Los MAMPORREROS del GOBIERNO con la LEY MORDAZA (Ley Influencer) AL DESCUBIERTO

Summary

The speaker in the transcript discusses the controversial 'Ley mordaza digital' or 'Digital Gag Law' in Spain, which was approved in 2022. They express concern over the law's potential to censor and control information and opinions on social media, particularly by influential content creators. The speaker urges viewers not to take their word or anyone else's for it, but to read the law themselves, specifically pointing to articles 3, 15, and 57. They highlight the law's impact on Spanish creators, even those based outside of Spain, and the role of the government in deciding what constitutes hate or discrimination. The speaker also criticizes certain individuals for allegedly misleading creators about the law's implications and for their own self-interests, suggesting a broader issue of manipulation and confusion regarding the law's true purpose and scope.

Takeaways

• 📜 The speaker discusses the 'Ley mordaza digital' (Gag Law), also known as the General Audiovisual Communication Law, passed in 2022, which they believe is misunderstood and could lead to censorship of digital content creators.
• 🤔 The speaker urges viewers not to take their word or anyone else's for it, but to read the law themselves, emphasizing the importance of personal understanding.
• 🚫 The law is said not to directly affect Spanish creators outside of Spain, but it does affect those who are within the country, contrary to some beliefs.
• ✅ The speaker points out that the law establishes a code of conduct, particularly in Article 15, which is meant to prevent the government from censoring information contrary to its views.
• 👀 The speaker mentions that the law has a sanctions regime (Article C, 57.1 and following), which could be subjectively interpreted and lead to punishment for vague reasons such as 'inciting discrimination or hatred'.
• 📝 Article 156, point 1, is highlighted as it states that sanctions will apply to audiovisual communication service providers, not directly to the government, but to those who are considered as such under the law.
• 😡 The speaker criticizes those who are reassuring content creators that the law will not affect them, accusing them of spreading confusion and working under the directives of certain political figures.
• 🤔 The speaker questions the motives of those who claim to be against the law while simultaneously attending government events and supporting its broader implications.
• 📉 The speaker alleges that the law was not fully implemented due to a lack of majority support and that it was passed with the votes of a single political party, hinting at potential political bias.
• 📈 The speaker predicts that the law will be used to slowly introduce censorship and control over content creators in the future, once certain thresholds are lowered.
• ⚖️ The speaker calls for unity and collective action against the law, arguing that it contravenes European legislation and principles of justice, and could lead to direct government censorship of free speech.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the video script?

The main topic of discussion is the 'Ley mordaza digital' or the so-called 'Ley influencer', which is the General Audiovisual Communication Law approved in 2022 in Spain, and its implications on content creators and freedom of speech.

What does the speaker urge the viewers to do?

The speaker urges the viewers to not just take his word or others' for it, but to read the law themselves, using the provided link, to understand its content and implications.

Which article of the law is mentioned as particularly concerning?

Article 94 of the General Audiovisual Communication Law is mentioned as particularly concerning as it treats influential users on social media platforms similarly to traditional media outlets, which could lead to direct government censorship.

What is the role of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation in the context of this law?

The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation, along with the National Market and Competition Commission, has the sanctioning power according to Article 150.25.1 of the law, which allows the government to directly control the application of sanctions.

Why does the speaker believe there is a problem with the understanding of the language in the law?

The speaker believes there is a problem with the understanding of the language in the law because it can be interpreted in a way that allows for direct government control over information and opinion on social media, which could lead to censorship and suppression of free speech.

What is the speaker's opinion on the role of big content creators in the current situation?

The speaker is critical of big content creators who are not speaking out against the law. He suggests that some may be influenced or manipulated into silence, possibly due to assurances that they will not be affected by the law.

What does the speaker accuse some individuals of doing in relation to the law?

The speaker accuses some individuals, particularly a lawyer named Cristóbal Gázquez and a content creator named Juan Anuj, of misleading other content creators, creating confusion, and acting in favor of the government's control over information.

What is the speaker's view on the current state of freedom of expression on the internet?

The speaker views the current state of freedom of expression on the internet as being under threat due to the implementation of the law, which he sees as a form of government control and censorship.

What action has the speaker taken regarding the law?

The speaker has been actively discussing and critiquing the law for two years, attempting to raise awareness about its potential implications for content creators and freedom of speech.

What is the speaker's advice to content creators who are affected by the law?

The speaker advises content creators to read the law themselves to understand its implications, and to be aware of the potential for government control and censorship on social media platforms.

What does the speaker suggest is the ultimate goal of those who support the law without criticizing it?

The speaker suggests that the ultimate goal of those who support the law without criticism is to generate confusion among the public and content creators, leading to a lack of opposition to the law and its potential for censorship.