Opie & Anthony: Irish Anti Speeding PSA

VideOandA

25 Jun 201508:20

Summary

TLDRThe conversation revolves around the impact and content of European and UK public service announcements (PSAs) related to anti-speeding, anti-drinking, and anti-texting while driving. The speakers discuss how these ads are much more graphic and brutal compared to those in other regions, potentially to the point of offending some audiences. They humorously and critically analyze a specific PSA depicting a car accident involving children, noting its shock value and questioning its effectiveness. The dialogue is interspersed with sarcastic comments about the ad's dramatic presentation and the unrealistic portrayal of children, ultimately debating whether there's a better way to convey safety messages.

Takeaways

👏 The script humorously critiques a brutally shocking anti-speeding advertisement, highlighting the difference in approach between European/UK and other regions' public service announcements.
😮 Emphasizes the extreme nature of European and UK ads against drinking, speeding, and texting while driving, suggesting they are more graphic than what might be acceptable elsewhere.
😱 Describes a fictional, graphic scenario where speeding leads to a catastrophic accident involving children on a field trip, underlining the potential tragic consequences of reckless driving.
🙄 Suggests that despite the shocking content, people who drink and drive might not be deterred by such ads, questioning the effectiveness of graphic PSAs on changing behavior.
💬 Discusses the perception that individuals who engage in risky behaviors like speeding believe they are in control and underestimate the dangers involved.
😭 Portrays a detailed, tragic accident in the PSA, using vivid imagery to make the consequences of speeding more tangible to viewers.
😂 Incorporates dark humor to critique the PSA's dramatic presentation, suggesting it might be overly sensationalized and potentially ineffective.
💁‍♂️ Raises questions about whether there are better ways to convey safety messages without resorting to extreme shock tactics.
🤔 Reflects on the jarring disconnect between the advertisement's tragic content and the casual, humorous tone of the conversation discussing it.
👨‍💻 Suggests a cynical view on the aftermath of such tragedies, focusing on the bureaucratic and emotional challenges of dealing with the consequences.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the transcript?
-The main topic discussed is the impact of European and UK public service announcements (PSAs) on topics like anti-speeding, anti-drinking, and anti-texting while driving, and how shockingly graphic they are compared to those in other regions.
Why do the speakers believe European and UK PSAs are more brutal than those in other regions?
-They believe these PSAs are more brutal because they don't shy away from showing the graphic consequences of actions like speeding or drinking and driving, aiming to shock viewers into compliance.
What specific type of PSA is being described in the transcript?
-The PSA described involves a graphic depiction of the consequences of speeding, where a car crashes into a park and flattens children on a field trip.
How do the speakers react to the PSA's content?
-The speakers react with shock and disbelief to the PSA's content, noting its brutality and discussing the impact such a graphic depiction might have on viewers.
What are the speakers' views on the effectiveness of such PSAs?
-The speakers are skeptical about the effectiveness of such graphic PSAs, questioning whether they would actually deter the targeted behaviors like drinking and driving or speeding.
Do the speakers believe that people who engage in dangerous behaviors like speeding are aware of the risks?
-The speakers suggest that people who speed might not fully consider the inherent dangers of their actions, thinking they are in control of the vehicle and dismissing the risk.
What alternative suggestions do the speakers jokingly make for preventing accidents near parks?
-Jokingly, the speakers suggest building higher walls around parks or not placing turns near parks as absurd solutions to prevent accidents like those depicted in the PSA.
How do the speakers react to the use of children in the PSA?
-The speakers note the emotional impact of using children in the PSA, particularly how the setup with innocent activities like a field trip and playing in a park makes the eventual tragedy more shocking.
What is the speakers' opinion on the realism of the PSA?
-Initially, one speaker questions whether the events shown were real or CGI, indicating a disbelief in the extreme measures taken to create the PSA.
How do the speakers interpret the message of the PSA?
-The speakers interpret the PSA's message as an extreme attempt to showcase the deadly consequences of speeding, using shock value to attempt to change viewer behavior.

Outlines

00:00

😣 Graphic Anti-Speeding PSA Shows Children Getting Run Over

The first paragraph describes a disturbing anti-speeding PSA video from Europe. It shows a man speeding and losing control of his car, which then crashes through a park fence and rolls over a group of young children on a school field trip, graphically depicting them getting flattened and killed. The teachers witness the aftermath in shock.

