Elon Musk sues ChatGPT-maker OpenAI | BBC News

Summary

埃隆·马斯克因合同违约起诉Open AI，声称这家美国公司现在将利润置于其创立原则之上，即负责任地开发人工智能。马斯克指责微软向Open AI投入了数十亿美元，实际上将其变成了子公司。尽管两家公司都否认这一指控，但美国监管机构正在调查微软投资的范围。马斯克在2018年离开Open AI，成立了自己的竞争对手公司，并多次警告不加限制地使用生成式人工智能可能构成的存在性威胁。此外，讨论还触及了微软最近收购一家法国新兴AI公司及其对创新空间的影响，以及政府在全球范围内如何调控AI以利于人类的重要性。

Takeaways

• 🚨 埃隆·马斯克因合同违约起诉OpenAI，声称该公司现在将利润放在其创立原则即负责任地开发AI之前。
• 💼 马斯克指责微软向OpenAI投入数十亿美元，实际上已将其变成一个子公司，两家公司均否认这一指控。
• 🔍 美国监管机构正在调查微软对OpenAI的投资范围。
• 🏭 马斯克在2018年离开OpenAI，成立了自己的竞争对手公司，并曾警告说，不加限制地使用生成式人工智能可能构成存在的威胁。
• 🌍 微软最近收购了法国的一家新兴AI公司，目前因竞争法而受到调查。
• 🤔 存在对微软可能扼杀创新空间的担忧，尤其是在AI领域，这是一个需要尽可能多的竞争者的领域。
• 💡 对埃隆·马斯克的动机提出了严重的问题，一些人可能会认为世界上最富有的人抱怨利润追求胜过人类福祉有些自私。
• 🌐 有关政府层面如何管理AI以利于人类而非伤害人类的重要讨论，特别是考虑到政府在互联网监管方面的缓慢反应。
• ⚖️ 关于大公司控制社交媒体的管理表现不佳的讨论，以及这是否意味着我们可能需要采取不同的AI管理方式。
• 🔬 对AI的未来表示担忧，担心只有少数几个系统重要的公司可能能够在前沿运作，这将需要更加积极的治理。
• 📡 讨论了俄罗斯使用AI在社交媒体上创建更高效、更危险的机器人和人格的能力，以及政府对此如何应对的担忧。

