The Death of Russia
Summary
TLDREl script explora las complejas razones detrás de la invasión de Rusia a Ucrania en 2022, argumentando que más allá de la figura de Vladimir Putin, factores geográficos, demográficos y económicos son clave. Rusia enfrenta un futuro incierto por su extensión continental difícil de gestionar, escasez de infraestructuras, problemas demográficos y una economía altamente dependiente de los hidrocarburos. La guerra se presenta como un intento fallido de resolver crisis internas y posiblemente el inicio del fin para la nación rusa, dejando en evidencia la vulnerabilidad de un enfoque histórico basado en la cantidad de territorio y población.
Takeaways
- 🌏 La invasión de Ucrania por parte de Rusia en 2022 es vista como un intento desesperado de Rusia por mantener su poder antes de su inminente colapso.
- 👤 Se sugiere que la figura de Vladimir Putin es solo una parte de la historia, y que las decisiones de Rusia como nación juegan un papel más amplio en el conflicto.
- 📉 Rusia enfrenta un futuro incierto debido a su demografía en declive, con una tasa de natalidad insuficiente para mantenerse y una alta tasa de mortalidad, especialmente entre hombres jóvenes.
- 🏔 La geografía de Rusia, con su extensión continental y difíciles condiciones climáticas, presenta desafíos significativos para la conectividad y la defensa del territorio.
- 🛣 La falta de infraestructuras de transporte eficientes y la dependencia de rutas marítimas bloqueadas o inaccesibles agravan los problemas económicos y logísticos de Rusia.
- 🏭 La economía de Rusia se ha convertido en una economía petrolera, dependiente en gran medida de la exportación de petróleo y gas natural a Europa, lo que la hace vulnerable a las sanciones y a la disminución de la demanda.
- 👥 La población de Rusia es multiétnica y se enfrenta a una crisis demográfica, lo que podría llevar a una fractura de la unidad nacional y a la independencia de regiones.
- 💥 La historia de Rusia está marcada por la opresión y el abuso del pueblo ruso por parte de sus líderes, lo que ha llevado a una estructura social similar a una horda.
- 🔄 La industrialización forzada durante la era soviética, aunque aumentó la esperanza de vida, también aceleró el colapso demográfico y la dependencia de la economía petrolera.
- 🚫 La dependencia de Rusia de su sector energético y la falta de diversificación económica podrían conducir a un colapso económico en las próximas décadas.
- ⚔ La guerra en Ucrania se presenta como un intento fallido de Rusia por recuperar su poder y territorio, lo que podría tener consecuencias catastróficas para la estabilidad regional y global.
Q & A
¿Qué evento desencadenó el conflicto que cambió la Europa moderna y el mundo en febrero de 2022?
-La invasión de Ucrania por parte de Rusia, iniciada por Vladimir Putin, fue el evento que cambió la Europa moderna y el mundo en febrero de 2022.
¿Quién es considerado el rostro de la agresión rusa contra un estado soberano?
-Vladimir Putin es considerado el rostro de la agresión rusa contra Ucrania, un estado soberano.
¿Cuál es la visión más amplia del conflicto más allá de la figura de Putin?
-La visión más amplia del conflicto incluye factores como la geografía, la demografía y la economía de Rusia, que contribuyeron a la decisión de invadir Ucrania.
¿Por qué se considera que Rusia como nación podría desaparecer en aproximadamente 20 años?
-Se considera que Rusia podría desaparecer en aproximadamente 20 años debido a crisis existenciales como la falta de un número suficiente de habitantes para mantener su crecimiento y la falta de una economía diversificada.
¿Cómo afecta la geografía de Rusia a su capacidad para desarrollar infraestructuras y cadenas de suministro a nivel nacional?
-La geografía de Rusia, con más de la mitad del territorio inhabitable y difícil de conectar, hace que sea complicado desarrollar infraestructuras y cadenas de suministro a nivel nacional.
¿Por qué la estrategia histórica de Rusia durante las guerras ha sido una política de tierra quemada?
-La política de tierra quemada se ha utilizado históricamente por Rusia debido a su extensa geografía; si los invasores se desmoronan antes de conquistar todo el país, esta estrategia suele ser efectiva.
¿Cómo ha cambiado la estrategia de expansión de Rusia en las recientes décadas?
-En las recientes décadas, Rusia ha perdido parte de su zona occidental, lo que la ha llevado a estar más expuesta y en contacto directo con la OTAN, una organización creada específicamente para contrarrestar el poder ruso.
