Olivia Wilde USED Jordan Peterson and Shia LaBeouf
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the film 'Don't Worry Darling' directed by Olivia Wilde, highlighting the film's aesthetic appeal but criticizing its narrative and character portrayals. It delves into the controversy surrounding the film, including Shia LaBeouf's departure and Wilde's alleged misrepresentation of Jordan Peterson as a villainous figure. The critique also touches on the film's exploration of societal expectations and the complexities of happiness within a simulated reality.
Takeaways
- ๐ฌ The film 'Don't Worry Darling' directed by Olivia Wilde has been surrounded by behind-the-scenes drama that has overshadowed the movie itself.
- ๐ Positive aspects of the film include its music, outfits, and 1950s setting, which are particularly appealing and evoke a sense of desire to live in Palm Springs.
- ๐ Criticisms of the film focus on the insufferable portrayal of Harry Styles and Chris Pine's character, which seems to be filled with regret for his involvement in the movie.
- ๐ The film's message is questioned, with the main character Alice discovering she's in a simulation and the real world revealing a less-than-ideal relationship dynamic.
- ๐ The plot involves a simulation where women are drugged and brainwashed into traditional roles, reflecting a commentary on societal expectations and gender roles.
- ๐ค Olivia Wilde's comparison of the film's villain to Jordan Peterson is disputed, as Peterson's philosophy is misrepresented in the movie's narrative.
- ๐ Jordan Peterson's work is about encouraging men to improve themselves and not about forcing women into traditional roles, contrary to the film's depiction.
- ๐จโ๐ฉโ๐งโ๐ฆ Peterson emphasizes the importance of men being good partners, parents, and members of society, advocating for self-improvement rather than resentment or entitlement.
- ๐ The film's portrayal of 'incels' or involuntary celibates is used to criticize a group of men who feel entitled to sex and blame women and society for their issues.
- ๐ข Olivia Wilde's use of Jordan Peterson in the film's narrative is seen as a misrepresentation and a way to generate controversy and publicity for the movie.
- ๐ซ The script discusses the controversy surrounding Shia LaBeouf's departure from the film and Olivia Wilde's handling of the situation, suggesting a lack of empathy and a rush to judgment.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video script?
-The main topic of the video script is a critique of the film 'Don't Worry Darling' directed by Olivia Wilde, discussing its behind-the-scenes drama, the movie's message, and the controversy surrounding its director's portrayal of certain characters and real-life figures.
What is the significance of the baggage claim merch mentioned at the beginning of the script?
-The significance of the baggage claim merch is not directly explained in the script, but it seems to be a promotional item or a product related to the video content, which the viewers are encouraged to check out through a link in the description.
What is the viewer's opinion on the film 'Don't Worry Darling'?
-The viewer has mixed opinions on the film. They appreciate the music, outfits, and 1950s setting but criticize the performances of Harry Styles and Chris Pine, as well as the movie's messaging and handling of behind-the-scenes issues.
What controversy is mentioned regarding Shia LaBeouf's departure from the film?
-The controversy mentioned is that Shia LaBeouf was reportedly replaced due to his on-set behavior, but he contradicted this narrative by stating that he was not fired and provided evidence of communication with Olivia Wilde indicating that he quit due to scheduling conflicts around rehearsals.
How does the viewer interpret Olivia Wilde's portrayal of the villain in 'Don't Worry Darling'?
-The viewer interprets Olivia Wilde's portrayal of the villain as being based on Jordan Peterson, which they find to be a misrepresentation, as they believe Peterson's work encourages men to improve themselves rather than suppressing women.
What is the viewer's stance on Jordan Peterson's work and its relation to the film's message?
-The viewer believes that Jordan Peterson's work is misrepresented in the film. They argue that Peterson's actual message is about self-improvement and addressing men's issues, rather than the film's portrayal of a system that drugs and enslaves women.
What is the term 'incel' as mentioned in the script, and how is it related to the film?
