LS | Tejasvi Surya’s Remarks | Special discussion on 'Operation Sindoor' | 28 July, 2025

Summary

In this compelling address, the speaker highlights India's military and diplomatic successes under the leadership of Narendra Modi, contrasting them with the Congress Party's historical stance on defense and terrorism. The speaker condemns the Congress Party's weakening of India’s armed forces and their repeal of anti-terrorism laws, emphasizing the importance of indigenous defense programs like Tejas. The address also critiques Congress for allegedly surrendering India's interests in foreign policy, using examples from past conflicts, and calls for India to stand independently on the global stage. The speech underscores the new normal of India’s defense posture—strong, independent, and resolute.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses condolences for those martyred in the Pahalgam attack, particularly the victims from Karnataka and his parliamentary constituency.
• 😀 The speaker highlights Operation Sindoor as a landmark military success by India, showcasing advanced warfare technologies like drones, precision missiles, and electronic warfare.
• 😀 India’s military action in Operation Sindoor is portrayed as precise, non-escalatory, and devastating, breaking the long-standing pattern of no cost for Pakistan’s misadventures.
• 😀 The speaker contrasts India's 2014 leadership’s approach to military success with past instances where military gains were surrendered at the diplomatic table, citing examples from 1948, 1965, and 1971.
• 😀 The diplomatic efforts during Operation Sindoor are celebrated, with emphasis on how countries like the US have now designated groups like TRF as terrorist organizations, showing global support for India.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the Congress Party’s historical stance on military readiness, citing Nehru’s initial opposition to a strong military and how Congress weakened India’s armed forces over the decades.
• 😀 The speaker references the deliberate weakening of India’s defense systems, citing the issues faced by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and the success of Make in India initiatives under Modi.
• 😀 The speaker accuses Congress of undermining defense projects like the Rafale deal and Tejas aircraft acquisition, which were crucial for India’s military strength.
• 😀 The Congress Party’s decision to repeal the POTA act in 2004 is criticized, arguing that it led to an increase in terrorism and civilian casualties, while the Modi government strengthened anti-terror laws.
• 😀 The speaker points to the strategic importance of removing Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, which led to a significant decline in terrorist attacks, framing it as a success of the current government.
• 😀 The speaker draws a stark contrast between Congress’s history of seeking foreign intervention (like in the 1965 ceasefire) and the BJP’s current stance of defending India’s interests independently, especially in military and foreign policy matters.

Q & A

What was the main announcement made at the beginning of the speech?

The main announcement was regarding dinner arrangements for the Honorable Minister and Members of Parliament in the MP Dining on the first floor of the Parliament House, with lunch available after 8:00 pm.

What tragic event does the speaker express condolences for?

The speaker expresses condolences for those who were martyred in the Pahalgam attack, including three individuals from Karnataka and two from the speaker's parliamentary constituency.

What was Operation Sindoor and why was it significant?

Operation Sindoor was a military action led by the Indian Army that demonstrated India's capability to neutralize terrorists wherever they are, particularly in Pakistan. It showcased India's new-generation warfare techniques using advanced technology like drones and precision missiles.

What key point does the speaker make about India's military success compared to past events?

The speaker highlights that, unlike past instances where military success was squandered through diplomatic negotiations (such as in 1948, 1965, and 1971), the military achievement from Operation Sindoor was reinforced through successful diplomacy led by India's government.

How does the speaker describe the Congress party's stance on national security?

The speaker criticizes the Congress party for weakening India’s national security, citing historical examples such as Pandit Nehru's policy of not needing a strong army and the Congress government's actions to weaken border infrastructure and defense projects.

What role did the United States play in supporting India’s stance on terrorism?

The speaker mentions that the United States designated the TRF (The Resistance Front) as a terrorist organization after India's diplomatic intervention, showcasing India's strengthened global standing on counterterrorism.

What is the speaker's critique of Congress regarding anti-terror legislation?

The speaker criticizes Congress for repealing the POTA (Prevention of Terrorism Act) after coming to power in 2004, arguing that this decision led to an increase in terrorist attacks and weakened the country’s counterterrorism efforts.

What evidence does the speaker provide to support the claim that terrorism became routine under the Congress-led UPA government?

The speaker provides a detailed list of terrorist attacks that occurred between 2004 and 2014, citing more than 8,000 civilian deaths during this period, arguing that the Congress party's repeal of POTA led to such increased violence.

What changes in Jammu and Kashmir does the speaker attribute to the current government?

The speaker credits the current government, under Narendra Modi, with reducing terrorist attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, particularly after the removal of Article 370, which was seen as a key factor in restoring peace to the region.

How does the speaker differentiate the actions of the Congress party from those of the current government?

The speaker differentiates the actions of the Congress party by pointing out that under Congress, India accepted external pressure (like from the Soviet Union in 1965), while under Modi’s leadership, India has stood firm and responded independently, especially in military and foreign policy matters.