Thomas Lubanga case study - Inside the International Criminal Court (4/5)

Summary

In March 2012, the International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga for recruiting child soldiers. The case highlighted challenges in victim contact, witness protection, and language translation. Despite criticism for its slow pace, the ICC's pursuit of justice for international crimes sends a strong message on holding powerful individuals accountable, emphasizing the importance of due process over speed.

Takeaways

• 🕵️‍♂️ The International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction in 2012 against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga for recruiting child soldiers.
• 🏛️ Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison for war crimes involving the use of child soldiers in hostilities.
• 🚧 The ICC faced challenges in the Lubanga case, including logistical difficulties and ensuring witness protection.
• 🗣️ The court had to manage the linguistic diversity by translating proceedings into a language understood by the suspect.
• 👥 The case highlighted the complexity of dealing with witnesses in unstable environments, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo.
• 🤝 The ICC had to use intermediaries to find and elicit evidence from witnesses, due to the fear and power dynamics in conflict zones.
• 🚫 Despite the ongoing conflict involving multiple allegations of rape, no charges were brought against Lubanga for gender-based violence.
• 💼 Barrister Rebecca Wilson emphasized the importance of ensuring that women's voices were heard within the court process.
• 🏥 The case took a long time due to the prosecutor's management and the challenges of gathering witness evidence.
• 🌐 The ICC has been criticized for its slow pace, having only two verdicts in its first decade, but the importance of getting the cases right is emphasized.
• 💰 While international criminal courts are not inexpensive, they are a cost-effective means of reinforcing the message that international crimes must be punished.

Q & A

When did the International Criminal Court (ICC) secure its first conviction?

The ICC secured its first conviction in March 2012.

Who was the first person convicted by the ICC?

The first person convicted by the ICC was Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga.

What was Thomas Lubanga convicted of?

Thomas Lubanga was convicted of the war crimes of recruiting child soldiers and using them to participate in hostilities.

What was the sentence given to Thomas Lubanga?

Thomas Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

What challenges did the ICC face during the Lubanga case?

Challenges included contacting victims, logistical difficulties in a conflict zone, managing witness testimonies, and ensuring the accused understood the proceedings in their language.

Why did the Lubanga case take a long time to conclude?

The case took a long time due to logistical difficulties, particularly dealing with witnesses in an unstable environment like the northern Democratic Republic of Congo.

What was the role of intermediaries in the Lubanga case?

Intermediaries, local people working for the court, were used to find witnesses and elicit evidence from them where international crimes were committed.

Why were some witnesses reluctant to come forward during the Lubanga case?

Some witnesses were afraid to come forward due to the risk of reprisals against them for cooperating with the court.

What was the role of NGOs like the one represented by Barrister Rebecca Wilson?

NGOs like the one represented by Barrister Rebecca Wilson worked to ensure that women's voices were heard within the court process, particularly regarding gender-based violence.

Why were there no charges related to gender-based violence in the Lubanga indictment?

Despite the involvement of multiple allegations of rape in the DRC conflict, no charges were brought against Lubanga concerning crimes of gender-based violence.

How has the ICC been criticized in its first 10 years of existence?

The ICC has been criticized for obtaining only two verdicts in its first 10 years, with one conviction and one acquittal, indicating a slow pace of justice.

What is the significance of the ICC's work despite its slow pace?

The significance lies in reinforcing the message that international crimes must be punished and powerful people held accountable, which is a worthy goal in itself.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ ICC's First Conviction: Thomas Lubanga

In March 2012, the International Criminal Court (ICC) achieved its first conviction after a decade of operation. Thomas Lubanga, a Congolese warlord, was found guilty of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of 15 to participate in hostilities. Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years in prison for these war crimes. The case was significant but also challenging due to the need to contact child victims, logistical issues in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the necessity to translate proceedings into a language the suspect could fully understand. The trial faced criticism for its slow pace and the handling of witness testimonies, with some witnesses being less than honest. The case also highlighted the difficulty of obtaining testimony from those directly affected by the violence due to fear of reprisals.

Keywords

💡International Criminal Court (ICC)

The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal established to prosecute individuals for international crimes, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. In the script, the ICC is highlighted for securing its first conviction against Thomas Lubanga, a Congolese warlord, which underscores the court's role in holding powerful individuals accountable for serious violations of international law.

💡Thomas Lubanga

Thomas Lubanga is a Congolese warlord who was the first person to be convicted by the ICC. His conviction for recruiting child soldiers is a landmark case for the court, demonstrating its commitment to addressing war crimes and protecting the rights of the most vulnerable, such as children involved in armed conflict.

💡Child Soldiers

Child soldiers refer to minors who are recruited or used in armed conflict. The script discusses Lubanga's conviction for conscripting children under the age of 15, emphasizing the severity of this violation and the court's efforts to address the exploitation of children in warfare.

💡War Crimes

War crimes are serious violations of the laws and customs of war applicable in armed conflict. Lubanga's conviction for war crimes, specifically recruiting child soldiers, is a central theme in the script, illustrating the ICC's role in prosecuting those responsible for such atrocities.

💡Witness Protection

Witness protection involves measures taken to ensure the safety of individuals who provide testimony in legal proceedings, particularly in sensitive cases. The script mentions the challenges of contacting child victims and protecting witnesses, highlighting the importance of safeguarding those who come forward to ensure justice can be served.

💡Interpreters and Translators

Interpreters and translators play a crucial role in legal proceedings, especially in international courts where defendants and witnesses may not speak the language of the court. The script discusses the need for specific training of interpreters and translators to ensure that the accused fully understands the proceedings, which is a fundamental aspect of a fair trial.