-The term 'incel' stands for 'involuntary celibate' and refers to individuals, usually men, who feel entitled to sex and blame society or women for their lack of romantic or sexual relationships. The film is criticized for portraying the main villain as an 'incel' leader, which the viewer finds to be a misrepresentation.
What is the synopsis of 'Don't Worry Darling' provided in the script?
-The synopsis describes 'Don't Worry Darling' as a film set in a 1950s-style town called Victory, where the protagonist Alice lives a seemingly perfect life until she starts noticing strange occurrences. The twist is revealed when it's shown that Alice is in a simulation, and in reality, she is a successful surgeon in a troubled marriage.
What is the viewer's critique of Olivia Wilde's handling of the film's promotion and behind-the-scenes issues?
-The viewer criticizes Olivia Wilde for using the controversy surrounding Shia LaBeouf's departure and the portrayal of Jordan Peterson to promote the film. They argue that Wilde's actions appear to be more about virtue signaling and self-promotion rather than focusing on the quality of the film or supporting her cast.
What is the viewer's opinion on the film's exploration of the idea of happiness in a simulation?
-The viewer acknowledges the film's exploration of whether a person can be happy in a simulation even if it's not real. However, they find the execution of this concept lacking, as the film's messaging and character portrayals are seen as problematic and misrepresentative.
How does the viewer connect the film's message to the current social landscape and Olivia Wilde's statements?
-The viewer connects the film's message to the social landscape by discussing how Wilde's portrayal of characters and real-life figures like Jordan Peterson is used to make a statement about gender roles and societal expectations. They critique Wilde's approach as being more about promoting her own image rather than accurately representing the complexities of the issues at hand.
Outlines
๐ฌ 'Don't Worry Darling' Film Critique and Behind-the-Scenes Drama
This paragraph delves into the release of the Olivia Wilde-directed film 'Don't Worry Darling', highlighting the film's appealing aspects such as its music, costumes, and 1950s setting, which contrasts with the negative reviews it received. The critique points out the film's lackluster performances, particularly of Harry Styles and Chris Pine, and discusses the intriguing premise of a simulated reality versus real-life dissatisfaction. The paragraph also touches on the film's controversial messaging regarding traditional gender roles and the influence of Jordan Peterson's philosophies, which the director claimed to have used as inspiration for the film's villain.
๐ค Misrepresentation of Jordan Peterson and Incel Culture in 'Don't Worry Darling'
The speaker challenges the film's portrayal of its villain as inspired by Jordan Peterson, arguing that Peterson's actual views are misrepresented. They clarify that Peterson advocates for personal growth and responsibility, rather than the enforced subjugation of women as depicted in the film. The paragraph addresses common misconceptions about Peterson's stance on monogamy, his male-dominated audience, and his views on feminism, emphasizing that Peterson's message is about self-improvement for men rather than reinforcing patriarchal structures.
๐ง Critique of Modern Dating Culture and its Impact on Gender Relations
This paragraph critiques the modern dating culture, particularly the impact of hookup culture and dating apps, which are argued to favor men and contribute to the rise of the 'incel' subculture. It discusses the societal shift towards casual sex and the different implications this has for men and women, suggesting that the sexual revolution has been more beneficial for men than for women. The speaker also touches on the negative effects of pornography and the challenges women face in a culture that encourages casual sex but simultaneously pressures them to suppress their natural instincts towards emotional bonding.
๐ The Disadvantages of Hookup Culture and the Need for Meaningful Relationships
The speaker continues the discussion on hookup culture, emphasizing its detrimental effects on women and the advantages it provides to a select group of men. They argue that this culture discourages meaningful relationships and fosters a sense of entitlement among men, leading to a rise in 'psychopathic' behavior. The paragraph also addresses the societal norms that encourage men to grow and evolve, suggesting that the current dating landscape undermines this process by rewarding short-term sexual gratification over long-term emotional connections.
