SKINNER (3) – CONDICIONAMENTO CLÁSSICO | BEHAVIORISMO (SEGUNDA TEMPORADA)

didatics
14 Oct 201906:30

Summary

TLDRThis video delves into the concept of classical conditioning, explaining how behaviors are learned through associations. Using examples like Pavlov’s dog and the Little Albert experiment, it shows how neutral stimuli can become conditioned to trigger automatic responses. The video also discusses key terms such as unconditioned and conditioned stimuli, and how emotional responses like fear can be conditioned in humans. While classical conditioning plays a crucial role in understanding human behavior, B.F. Skinner’s focus on operant conditioning highlights the limitations of this theory in explaining more complex behaviors.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The video explains two types of conditioning: classical conditioning (also known as respondent or Pavlovian conditioning) and operant conditioning. This video focuses on classical conditioning.
  • 😀 Classical conditioning involves a natural response to a specific stimulus that the organism has experienced before.
  • 😀 A famous example of classical conditioning is Pavlov's experiment with dogs, where the sight of meat naturally triggers salivation.
  • 😀 In classical conditioning, the meat serves as an unconditioned stimulus, and salivation is the unconditioned response.
  • 😀 To create conditioning, a neutral stimulus (e.g., a bell sound) is paired with the unconditioned stimulus (e.g., meat) multiple times.
  • 😀 After several pairings, the neutral stimulus (the bell) becomes a conditioned stimulus, causing a conditioned response (salivation) even without the meat.
  • 😀 This process highlights that behavior can be initiated by a specific stimulus in classical conditioning.
  • 😀 The script refers to John Watson's 'Little Albert' experiment, where a baby was conditioned to fear a white rat after it was paired with a loud noise.
  • 😀 Watson's experiment demonstrated that babies do not have an innate fear of animals but can learn fear if they are paired with an aversive stimulus.
  • 😀 Watson concluded that babies can generalize their fears to similar objects, like other furry animals, once they associate them with negative experiences.
  • 😀 Skinner paid little attention to classical conditioning because he believed it could only explain a limited range of human behaviors. His focus shifted to operant conditioning, which will be discussed in the next video.

Q & A

  • What are the two types of conditioning mentioned in the video?

    -The two types of conditioning mentioned are classical conditioning (also called Pavlovian or respondent conditioning) and operant conditioning.

  • What is classical conditioning?

    -Classical conditioning is a type of learning where an organism exhibits a response due to a specific stimulus it has previously encountered. It involves pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to create a conditioned response.

  • What is an unconditioned stimulus and what is an example given in the script?

    -An unconditioned stimulus is something that naturally triggers a response without prior learning. An example provided in the script is meat, which naturally triggers salivation in dogs.

  • What does it mean for a response to be 'unconditioned'?

    -An unconditioned response occurs naturally and automatically in response to an unconditioned stimulus, without any prior learning or conditioning.

  • How is a neutral stimulus used in classical conditioning?

    -A neutral stimulus is something that initially does not trigger any response. In the script, the sound of a bell is used as a neutral stimulus, which, when paired repeatedly with the unconditioned stimulus (meat), eventually triggers the same response (salivation).

  • What happens to a neutral stimulus after repeated pairings with an unconditioned stimulus?

    -After repeated pairings with the unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus, and it triggers a conditioned response (such as salivation) on its own.

  • What was the 'Little Albert' experiment about, and what did it demonstrate?

    -The 'Little Albert' experiment, conducted by John Watson and Rosalie Rayner, involved conditioning a baby to fear a rat by pairing it with a loud, frightening noise. It demonstrated that fear could be conditioned in infants and that fear could be generalized to similar objects.

  • What were some of the key conclusions drawn from the 'Little Albert' experiment?

    -Some conclusions from the 'Little Albert' experiment were: babies have little or no innate fear of animals, fear can be learned when animals are paired with aversive stimuli, babies can differentiate between objects, and fear responses can be generalized to similar objects.

  • Why did Skinner pay less attention to classical conditioning in his research?

    -Skinner paid less attention to classical conditioning because he believed it could only explain a limited range of human behaviors, which led him to focus more on operant conditioning.

  • What is operant conditioning, and how does it differ from classical conditioning?

    -Operant conditioning is a type of learning where behavior is shaped by consequences, such as rewards or punishments. Unlike classical conditioning, which focuses on automatic responses to stimuli, operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors influenced by reinforcement or punishment.

Outlines

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Mindmap

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Keywords

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Highlights

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级

Transcripts

plate

此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。

立即升级
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
Classical ConditioningPavlovWatsonSkinnerBehaviorismLearning TheoryPsychologyConditioned ResponseConditioned StimulusLittle AlbertHuman Behavior
您是否需要英文摘要?