Do We Have Free Will or Are We Predetermined?
Summary
TLDRThe video explores the long-standing philosophical debate between Free Will and Determinism, discussing how both ideas impact our lives. It argues that instead of seeking a universal answer, we should determine which perspective is more relevant to our individual situations. People may struggle with defeatism, attributing their failures to external forces, or reckless aspiration, overestimating their control over life. The Stoics provide a balanced view, likening humans to dogs tethered to a cart, with limited freedom. True wisdom lies in using reason to accept what we cannot change, finding serenity in that acceptance.
Takeaways
- 🧠 The debate between Free Will and Determinism has been central to philosophy, starting from Ancient Greece and continuing to modern times.
- ⚖️ Free Will suggests that humans have the ability to shape their actions and lives, while Determinism implies that external forces like fate, biology, or politics control them.
- 📜 The Stoics provided a balanced view, stating that we are neither fully free nor fully determined, but exist somewhere between the two states.
- 🌀 The ancient Stoic analogy compares humans to dogs tied to a cart, symbolizing that we have some freedom but are also bound by external constraints.
- 😟 High levels of Defeatism lead people to blame outside forces for their failures, resulting in underachievement and avoidance of personal responsibility.
- 🚀 Excessive Aspiration, driven by an exaggerated belief in Free Will, can lead to disappointment and frustration when inevitable setbacks occur.
- 🎯 The debate becomes more meaningful when individuals personalize it, considering whether Free Will or Determinism is more relevant to their lives.
- 🔄 According to the Stoics, we cannot always change events, but we can change our attitude toward them, finding serenity in accepting what we cannot control.
- 🗝️ Reason helps humans understand their limitations and adjust expectations, preventing unnecessary conflict with reality.
- 🌱 The School of Life encourages developing emotional intelligence, offering tools to help people understand and navigate these philosophical ideas.
Q & A
What is the central debate in the history of philosophy discussed in the script?
-The central debate discussed is the philosophical conflict between Free Will and Determinism, which explores whether human actions are shaped by personal choice or determined by forces beyond control.
Why is it difficult to find a conclusive answer to the Free Will vs. Determinism debate?
-The debate is difficult to resolve because it is often framed in objective terms, seeking a universal truth for all humans, instead of considering individual differences in psychological needs such as levels of Defeatism or Aspiration.
What are the two contrasting psychological qualities mentioned in the script?
-The two contrasting psychological qualities are Defeatism, where individuals attribute their life outcomes to external forces, and Aspiration, where individuals believe they can control every aspect of their lives through willpower.
How does excessive Defeatism affect an individual's life?
-Excessive Defeatism leads individuals to blame external factors, such as parents, government, or society, for their life circumstances, resulting in underachievement and self-deception.
What is the danger of having an exaggerated notion of Free Will?
-An exaggerated belief in Free Will can lead individuals to think they can change all aspects of their lives, which may result in frustration and bitterness when things don’t go as expected.
How should individuals decide whether to believe more in Free Will or Determinism?
-Individuals should reflect on their personal lives and determine whether their suffering stems more from a defeatist attitude or from reckless aspirations, adjusting their beliefs accordingly to find balance.
What is the Stoic view on Free Will and Determinism?
-The Stoics proposed a balance between Free Will and Determinism, using the metaphor of a dog tied to a cart. Humans have some freedom but are always limited by external forces, and serenity comes from accepting what cannot be changed.
How does the Stoic metaphor of the dog and the cart help explain our relationship with destiny?
-The Stoic metaphor illustrates that while we have some leeway in life (like the dog on a leash), we are also bound by uncontrollable external factors (the cart). Understanding and accepting these limitations reduces frustration.
How can reason help us navigate between Free Will and Determinism?
-Reason allows us to predict and understand the relationship between our desires and external events, helping us decide when to accept necessity and when to assert our will, ultimately leading to more freedom and peace.
What is the ultimate message about balancing Free Will and Determinism for a fulfilled life?
-The script suggests that to live a calmer and more fulfilled life, individuals should personally assess how much faith to place in Free Will or Determinism, recognizing when to accept the unchangeable and when to pursue change.
