, you're attacking corporate

profit taking.

And these are chemicals.

They're they're molecules.

Who cares? You know, they can't hurt

you.

And that was just.

And then you do this incredible

show on anti-crime disruptors.

And I'm like, oh my God, Tucker

Carlson. And just on the best

show that's ever been done

showing, you know, what's happening

with underground disruptors, how

they're just destroying us.

And the Democrats went after

you and the environmental movement.

And I'm like, what?

You know, we've been trying to get

for 40 years, Republicans

care about these issues.

And they said, oh, he's saying that

chemicals turn people gay and

he's anti-gay and all this stuff.

And that wasn't what you said at

all. And that's not what anybody

said.

And what what we're saying is

we're we're destroying our children.

That's what we're saying.

Yeah. And God's creation, which is

not ours to history.

Your description of why we

protect nature and its role in

our lives, and what happens when

you're cut off from nature and

animals. But yeah, being part

of nature is the best I've ever

heard. Ever.

And I think, you know, I mean it.

And when that,

you know, when it becomes a matter

of quantifying things for profit,

then that kind of corrupts the whole

enterprise. So where do

you my last question, what happens

now? You had this kind of amazing

announcement with Donald Trump on

Friday. It's now Monday.

I think it was just three days ago.

How do you spend from here until

Election Day?

I'm going to work to get him

elected.

And, and, you know, I'm working

with the campaign.

We're working on policy issues

together.

I will, I've been

asked to go on the transition team,

and, you know, to help pick the

people who will be running

the government.

And, I'm,

I'm looking forward to that.

And I, you know, I'm I'm going

to fight.

I don't know what would happen to me

if we lose.

Well, that's that was that's kind of

I mean, a lot of people I know

personally and I'm friends with have

gone to prison. One of them is in

prison right now, Pavel Durov.

There are others,

like, what happens if he loses

to you?

If, you mean if.

Trump loses and Kamala Harris

becomes.

Oh, I don't know.

But I mean, listen, I know I

don't I never

really think about that.

I want to I think it's good, but

I think it's okay.

Here's what I to do today.

And, you know, get up every day and

say reporting for duty, sir.

And then go do that.

And, you know, nothing's

a crisis. Everything's a task.

Right. And,

and so that's what I'm going to be

kind of a happy warrior and, you

know, I'm, I,

I know what I have to do is I'm

going to do it.

Robert F Kennedy junior.

Thank you.

That was really. That was a

blessing. I appreciate it.

Thank you.

To watch the rest unlock our entire

vast library of content.

You can visit TuckerCarlson.com

and activate your membership today

in the name of free speech.

We hope you will.