Film Pendek "Keadilan Sang Hakim"

Humas Mahkamah Agung RI

3 Jan 202318:31

Summary

TLDRIn a small coastal village in Aceh, Indonesia, a poor farmer named Mudasir is accused of stealing a calf. The courtroom is tense as both Mudasir and a wealthy rancher, Haji Sulaiman, claim ownership of the calf. As the trial unfolds, the judge decides to conduct an on-site inspection, where the calf's behavior reveals its true owner. The court eventually clears Mudasir of all charges, ruling in his favor, demonstrating the deep bond between man and animal that cannot be fabricated.

Takeaways

⚖️ A poor farmer named Mudasir from western Indonesia is accused of stealing a cow, sparking a trial to determine justice.
🐄 Mudasir claims the cow he took belongs to him and not Haji Sulaiman, a livestock businessman who also claims ownership.
👨‍⚖️ The courtroom is crowded with spectators eager to see the outcome of this theft case involving a cow.
🕵️‍♂️ Witnesses testify that Mudasir took the cow from Haji Sulaiman's farm, but Mudasir insists he didn't steal it.
⚽ Mudasir named the cow 'Pele' after his favorite Brazilian football player, stating he raised it from birth.
🐾 The judge decides to conduct an on-site inspection to observe the cow's reaction to both parties calling it.
🚶‍♂️ When Mudasir calls the cow, it immediately approaches him, reinforcing his claim of ownership.
🧑‍⚖️ After observing the cow's behavior, the judges believe Mudasir's story over the other witnesses.
🙅‍♂️ The court rules that Mudasir is not guilty, as there is insufficient evidence to prove he stole the cow.
✅ The judges conclude that the cow's natural instinct proves Mudasir's ownership, leading to his acquittal and the return of the cow.

Q & A

What is the central conflict in the story?
-The central conflict revolves around a legal dispute over the ownership of a cow between Mudasir, a poor farmer, and Haji Sulaiman, a wealthy livestock entrepreneur. Both parties claim ownership of the cow, leading to a court case.
Why does Mudasir believe the cow belongs to him?
-Mudasir believes the cow belongs to him because he raised it from a young age, naming it 'Pele' after his favorite Brazilian soccer player. He claims to have received the cow as a calf from the livestock department four years ago and has taken care of it ever since.
What evidence does Mudasir provide to support his claim of ownership?
-Mudasir claims that the cow's large size, wide ears, and brown skin are distinguishing features that prove it is his. He also mentions that he has been taking care of the cow since it was a calf.
How does the court attempt to resolve the ownership dispute?
-The court decides to conduct an on-site inspection where both Mudasir and Haji Sulaiman are asked to call the cow in their usual manner. The cow's response to Mudasir's call, moving towards him, is used as evidence of his ownership.
What conclusion does the court reach regarding the ownership of the cow?
-The court concludes that Mudasir is the rightful owner of the cow. This decision is based on the cow's natural response to Mudasir during the on-site inspection, indicating a long-term bond between them.
What is the significance of the cow's reaction to Mudasir during the inspection?
-The cow's reaction is significant because it demonstrates a natural bond and familiarity with Mudasir, suggesting that he has indeed been caring for the cow for a long time. The court uses this behavior as key evidence to support Mudasir's claim.
Why does the court emphasize that a cow cannot lie?
-The court emphasizes that a cow cannot lie to highlight that the animal's natural behavior and response to its caregiver is genuine and unmanipulated, unlike human testimonies, which could be false or influenced.
What are the implications of the court's decision for Mudasir?
-As a result of the court's decision, Mudasir is declared not guilty of theft, his rights are restored, and the cow is returned to him. The case also reinforces his dignity and standing in the community.
How does the court justify its decision to compare human testimony with the behavior of an animal?
-The court justifies this comparison by stating that while humans can lie, especially under pressure, an animal's natural behavior cannot be easily manipulated. The relationship between the animal and its owner is based on long-term care and trust, which cannot be forged quickly.
What lesson does the court case convey about the justice system?
-The case highlights the importance of seeking the truth in the justice system, even if it requires unconventional methods. It shows that justice should be based on careful consideration of all evidence, including natural behavior, to ensure a fair and just outcome.

Outlines

00:00

🐄 A Farmer's Struggle for Justice

In the westernmost part of Indonesia, a poor farmer named Mudasir stands accused of stealing a cow. The courtroom is packed as people eagerly await the trial’s proceedings. Mudasir and a wealthy livestock entrepreneur, Haji Sulaiman, both claim ownership of the cow. Witnesses testify against Mudasir, stating that they saw him taking the cow from Haji Sulaiman’s farm. Mudasir admits to taking the cow but insists it is his, explaining that he has named it Pele, after his favorite Brazilian football player. However, he struggles to provide concrete proof that the cow is his, as its physical traits are common among many cows.

05:01

🧑‍⚖️ The Court's Dilemma

The trial continues as the judge and the jury probe deeper into the case. Mudasir reveals that four years ago, he received a calf from the local livestock department, which he has since raised and cared for. He recounts how the cow went missing one day, only to be found near Haji Sulaiman's farm, leading him to take it back. The prosecution challenges Mudasir's claims, but he remains steadfast in his story. The court decides to visit the location to inspect the cow and gather more evidence, heightening the tension in the case.