¿Por qué la geografía de Rusia y la falta de buenas vías navegables internas representa un desafío económico para el país?
-La falta de vías navegables internas y la geografía desfavorable dificultan el transporte de bienes a bajo costo y confiable, lo que representa un desafío económico para Rusia.
¿Cómo se relaciona la crisis demográfica de Rusia con su capacidad para mantener su poderío y estabilidad?
-La crisis demográfica de Rusia, caracterizada por una baja tasa de natalidad y una alta tasa de mortalidad, amenaza con debilitar su poderío y estabilidad, ya que hay menos personas para mantener la economía y la seguridad del país.
¿Cómo se describe la industrialización repentina de Rusia bajo órdenes soviéticas y sus efectos en la sociedad?
-La industrialización repentina de Rusia bajo órdenes soviéticas, que incluyó forzar a la población a vivir en pequeñas viviendas y trabajar en fábricas improvisadas, inició una crisis demográfica pero también aumentó la esperanza de vida, lo que llevó a un aumento en la población de la URSS.
¿Qué papel han jugado las exportaciones de petróleo y gas natural de Rusia en su economía actual?
-Las exportaciones de petróleo y gas natural son fundamentales en la economía actual de Rusia, representando más de la mitad de su perfil económico, y son esenciales para su rol como proveedor de energía a Europa.
¿Cómo podría afectar la guerra en Ucrania a la estrategia económica de Rusia basada en la exportación de recursos naturales?
-La guerra en Ucrania, junto con las sanciones occidentales, podría tener efectos devastadores en la estrategia económica de Rusia basada en la exportación de recursos naturales, ya que estaría en riesgo su capacidad para suministrar a sus principales clientes europeos.
¿Qué alternativas podría considerar Rusia si se siente empujada a una esquina en términos de poder y supervivencia?
-Si Rusia se siente empujada a una esquina en términos de poder y supervivencia, podría considerar la opción de utilizar su arsenal nuclear, aunque esto sería una garantía de respuesta en cadena y la muerte del país.
¿Qué implicancias podría tener la guerra en Ucrania para el futuro político y social de Rusia?
-La guerra en Ucrania podría conducir a un colapso de Rusia, con la posibilidad de que surjan regiones independientes controladas por diferentes grupos étnicos o naciones, y un cambio drástico en su gobierno y estructura social.
Outlines
🌏 La Invasión de Rusia a Ucrania y sus Consecuencias
Este párrafo explora las razones detrás de la invasión de Ucrania por parte de Rusia en 2022, argumentando que más allá de la figura de Vladimir Putin, existen factores geográficos, demográficos y económicos que contribuyeron a la decisión de invadir. Se sugiere que la guerra es un intento desesperado de Rusia por mantener su poder antes de su inminente desaparición como nación en aproximadamente 20 años. Se discuten las desventajas geográficas de Rusia, su difícil conectividad y la invasibilidad de su territorio, así como la dependencia económica en los recursos naturales y la falta de infraestructura interna para el transporte de bienes.
👥 Demografía y Género en la Crítica de la Invasión
El párrafo toca en la perspectiva de que la decisión de invadir Ucrania no es solo política sino también una cuestión de supervivencia para la nación rusa. Se menciona la afirmación de Boris Johnson de que Putin no invadiría si fuera mujer, lo que resalta la crítica de género en el análisis de la situación. Además, se discute la diversidad étnica dentro de Rusia y cómo la falta de una conexión natural y la industrialización forzada han llevado a una crisis demográfica, con una tasa de natalidad insuficiente y una tasa de mortalidad elevada, particularmente entre los hombres rusos.
🏭 La Industrialización Forzosa y sus Efectos en Rusia
Este segmento examina la industrialización repentina de Rusia bajo el régimen soviético y cómo esto generó un colapso demográfico. Se describe cómo la estrategia de 'horda' utilizada por el gobierno ruso a lo largo de los siglos, basada en el uso de la cantidad de personas como un recurso, ha definido a Rusia hasta la guerra actual. Se argumenta que la industrialización rápida y la falta de un enfoque en la calidad en la producción han llevado a una dependencia en el sector energético, particularmente en el petróleo y el gas, lo que ha hecho a Rusia vulnerable a las sanciones occidentales y a la disminución de la demanda europea.
