Why Are Clinical Research Contracts and Budgets So Complicated For Clinical Research Sites?
Summary
TLDRIn this video, the speaker discusses the complexities of contracts and budgets in clinical trials, emphasizing the unique aspects of each study. They highlight the importance of overhead costs, such as administration and quality control, and how these can be negotiated with sponsors. The video also touches on the challenges of distinguishing between overhead, line items, and invoiceable costs, and the need for specialized knowledge to navigate these processes effectively. The speaker advocates for the use of networks like DSCS to streamline and democratize access to this information for sites of all sizes.
Takeaways
- π Contracts and budgets are essential for clinical trial sites as they grow busier with more studies.
- π€ Special shout out to Chris, the business partner who handles contract and budget negotiations for Yuma Clinical Trials, a DSCS site.
- π The complexity of contracts and budgets comes from the uniqueness of each study and the various costs involved.
- π’ Overhead costs include administrative expenses, rent, payroll, and marketing efforts that benefit all studies.
- π‘ Quality control and assurance systems are crucial for maintaining compliance with FDA regulations.
- π» Technology fees, such as eSource, can be part of the budget and may be passed on to sponsors.
- π Recruitment costs, like those for advertising through platforms like Patient Ace, can be invoiced to sponsors.
- π§ Some costs like dry ice may be overhead, specific line items, or invoiceable pass-through costs depending on the study.
- π½ Patient meals and transportation are often invoiceable fees, but can also be considered overhead.
- π Fair market value is important to understand for negotiating line items in contracts and budgets.
- π Training costs for CRCs are part of doing business and can be negotiated into budgets for most studies.
- π Economies of scale and working with networks like DSCS can help streamline contract and budget negotiations.
- π€ Automation of certain aspects of contracts and budgets is possible, but the human element is still crucial for specialized knowledge and negotiations.
Q & A
What is the main topic discussed in the video script?
-The main topic discussed in the video script is the complexities of contracts and budgets in clinical trials, particularly from the perspective of a clinical trial site.
Who is Chris Soer and what is his role in the context of the script?
-Chris Soer is the business partner of the speaker and is responsible for negotiating all contracts for Yuma Clinical Trials, which is a DSCS site in the DSCS site network.
What does the term 'overhead' refer to in the context of clinical trials?
-In the context of clinical trials, 'overhead' refers to the administrative costs such as rent, payroll, workers' compensation, branding, marketing, and community outreach, as well as quality control mechanisms and QA systems.
What is the significance of understanding the fair market value of procedures in clinical trials?
-Understanding the fair market value of procedures is crucial because it helps in negotiating contracts and budgets accurately, ensuring that the site is adequately compensated for the services provided during a clinical trial.
How can a clinical trial site pass off certain costs to sponsors in a contract?
-A clinical trial site can pass off certain costs to sponsors by including them as line items in the contract, such as eSource fees, technology fees, recruitment costs, and invoiceable pass-through costs like x-rays, MRIs, and local labs.
What is the role of Patient Ace in the context of the script?
-Patient Ace is one of the speaker's other companies used for advertising on Instagram and Facebook. It is mentioned as a tool for recruitment in clinical trials, with the costs of the ads potentially being passed off to sponsors.
What is the difference between overhead costs and invoiceable costs in clinical trials?
-Overhead costs are general operational expenses of the site that are not directly tied to a specific study, while invoiceable costs are specific expenses related to a study that can be billed directly to the sponsor.
Why is it important for a clinical trial site to have a quality management system?
-A quality management system is important because it ensures that the site is following SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) and is prepared for FDA audits, which are critical for maintaining compliance and credibility in clinical trials.
What is the role of a CRC (Clinical Research Coordinator) in a clinical trial site?
-A CRC is responsible for coordinating the day-to-day activities of a clinical trial at a site. They ensure that the trial is conducted according to the protocol, and they may also be involved in training, which is an ongoing cost for the site.
What does the speaker mean by 'democratizing' contracts and budgets for clinical trial sites?
-The speaker refers to making the process of contract and budget negotiations more accessible and understandable for smaller sites, possibly through the use of technology and support networks like DSCS, to level the playing field with larger sites and networks.
How can a smaller clinical trial site navigate the complexities of contracts and budgets without a network like DSCS?
-A smaller site may need to learn the intricacies of contract and budget negotiations the hard way, possibly by hiring specialized knowledge like a contract negotiator or by gaining experience and understanding the industry standards and databases used by larger sites and CROs.
