The Rise of Far-Right Populism| Bigger Than Five
Summary
TLDRThe video script from 'Bigger than Five' explores the global rise of far-right nationalism and populism, examining its impact on international order. With examples from the US, Europe, Brazil, and beyond, it discusses whether this trend is a disruptive force or a response to societal concerns. The conversation features experts debating the implications for democracy, economy, and social challenges, questioning whether populism can truly address the needs of the people or if it's more about exclusion and division.
Takeaways
- 🌍 Far-right nationalism and populism are on the rise globally, affecting countries from Europe to South America and Asia.
- 🇺🇸 Donald Trump is seen as a leader of this populist movement, promoting policies such as 'America First' and strong stances on immigration and trade.
- 💼 Despite claiming to represent the working class, Trump's administration has a significant presence of lobbyists and representatives from big businesses.
- 🏛️ Trump’s economic adviser, Stephen Moore, argues that Trump has taken a populist stance on issues like immigration, trade, and tax cuts, although critics point to corporate influences within his administration.
- 🇧🇷 Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, often compared to Trump, has enacted policies that have led to a significant increase in police killings and controversial actions against crime.
- 🌏 Populist leaders often frame their politics as a battle against elites and outsiders, appealing to working-class citizens who feel marginalized.
- 🇺🇸 American nationalism, as discussed by Frank Buckley, emphasizes a preference for Americans over non-Americans and aims to implement merit-based immigration similar to Canada’s system.
- 🤝 The discussion highlights concerns about the divisive rhetoric used by populist leaders, which can exacerbate social and political tensions.
- 🗳️ There are worries that populist movements may undermine democratic institutions and values, though some believe in the self-corrective nature of democratic societies.
- 📰 The broader impact of these populist movements includes a coarsening of political discourse and a potential erosion of trust in national and international institutions.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video 'Bigger Than Five'?
-The main topic of the video is the rise of far-right nationalism and populism globally, and its potential impact on international order and politics.
What does the host suggest about the far-right political parties in Europe?
-The host suggests that far-right parties in Europe have made significant progress, gaining a notable number of seats in several EU countries, which is unprecedented since World War II.
How does Donald Trump view his role in the context of the far-right movement?
-Donald Trump sees himself as the cheerleader of the rising far-right movement and has attempted to capitalize on this momentum during his state visit to the UK.
What are some of the policies or slogans associated with far-right populist leaders according to the transcript?
-Some policies and slogans include 'America First', stopping immigration, eradicating Islamic ideology, regulating globalization, and returning the economy and oligarchies to their proper place.
What does the speaker argue about the state of European politics over the past 20 years?
-The speaker argues that extremists are those who have governed Europe for the past 20 years, citing precariousness and poverty as a result of their policies.
What is the Hungarian government's stance on migrants, according to the transcript?
-The Hungarian government has entrusted their leaders to stop migrants across all of Europe, defend the Europe of nations, and protect Christian culture in Europe.
What is Stephen Moore's view on Donald Trump's impact on the Republican Party?
-Stephen Moore believes that Donald Trump has converted the Republican Party into a populist, working-class party, taking positions that are popular among middle-class voters and challenging corporate interests in various areas.
What is the argument made by the host regarding the presence of lobbyists in the Trump administration?
-The host argues that the presence of hundreds of lobbyists representing big businesses in the administration contradicts the idea of a working-class party and Trump's promise to 'drain the swamp'.
How does Stephen Moore respond to the criticism of Trump's administration being influenced by corporate interests?
-Stephen Moore argues that Trump has taken on big businesses in areas like trade, drug prices, and technology companies, and that Trump's administration is pro-business but not necessarily biased towards corporate interests.
What is the view expressed by the host on the global rise of far-right populism?
-The host suggests that the global rise of far-right populism is a force that thrives on exclusionary politics, disruption, and division, and questions whether it can address economic and social challenges effectively.
What is the panel's consensus on the future of populism and democracy?
-The panel believes that while populism may not be able to deliver on its promises and could lead to a coarsening of politics, democracy, despite its flaws, is still the best system and has self-corrective instincts that prevent things from getting out of hand.