💥 El Futuro Incierto de Rusia y sus Opciones
El último párrafo reflexiona sobre el futuro de Rusia y las posibles consecuencias de su invasión a Ucrania. Se sugiere que la guerra ha sido un fracaso y representa el inicio del fin para Rusia, ya que no ha logrado sus objetivos y ha exacerbado sus problemas demográficos y económicos. Se plantea la posibilidad de que Rusia recurra al uso de armas nucleares como una opción desesperada si se siente empujada a una esquina, lo que garantizaría su propia destrucción. Finalmente, se cuestiona quién podría ser el próximo objetivo de Rusia en su lucha por mantener el poder.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Invasion de Rusia a Ucrania
💡Vladimir Putin
💡Geopolitítica
💡Demografía
💡Economía
💡Estrategia de defensa
💡NATO
💡Crisis demográfica
💡Petróleo y gas natural
💡Estrategia de supervivencia
Highlights
Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 marked a significant shift in modern Europe and global politics.
Vladimir Putin is often seen as the primary instigator of the war, but the situation is more complex, involving numerous factors and players.
Boris Johnson's comment suggests that if Putin were a woman, the invasion might not have occurred, drawing parallels to Catherine the Great's expansionist policies.
The speaker argues that Russia's existential crisis, including a predicted cultural and societal decline within 20 years, is a key motivator for the invasion.
Russia's vast geography, while seemingly advantageous, presents significant challenges in terms of habitability and infrastructure.
The country's flat terrain has historically made it vulnerable to invasions, leading to a defensive strategy of retreating into the expansive land.
Recent geopolitical shifts have seen former buffer zones between Russia and the West become part of NATO, heightening Russian concerns over security.
Russia's lack of internal waterways and difficult sea routes hinder its economic potential and trade connectivity.
The speaker posits that Russia's historical strategy of treating its people as a horde to ensure national security has shaped its governance since the 1300s.
Demographic issues in Russia, including a low birth rate and high mortality rate among men, threaten the country's long-term stability.
Russia's rapid industrialization under Soviet rule led to a demographic crisis, with a focus on quantity over quality of life.
The speaker suggests that Russia's historical strength was due to its large population, but this advantage is now diminishing.
Post-Soviet Russia's economy has become heavily reliant on petroleum exports, making it vulnerable to external economic pressures.
The invasion of Ukraine is presented as a last-ditch effort by Russia to reclaim its power and address its demographic and economic challenges.
The speaker warns that if Russia feels cornered, it might resort to using its vast nuclear arsenal, which would have catastrophic global consequences.
The war in Ukraine is seen as an admission by Russia of its impending collapse and a desperate attempt to retain power.
The speaker concludes by highlighting the uncertainty and fear of Russia's future actions as it grapples with its decline.
Transcripts
in february of 2022 russia decided to
invade ukraine and started a war which
has changed modern europe and the world
who caused this war vladimir putin of
course or was it sure putin certainly
triggered this war isn't evil human and
is the face of russian aggression
against a sovereign state but that's not
the full picture we love to put a face
onto complex issues facing literally
millions of individual players and
people boris johnson even said putin
would not have invaded if he was a woman
something which catherine the great
would cry about in her grave also having
invaded crimea if we were to write a
list of reasons why russia invaded
ukraine many people would put putin as
number one but i would say that number
one is the fact that russia as a nation
as a culture as a society will no longer
exist in around 20 years or so and this
is a last-ditch effort to keep russia in
any sort of power before it's too late
what
russia has always existed in our modern
world we can't have a world without it
well it might seem like russia is big
and mighty and scary but when you look
at the details of what makes russia
russia some flaws start to show and some
existential crises are on the horizon
i'll show you how russian politicians
didn't decide to invade ukraine but how
russian geography demographics and
economics made it invade and yet the
country will still fail i mean the war
has already been a disaster for russia
instead of steamrolling tiny old ukraine
they actually put up a good fight
cementing russia's future as a dead
nation killing its expert-led economy
with sanctions and weakening the
demographic and geographic weaknesses it
already had this war is the beginning of
the end for russia this is the death of
russia
how can i be so bold to claim this i
mean let's look at russia it's
absolutely massive russia is by far the
largest country on earth stretching from
europe to china as a continent-sized
country they have so much land to
develop for themselves yes and no no as
in more than half of russia looks like
this and is pretty much impossible to
live in only having small pockets of
civilization wherever there is oil or
minerals to be mined that leaves all of
this land uninhabited but yes as in
there's still a lot of actually
habitable land to the south and west of
russia here it is forested it is flat
and it is empty it is so hard to connect
any country-wide infrastructure supply
chains together let alone to any
consumers who want russian goods and