Outlines
π Understanding Contracts and Budgets in Clinical Trials
This paragraph discusses the complexities of contracts and budgets in clinical trials, emphasizing the unique aspects of each study. The speaker introduces Chris, a business partner who handles contract negotiations for their site, which is part of the DSCS network. The paragraph delves into overhead costs, such as administration, rent, payroll, and marketing, which are shared across all studies. It also touches on the importance of quality control and the potential for passing certain costs to sponsors, like eSource fees and recruitment expenses. The speaker highlights the challenge of distinguishing between overhead, line items, and invoiceable costs, using examples like dry ice, meals, and transportation for patients, and the necessity of having a 24-hour line for patient support.
πΌ Navigating the Fair Market Value and Contract Negotiations
The second paragraph focuses on the importance of understanding fair market value for various procedures in clinical trials, as sponsors and CROs are likely to have detailed knowledge of these values. The speaker shares experiences where CROs have attempted to underpay based on incorrect fair market values. The paragraph underscores the challenges faced by smaller, independent sites that lack access to such databases and must learn through experience. It also discusses the necessity of training costs, such as CRC training fees, and how these can be negotiated into study budgets. The speaker mentions the potential for economies of scale and the benefits of working with a network like DSCS, which aims to streamline and democratize the process for sites of all sizes. The paragraph concludes with thoughts on the intricacies of contracts and budgets and an invitation for feedback on the topic.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Contracts
π‘Budgets
π‘Overhead
π‘Quality Assurance (QA)
π‘Sponsors
π‘CROs (Contract Research Organizations)
π‘eSource
π‘Recruitment
π‘Fair Market Value
π‘CRC (Clinical Research Coordinator)
π‘DSCS (Decentralized Site Network)
Highlights
Introduction to the topic of contracts and budgets in clinical trials, emphasizing their complexity and uniqueness for each study.
Acknowledgment of business partner Chris Soer, who handles contract negotiations for Yuma Clinical Trials as a DSCS site.
Explanation of overhead costs, including administrative expenses, rent, payroll, and marketing.
Discussion of the importance of quality control mechanisms and QA systems for compliance with SOPs and FDA audits.
The concept of eSource fees and how they can be negotiated as part of the contract.
Introduction of technology fees and how they are being incorporated into budgets.
The role of Patient Ace in managing recruitment advertising and the process of invoicing sponsors for these costs.
Differentiating between overhead costs and invoiceable costs, such as dry ice, meals, and transportation for patients.
The challenge of determining when costs become overhead versus an invoiceable line item for a specific study.
The necessity of understanding fair market value for various procedures and the role of sponsors and CROs in this knowledge.
The economic considerations and negotiations involved in determining overhead versus line item costs.
The importance of economies of scale and the benefits of working with a network like DSCS.
The human element in contract and budget negotiations and the difficulty of automating this process.
The necessity for sites to understand what they will be paying for before conducting a study.
The role of CRC training and how it can be negotiated into budgets for reimbursement.
The ongoing responsibility of training employees, regardless of sponsor reimbursement.
The potential for smaller sites to join larger site networks or companies for support in contract and budget management.
The ongoing efforts of DSCS to streamline and democratize contract and budget processes for sites of all sizes.
Closing thoughts on the complexity of contracts and budgets and an invitation for further discussion on the topic.