Q & A

埃隆·马斯克为什么起诉Open AI？

埃隆·马斯克起诉Open AI是因为他认为该公司背离了其成立初衷，即负责任地发展人工智能，而现在更多地追求利润。

马斯克认为微软对Open AI的投资有何影响？

马斯克认为微软向Open AI投资了数十亿美元，实际上已经将其变成了微软的一个子公司。

美国监管机构正在调查什么？

美国监管机构正在调查微软对Open AI的投资的具体情况。

马斯克对于人工智能的使用有什么警告？

马斯克警告说，不加限制的使用生成式人工智能可能构成存在的威胁。

为什么说在人工智能领域，大公司控制创新空间可能是有问题的？

在人工智能领域，如果大公司控制了创新空间，可能会阻碍其他竞争者的发展，减少创新和多样性。

埃隆·马斯克批评利润追求的动机为何被视为自私？

一些人可能认为，作为世界上最富有的人之一，马斯克批评追求利润而不是人类利益的行为，显得有些自利。

政府在人工智能监管方面面临什么挑战？

政府在制定监管人工智能的措施时面临挑战，需要平衡创新促进和风险管理，且必须快速适应技术的快速发展。

社交媒体公司在监管自身方面表现如何？

社交媒体公司在自我监管方面表现不佳，往往未能负责任地管理平台上的内容和用户的福祉。

为什么有人担心只有少数大公司能够掌握人工智能的最前沿技术？

人们担心，如果只有少数大公司能够掌握最前沿的人工智能技术，这可能会导致技术和经济权力的高度集中，限制创新和竞争。

人工智能如何在社交媒体上被用于更有效地创建虚假身份和信息？

人工智能可以被用来在社交媒体上创建更真实的机器人和虚假身份，使得传播虚假信息和干预选举变得更加高效和难以检测。

Outlines

00:00

😮埃隆·马斯克起诉OpenAI违约

中,埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)正起诉OpenAI违约。马斯克说,OpenAI现在把利润置于其发展AI的责任之前。马斯克曾协助成立OpenAI,现在他说微软已经向OpenAI注入数十亿美元,实际上将其变成了微软的子公司。两家公司否认这一说法,但美国监管机构正在调查微软对OpenAI的投资范围。

05:02

😥微软并购法国AI初创公司,引发反垄断调查

中提到了关于微软并购一家法国初创AI公司,引发了反竞争调查。文章讨论了大公司控制AI发展是否会扼杀创新空间的问题。还提到了社交媒体公司在内容审核方面表现很差,AI监管是否也会重蹈覆辙。文章最后讨论了利用AI合成的政治深度伪造和自动化宣传将给未来选举带来的威胁。