๐ฅ Olivia Wilde's Controversial Casting Decisions and On-set Dynamics
This paragraph focuses on the controversy surrounding Olivia Wilde's casting decisions for 'Don't Worry Darling', particularly the dismissal of Shia LaBeouf and the subsequent fallout with actress Florence Pugh. It discusses the conflicting narratives between Wilde and LaBeouf, with LaBeouf providing evidence that he was not fired but chose to leave the project. The paragraph also hints at tensions between Wilde and Pugh, suggesting that Pugh felt unsupported during the filming process and was frustrated with Wilde's directorial approach.
๐ฃ Critique of Olivia Wilde's Public Image and the Film's Promotional Tactics
The final paragraph criticizes Olivia Wilde for her handling of the behind-the-scenes drama of 'Don't Worry Darling', accusing her of exploiting the situation for promotional purposes. It argues that Wilde's portrayal of herself as a feminist and her use of Jordan Peterson's philosophy in the film are contradictory to her actions, particularly her treatment of Shia LaBeouf. The speaker also addresses Wilde's complaints about the focus on the film's drama, suggesting that her own actions contributed to this scrutiny.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กDon't Worry Darling
๐กOlivia Wilde
๐กSimulation
๐กIncels
๐กJordan Peterson
๐กFeminism
๐กShia LaBeouf
๐กHookup Culture
๐กFlorence Pugh
๐กVirtue Signaling
Highlights
The film 'Don't Worry Darling' directed by Olivia Wilde has behind-the-scenes drama that is more interesting than the movie itself.
The movie features great music, incredible outfits, and a 1950s setting that evokes Palm Springs.
The film's protagonist Alice, played by Florence Pugh, is portrayed as extremely happy and in love with her husband Jack.
Alice begins to notice strange occurrences in the seemingly perfect town of Victory, leading to a twist revealing a simulation.
In reality, Alice is a successful surgeon and Jack is an unemployed and resentful husband.
The movie explores the dark side of a simulated utopia where women are drugged and brainwashed into traditional roles.
The character Frank, played by Chris Pine, is revealed as the architect behind the simulation, influenced by the ideas of Jordan Peterson.
Olivia Wilde's portrayal of the villain is criticized for misrepresenting Jordan Peterson's views on societal roles and gender.
Dr. Peterson's actual views encourage men to seek self-improvement and healthy relationships, contrary to the film's narrative.
The film's message is questioned, as it seems to argue against the idea of men helping other men become better partners.
Dr. Peterson discusses the negative impacts of the hookup culture and the advantages it gives to men over women.
The transcript examines the misrepresentation of Dr. Peterson's views on monogamy and his actual advocacy for meaningful relationships.
Shia LaBeouf's departure from the film and the controversy surrounding it are discussed, with LaBeouf claiming he was not fired.
Florence Pugh's falling out with Olivia Wilde is hinted at, possibly due to a lack of support during filming.
Olivia Wilde is criticized for using Jordan Peterson's name to promote her film without understanding his actual work.
The video concludes with Jordan Peterson's response to Olivia Wilde's comments, defending his work with disaffected young men.
Transcripts
baggage claim merch is officially live
so go check it out link is in the
description a week ago I couldn't help
but sit down to watch the Olivia Wilde
directed film don't worry darling and as
many people have already reviewed it on
YouTube you're probably aware that the
behind the scenes drama was a lot more
interesting than the actual movie itself
the film had some great aspects to it
like the music the incredible outfits
and the 1950s setting I mean it
definitely made me want to move to Palm
Springs and immediately start working on
my drinking problem and forget about
Meghan Markle because this is clearly
the Florence Pew moment beyond that
however I don't have a lot of positive
things to say about the movie since
Harry Styles is insufferable in it and
the ones incredibly handsome Chris Pine
seems to be contemplating what
ill-advised decisions he has made in his
life that have led him to this fresh new
health my favorite thing about the movie
is like it feels like a
it feels like a real life
so let's get into it let's talk about
everything wrong with the messaging of
the movie all the behind the scenes
nonsense like Shia LaBeouf's departure
and most importantly why Olivia Wilde
decided to base her villain on Jordan
Peterson who apparently is the hero of
incels now did you know that more on
that later if you haven't watched don't
worry darling well don't worry darling
here's a quick synopsis so spoiler alert
the movie is based in the 1950s Palm
spring-esque Oasis town called Victory
where everyone is stylish the parties
are wild the women are super into their
housework and the men perform a daily