Outlines
🤔 The Debate Between Free Will and Determinism
The ongoing debate between Free Will and Determinism has shaped philosophy for centuries, from Ancient Greece to modern times. At its core, it questions whether humans are free to make choices or are controlled by external forces like fate or biology. The problem is often addressed objectively, but it becomes more insightful when viewed subjectively—whether Free Will or Determinism is more relevant to an individual’s psychological makeup. People differ in their levels of Defeatism and Aspiration, which impacts how much responsibility they assign to external forces or themselves. Excessive Defeatism can lead to underachievement, while extreme Aspiration based on Free Will can cause frustration when goals aren’t met. Striking the right balance between the two is crucial for personal fulfillment.
🐶 The Stoic Philosophy on Free Will and Determinism
Stoic philosophers proposed a middle ground between Free Will and Determinism, suggesting that humans, like dogs tied to a cart, have limited freedom. The leash allows some movement, but ultimately external forces pull us in directions we can’t fully control. The wise course is not to resist when it’s impossible to change outcomes but to accept the limits of freedom with reason. Unlike a dog, humans can use reason to understand and predict when resistance is futile, helping to reduce frustration. Stoics argue that understanding our limits and adjusting our desires accordingly brings us serenity and a deeper sense of freedom.
🧠 Emotional Intelligence and Acceptance
At The School of Life, developing emotional intelligence is key to handling the philosophical tension between Free Will and Determinism. The ability to accept the things we cannot change, while maintaining the freedom to choose our attitude towards them, leads to a unique form of serenity. By embracing what is necessary and letting go of unrealistic desires, we can find freedom and peace. The School of Life provides resources to help individuals cultivate this emotional awareness.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Free Will
💡Determinism
💡Defeatism
💡Aspiration
💡Stoicism
💡Dog and Cart Metaphor
💡Philosophy
💡Christian Philosophy
💡Emotional Intelligence
💡Reason
Highlights
The debate between Free Will and Determinism has dominated philosophy, starting in Ancient Greece and continuing to this day.
The core issue is whether human beings are fundamentally free to choose their actions or are determined by forces beyond their control, such as fate, biology, politics, or class.
The question of Free Will versus Determinism becomes more interesting when framed personally, rather than objectively, focusing on what is more relevant to the individual.
Each person’s perspective on Free Will or Determinism depends on their levels of Defeatism and Aspiration.
People with high levels of Defeatism often believe their lives are controlled by external forces, leading to under-achievement and self-deceit.
On the other hand, those with exaggerated notions of Free Will may believe they can change everything in their lives, leading to frustration and bitterness when things don't work out.
The debate between Free Will and Determinism isn’t beyond resolution but should be answered personally, considering how much of one’s suffering stems from defeatism or reckless aspiration.
Ancient Roman Stoic philosophers offered a middle ground between Free Will and Determinism.
The Stoics used the metaphor of a dog tied to a cart to illustrate how humans have a degree of freedom but are still subject to external forces beyond their control.
The Stoics advised that it’s better to trot along with the cart (fate) than to resist and suffer.
Stoicism encourages accepting what is necessary without passivity, as it’s equally unreasonable to resist what is inevitable or to accept what isn’t.
Reason allows humans to understand when their desires are in conflict with reality, providing a unique sense of freedom.
The ability to calculate the path of the ‘cart’ or destiny allows individuals to adjust their desires, creating more slack and reducing suffering.
Though we cannot change certain events, we remain free to choose our attitude toward them, leading to serenity and freedom.
At The School of Life, the focus is on developing emotional intelligence and offering products to support personal growth.
Transcripts
The history of philosophy has been dominated by competing arguments around the ideas of
Free Will and Determinism. Simply stated, the issue hangs on whether human beings should
be thought of as fundamentally free to choose their actions and mould their lives – or
whether they should be deemed as being at heart determined by forces beyond their control,
be they fate, biology, politics or class. The debate has been long-running and hugely
vicious. It began in Ancient Greece, was picked up by the Romans, dominated Christian philosophy
and rumbles on to this day among philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists. Part of
the reason why the question seems so hard to find a conclusive answer to is that it
is almost always framed in objective terms, as if we might discover whether either Free
Will or Determinism could be an advisable interpretation for human beings in general.