part of being a flat country is just
naturally getting invaded all the time
the russians have been invaded so many
times and have not been able to defend
themselves with their land that their
main strategy and wars has been a
scorched earth policy basically burn
everything down and retreat into your
ever expansive land it generally works
because the russians have so much land
that the invaders break down before they
take the whole country the other
strategy to keep the russian corps safe
was to expand until they hit any natural
or military barriers it took them across
northern asia to the pacific hitting
these seas and these mountains and into
the northern european plain into these
forests around modern-day poland to
romania but in recent years they lost
this western part and are now back here
and what used to be part of them are now
part of nato an organization which was
specifically made to counter russian
power what used to be their natural
buffer zone between the west and russian
corps was now the west touching the
russian core sure it's likely they won't
attack russia right now but what if
things change nato has many many
different ways to invade russia and take
moscow if they wanted to something which
is everything against their historical
strategy as we'll see and we're not done
with the awful russian geography yet
they have another major enemy the water
transporting goods on land is fine and
all but it's expensive to set up and
maintain especially when your country
takes up a whole continent transporting
goods by water is cheap easy and
reliable the most successful countries
in history are those that have internal
waterways or mastered the ocean russia
doesn't have any water okay that's an
exaggeration of course they touch seas
and have rivers but they're pretty much
useless the pacific seas are so far away
from the russian core over land that it
gets rid of the advantage water even had
and its baltic and black sea routes are
blocked to get out of the black sea
russia needs to bypass crimea the
turkish straits the greek aegean sea and
then depending on the route either the
suez canal and babel mandeb or italy and
the spanish slash british moroccan
straight at gibraltar that's a lot of
friends they need to make that they
don't have right now to get out of the
baltic sea they need to pass finland the
three baltic brothers sweden poland
germany denmark the uk and maybe france
norway and the netherlands these are
less friends they need to make and more
countries that absolutely despise russia
after centuries of living together and
would block the route in a heartbeat
okay fine russia won't use his ports how
about its rivers still no most major
rivers flow north to the arctic ocean
which is a little too cold to sail boats
in the ones that don't flow there like
the volga flow to the caspian sea which
can't be escaped from
then some rivers flow to the black and
baltic seas which run into the same
problems as the ports there and almost
all rivers in russia freeze anyways
water has never been a strong suit
that's a major reason why they wanted
crimea first out of any ukrainian
invasion it lets them have a hope of
naval power so to get anything done in
russia with his open flat land and its
land transportation-based population and
economy the russian governments always
treated the russian people like hordes
keep that in mind the horde-like
structure that the government has always
used has defined modern russia since the
1300s up until this very war low density
from low connectivity and awful weather
conditions meant russia's population was
always small and focused on sustenance
agriculture russia never naturally
industrialized but when they suddenly
were forced to it created another crisis
something which invading another country
will not fix
the russian people have a much greater
problem than their geography their
people no i swear it's not a racist
thing it's a numbers thing they don't
have enough people to keep russia safe
or growing first of all many people
don't realize how multi-ethnic russia is
only about three-quarters of russia is
even russian if things get bad i'm sure
the other quarter in the caucasus or
step or out in the boonies of siberia
wouldn't mind some extra autonomy from
moscow especially with the lack of
waterways connections and very low
population density but along with those
fringes who could split off russia also
does not have enough russians see back
in the ussr the government maybe kind of
forced everyone into a tiny apartment
and made them get to work it
kick-started industrialization but
everyone now lives in a tiny box instead
of on a huge farm they have less kids
the faster you industrialize the faster
people stop having kids and the faster
the eventual collapse russia bolted and
industrialized in about 15 years under
soviet orders the russian birth rate
right now is around 1.5 kids for every
women below the 2.1 needed to maintain
replacement levels this means that
russia is losing people every death in
russia is a forever death if you like to
be cynical the main places in russia
actually gaining people are those away
from the court which happened to be
those of different ethnicities like the
tatars and the chechnyans along with
that a soviet history of not exactly the
nicest conditions for political freedom
or food security killed many russians
and the brutality of the world wars
cemented its eventual demographic crisis
you can trace the events of russian
history on its population pyramid quite
nicely
here are the world wars the famine in
between them soviet stagnation
perestroika basically liberalizing the
country and then the collapse of the
union the bulge down here is an echo of
their baby boom here you can see how
