Theories of Emotion
Summary
TLDRThis script delves into the complexities of emotions, distinguishing them from feelings and moods. It outlines the physiological, cognitive, and behavioral components of emotions, referencing Charles Darwin's work on universal expressions. The summary also explores various theories, including the common-sense view, James-Lange theory, Cannon-Bard theory, and Schacter-Singer two-factor theory, examining how stimuli, physiological arousal, and cognition interplay to produce emotional experiences.
Takeaways
- 🧠 Emotions, feelings, and moods are distinct: Emotions are immediate responses to stimuli, feelings are the subjective experience of these emotions, and moods are longer-lasting states without a specific trigger.
- 🌟 Emotions have three components: physiological arousal, cognitive experience, and behavioral expressions, which are observable to others.
- 📚 Charles Darwin's work highlighted that similar emotional expressions are shared across members of a species, suggesting a genetic basis for emotional expressions.
- 🤔 The common-sense view posits that a stimulus leads to an emotion, which then causes physiological arousal, but this view has been challenged.
- 🔄 James-Lange Theory suggests that physiological arousal leads to the experience of emotion, but this theory faces criticism due to inconsistencies and exceptions.
- 🏗️ Cannon-Bard Theory proposes that emotional experience and physiological arousal occur independently and simultaneously, without one causing the other.
- 🤓 Schachter-Singer Two-Factor Theory introduces cognition as a mediator between physiological arousal and the experience of emotion, emphasizing the role of interpretation.
- 🔑 Cognition plays a crucial role in determining the specific emotion felt, as the same physiological arousal can be interpreted differently based on the situation.
- 🔍 Evidence suggests that physiological feedback is not always necessary for emotion, as seen in patients with spinal cord injuries who still experience emotions.
- 🔄 The relationship between physiological arousal and emotion is complex, with some theories suggesting causality and others proposing independence or mediation.
- 🌐 The script explores various theories of emotion, illustrating the ongoing scientific debate and the complexity of understanding emotional responses.
Q & A
What is the difference between emotions, feelings, and moods as described in the script?
-Emotions are immediate and specific responses to internal or external events. Feelings are the subjective experience of these emotions, such as saying 'I feel angry.' Moods, on the other hand, are diffuse, longer-lasting emotional states without a clear identifiable trigger.
What are the three components of an emotion as outlined in the script?
-The three components of an emotion are physiological, cognitive, and behavioral. Physiological involves bodily arousal, cognitive is the conscious experience of emotion, and behavioral involves expressions that others can observe.
What did Charles Darwin argue about emotional expressions in his 1872 book?
-Charles Darwin argued that particular emotional responses tend to accompany the same emotional states in all members of a species, suggesting that the expression of emotion is genetically determined and has evolved over time.
What is the common-sense view of how emotions work?
-The common-sense view posits that a stimulus leads to an emotion, which in turn prompts bodily arousal, such as increased heart rate or sweating.
How do the James-Lange theory and the Cannon-Bard theory differ in their explanation of the relationship between emotions and physiological arousal?
-The James-Lange theory suggests that bodily arousal causes emotions, while the Cannon-Bard theory proposes that physiological arousal and the experience of emotions are separate processes that occur independently of each other.
What are the criticisms of the James-Lange theory mentioned in the script?
-The criticisms include the possibility of physiological arousal without emotion, the slowness of physiological changes compared to the immediate experience of emotion, the association of similar physiological responses with different emotions, and evidence that physiological feedback is not necessary for emotion.
What is the Schacter-Singer two-factor theory, and how does it differ from the other theories mentioned?
-The Schacter-Singer two-factor theory introduces cognition as a factor that interprets the source of physiological arousal, suggesting that a stimulus causes arousal and cognition, which then elicits the emotion. This differs from the other theories by adding a cognitive evaluation step between arousal and emotion.
How does the script illustrate the difference in emotional experience based on cognitive evaluation?
-The script uses the example of feeling one's face flush, where the same physiological arousal can lead to different emotions based on the cognitive evaluation of the situation, such as pride or shyness.
What are the four theories of emotion mentioned in the script, and how do they differ?
-The four theories are the common-sense view, the James-Lange theory, the Cannon-Bard theory, and the Schacter-Singer two-factor theory. They differ in their explanations of the causal relationships between stimuli, physiological arousal, and the experience of emotion.