synchronized drive to work our
protagonist Alice is extremely happy and
madly in love with her husband Jack
they're so Amorous in fact that I really
had to resist the urge to throw cold
water at the TV oh my God stop it move
the plot forward tell us something why
were the eggs empty I'm so confused
anyway the 5 min it's a day Alice is not
having sex with Jack she starts to
notice some wild things happening and
after what felt like hours of very weird
things happening with no explanation nor
any hints only Chris Pine's character
Frank giving some vague speeches we
choose to stand our ground to mine
that pure
unbridled
we're finally told that Alice is in fact
in a simulation real Alice and real Jack
live in current times where Alice works
all the time as a successful surgeon and
Jack is a resentful unemployed piece of
garbage who can't even decide on what to
order for dinner without guidance from
his mother I mean sorry his wife well
I'm starving I haven't eaten why not I
wasn't sure what you wanted and you
never text me back I don't have my phone
in the OR Jack
would it be nice to know that does he
not know that she's not just standing
around at work that being a surgeon
she's in surgery and can't check her
text messages well we did see earlier
that he doesn't know potatoes need to be
boiled before they can be mashed dear
God anyway in the real world Alice is
unhappy and so is Jack thankfully Jack
has been listening to a podcast by Frank
where he helps him to realize that the
only answer to the modern man's troubles
is to drug and brainwash women into
re-embodying their traditional roles in
the home while the men go out to work
upon discovering all this Alice kills
Jack Frank's wife kills him and says
this it's my turn now what does that
mean who knows no one knows what it
means but it's provocative and at the
end after quite the car chase Alice
escapes and that's it that's the end of
the movie The Meta question that Olivia
Wilde is asking with this movie is that
can a person be happy in a simulation
even if they have everything they want
but find out it's not real who is
actually brave enough to question A
system that really works for them in a
really amazing way a comfortable World
we're all really good at being
comfortable in bubbles and that's what
we were trying to kind of unpack well
Florence Pugh's character who Escapes Me
Alice Alice Alice goes down the rabbit
hole shall we say and she she questions
it she does brilliant performance she's
Sensational in this film and she is the
one who's brave enough to dismantle the
system that serves her and the main
message of the film is that the true
male fantasy is to put women back in the
kitchen where they can make the roasts
and hand them a drink when they come
home and toss said roast aside because
there's something else on the menu you
get to stay here
and you're happy
you happy now you know who the main
villain of Peace truly is it's the
incels or involuntary celibates I.E
heterosexual men who blame women and the
current structure of society for their
miseries and general sexual failure with
women which is why they have to drug
them to get them to play out the roles
that feel more natural thanks to the
influence of their cultish leader Frank
Frank is the architect behind this new
Utopia and yes the character that Olivia
Wilde said she modeled after Jordan
Peterson after calling Peterson a hero
to incel community wild described
insults as disenfranchised mostly white
men who believe they are entitled to sex
from women and they believe that Society
has now robbed them but the idea of
feminism is working against nature and
that we must be put back into the
correct place now if you're familiar
with Dr Peterson's work then you know
that he is far from an insult hero so
you're a young man and all the women are
rejecting you
who's got the problem
it's not all the women
that's a bad road to go down if all the
women are rejecting you it's you that
doesn't sound very pro-incile to me so
why would Olivia Wilde compare Frank who
is literally arguing for female
drug-induced enslavement to Jordan
Peterson it's clear that Olivia Wilde is
not familiar with his work what she
seems to be familiar with however is the
work of his self-proclaimed enemies that
have very intensely misinterpreted and
misrepresented his beliefs and in
relation to the topics covered in don't
worry darling there are three specific
ways that Dr Peterson is misrepresented
number one his comments on enforced
monogamy number two his audience being
comprised primarily of men number three
his comments about the feminist movement
if we look at the phrase enforce
monogamy without any context that sounds
like exactly the type of force coercion
of women that don't worry darling
portrays but what does it actually mean
and what does it have to do with Dr
Peterson you know I was pilloried a few
years back from my comments about
enforced monogamy because they were
taken out of context and twisted in
exactly the way that things like that