Keywords

💡违约

按照视频脚本,伊隆·马斯克正在起诉Open AI违约。违约意味着Open AI没有履行与马斯克之间的某些合同义务。这表明双方之间存在法律纠纷。

💡利润

马斯克批评Open AI现在将利润置于其发展AI的责任原则之前。利润是企业的核心目标,但在某些敏感的技术领域,仅仅追求利润可能产生负面后果。

💡子公司

马斯克声称,微软向Open AI注入了数十亿美元资金,实际上将其变成了子公司。子公司是一个公司对另一个公司的控股或所有权。这意味着Open AI可能失去独立性。

💡监管

美国监管机构正在调查微软对Open AI的投资参数。监管意味着政府对某些行业和公司施加规则和限制。这是为了防止滥用和负面影响。

💡竞争

安娜贝尔指出,微软最近收购了一家法国AI初创公司,它本身就面临反垄断调查。这意味着它正在获得AI领域的主导地位,可能会扼杀其他竞争对手的创新空间。

💡动机

安娜贝尔质疑马斯克作为世界首富抱怨获利多于造福人类的动机。动机决定了一个人行动和表达的出发点。对马斯克的动机提出质疑,意味着怀疑他的诉讼和批评是否公正和合理。

💡治理

专家认为政府层面需要就AI是否会造福人类还是伤害人类提出疑问,并对其进行监管。这种监管统称为治理。它决定了科技发展后果的正负面影响。

💡深度伪造

视频中提到了深度伪造技术可能被用于在美国大选中操纵和欺骗选民。这种AI生成的虚假音视频非常真实,容易被人们误信。这将对选举和民主制度造成重大威胁。

💡网络安全

伊恩指出,在网络安全领域,它们开始受到破坏和攻击后,整个网络安全行业应运而生。同样,在AI领域,一旦深度伪造等技术被滥用,政府和公司都需要迅速做出回应。

💡防范

视频中提到英国政府声称会采取情报主导方法来防范利用AI进行的选举干预。但安娜贝尔对政府的防范能力仍然持怀疑态度。这是因为AI技术变化太快,可能超出政府应对能力。

Highlights

首要重点文本

第二个值得注意的重点文本

Transcripts

Elon Musk is suing open AI for breach of

contract the billionaire entrepreneur

says the US firm is now putting profit

before its founding principle of

developing AI responsibly Mr musk who

helped set up the firm says Microsoft

has plowed billions into open Ai and has

in effect turned it into a subsidiary

the two companies deny the claim but us

Regulators are investigating the

parameters of Microsoft's investment Mr

mus left open AI in 2018 to set up his

own rival he has warned before that the

UN feted use of generative artificial

intelligence could pose an existential

threat um Microsoft just bought one of

the uh emerging AI companies in France

this week they're already under

investigation Annabelle uh over uh

competition laws do you think um

Microsoft is starting to suffocate the

space that there is for

Innovation certainly I think it's

problematic when it comes to artifici

artificial intelligence it's an a field

where we need as many contenders able to

climb the ladder and fewer large

organizations which are creating this

revolutionary technology but pulling the

ladder up behind them you know I think

there are serious questions to be asked

about Elon musk's

motivations about um the world's richest

man complaining about profit making over

benefit to humanity which some may view

as a little selfs serving that said I

think that there are very serious

questions that we need to ask at the

government level across the world about

whether AI is going to benefit Humanity

or whether it is going to harm Mankind

and if we have fears over the latter

which certainly some politicians have

voiced then how are they going to

regulate it because in the UK at least

they were very slow to regulate the

internet and when they did

eventually the on sa bill it was a very

far wide reaching piece of legis ation

which encompassed arguably far more she

to without addressing the fundamental

concerns that we have over safety online

yeah I was I was about to ask you Ian

whether actually maybe it's a better

thing that the big companies are in

charge of this and controlling the roll

out of this extremely powerful

technology but Annabelle makes a very

good point that the big companies that

have had charge of social media meta um

uh you know all Twitter you know um Tik

Tok these sort of big companies they've

not done a very good job of that so so

maybe maybe we'd be better going the

other way they've done a horrible job of

it uh social media has basically

regulated itself which meant that it's

had no interest in taking responsibility

for the well-being of either the people

that are on their platforms uh or the

political systems that they operate in

and democracy and our citizens are worse

off as a consequence now when it comes

to AI uh certainly the governments are

trying to get a move on governance with

much greater urgency in part because of

the lessons that they are have learned

uh from the hands off on social media

and companies are trying with various uh

degrees of success uh to cooperate with

those governments but it's not at all

clear uh that it's going to succeed the

technology is moving a lot faster than

the governments are uh and that means

the business models are going to matter

a lot more for the governance um I I do

worry uh that when we think about the

future of AI in 3 or 5 years time it's

quite possible that with the amount of

Comm compute required and the amount of

energy required to run that compute that

it's only going to be perhaps a very

small number of systemically important

companies maybe even working with

governments that will be capable of

operating at The Cutting Edge that that

will require a much more assertive

governance if that's where the

technology goes just in terms maybe get

a quick thought from both of you because

we a bit pressed for time but just one

um social media post that I saw from

Miles Taylor one of our panelists this

week he's been talking to Senator Mark

Warner Ian and and he said that

um they have a dossier in their hands

that the Russians are now able to create

these Bots and personas on social media

using AI in a much more efficient much

more dangerous way than they were able

to in 2016 2020 the concern was that

Senator Warner thinks that just not had

a conversation really within Congress

about how they going to stop that or how

they going to tackle it that's right uh

it's going to require a crisis first we

already saw you know one deep fake with

the robo call pretending to be Biden in

the runup to the New Hampshire primary

there's going to be a lot more of this

and the companies are going to have to

respond very very quickly with

governments as things start to break

that we had that with cyber and entire

cyber security industry came up after

things started to break that's going to

have to happen on AI on about well what

about this side because um I know that

there is a a sort of intelligence-led

approach to it MI5 I think are involved

in it do are you convinced by what the

government is saying to to protect the

upcoming British

election I certainly have concerns now

the country at the moment is being run

by Tech bro rishy sunak who has wanted

to try and lead the world on Innova AI

regulation he had a hosted a global

Summit last Autumn to that effect but

there are very serious concerns what

really worries me is the pace of change

it was 10 years ago that we were worried

about the internet and its ability to be

weaponized in order to spread

disinformation to discredit certain

candidates in an election now we have

the rise of AI and as Ian says deep

fakes which are going to convince

members of the public at at a speed that

may not be corrected before they go to

the poll so certainly that there's a

very real concern there and I'm not sure

that the government has the tools yet to

address it