I compare AMDs AFMF, Nvidia's Smooth Motion & Lossless Scaling in games! What's the strengths ??

Summary

This video explores and compares Nvidia Smooth Motion, AMD Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF), and Lossless Scaling for enhancing game performance and visual smoothness. The reviewer tests multiple games, highlighting how Nvidia Smooth Motion delivers excellent image quality but can be temperamental and crash-prone, while AFMF is highly reliable with minor ghosting. Lossless Scaling emerges as the most versatile option, offering smooth frame generation, reduced latency, and improved image quality across nearly all games. The video provides detailed insights on latency, ghosting, and usability, helping gamers decide which technology best suits their hardware and gaming preferences.

Takeaways

• 😀 Nvidia Smooth Motion can cause crashes and lock games to 60 FPS, making it temperamental in certain titles.
• 😀 Lossless scaling is often preferred due to smoother performance and reduced latency compared to Nvidia Smooth Motion, especially in older games.
• 😀 AFMF (AMD Fluid Motion Frames) is generally reliable and works in most modern games without major issues.
• 😀 Image quality with Nvidia Smooth Motion is good when it works, with less ghosting compared to AFMF, though it’s more prone to issues.
• 😀 OBS doesn’t always capture AMD's overlay correctly, leading to frustration in content creation when trying to record performance data.
• 😀 Lossless scaling is a well-rounded solution that works across most games and provides a better image quality with fewer ghosting issues compared to AFMF.
• 😀 In games like 'Dead Take,' Nvidia Smooth Motion worked well, showcasing impressive image quality and reduced ghosting.
• 😀 AFMF generally works well in most titles, though ghosting can be an issue, especially in certain scenarios like opening cabinets or looking at crosshairs.
• 😀 The technology behind AFMF is very user-friendly and integrates seamlessly into AMD's Adrenaline app, which is praised for its accessibility.
• 😀 The author's personal preference leans toward lossless scaling due to its broad compatibility and continual improvements, especially in terms of image quality and latency reduction.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video discussed in the transcript?

The video focuses on comparing Nvidia Smooth Motion, AMD Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF), and Lossless Scaling in video games, evaluating their performance, image quality, latency, and overall usability.

How does Nvidia Smooth Motion perform across different games?

Nvidia Smooth Motion performs well when compatible, providing high image quality and less ghosting, but it is inconsistent, can crash some games, and may lock older titles to 60 FPS.

What are the advantages of AMD Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF)?

AFMF is highly compatible, works in nearly all games, easy to toggle on/off, and generally smooth. Its main downside is occasional ghosting, particularly on crosshairs or detailed elements.

What makes Lossless Scaling a preferred option according to the video?

Lossless Scaling is reliable across most games, offers low latency, reduces ghosting through AI-enhanced frame generation, and is cost-effective and open-source, making it suitable for consistent use.

Why did Nvidia Smooth Motion fail in games like Neo and Crisis Remastered?

It either locked the games to 60 FPS or did nothing, likely due to compatibility issues with older games or different game engines, showing its selective functionality.

How does frame generation affect latency and performance?

Frame generation can introduce noticeable latency at low FPS (below 40), and while it smooths gameplay at higher FPS, it is recommended to use it at 60+ FPS for optimal experience.

What impact does AI have on Nvidia Smooth Motion and Lossless Scaling?

AI enhances frame interpolation in both Nvidia Smooth Motion and Lossless Scaling, improving image quality and reducing ghosting, with Nvidia generally achieving slightly better visual results.

How does image quality compare between Nvidia Smooth Motion and AMD AFMF?

Nvidia Smooth Motion generally offers better image quality with less ghosting due to AI-based frame generation, while AFMF may produce slight ghosting but remains acceptable for most players.

What are some practical limitations of using AMD’s overlay with OBS?

AMD’s overlay sometimes fails to record in OBS despite being set up correctly, meaning users may not always capture FPS or overlay metrics during gameplay.

Which solution is recommended for single-player versus online multiplayer games?

For single-player games, frame generation with AFMF or Lossless Scaling is effective and smooth. For online multiplayer, frame generation is not recommended due to potential latency issues; higher native FPS is preferred.

How does Lossless Scaling compare to AFMF in terms of latency and responsiveness?

Lossless Scaling generally provides slightly lower latency and feels more responsive than AFMF, while still offering broad compatibility across games.

Why might Lossless Scaling be considered a better long-term option for gamers?

Lossless Scaling is continually improving with updates, reduces ghosting, works in almost all games, uses AI for better image quality, and is affordable, making it a sustainable choice for consistent gameplay enhancement.