05:01

😅 Discussion and Reactions to the Shocking PSA Video

The second paragraph shows the speakers' reactions to the shocking anti-speeding ad. They express disbelief at the graphic nature of the video, joke about the lack of reaction from the teachers, and discuss whether such disturbing PSAs are actually effective. They compare it to other emotional ads and agree this one went too far in trying to send an anti-speeding message.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Public Service Announcement (PSA)

A Public Service Announcement (PSA) is a message broadcast on television or radio, aimed at educating the public about an issue and influencing their opinions or behavior. In the context of this script, PSAs from Europe and the UK, particularly those addressing anti-drinking, anti-speeding, and anti-texting while driving, are discussed. These ads are noted for their brutal and shocking content, designed to have a strong impact on viewers by illustrating the severe consequences of irresponsible behaviors such as speeding.

💡Shock Value

Shock value refers to the use of disturbing, surprising, or offensive content to grab attention and elicit a strong emotional response from the audience. The script highlights how European and UK PSAs use shock value effectively to convey the dangers of speeding, drinking, and driving, suggesting that such content might offend some viewers but is intended to provoke serious consideration of the risks involved.

💡Speeding

Speeding is driving beyond the posted speed limit or too fast for road conditions. It's a central theme of the discussed PSA, depicted as a dangerous behavior that can lead to tragic accidents. The script conveys a scenario where speeding results in a catastrophic event, emphasizing that speeders may not fully appreciate the inherent dangers of their actions, believing they are in control of their vehicle.

💡Impactful Messaging

Impactful messaging involves crafting messages that leave a lasting impression on the audience, compelling them to think or act differently. The script illustrates this through the description of PSAs that use graphic imagery and scenarios to highlight the consequences of risky behaviors, like speeding, aiming to alter viewer attitudes towards such behaviors.

💡Viewer Offense

Viewer offense refers to the negative reaction some audience members might have towards content they find too shocking or disturbing. The script suggests that while European and UK PSAs are effective in conveying their message, their graphic nature might be too intense for some viewers, potentially leading to feelings of discomfort or outrage.

💡Drinking and Driving

Drinking and driving involves operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. It's discussed in the script as a behavior that PSAs aim to combat, alongside speeding and texting while driving. The script posits that individuals who drink and drive might not intend harm but become significantly more likely to cause accidents due to impaired judgment.

💡Target Audience

The target audience is the specific group of people a message is aimed at. In the script, it's suggested that the brutal PSAs are not just targeting habitual offenders but also 'fringe people'—those who might occasionally engage in risky behaviors like speeding, with the hope of making them reconsider their actions.

💡Realism in Advertising

Realism in advertising refers to the depiction of real-life scenarios or consequences to make a message more relatable or impactful. The script describes a PSA that uses a highly realistic and tragic scenario where children are harmed due to speeding, emphasizing the severe real-world consequences of such actions.

💡Emotional Response

An emotional response is a reaction elicited from an audience by certain stimuli, in this case, the graphic content of a PSA. The script details how the use of children and dramatic scenarios in PSAs is designed to evoke strong emotions like fear, sadness, or shock, thereby making the message more memorable.

💡Behavior Change

Behavior change refers to the modification of individual behaviors in response to interventions like PSAs. The script debates the effectiveness of shock-value PSAs in causing behavior change, suggesting that while some viewers may be resistant or offended, others may be influenced to alter their risky behaviors, such as speeding, as a result.

Highlights

Anti-drinking, anti-speeding, anti-texting ads from Europe are very graphic and shocking

People who drink and drive don't think they will kill someone until they are impaired

Speeders don't consider the danger inherent in speeding

Ad shows kids on a field trip getting run over by a speeding car that flips over a wall

The car flattens all the kids playing in the park

Teachers show no reaction to their entire class being flattened

The real message is don't speed near parks with kids

By signing permission slips, parents sign away everything if something happens

Using "Sweet Child o' Mine" in an ad about dead kids is very inappropriate

The New Zealand ad with the pillow was also extremely graphic

The slow motion really emphasized the damage caused by speeding

This ad was too over the top to be effective

A more subtle approach would work better to change behavior

The cute kids made their deaths even more horrifying

Not a single child was picking their nose or messing around - very unrealistic!