Outlines
🌍 The Rise of Far-Right Nationalism and Populism
The script opens with a discussion on the global rise of far-right nationalism and populism, highlighting its presence from Italy to the Philippines. It introduces the show 'Bigger than Five' and its host Rider, who questions whether this trend is a solution to global issues or a threat to international order. The narrative mentions the political gains of far-right parties in Europe and the U.S., with a focus on Donald Trump's 'America First' policy and his attempts to capitalize on the populist wave during his state visit to the UK. The script also touches on the controversial policies proposed by these movements, such as halting immigration, eradicating Islamic ideology, and regulating globalization.
🤔 The Populist Paradox: Trump's Economic Policies and Corporate Lobbyists
This paragraph delves into the debate over whether President Trump has truly transformed the Republican party into a populist working-class party. It features an interview with Stephen Moore, a former economic adviser to Trump, who argues that Trump's policies on immigration, trade, and tax cuts reflect populism. However, the discussion also addresses the presence of hundreds of corporate lobbyists in the Trump administration, raising questions about the alignment of these policies with the interests of the working class. Moore defends the administration's stance, stating that Trump is pro-business but also takes on big businesses in certain areas, such as trade and drug prices.
🏛️ The Impact of Populist Leaders on Society and Democracy
The script continues with a discussion on the impact of populist leaders on society and democracy, using the example of Brazil's new president, Jair Bolsonaro, who has been associated with far-right ideologies. It presents contrasting views on whether these leaders are responding to legitimate concerns of the people or exploiting them for political gain. The conversation includes insights from John Alterman and Frank Buckley, who debate the nature of populism, its potential threat to democracy, and the importance of recognizing the diverse needs and interests within societies.
🛑 The Challenge of Populism: Delivering on Promises vs. Reality
In this section, the script explores the challenges that populist leaders face in delivering on their promises. It suggests that while these leaders may start strong with charismatic leadership, they often fail to meet the high expectations set, leading to disillusionment among their followers. The conversation also touches on the potential erosion of trust in institutions and the importance of maintaining democratic values and norms. The speakers discuss the resilience of democracy and the need for self-correction within societies to address the shortcomings of populist movements.
🌐 The Future of Populism and Globalism
The final paragraph of the script contemplates the future of populism and globalism, questioning whether the current trend of far-right populism will continue to grow or whether it will eventually decline due to its inability to address complex economic and social challenges. The discussion suggests that while there is a retreat from globalism, the exclusionary politics and divisive nature of populism may not be sustainable in the long term. The script concludes with a reflection on the need for healing and rebuilding trust within societies and the importance of democratic processes in overcoming current challenges.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Far-right Nationalism
💡Populism
💡International Order
💡Donald Trump
💡Economic Nationalism
💡Immigration
💡Globalization
💡Establishment
💡Working Class
💡Trade War
💡Democracy
Highlights
The rise of far-right nationalism and right-wing populism as a global phenomenon is discussed, with its potential to either solve or disrupt international order.
Far-right parties in Europe have made unprecedented progress since World War II, gaining significant seats and challenging the political center.
Donald Trump's role as a self-proclaimed cheerleader for the rising far-right movement and his efforts to capitalize on this momentum during his state visit to the UK.
The debate over what far-right political disruptors can achieve, beyond popular slogans, with a focus on 'America First' policies.
Criticism of the far-right in Europe, claiming they have governed in the name of precariousness and poverty for the past 20 years.
The Hungarian Prime Minister's commitment to stopping migrants, defending the Europe of nations, and protecting Christian culture in Europe.
Stephen Moore's perspective on Trump's conversion of the Republican Party into a populist, working-class party despite the presence of lobbyists.
Discussion on Trump's pro-business stance and how it contrasts with his populist image, including his actions against big businesses and trade policies.
Concerns about the influence of big business representatives within the Trump administration and the potential conflict with populist ideals.
The trade war with China as described by Moore, who views it as an abusive relationship and a new cold war, necessitating a strong stance against Chinese practices.
The potential benefits and risks of an all-out trade war with China, and the belief that it could lead to freer trade and a better agreement for the US.
The debate on whether Trump's populist policies will secure his re-election in 2020, with Moore expressing optimism for Trump's chances.
Jair Bolsonaro's presidency in Brazil, his promises to ease gun laws and combat crime, and the resulting increase in police killings.
The exploration of whether the global rise of far-right populism is a threat or a response to legitimate concerns of the people.
John Alterman and Frank Buckley's discussion on the common themes among populist leaders and the potential risks of exclusionary politics.