many females are up here with no male
counterpart a product of the world wars
and alcohol russian men whether through
alcoholism suicide or crime and opioid
usage after government breakdown from
the ussr's collapse are likely to die
before 60 years old during the 2000s
young men in russia were six times more
likely to die than young men in iraq
during american occupation and that was
during russian peace and prosperity
the russian people are quite literally
drinking themselves to death so a
shrinking birth rate and growing death
rate which crossed after the soviet
union fell meant that russia's
population has been in decline since the
90s this is before kovitt killed an
extra 800 000 to a million russians and
the war in ukraine is killing the
remaining young men this is russia's
last chance that it has a young male
population and a middle-aged population
for that matter too but it's unlikely a
war would fix that so if there is a
demographic crisis on their way where
the russians are aging out of any
consumption or expert-led economy and
their geography means that they are
always paranoid of an attack how did
they even get so powerful in the first
place weren't they always doomed from
the start
russia both was and was not meant to be
a great power the whole weak geography
and modern demographic things are a
drake to the current russia but
throughout history they didn't have this
demographic collapse to worry about in
fact they had a growing population for
the most part and as just a physically
big chunk of land they had a lot of
people compared to other feudal european
kingdoms modern russia was made by the
tragedy and horrors of the mongol
conquests in northern asia the russian
people then essentially traded
prosperity for security in numbers to
fight out any other invaders and there
were a lot living in the step and all
from this the russian rulers always
treated the russian people badly more as
a group of numbers to throw at their
problems it was like a pack animal
strategy some will die in any invasion
but the ones on the inside will survive
like a horde but since the russian
people lived too far away from one
another they could never industrialize
focusing on impoverished farming until
they got a wake-up call too actually
first was the russo-japanese war in
which a supposedly inferior asian nation
absolutely wiped the floor with russia
and second was world war one the
russians were under-equipped had no
industry and lacked any supply chains or
coherent transportation methods their
strategy of just throwing people at
fronts and moving forward on flatland
broke in world war one when the front
didn't move and it ended with millions
of russians dying in the trenches the
war was brutal and it's no surprise
russia pulled out of it having a
revolution and then a civil war now
turning communist and collectivist no
surprise that a community driven united
in grief horde-like population would be
the first one ever to try out a
communist government the forced
industrialization by shoving people into
small apartments and makeshift factories
which would make osha cry kickstarted
demographic collapse but it also made
life expectancy rise causing more people
to live in the ussr than ever before
this is what made russia rise to power
it simply had a ton of people but the
whole communist stick still didn't
change the surf-like conditions but the
leaders couldn't keep the population
poor forever they needed something for
themselves to get rich so quotas were
made based on numbers not value and
extra production was taken it made
people cut a lot of corners farmers
stopped growing grain because their
extra profit was not going to themselves
mass famines ensued steel workers often
made their plates too small or too thins
to meet the number quotas soviet
equipment failed as a result there is no
coherent supply chain or communication
that failed equipment took a long time
to be made soviet cars planes tractors
buildings rockets and military equipment
were all made by cutting corners and
they all suck no offense to feed this
industrialization they took from the
farmers which led to you guessed it
famine and if you complained you guessed
it you got a free trip to siberia and
then world war ii happened and oh boy it
was a killer literally the throwing
people at germans and scorched earth
policies killed over 15 percent of the
entire country mainly civilians the
horrors of the soviet union and before
led to this high death rate and low
birth rate but there is hope in the 60s
when the ussr became a major producer of
oil and gas leading to more people
leading to them realizing life sucks
leading to perestroika the leaders
easing up a bit on the stringency of the
soviet union turns out if you give the
people a little bit of freedom they want
the full thing and the soviet bloc
crumbled in the early 90s including
itself good for the people maybe bad for
the whole pack animal strategy after
1991 russia was in free fall their
geopolitical strategy just broke the cut
in state spending aka collapse of all
government services and drug problems
led to a death rate that would kill the
nation in 50 years and russians were
leaving in droves especially educated
ones not only that but their buffer
states turned into their enemies joining
nato and the eu i guess that's what
happens when you treat them like your
own pawns
keep in mind this safety and number
strategy has kept the russians together
since the 1300s and it all ended in 1991
it was how russia was born in the first
place it didn't matter if you didn't
have natural defenses you had numbers it
didn't matter if you didn't have
industry you had numbers but this
strategy also killed its birth rate and
