It's time to STOP using these plugins!

Summary

In this video, D discusses the ongoing debate between using VST 2.4 and VST 3 plugins in 2024. He emphasizes the importance of transitioning to VST 3 due to its enhanced performance, efficiency, and features like side chaining and sample-accurate automation. D argues against sticking with outdated VST 2.4 plugins, highlighting that developers have had ample time to upgrade. He encourages users to adapt their workflows to modern technology, suggesting that relying on unsupported plugins can hinder progress. Ultimately, he advocates for using updated plugins to ensure optimal performance in music production.

Takeaways

• 🚫 Stop using VST 2.4 plugins in 2024; prioritize VST 3 for better performance and compatibility.
• 🔍 Understand the history of the VST protocol, which was created by Steinberg in 1996, revolutionizing music production.
• 💡 VST 3 introduced several enhancements, including better performance, efficiency, and the ability to categorize plugins.
• 🔄 Developers had over 16 years to upgrade their plugins to VST 3 since its release in 2008; continued use of VST 2.4 is often unnecessary.
• ⚙️ VST 3 supports dynamic inputs and outputs, allowing users to adapt plugin connections based on their needs.
• 🔗 Sample accurate automation is available in VST 3, making it more precise for mixing and editing.
• 🎧 Sidechain functionality is significantly improved in VST 3, supporting multiple sidechain inputs.
• 💔 Nostalgia for old plugins shouldn't hold users back; modern alternatives often perform better and are more reliable.
• 🛠️ Don't wait for outdated technology or plugins to catch up; adapt to current tools and maintain your workflow.
• 👨‍🏫 Focus on improving your skills with current tools rather than relying on legacy plugins that may hinder your production capabilities.

Q & A

What is the main argument against using VST 2.4 plugins in 2024?

The main argument against using VST 2.4 plugins in 2024 is that they are outdated and no longer supported by modern DAWs and operating systems, leading to potential compatibility issues and performance inefficiencies.

What significant improvements does VST 3 offer over VST 2.4?

VST 3 offers better performance and efficiency, dynamic inputs and outputs, sample-accurate automation, and support for multiple side chain inputs, making it a more versatile and powerful option for music production.

Why is it important for developers to transition to VST 3?

It is important for developers to transition to VST 3 because it allows them to create plugins that are more efficient and compatible with modern systems, ensuring users have access to the latest features and technology.

What does the speaker suggest about using legacy plugins?

The speaker suggests that while nostalgia for legacy plugins is understandable, it is more beneficial to find modern alternatives that can perform the same tasks or even better, ensuring a more effective workflow.

What challenges do users face with VST 2.4 on newer systems?

Users face challenges such as compatibility issues with new operating systems, especially with Apple silicon, as VST 2.4 is no longer being updated or supported, which can lead to crashes or malfunctions.

How long has it been since VST 3 was introduced, and what does this imply for developers?

VST 3 was introduced in 2008, meaning developers have had over 16 years to upgrade their plugins. This implies that they should have sufficient time to transition their products to the newer protocol.

What does the speaker believe is more important than having old plugins?

The speaker believes that keeping up to date with your DAW and using modern, supported plugins is far more important than clinging to old plugins that may hinder your production process.

What advice does the speaker offer regarding finding alternatives to old plugins?

The speaker advises users to actively seek out modern alternatives that meet their needs, rather than waiting for outdated plugins to be updated, as there are many better options available today.

What are the consequences of sticking with outdated technology according to the speaker?

Sticking with outdated technology can lead to frustration, slower workflows, and compatibility issues, ultimately impacting the quality and efficiency of music production.

How can users future-proof their music production workflows?

Users can future-proof their music production workflows by adopting the latest technology, using updated plugins, and continuously adapting their skills to leverage modern tools available in the market.