Concerns about the erosion of trust in liberal democracies and the potential undermining of democratic values by populist rhetoric.
The potential for self-correction within American society and the belief that Americans can prevent things from getting out of hand.
The final thoughts on the future of populism, democracy, and the challenges of addressing economic and social issues through exclusionary politics.
Transcripts
[Music]
is far-right nationalism a new global
movement is the rise of right-wing
populism the answer to the world's
problems or is it a disruptive force
that is threatening the international
order
hello and welcome to bigger than five
with me rider
the far right is on the rise from italy
to india from the philippines to brazil
the specter of populism has become
global
in europe far-right parties have made
headway like never before since world
war ii
in several eu countries they have
stripped a significant number of seats
from the center
donald trump who sees himself as the
cheerleader of this rising insurgent
movement
tried to capitalize on this growing
momentum during his state visit to the
uk this week
but beyond their popular slogans what
can these political disruptors actually
achieve
from this day
forward it's going to be only america
first
america
first
immigration should be stopped an islamic
ideology should be eradicated
globalization should be regulated
economy and oligarchies return to their
proper place
[Music]
there are no far right here but the
politics of good
sense extremists are those who have
governed europe for the past 20 years in
the name of precariousness and poverty
[Music]
we've managed in five and a half weeks
not just
to frighten the establishment oh no
they're not frightened
they're absolutely terrified
[Music]
hey
hungarians commissioned three things
from us in the first place they've
entrusted us to stop migrants across all
of europe they've commissioned us to
defend the europe of nations and they've
commissioned us to protect christian
culture in europe and you can be sure
that that is what we are going to do
[Applause]
[Music]
so as the populists march on the leader
of the pack remains at the helm here in
washington with his sights on the 2020
election will president trump continue
down the populist path i'm joined by
stephen moore a former senior economic
adviser to trump and an economist at the
heritage foundation he was previously
considered for a seat on the federal
reserve board stephen moore you believe
that donald trump has converted the
republican party into quote a populist
working class party if that really is
the case how then do you explain the
fact that hundreds of lobbyists
representing big business and major
corporations work in the administration
well look there's
lobbyists all over washington d.c but i
do think that donald trump has been a
president who has uh really taken a lot
of positions um that are populous that
uh on immigration on trade on cutting
taxes you know if you look at the um the
way he won the election in 2016 he won a
lot of these kind of middle class voters
and middle america and and by the way
having worked for the campaign i think a
lot of americans were disgusted with
both the republican and democratic party
and they were disgusted by corporate
interest and he specifically campaigned
on this promise of draining the swamp in
other words ridding washington of its
corporate interest that's not what he's
done so
president trump in my opinion is very is
pro is a very pro-business president and
which is good he's great we're creating
a lot of jobs where our businesses are
financially healthy uh he's unapologetic
about that but i can point to you a lot
of areas where he's take on taking on
the big
businesses the big businesses don't like
his trade policy with respect to uh
china with respect to mexico
uh he's taken on the big drug companies
in terms of drug prices he's taken on
google and some of the big uh you know
big technology companies but he's not
taking on the lobbyists who represent
them that's not exactly what a working
class party looks like well
you know i mean when when he's coming
out against um a lot of these firms um i
think i think he does
he does what
what i think he thinks is best for
america it's this is what i'm putting
america first is about i think it would
be unfair to say that he just represents
corporate interests because there's so
many issues where he's really butted
heads with corporate america well and by
the way a lot of the corporate you know
the chamber of commerce and a lot of
those major business groups they didn't
even support trump when he ran for
president
sure but i mean advocacy groups are
finding it quite concerning that he is
allowing
so many of the representatives of big
business to be involved within the
government i have a whole list here
that's published on open secrets you can
take a look we can go through the names
one by one it's an eight nine page long
uh document that shows to what extent
there is an infiltration of these sort
of
big interest influences within the
administration so my question to you is
how does that square off with the idea
of being a populist well i mean you're
the average working class person so you
know i i'm not familiar with the study
you're talking about and so i i can't
really comment about it i will say this
that you know there are a lot of
business men and women who are in the
trump administration this is as i said
this is a very pro-business
administration he wants american
companies to out-compete china and japan
and germany and and other countries now
um you look at somebody like wilbur ross
who's our commerce secretary you know he
has
been an extremely successful business