Transcripts
Guru Nation thank you so much for
watching make sure you like subscribe
comment share really means a lot to me
today I want to talk a little bit about
contracts and budgets and like remove
some of the mystery around it so you
know we've most sites when they start
getting busy they start getting more and
more contracts and budgets and really
quick shout out to my business partner
Chris soer who negotiates all of our
contracts because Yuma clinical trials
is a dscs site in the dscs site Network
and Chris oversees all the contract and
budget negotiations so um I will I have
Chris on as a regular guest and we've
discussed these kind of things before
but I want to kind of to break it down
for you and show you the complexity of
contracts and budgets because every
study is unique every study has you
complexities and intricacies that only
that
study uh that are unique to that study
but the site in general has something of
what's called overhead which is admin
which is rent which is payroll workers
comp which are things like branding
marketing community outreach when we go
out and do branding it's not just for a
study it's for all of our studies uh
then we have other things that go into
overhead like you're supposed to have at
least quality control
mechanisms um QA systems in place making
sure that we are following our Sops
these are things that when the FDA comes
to audit you better have quality
management system yeah a lot of these
things we can pass off on to the
sponsors in the contract in budget for
example when you break when you break
down like quality insurance well do you
have a eSource okay how much is that
that could be part of the eSource fee
you could have overall technology fee
which we've started putting into some of
our budgets so you can get little pieces
of things here and there you can
definitely get a recruitment invoiceable
added to your budget when it comes to um
advertising like we use patient Ace
which is one of my other companies for
Instagram and Facebook ads and we can
pass those invoices off to the sponsors
but we can also pay our monthly fee to
Patient Ace right just for a bundle of
studies and then we got to break it down
based on the ads and which ones I be
approved and which one goes to which
sponsor so at one point does it become
overhead versus an invoiceable and it
gets complicated because I would would
use patient Ace even if I lost one of my
studies I would use patient Ace even if
I lost two of my studies I don't think I
would use patient Ace if I lost all my
studies there would be no need I don't
have studies but the point is I'm using
the tool regardless of any one
particular trial it's a technology that
my site chooses to pay for with or
without study
XYZ and so there's a lot of economic
considerations in place
when you break down what's overhead
versus what's a line item for a
particular study versus invoiceable pass
through costs like um x-rays MRIs local
Labs not every study's going to want or
need those things but for the ones that
do you better make sure that you are you
have that in your invoiceable cost for
that sponsor another element is dry ice
um sometimes that's just part of
overhead other times it's a specific
align item that you've got an invoice
for other times you have things like
meals for patients or transportation for
patients like a lot of the times those
are invoiceable fees and the meals
because the patients already receive a
stipend you're not going to get
necessarily meal reimbursement for your
patients because the sponsor the sponsor
may ask you well why are they getting a
study participant fee but then you just
want to be a nice company and have a
pleasant and and offer snacks for your
patients so that then becomes part of
overhead so these are a lot of moving
Parts having that 24hour line for
patients to call non-stop like there's a
real human being answering that phone
that's part of overhead so overhead gets
a lot of the overhead is a lot of the
catch all bucket but then every study
also has line items for certain
procedures and each of those procedures
have their own range of fair market
value and you have to know what that
fair market value is because believe me
the sponsors and cro know that stuff and
they probably have a database especially
the C have a database for that stuff and
the cro also have access to this
information more so than the sponsors
because they are the middle men between
sponsors and sites a lot more than
sponsors have access to the data so as a
site you've got a lot of headwinds
working against you and according to
Chris my business partner like and I've
been a witness to this we've caught C's
lying to try to save a buck based on
fair market value with the same sponsor
now luckily for us again this is
economies of scale and the benefit of
working with we won't let them play
those games but if you're a smaller site
and you're independent and you're not
using a service like the SCS you've
going to you're just going to have to
learn this stuff the hard way and that's
where the human element comes in to
where there's there's no real way to
automate the contract and budget aspect
yet there's ways to automate certain
aspects of it but to automate the fine
nuances and the specific negotiations
that go into a budget or a contract you
need highly specialized knowledge like
someone like Chris ber someone like like
Daran K Carney and then you have to
understand what you're actually going to
be paying for before doing a study so
again there's certain costs of doing
business CRC training but there then you
get a CRC training fee if you know how
to negotiate it in every budget for most
studies again if you ask for it but that
should also be part of your ongoing
program as a site like you have
employees you're expected to train those
employees whether a sponsor is paying
for it or not so if you don't have a
study and you have a CRC do you mean to
tell me you're not training him or her
because you didn't get your CRC training
fee yet no that's a cost of doing
business so a lot of times you can get
your cost reimbursed from different
buckets and at the end of the day it
kind of all pays for itself if you're
doing it right it kind of all takes care
of itself and allows for decent profit
for the site owner ERS uh and you reach
a point where training a CRC is not just
makes them a viable CRC for one study
but for many studies at which point now
you can afford quality assurance person
to come in or maybe one of your other
crc's or you hire a quality assurance
person to do the QA which is not a line
item in any budget that I've seen
although I'm sure we can start asking
for those and as with all things in this
indry if you can justify it you you'll
get it but typically QA is part of the
overall site business model like you're
supposed to watch for your quality
assurance as a site owner so it gets
complex and this is why a lot of sites
reach out for help and we're here to
help you so dscs is the site Network
we're here to help uh we are working on
ways to streamline these things and
we're working on ways to democratize
this for the sites for the smaller sites
the bigger sites and the bigger site
networks you kind of almost forced if
you're a small site to join forces with
a bigger site Network or at least a
company like DS eventually it's going to
reach the masses with technology we're
not there yet but we're working on it
but just my thoughts on contracts and
budgets and uh why it's so complicated
like subscribe comment share let me know
if you want to hear more on this topic
byebye
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)