Pele dan Keadilan Sang Hakim

Summary

In a small village in Indonesia, a poor farmer named Mudasir stands trial for allegedly stealing a cow from the wealthy Haji Sulaiman. The courtroom is filled with spectators as both men claim ownership. Mudasir asserts that the cow, named Pelé, is his, having raised it since it was a calf. During a unique field examination, the cow responds only to Mudasir, leading the judge to question the reliability of human testimonies. Ultimately, the court finds Mudasir not guilty, emphasizing the bond between him and the animal, which serves as a poignant commentary on justice and truth.

Takeaways

• 😀 Mudasir, a poor farmer, is accused of stealing a cow owned by businessman Haji Sulaiman.
• ⚖️ The courtroom is crowded with spectators eager to witness the trial proceedings.
• 🐄 Both Mudasir and Haji Sulaiman claim ownership of the cow, leading to conflicting testimonies.
• 👨‍⚖️ Mudasir argues he did not steal the cow, asserting it is his pet named 'Pele'.
• 🌱 Mudasir explains he received the cow as aid from the livestock department four years ago.
• 🔍 The trial features an on-site investigation where the cow is called to determine recognition.
• 👂 The cow responds to Mudasir's call, suggesting a bond between them that supports his claim.
• 📜 The judges deliberate, emphasizing the reliability of animal behavior over human testimonies.
• ✅ The court concludes that the prosecution failed to prove Mudasir's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
• 🎉 Mudasir is found not guilty, and the cow is ordered to be returned to him along with the restoration of his rights.

Q & A

What crime is Mudasir accused of?

Mudasir is accused of stealing a cow from Haji Sulaiman, a livestock businessman.

What is Mudasir's defense regarding the ownership of the cow?

Mudasir claims that the cow, which he named 'Pele,' is his and that he raised it from a calf, asserting that he did not steal it.

What evidence does Mudasir provide to support his claim?

Mudasir explains that he has been caring for the cow since it was a calf, and he points out its distinctive characteristics, such as its size and color.

How do the witnesses contribute to the trial?

Witnesses testify that they saw Mudasir taking the cow from Haji Sulaiman's farm, complicating Mudasir's defense.

What unusual method does the judge use to determine the cow's ownership?

The judge orders a site inspection where both Mudasir and the witnesses are asked to call the cow to see which one it responds to.

What happens when Mudasir calls the cow?

When Mudasir calls out 'Pele,' the cow approaches him, suggesting a bond that supports his claim of ownership.

What is the final verdict of the court?

The court finds Mudasir not guilty, stating that while humans can lie, animals cannot, thus supporting Mudasir's claim.

What rationale does the court provide for its decision?

The court emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between humans and animals, concluding that Mudasir's bond with the cow lends credibility to his defense.

What happens to the cow after the verdict?

The cow is ordered to be returned to Mudasir, and he is absolved of any wrongdoing.

What themes are highlighted in this court case?

Themes of justice, truth, the bond between humans and animals, and the complexities of ownership are prevalent throughout the case.