How does the script suggest that physiological stimuli can influence emotions, despite the Cannon-Bard theory?
-The script mentions reports of physiological stimuli influencing emotions, suggesting that while the Cannon-Bard theory proposes independence between physiological arousal and emotion, there is evidence of a connection between the two.
What role does cognition play in the Schacter-Singer two-factor theory?
-In the Schacter-Singer two-factor theory, cognition plays a crucial role in interpreting the source of physiological arousal, which then leads to the experience of emotion. It is the cognitive evaluation of the stimulus in conjunction with the arousal that determines the emotional response.
Outlines
🧠 Understanding Emotions and Their Components
This paragraph delves into the complex nature of emotions, distinguishing them from feelings and moods. It explains that emotions are immediate reactions to stimuli, while feelings are the subjective experience of these emotions, and moods are longer-lasting states without a specific trigger. The paragraph also breaks down the components of emotions into physiological (bodily arousal), cognitive (conscious experience), and behavioral (observable expressions). It references Charles Darwin's work on the universality of emotional expressions across species, suggesting a genetic basis for these behaviors.
🤔 Theories of Emotion: Causality and Interpretation
This paragraph explores various theories that attempt to explain the process of emotion. It starts with the common-sense view that a stimulus leads to an emotion, which then causes physiological arousal. It then discusses the James-Lange theory, which proposes the reverse causality, suggesting that physiological arousal leads to the experience of emotion. The Cannon-Bard theory posits that emotion and arousal are independent responses to a stimulus. Finally, the Schachter-Singer two-factor theory introduces cognition as a mediator between physiological arousal and the experience of emotion, arguing that the interpretation of arousal in context leads to the emotional response. The paragraph reviews these theories, highlighting their key differences and the aspects they emphasize in the emotion process.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Emotion
💡Feeling
💡Mood
💡Physiological Component
💡Cognitive Component
💡Behavioral Component
💡James-Lange Theory
💡Cannon-Bard Theory
💡Schachter-Singer Two-Factor Theory
💡Evolution
💡Cognitive Evaluation
Highlights
Emotions are complex and can be difficult to distinguish from feelings and moods.
Emotions are immediate responses to internal or external events, while feelings are the subjective experience of these emotions.
Moods are diffuse, long-lasting emotional states without a specific trigger.
Emotions consist of physiological, cognitive, and behavioral components.
Physiological arousal includes bodily reactions like a racing heart or tense muscles.
Cognitive components involve the conscious experience of the emotion.
Behavioral components are the outward expressions of emotions, such as facial expressions.
Charles Darwin's work on the expression of emotions in men and animals suggests universal behaviors for specific emotions.
Darwin argued that emotional expressions are genetically determined and have evolved over generations.
The common-sense view posits that a stimulus leads to an emotion, which then causes physiological arousal.
William James and Karl Lang proposed that bodily arousal causes emotions, contradicting the common-sense view.
Criticisms of the James-Lange theory include the possibility of physiological arousal without emotion and the slowness of physiological changes.
The Cannon-Bard theory suggests that physiological arousal and the experience of emotion are independent processes.
Evidence suggests that physiological stimuli can influence emotions, indicating a connection between physiology and emotions.
The Schachter-Singer two-factor theory introduces cognition as a factor influencing the experience of emotion.
According to the Schachter-Singer theory, the interpretation of arousal leads to the experience of a specific emotion.
The theory highlights the importance of cognitive evaluation in determining emotional responses to stimuli.
A review of four major theories of emotion, explaining their differences and implications for understanding emotional experiences.