But, in truth, the debate becomes more interesting and more relevant if we change the parameters
of the question – and ask simply: is an idea of Free Will or of Determinism more or
less relevant to me? All of us will have different needs in this area depending on our contrasting
levels of two psychological qualities: Defeatism on the one hand, Aspiration on the other.
There are people whose levels of Defeatism have grown so high, they too readily declare
that responsibility for things always lies outside of themselves: the course of their
life is, they tell us, entirely determined by parents, school, the government, the bosses,
the media… anyone but themselves. The result is radical under-achievement and self-deceit.
But there is another kind of difficulty created in people whose levels of Aspiration have
grown so high on the basis of overly exaggerated notions of Free Will. They will deem that
everything about their lives is capable of change. They will declare that they can achieve
all things simply through an exercise of the will. Their career and income, their relationships
and prospects are all, apparently, subject to dramatic change. It’s an inspiring philosophy,
but one that reliably also leads – when things don’t work out, as they never do
in all areas – to bitterness and rage. Each of us needs to decide for ourselves whether
we should have a greater faith in Determinism or in Free Will. We should ask how much of
the suffering in our lives can be traced back to a defeatist attitude and how much might
be traced back to reckless aspiration. Some of us need to dial up a faith in Free Will,
others need more of a mellow acceptance of Determinism. The oldest debate in philosophy
isn’t beyond answering. We just have to answer it more personally, with more of a
sense of what we need to believe in to be calmer and more fulfilled. Perhaps the wisest
way to navigate the debate between Free Will and Determinism was worked out by the Ancient
Roman philosophers of the Stoic school. These Stoics proposed that we should see ourselves
as always hovering between a Free and a Determined state – and they invented a powerful image
to evoke our condition as creatures able at times to effect great change – and yet never
far from being subject to immensely powerful external necessities. We are, they said, like
dogs who have been tied to an unpredictable cart. Our leash is long enough to give us
a degree of leeway, but is not long enough ever just to allow us to wander wherever we
please. A dog will naturally hope to go wherever it pleases, said the Stoics. But if it cannot,
then it is better for the animal to be trotting behind the cart rather than dragged and strangled
by it. To reflect that we too are never without a leash around our neck may help to reduce
the violence of our protest against events which veer away from our intentions. It may
sound like a recipe for passivity, but as the Stoics insisted, it is no less unreasonable
to accept something as necessary when it isn’t as to rebel against something when it is.
It’s our reason that must judge the difference and this is where we have a big advantage
over a dog. A dog will probably not at first grasp that he is even tied to a cart, nor
understand the connection between the swerves of the cart and the pain in his neck. So he
won’t be able to predict where the cart is going and adjust his position accordingly.
But reason enables us to theorise with considerable accuracy about the path of the cart or destiny,
which offers us a chance, unique among living beings, to increase our sense of freedom by
ensuring a good slack between our desires and what we cannot change. Reason allows us
to calculate when our wishes are in irrevocable conflict with reality, and then bids us to
submit ourselves willingly, rather than angrily or bitterly, to necessities. We may be powerless
to alter certain events, but we remain free to choose our attitude towards them, and it
is in an unprotesting acceptance of what is truly necessary that we can find a distinctive serenity and freedom.
At The School of Life we believe in developing emotional intelligence.
To that end we've also created a whole range of products to support that growth. Find out
more at the link on the screen now.
浏览更多相关视频
The Simple Trick to Stop Caring What People Think
O Que significa Arminianismo ou ser Arminiano?
Transcendental Idealism and Knowledge | Immanuel Kant #1
1 Proof that the God is Real
The great free will debate | Bill Nye, Michio Kaku, Robert Sapolsky, Steven Pinker & more
Don't Allow People To Manipulate You Emotionally: Part 2: English: BK Shivani at Spain
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)