💡Logistical Difficulties

Logistical difficulties refer to the practical challenges in managing and organizing complex operations, such as a trial involving international crimes. The script mentions the challenges of dealing with witnesses in an unstable environment, like the Democratic Republic of Congo, which can significantly impact the pace and effectiveness of justice.

💡Gender-Based Violence

Gender-based violence includes acts of violence that are committed on the basis of gender. Although not directly charged in Lubanga's case, the script mentions the involvement of an NGO that sought to ensure women's voices were heard in the court process, reflecting the broader issue of addressing gender-based crimes in conflict situations.

💡Accountability

Accountability implies the obligation to account for one's actions and to face consequences if those actions are found to be in violation of the law. The script emphasizes the importance of holding powerful individuals accountable for international crimes, which is a core principle of the ICC and a key message of the video.

💡Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)

NGOs are organizations that operate independently of governments and are involved in various forms of public service and advocacy. The script mentions an NGO that represented women victims of sexual violence during the civil war in the Democratic Republic of Congo, illustrating the role of NGOs in supporting victims and advocating for justice.

💡Indictment

An indictment is the formal charge against a defendant in a criminal case. The script notes that there were no charges concerning crimes of gender-based violence in Lubanga's indictment, which points to the complexities and limitations in charging and prosecuting cases before the ICC.

Highlights

The International Criminal Court (ICC) secured its first conviction in March 2012 against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga.

Lubanga was found guilty of conscripting and enlisting children under 15 for use in hostilities.

He was sentenced to 14 years in prison for war crimes involving child soldiers.

The ICC faced challenges in its first case, including establishing procedures and ensuring justice.

Contact with child victims under 15 was necessary to facilitate their participation in the courtroom.

Witness protection and the translation of proceedings into a language understood by the suspect were crucial.

Logistical difficulties in the Democratic Republic of Congo's unstable environment prolonged the case.

The prosecutor's management of the case was criticized, with some witnesses not being entirely honest.

Many with firsthand experience were afraid to come forward due to the power of those being prosecuted.

The ICC used intermediaries to find witnesses and elicit evidence in conflict or post-conflict societies.

The possibility of cooperation with the court could lead to reprisals against witnesses.

NGOs ensured that women's voices were heard within the court process, despite no charges for gender-based violence.

The ICC has been criticized for its slow pace, with only two verdicts in its first 10 years.

The ICC's focus is on ensuring that international crimes are punished and powerful individuals are held accountable.

Despite the ICC's costs, it is considered a worthy goal to reinforce that international crimes must not go unpunished.

The ICC's modus operandi and effectiveness will be reassessed in the coming years.

Transcripts

the international criminal court is now

in session in March 2012 10 years after

it was set up the international criminal

court finally secured its first

conviction against the congales warlord

Thomas lubanga that Mr Thomas lubanga

Dilo is guilty of the crimes of

conscripting an enlisting children under

lubanga was later sentenced to 14 years

in prison for the war crimes of

recruiting child soldiers and using them

to participate in

hostilities I think that the court in

pursuing that case was to a large extent

feeling its way because it was the first

case they were very anxious to get it

right that as a result of the

implementation of the common plan to

build an army the case against Mr

tomango has raised a number of challenge

first regarding the contact with the

victims boys and girls under the age of

15 to facilitate their participation to

make their voices heard inside the

courtroom before the judges but also to

protect the different Witnesses we have

also the obligation to translate the

whole procedure to a language that the

suspect uh fully

understand and we need to train specific

translators and interpreters to be able

to deal with our obligations in

regarding this linguistic issue

September

2002 one of the reasons why the leang

case took so long was the logistical

difficulties with dealing with Witnesses

in particular in a very unstable

environment which is the northern

Democratic Republic of Congo I have to

say I don't think the prosecutor managed

the case especially well there were some

suggestions that uh the witnesses some

of the Witnesses were were not were not

always entirely honest with the court

and it has to be said that actually the

the trial chamber disregarded a great

deal of the witness evidence which the

prosecutor

brought many people with firsthand

experience of the events in question

were too afraid to come forward so the

ICC used intermediaries local people who

worked for the court to find witnesses

and elicit evidence from

them where International crimes being

committed we tend to be dealing with

conflict or postconflict societies and

of course people who are being

prosecuted before the interational

criminal court are very powerful local

actors and even the possibility of

somebody having cooperated with the

court could lead to to reprisals being

taken against them and their

Barrister Rebecca Wilson worked for a

non-governmental organization in the ha

which represented women who were victims

of sexual violence during the Civil War

in the Democratic Republic of

Congo drives but while the ICC was aware

while the luanga case was ongoing that

the DRC conflict involved multiple

allegations of rape no one was charged

with the

offenses those children our role as an

independent NGO was to make sure that

women women's voices were firmly heard

within that court process a number of

military training camps were added we

hoped that we would ensure there was a

women's perspective within that case and

those

proceedings and so we worked with

organizations that were based within the

Democratic Republic of the Congo in

particular women's

organizations to try and make sure that

for example they could be recognized as

victims in the case an order relating to

the unfortunately in the indictment

there were no charges at all concerning

crimes of gender based violence Mr

lubanga will remain in custody and that

concludes this hearing despite its

achievements the ICC has been widely

criticized for obtaining just two

verdicts in its 10year existence one

conviction and one

acquittal it is not quick but getting

things right isn't quick and I think

what we need to do is to look to see

where we are in another 10 years to see

whether one case every 10 years is going

to be the modus operandi of the court or

whether in fact it was simply it was it

was starting in first gear although

international criminal courts aren't

cheap they're far cheaper than fighter

jets and in the end if the message has

to be has to be reinforced that

International crimes must be punished

and that powerful people must be held

accountable then that in itself is a

worthy

goal get more from the open University

check out the links on screen now