Rakyat Gelar Aksi Besar Besar Kepung Gedung DPR - [Metro Pagi Primetime]

Summary

Indonesian citizens from various professions and social elements gathered in front of the House of Representatives (DPR) building to protest against the revision of the Regional Election Law without considering the Constitutional Court's decision. This 'Emergency Alert Indonesia' movement, reflecting public outrage, took place in several cities and on social media, with images of a blue Garuda bird and the hashtag #KawalPutusanMK. The public demanded adherence to the court's ruling, and representatives from the DPR faced rejection when they attempted to meet with protesters, citing an unsupportive situation and the fear of provocateurs. The delay in the plenary session was seen by some as a tactic to reduce public tension while others viewed it as a disregard for democratic principles.

Takeaways

• 😡 The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) decided not to endorse a revision to the Regional Election Law, which had been maneuvered by the DPR itself, causing public outrage.
• 📢 Pro-democracy activists from various professions and social elements gathered to protest in front of the DPR building, demanding adherence to the Constitutional Court's ruling on regional elections.
• 📣 The public's voice, represented by a large-scale demonstration, showed the people's stern opposition to the DPR's disregard for the Constitutional Court's decision.
• 🚨 The 'Emergency Warning Movement of Indonesia' took place not only in Jakarta but also in various cities, reflecting a nationwide concern over the potential undermining of democracy.
• 🎭 Actors and comedians joined the protests, expressing their rejection of the revision of the Regional Election Law and calling for the respect of democracy.
• 🚦 Traffic congestion was caused by the protests, but the protesters believed that democracy should not be 'stuck' for the next five years, emphasizing the importance of following the Constitutional Court's ruling.
• 👥 Representatives from the DPR, including the chairman and members of the committee, attempted to meet with the protesters but were met with strong rejection and even had bottles thrown at their vehicles.
• 📝 The deputy speaker of the DPR confirmed that the plenary session was postponed, indicating that the DPR was following the rules, as the quorum was not met.
• 🏛 The postponement of the plenary session was seen by some as a tactic by the DPR to reduce public tension and manage the ongoing protests against the revision of the Regional Election Law.
• 🤔 Activist and political analyst Madani questioned the delay, suggesting it might be a strategy to wear down the protesters and then quietly pass the revision without public scrutiny.
• 👮‍♂️ In Semarang, police had to use tear gas against students protesting in front of the Regional Legislative Council building, indicating escalating tensions.

Q & A

What was the main reason for the public protest in front of the DPR building?

The public protest was mainly due to the dissatisfaction with the maneuvering of the DPR to revise the Regional Election Law without referring to the Constitutional Court's ruling, which was seen as a threat to democratic principles and justice.

What did the protesters demand regarding the Regional Election Law revision?

The protesters demanded that the DPR should not rush the revision of the Regional Election Law within less than 24 hours and should respect the Constitutional Court's ruling.

How did the public express their opposition to the revision of the Regional Election Law?

The public expressed their opposition by gathering in large numbers in front of the DPR building, holding a mass action, and using social media to spread awareness with images and hashtags supporting the Constitutional Court's decision.

What was the response of the DPR representatives when they met with the protesters?

The DPR representatives, including the chairman of the committee, faced strong rejection from the protesters and even had bottles thrown at their vehicles. Eventually, they decided to withdraw due to the non-conducive situation and the fear of provocateurs.

What was the outcome of the DPR's plenary session regarding the Regional Election Law revision?

The plenary session was postponed, and there was no approval of the Regional Election Law revision on that day. It was stated that if the revision is not approved by the plenary session until August 27, 2024, the DPR would follow the Constitutional Court's decision.

What did the Deputy Speaker of the DPR, Ahmad Baidowi, indicate regarding the plenary session?

Ahmad Baidowi indicated that the postponement of the plenary session was a sign that the DPR was following the rules, and if the revision of the Regional Election Law is not approved by the plenary session, the DPR would abide by the Constitutional Court's decision.

What was the political analyst Madani's view on the postponement of the plenary session?

Madani considered the postponement as a tactic by the DPR to reduce public tension and to make the student movement and the public appear tired of the current practices, possibly aiming to quietly pass the revision later.

What happened in Semarang in relation to the Regional Election Law revision?

In Semarang, there was a clash in front of the Regional House of Representatives building, where the police had to use tear gas against students who were protesting the revision of the Regional Election Law.

What did the legal expert Arif MT say about the DPR's ignoring of the Constitutional Court's decision?

Arif MT emphasized that there was no valid reason for the DPR to ignore the Constitutional Court's decision and that it was merely an excuse for the DPR's arrogance and disregard for the law.

What was the general sentiment among the protesters and legal experts regarding the actions of the DPR?

The general sentiment was one of disappointment and concern, with the protesters and legal experts calling for the DPR to respect the law and the Constitutional Court's decision, and to avoid unethical political maneuvers that undermine democracy.

What was the call to action for the public and the representatives from the activists and legal experts?

The call to action was for the public to continue demanding accountability from their representatives, for the representatives to uphold the principles of democracy and justice, and for an end to the unethical political maneuvers that threaten the nation's democratic foundations.