after those buffer states vanished and
the population literally halved after
1991 from the soviets collapsed there
was a crisis without this strategy would
there even be a russia the answer is no
and the ukraine war was a last-ditch
attempt to fix that
after 1991 there was chaos
hyperinflation corruption and oligarchs
taking over russia economically their
industry crashed after the collapse of
the soviet union but their energy sector
didn't it didn't take long for a new
russia one under vladimir putin to find
its new economic purpose in 1999 the
answer two words or i guess one word
petrostate russia is a key expert of
many crucial materials sure minerals
ores food fertilizer blah blah blah but
there is nothing quite like their
petroleum oil and natural gas exports
they account for over half of their
whole profile then ores and then metals
they love digging stuff up in their
massive territory and shipping it
outwards but shipping is not easy
especially with no water
so they use thousands of kilometer long
pipes to supply their oil to mainly
europe their pipes being mainly built in
the soviet era and where the west and
east blocks met this means their pipes
pretty much don't go past germany and
the former yugoslavia but it also means
these places with huge manufacturing
capacity get an easy source of energy
now while this might seem great for the
russians as they're essentially trapping
europe especially germany become their
sole supplier of energy and they do love
natural resource-based threats it might
be more of a trap for the russians see
russia has almost no internal demand due
to their boomer age demographic
structure but europe is also aging out
of demand too but before that russia is
aging out of an export-led middle-aged
demographic not only that but this is
pretty much all russia has they've
become a one-trick pony of an oil and
metal supplier to europe they are
extremely vulnerable to i don't know
western sanctions or any drop in
european demand or germany booting up
coal based energy again
this export-oriented natural
resource-based economy works better than
the industrial command-driven economy
until there is any slight disruption
among their energy supply lines any one
pipeline getting blown up would have
great effects on russia any slight
disruption with turkey or greece or
denmark or any of the other 20 countries
would have grave effects on their oil
that actually goes by sea so once again
demographics have screwed russia over
only having around 10 to 20 years left
before not just demographic collapse but
economic collapse and i think it was
abroad a little early after massive
sanctions on all things russia the one
advantage the country has going into an
economic collapse or a world in which
trade outside of russia is greatly
reduced is that russia at least has
enough food and enough fuel to keep
itself running the rest of the country
will suffer though
so if russia has a weak land a
demographic crisis and a breakdown of
the strategy that made russia russian
why is invading ukraine the answer kind
of access to more people although they
would need to control a country of 45
million hard tasks kind of to getting
more land and sea lanes back they do
want that sweet sweet buffer and human
meat shield and kind of getting some
industry back ukraine is an agricultural
powerhouse russia wouldn't mind that
their economy has been in free fall
since 1991 and its new strategy of
becoming a petroc exporter to europe
will fail within a decade or two
their population was destroyed from
years of soviet abuse and even if they
restored their borders they would still
have a demographic collapse to get its
power old economy and honestly its pride
back russia wants its old borders of
course since all these states are now
nato and eu-affiliated ukraine was the
best choice i mean what russia saw when
they looked at ukraine was a flat weak
disorganized divided country and to be
fair to russia it was all of those
things ukraine was only supposed to be
the start of years of war getting their
old borders back ukraine was the test
ground and it failed badly for the
russians the war is a stalemate
signifying that russia is already done
this is the final nail in their coffin
american and european strategists could
go home and cheer that oh my god russia
can't even take over ukraine but then
the next day they'll come back terrified
and sad that oh my god russia can't even
take over ukraine if this is really a
war of russian survival then there's
another much scarier option they can use
the n-word no not that n-word nukes the
russians have the largest nuclear
arsenal on earth if the russians really
feel backed into a corner trying to hold
on to any russian power nukes definitely
are not out of the question it's their
final option but if they do use it they
are guaranteeing the death of russia
anyways after they will be nuked
countlessly in retaliation a new russia
after this crisis could have an
independent step caucuses siberia
chinese japanese controlled regions or
muslim controlled regions or new
government i don't know the details what
i do know is by declaring this war in
ukraine russia has all but admitted that
they know russia is going to collapse
and they will do anything to stay in
power no matter the consequences the
beginning of the end of russia is here
but they are still here to stay for a
couple of decades as an increasingly
panicked russia tries to keep power a
scary question for border countries
comes up the question isn't are the
russians going to swing at someone to
stay in power they've already done that
the question is who else will the
russians swing at
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)