person some people say oh he's
representing this interest or not but i
think what makes trump a kind of unique
president is that the p he's brought in
people who have been successes you know
in terms of business and we need that we
need to run i think we need to run
washington and our government more like
a business pay its bills
you know uh be efficient be productive
and i think that's the change that trump
has brought but are you then misleading
the public by saying that you represent
their interests
groups are going even further they're
calling it quote a takeover of
government by an extremist faction of
the corporate class can you deny that
just because someone worked for a
company or corporation doesn't mean that
they're you know that they're biased i
think these are i've worked you know
with donald trump i know a lot of his
top advisors i think they're excellent
people i think they have the american
interest
at stake and you know i i do think that
it would be and by the way i had to sign
something when i signed up for donald
trump that i would not work you know for
a corporate interest and so on that i
would not become a lobbyist and i think
he's if anything i think trump has
gotten around that whole idea of what's
what uh you know you call the revolving
door of people coming into government
and then into business and i'll be more
than happy to share this list with you
of all hundreds of lobbyists i'll take
your word i'll leave it here and we can
of course have a look at it but part of
trump's quote-unquote populist message
as well is to pit the united states
against this foreign enemy
uh more often than not china stealing
jobs taking away jobs in people's lives
livelihoods in this country you've
called the trade war with china the epic
battle of our time and you say that
trump is right to take the fight to
beijing how does an all-out trade war
with this new economic superpower
actually benefit the united states well
we're in an abusive relationship with
china they cheat they steal they lie
they're involved in cyber espionage
against the united states they're
hacking into our computer systems
this is this is the new cold war i
really believe that i think china is
back to its totalitarian roots that you
saw under mao i think it's become a
regime that's both an economic and
national security danger to the united
states and you know this behavior of
them
you know stealing 300 billion dollars of
our technology every year the fact that
they're they've disregarded every wto
rule and regulation they're acting
illegally uh the fact that they have not
opened up their markets to the united
states while we've totally opened up our
markets to them i think look i don't
always agree with you you can argue you
can argue exploitation of workers
currency manipulations subsidies
lack of freedoms but the numbers are
there they went from
an economy whose gdp was 150 billion
dollars just in 1978 to what they are
now almost 15 trillion dollars
in this reality and just live with it it
was one thing for us to uh turn a blind
eye to some of the uh economic uh
malpractice that they were involved in
when they were a two or three trillion
dollar economy now they're a ten
trillion dollar economy as you just said
they're the second largest economy we
can't go forward with the relationship
where they're cheating and stealing and
we're just basically taking it very easy
it's very easy to blame everything on
china when presumably one should also
look at the failings of the capitalist
system that you are such a fierce
defender of
it has not fulfilled the promises it
once said it would live up to in fact it
has left all of these working-class
people that the trump administration
purports to defend on the sidelines on
the margins this is this is the
working-class president you know there
was a report in the wall street journal
that the biggest wage gains
have been for lower and middle-income
people i mean i just think it's been a
phenomenal success for working-class
americans i mean and i think it's a
beautiful picture we've got right now
now look i agree with you on the china
trade thing it's with respect to this is
a high risk strategy there's no question
about it it is going to hurt the u.s
economy but i think at the end of the
day donald trump is going to win i think
we're going to get a trade agreement
with china that will actually mean freer
trade between both of our countries
which would be fantastic and do you
expect donald trump to get re-elected on
the basis of what he the policies
populist policies that he's adopted i
think there's a very high likelihood
donald trump is going to be elected
president in 2020. stephen moore thank
you very much thank you
further south the so-called trump of the
tropics jair bolsonaro was sworn in as
brazil's president in january the former
army captain ran on easing gun laws and
promised to stamp out crime
in the first four months of his
presidency 558 people were killed by
police in rio de janeiro alone that's
nearly five killings per day according
to the government's own data and while
thousands gathered on the streets of rio
last week in support of bolsonaro we
went to sao paulo to hear how brazilians
there view their populist president
[Music]
my
foreign
here
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
um
is
[Music]
b
so then is this global rise of far-right
populous truly a global threat or are
these leaders responding to the
legitimate concerns of the people i'm
joined by john alterman senior vice
president and brazilian chair in global
security and geo strategy at the center
for strategic and international studies
and frank buckley he is a foundation
