HERE'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TRY TO RUN A SCAM ON A JUDGE

Summary

In a court dispute, Stacy Allen sues Canarsie Optical for not receiving sunglasses worth $2,259, claiming the store credits she was given are invalid. The optical store owner refutes the claim, presenting evidence of Allen's history of buying designer sunglasses and her use of Care Credit for purchases. The judge finds inconsistencies in Allen's story and her alleged addiction to sunglasses, ultimately ruling in favor of the defense, calling the case a 'big fraud.'

Takeaways

• 😀 Stacy Allen has been a loyal customer of Canarsie Optical for several years, frequently purchasing designer sunglasses.
• 😐 Stacy had two store credits from Canarsie Optical due to returned glasses, which she claims were not to her liking.
• 🤔 The store credits were handwritten on receipts, which raised questions about their legitimacy in the court setting.
• 👓 Stacy returned a pair of Gucci glasses due to discomfort and received a 400 credit, which she claims was not properly documented.
• 💳 Stacy applied for Care Credit, a financing option, and was approved for a $3,500 credit line, which she used to purchase more sunglasses.
• 🛍️ Stacy purchased Versace, Christian Dior, and Roberto Cavalli sunglasses, totaling $1,159, using a combination of her store credits and Care Credit.
• 🤷‍♀️ Stacy claimed she never received the sunglasses she paid for, which was the basis of her lawsuit against Canarsie Optical.
• 🤔 The court questioned why Stacy would sue for store credits if they had already been used, indicating a potential discrepancy in her claims.
• 👶 Stacy mentioned having a baby as a reason for financial hardship, but the timing of her claims and the fact she was known to frequently purchase sunglasses raised suspicion.
• 🏠 The court also questioned Stacy's eligibility for Medicaid, given her spending habits on luxury sunglasses.
• 📋 Documentation, such as credit card statements and receipts, were presented as evidence, but inconsistencies in Stacy's claims led to a verdict for the defense.
• 🚫 Stacy admitted to having an addiction to sunglasses, which she learned was a problem through this experience.

Q & A

What is the main issue in the lawsuit between Stacy Allen and Canarsie Optical?

The main issue is that Stacy Allen claims she never received sunglasses worth $2,259 that she paid for, and she wants her money returned.

How long has Stacy been a customer of Canarsie Optical?

Stacy has been dealing with Canarsie Optical for about three to four years, starting from around 2004 or 2005.

What type of sunglasses does Stacy usually purchase from Canarsie Optical?

Stacy usually purchases designer name brand sunglasses, such as Roberto Cavalli's and Christian Dior's.

What is the problem with the 'store credits' Stacy claims to have?

The problem is that the store credits are handwritten on the back of receipts and do not follow the standard procedure for issuing store credits, which raises questions about their validity.

How does Stacy explain the discrepancy in the amount written on the receipts as store credits?

Stacy claims that the amounts written as store credits represent returns of glasses she did not like, such as a pair of Gucci glasses that were too heavy for her.

What is the significance of the Care Credit program mentioned in the script?

The Care Credit program is a financing option for vision and dental services that Stacy applied for and was approved for, which she used to purchase additional sunglasses.

Why does the judge question Stacy's financial situation given her use of Medicaid?

The judge is concerned because Stacy's application for Care Credit indicated she made $18,000 net and owned a home, yet she also has Medicaid, which is typically for low-income individuals.

What is the defense's argument regarding Stacy's claims of not receiving the sunglasses?

The defense argues that Stacy's claims do not make sense because she would not have paid for the glasses if she had valid store credits, and she is accused of doctoring evidence.

What is the outcome of the lawsuit as presented in the script?

The judge rules in favor of the defense, stating that the case presented by Stacy was a fraud and that her claims did not add up.

How does Stacy describe her addiction to sunglasses?

Stacy admits to having an addiction to sunglasses, which was fueled by the salesman showing her designer glasses and her desire to keep buying them.

What lesson does Stacy claim to have learned from this experience?

Stacy says she has learned her lesson the hard way, implying that she will be more cautious and not fall for such sales tactics in the future.