10:03

🐮 The Unlikely Testimony

The judges, after deliberating, agree that a cow cannot lie, unlike humans who may have motives to deceive. They reflect on the previous day’s inspection, where the cow, upon being called by Mudasir, responded by moving towards him, confirming his bond with the animal. This behavior sways the judges, leading them to trust Mudasir’s testimony over that of the other witnesses. The judges decide to stand by their belief in Mudasir’s innocence, showing that sometimes, the truth can be found in the most unexpected ways.

15:04

⚖️ Verdict of Innocence

In a final judgment, the court declares Mudasir innocent, stating that the cow’s response proved his ownership. The court concludes that the bond between Mudasir and the cow was formed over years and could not be fabricated. Since the theft accusation was not substantiated, the charges are dismissed. The court orders the return of the cow to Mudasir and restores his rights and dignity, also imposing the court costs on the state. The judgment emphasizes the importance of truth, justice, and the connection between humans and animals.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Mudasir

Mudasir is the main character in the video, a poor farmer accused of stealing a cow. His identity as a struggling farmer forms the core of the narrative, emphasizing themes of justice and truth. Mudasir's claim of ownership over the cow, which he names Pele, is central to the conflict in the story.

💡Haji Sulaiman

Haji Sulaiman is the antagonist in the video, a wealthy livestock businessman who also claims ownership of the cow in question. His accusation against Mudasir raises issues of power dynamics and social inequality. The contrast between Sulaiman's wealth and Mudasir's poverty highlights the stakes of the trial.

💡Justice

Justice is a central theme in the video, explored through the courtroom trial where Mudasir is accused of theft. The trial, which includes unusual methods like asking the cow to choose its owner, reflects the quest for fairness and truth in a legal system that must weigh human testimony against natural instinct.

💡Pele

Pele is the name Mudasir gives to the cow he claims to have raised from a calf. The cow's name, inspired by the famous Brazilian soccer player, symbolizes Mudasir's personal attachment to the animal. The name becomes a point of contention in proving ownership, as it reflects Mudasir's familiarity and care for the cow.

💡Courtroom

The courtroom is the setting for much of the video's drama, where Mudasir and Haji Sulaiman present their cases. The proceedings, which include witness testimonies and the judge's decision to inspect the cow on-site, demonstrate the legal process and the challenges of determining the truth in complex situations.

💡Witness Testimony

Witness testimony plays a crucial role in the trial, as various individuals testify about the events surrounding the cow's alleged theft. The reliability of these testimonies is questioned, highlighting the difficulties in discerning truth when human perspectives are involved.

💡Animal Instinct

Animal instinct is a key concept in the video, particularly in the judge's decision to let the cow choose between Mudasir and Haji Sulaiman. The cow's natural behavior, which leads it to approach Mudasir, is used as evidence of its true ownership, underscoring the idea that animals cannot lie.

💡Verdict

The verdict is the judge's final decision in the trial, where Mudasir is found not guilty based on the cow's reaction and the lack of conclusive evidence against him. The verdict restores Mudasir's rights and returns the cow to him, symbolizing the triumph of truth and justice.

💡Social Inequality

Social inequality is a theme explored through the contrast between Mudasir, a poor farmer, and Haji Sulaiman, a wealthy businessman. The trial highlights the power imbalance in their conflict and raises questions about the fairness of the legal system in protecting the rights of the less privileged.

💡Truth

Truth is a central concept in the video, with the trial representing a search for the real owner of the cow. The judge's unconventional methods, including relying on the cow's instinct, emphasize the complexity of uncovering truth in legal disputes, especially when human testimony is conflicting.

Highlights

A poor farmer named Mudasir is accused of stealing a cow, leading to a court trial in Aceh, Indonesia.

Mudasir claims that the cow he took belongs to him and was not stolen from Haji Sulaiman.

The courtroom is packed with visitors eager to watch the proceedings of this theft case.

Mudasir describes the cow as having a large body, wide ears, and brown fur, which are common traits for many cows.

Mudasir names his cow Pele, inspired by the famous Brazilian soccer player, showing his personal attachment to the animal.

During the trial, it's revealed that Mudasir received a calf from the animal husbandry department four years ago.

Mudasir explains how he has been raising and caring for the cow since it was a calf, implying a strong bond.

The presiding judge decides to conduct a site visit to observe the cow's behavior to determine its true owner.

At the site visit, the cow immediately responds to Mudasir's call, indicating its familiarity with him.

The judge and jury are convinced by the cow's response that Mudasir is the rightful owner.

The judge acknowledges that while humans can lie, an animal's instincts are more trustworthy in this case.

The court rules that Mudasir is not guilty, stating that one of the essential elements of theft—ownership—was not proven.

The judge orders the return of the cow and the rope used as evidence to Mudasir, confirming his ownership.

The court also orders that all legal costs be borne by the state, given Mudasir's acquittal.

The ruling emphasizes the relationship between a human and an animal, which cannot be easily fabricated or created in a short time.