professor at george mason university's
scalia school of law he is also a former
campaign speechwriter for president
trump welcome to you both frank buckley
you call donald trump a liberal
nationalist you say that whatever is
happening in europe has nothing
whatsoever to do with trump many people
in europe would actually disagree they
see a common thread
between the populists on the other side
of the atlantic and here in the us they
may well do so but i think it's
important to recognize that when
americans talk about nationalism they're
talking about
what the country of lincoln
and jefferson and to the extent that
you're anti-liberal as populists may be
you're something less than an american
nationalist but you're not happy with
your country today when we talk about
far-right nationalists and populists
would you agree that there are common
themes that link them all together and
bind them that they have
exploited and when i say they the
leaders
in europe in
south america in india in the
philippines and other countries they've
exploited what trump also has done quite
successfully they've made this appear as
a fight against the elites against the
establishment against the unwanted
migrant
they've shown that this is a struggle in
their words for the working class well
indeed there's something to that in the
sense that at least in america the
elites the liberal elites i might call
them that in a political sense have
argued that uh they're the people on the
side of economic mobility and equality
whereas i've argued it's exactly their
policies which are keeping us immobile
and unequal so yes there was a real
economic need for
a trump presidency but i'd really
caution against trying to link that to
say what's happening in india would you
link this movement to john ultimately i
think there is what i see populist
leaders doing
is saying
we
the majority are all homogenous we are
all like each other and there's a
minority
that is trying to take things from us
and we need to take the country we the
majority need to take it from the
minority in reality in my view i don't
know whether frank agrees or not
actually
societies are made up of lots of
different cross-cutting minorities where
you share some things with thirty
percent some things with forty percent
some things with twenty percent so
everybody has so many different
identifiers everybody is simultaneously
and majority and you trade off that's
the way democracy works the way
autocracy works is that the way
democracy works because it sounds like
exclusionary politics which could be
very detrimental as you say to
minorities in many countries
the mayor of london just described trump
as quote just one of the most egregious
examples of a growing global threat was
this an unfair characterization do you
think john alterman or is he right in
putting all of these different players
who prey on people's fears with
scapegoat minorities in the same basket
again what is what seems to me to be the
threat
is saying to a group of people you are
all the majority and these people are
taking away from you in fact
we are all part of minorities we're all
part of majorities and we give and we
take and that's how societies work
that's how politics works and let me say
something again about american
nationalism and how this being a country
of all the minorities you're talking
about there's something that's rather
un-american about wanting to privilege
one group over another that is to say
we're the country of johnny cash and
aretha franklin and coolio and a whole
bunch of people now look you can but
who's talking about privileging one
group over another except for trump
and and his uh no i in his group i mean
this is a pluralist society isn't it i
disagree with that um i don't believe he
is but yet
while there are people who do that that
makes them less than american as far as
i'm concerned what they haven't
recognized is that to be an american
means you have to embrace all the very
different strands in our country you say
you don't believe that's what he's doing
but isn't he doing exactly that with
migrants with so-called invaders from
mexico with the muslim ban with really
trying to keep people out
and and wanting this country to be first
and foremost for americans yeah well
see if you're an american nationalist
you prefer americans to non-americans so
there's nothing
anti-american about saying we need
borders
as for that nobody says we shouldn't
have borders i mean but the issue is but
the issue is
do you essentially deny the incredible
process by which
foreign populations become american
that's been the history of the united
states and what strikes me as as
particular to
the trump presidency the trump political
approach
is it seems to deny that some people can
cease to be a threat it denies the
greatness of america in taking these
immigrant populations and turning them
not only into taxpayers but into nobel
laureates and other people to lead the
country into the future i'm one of these
people you're referring to actually but
exactly this is not just about economics
though is it because you say that it's
the slow process of restoring the
american dream how exactly does this
restore the america no i disagree and in
fact the best example the proof
is the new republican proposals with
respect to immigration which frankly
simply copy
the canadian immigration law i don't
hear anyone saying that canada is
anti-liberal
or should be attacked in any particular
way no if what we're trying to do is to
promote say a merit system based on the
canadian model that's not racist in fact
the canadian experience means what
you're going to end up doing is
admitting probably a lot more people
from asia the concern many people though