Transcripts
emotions are a tricky subject both in
life and in psychology questions like
why do you make me feel this way are not
only confusing on a personal level but
also on a scientific level first let's
distinguish emotions from feelings and
moods an emotion is an immediate
specific positive or negative response
to internal thoughts or external
environmental events a feeling is the
subjective experience of an emotion it's
what we refer to when we say things like
I feel angry or I feel happy a mood
meanwhile is a diffuse longer lasting
emotional state that doesn't necessarily
have an identifiable object or trigger
so if something frustrating happens to
you you might immediately feel the
emotional response of anger and for the
next few days you might be in a bad mood
let's move on to the various components
of an emotion so we know that emotions
are immediate and specific responses
these responses have at least three
parts physiological cognitive and
behavioral a physiological component of
an emotion might be bodily arousal like
a racing heart or tense muscles the
cognitive components of an emotion is
the subjective conscious experience of
emotion and the behavioral components of
an emotion is the characteristic overt
expressions of the emotions behaviors
that other people can read like
particular facial expressions or posture
Charles Darwin studied this third
component of emotions in his 1872 book
the expression of emotions in men and
animals in which he argued that
particular emotional responses tend to
accompany the same emotional states in
all members of the species so according
to Darwin's argument all of the members
of the species will display the same
behavior when they feel a particular
emotion all cats will display the same
behavior when they are happy and all
humans will have the same facial
expressions in behavioral and skin
[Applause]
with this evidence Darwin suggested that
the expression of emotion is genetically
determined this behavior has evolved and
has been passed down through generations
in our genes now let's look at some
theories of how emotions work let's
start with the common-sense view in this
view a stimulus and emotion which in
turn prompts some bodily arousal so in
this case a frightening spectacle and
Bill's are ruling with fear which makes
him sweat and makes his heart rate rise
in the mid-1880s two scholars William
James and Karl Lang independently came
up with similar theories that
contradicted this common-sense view
James and Lang both suggested that
instead of emotions causing bodily
arousal bodily arousal causes emotions
so to return to our previous example
that would mean that the site of the
hero on his threshold makes our villains
heart beat faster his hands tremble and
his palms sweat and these physiological
changes caused him to feel fear but this
theory is vulnerable to a few criticisms
first it is possible to have
physiological arousal without any
accompanied emotion for instance your
palms might sweat because it's hot but
that's what won't make you feel all
nervous just kind of grow second
physiological changes can be too slow to
proceed the conscious experience of
emotion our villain might feel scared as
soon as he sees our hero but it might
take a few seconds for him to start
sweating third the same set of
physiological responses are associated
with very different emotional
experiences a faster heart rate could
mean fear but it could also mean anger
or surprise or joy finally there is
evidence that physiological feedback is
not necessary for emotion for example
patients with spinal cord injuries who
have lost most of their physiological
feedback so experience the same emotions
as before
however in the james-lange theories
favor there is notably some slight
evidence of dissipation in their
emotional reactions as an alternative to
the james-lange theory two other
theorists Walter Kenan and
Philip Bard proposed that the
physiological arousal of emotions and
the experience of emotions are entirely
separate processes that is a stimulus
causes the emotion and physiological
arousal independently neither one causes
the other
so the site of our hero causes our
villain both to feel fear and for his
palms to sweat and hurt to raise but
contrary to this theory there has been
many reports of physiological stimuli
influencing emotions so it's unlikely
that physiology and emotions are
completely disconnected one suggestion
of how arousal and the experience of
emotion may be connected but not causal
which proposed in the 1960s by Stanley
Schachter and Jerome singer as the
Schechter singer two-factor theory which
introduces the factor of cognition the
theory suggests that when a stimulus
elicits some arousal this arousal elicit
some cognition which interprets the
source of the arousal and then this
interpretation then elicits the
experience of emotion
from the stimulus it takes two different
factors the arousal and the cognition to
elicit the emotion hence the name
Schechter singer two-factor theory for
example say that you feel your face
start to flush according to this theory
you'll automatically use cues from your
environment to help explain this flush
you might be mid-workout or someone
might have just confessed their love to
you although the arousal is the same the
cognitive evaluation of the stimulus is
very different across these two
scenarios and so the emotions you would
feel would also be very different say
pride versus shyness for instance
to return to our previous example if the
sight of our hero makes our bones heart
beat faster then their cognitive
evaluation of the situation say
remembering that the hero is a Secret
Service agent here to save the world or
that he is their long-lost love from
primary school will determine their
emotional response to the situation
again with this theory it's about the
interpretation of the stimuli in the
arousal which leads to the emotion so
let's just quickly review these four
theories of emotion top you remember
them first the common sense view is that
a stimulus will cause an emotion which
causes arousal second the james-lange
theory reverses emotion and arousal
suggesting instead that a stimulus
causes arousal which then causes the
motion third the Canon Bard theory
separates out emotion and arousal as
independent reactions to the stimulus
and finally the Schechter singer
two-factor theory adds another factor to
the cause of emotion after a stimulus
elicits some arousal you called the
nobley ESS the stimulus and that
assessment causes the emotion
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)