have is that this type of rhetoric that
we're hearing from populist politicians
today president trump here in the united
states and many across europe is fanning
the flames of intolerance that it is
pitting one group of people against
another we see this across the board
today is there a risk that many of these
liberal democracies as we call them run
the risk of becoming undermined that
their values become undermined yeah it
feels to me that there's a coarsening of
politics that part of politics is
assuming that if you lose once you can
win the next time and it seems to me
that baked in to the populist idea is a
sense that that there are people who
have rigged the system and we have to
take it back and never lose again
and it seems to me that that part of the
part of what makes democracy work is an
assumption that sometimes you win and
sometimes you lose and you're just as
legitimate as a loser as you are as a
winner and it sounds like this perpetual
victimization that we hear often here uh
frank buckley would you agree
no i i i
yes there's a lot of that going around i
wish people have thicker skins you know
the only people who have problems with
the legislative legitimacy of the trump
administration
are people on the left which reminds one
of what one admitted populist said huey
long said if fascism ever comes to the
united states he'll come under the label
of anti-fascism but aren't we seeing the
beginnings of that in many respects with
some of the rhetoric that's being used
it's vitriolic many people would argue
we also see a breakdown
in the institutions of the state i mean
can you say frankly that president trump
hasn't been undermining the independence
of the justice system the independence
of the free press can you say that he's
not been a model of civility i will
grant and his tweets on the way into
london just
reinforce that yeah but you know that
said when you look at policies as i say
the idea of a canadian system or indeed
the idea of preferring
americans to non-americans that's
precisely the definition of nationalism
refugees i mean it seems to me canada
has an exemplary way of welcoming
refugees the u.s has not only cut the
number of refugees but has has
eliminated the possibility of many
muslims even visit the united states i
think we agree on the idea
the problem is in the implementation it
seems to be
these people are dangerous it's us
against them and that us them instead of
we
right is it different i quite agree with
you about refugees by the way so where
do we go from here
do we see an increase in in populists
around the world do we see a trend
towards deglobalization what is the
answer to many of the world i think
ultimately populists can't deliver what
they promise that there's always
something populists often the movements
get started on the charisma of a leader
but either after the leader dies or
leaves the movement or just can't
fulfill all the promises people see
through it
democracy
and i distinguish democracy from
populism this sort of messy everybody's
in the minority is slow it's messy it's
inefficient
but
it's better than all the other stuff
and i think we have to get back to the
to understanding it's not perfect but
it's better than all the alternatives
are we seeing the slow demise the slow
decline of democracy no i don't think we
are it may be so in other countries but
in this country if that is happening
it's only happening because some people
are questioning
our constitutional norms but in the end
i look i think
americans have themselves are they
questioning constitutional laws are they
questioning the way the president has uh
has behaved in many respects uh well you
know you can certainly
you know criticize trump's tone he does
not speak like a gentleman let us admit
that it's fairly easy to do
but the point i wanted to make is that
there are self-corrective instincts in
americans they don't let have not ever
let things get out of hand too much and
one can take some comfort from that
so
you know there was that famous telegram
from austrian world war one
situation desperate but not serious
you're not concerned but but i do think
that a we are slipping in the world we
are slipping
as in the way we relate to each other it
will take a while to dig out i'm not
sure we're going to get back to the
level we were in terms of people
trusting
the united states in terms of americans
trusting each other i think this is
going to take some time to heal and it
may not heal completely
and yet there seems to be a serious
erosion of trust again also on the part
of the population around the world with
the status quo with the establishment
what is the best remedy well want of
trust or simply political disagreement
the latter is perfectly appropriate
all right frank buckley john altman
thank you both very much thank you
and with globalism now in retreat will
this far-right populist revolt address
the economic and social challenges
facing many countries
for now it appears to be a force that
thrives on exclusionary politics
disruption and division more than
anything else from merida and all the
team here in washington thanks for
watching see you next time
[Music]
you
浏览更多相关视频
Why I'm an anarchist | Sophie Scott-Brown full interview | Anarchy and democracy
Populism is a foundational element of democracy, manipulated by demagogues, argues Oscar Whittle 4/6
Zakaria says Trump’s rise is not a fluke, and there’s one critical issue behind it
Why democracy is still the best form of government | Alex Tan | TEDxChristchurch
The globalization backlash: A new world economic order? | Business Beyond
How to Get Inside the "Brain" of AI | Alona Fyshe | TED
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)