get twisted now but every what did you
mean by that
I mean that one of the one human
Universal is the construction of
societies to
both mandate and reward monogamy and
there's all sorts of reasons for that
it's because it's the best long-term
solution fundamentally but one of the
reasons for that is that when women are
scarce men get violent
now you know that was read to say well I
thought that this Society should be
Distributing women to undeserving men
which is of course absolutely is an
utterly preposterous and bears no
relationship whatsoever to anything I
ever said or thought or anything anyone
saying would ever think or say or has
ever thought or said because I don't
know anyone politically ever who was
insane enough to think that the state
should distribute women to men like
that's just never happened so to be
accused of that belief and then for that
too you know be put forward as a
credible representation of what I
thought was just one of the Preposterous
things that has happened to me it's an
unfortunate name enforced monogamy
because it's a term from anthropology
right but it what you mean is culturally
celebrated monogamy culturally and Norms
that are supporting people and raising
that ability supporting and punishing
both but mostly supporting I mean the
punishing is that there's there's a
moral uh disapproval
applied to say cheating
right to adultery to especially running
around behind your partner's back if
you're married particularly that but
even if you're even if you're in a
long-term stable relationship it's like
well that's all enforcement in his
comments about monogamy Dr Peterson is
not talking about forcing women but more
so encouraging men to seek out proper
long-term relationships and focus on
self-improvement why are weak men such a
problem
what weak people are a problem in
general and I don't mean physically weak
I mean cowardly let's say and deceitful
because I'm thinking it more in terms of
moral weakness well there's a variety of
reasons is first of all if you can't
support your own weight let's say
then someone else has to do it and
that's not good and then if you don't
make your pathway if you don't pick a
forthright and useful and Noble pathway
through life then you'll become bitter
and and and too hurt by the tragedy of
existence and then you tend to seek your
revenge wherever you can get it and
that's not good
so it's a it's a mistake on all fronts
it's not good for you it's not good for
your family it's not good for the
community let me ask for some dating
advice from Jordan Peterson how do you
find on that topic the love of your life
that's a good question
I was asked that multiple times but I
did to have a good answer and then I
thought
why don't I have a good answer
I thought oh I know why because that's a
stupid question
so so why yeah why
because it's it's putting the cart
before the horse here's the right
question
[Music]
how do I make myself into the perfect
date
you answer that question and you will
not have any problem answering the
previous question it's like
what I want in a partner mm-hmm
if I offered everything I could to a
partner who would I be the harder you
work on
offering other people what they need and
want
the more people will line up to play
with you so it's the wrong question it's
like how can I be the best partner
possible so you can see that Dr
Peterson's primary messaging is to push
men to evolve beyond their insecurities
resentments and weaknesses and become
better members of their society and this
brings me to the second point that
Peterson is often misrepresented or
attacked for the fact that he draws a
large male audience he used to often
feel defensive of this fact but in
recent years has come to wonder what
exactly is wrong with it why why do you
think so many young men are following
you because you you have you have a lot
of yours because I want your best for
them
genuinely
that I'm encouraging more than you do
for young women no no no why do you
think so many are young men I think that
young women are encouraged a lot which
is fine as far as I'm concerned but I
think that that's less true uh for young
men now because we believe that there's
something pernicious about male
competence and activity it's part of a I
suppose it's part of the notion that the
best way to characterize Western Society
is as a tyrannical patriarchy which is a
appalling Doctrine as far as I'm
concerned isn't it good that he is
speaking to disaffected men who are
generally growing up without any
encouragement or positive male role
models and his messaging to them isn't
that they should continue to be
resentful and angry or feel entitled to
women just for existing rather he takes
them to task aiming to encourage men to
be better better Sons to their parents
Partners to their women parents to their
children and better members of society
because truly Partnerships with weak men
make women deep unhappy as the movie
clearly showcases the impact of this
advice is incredible perfectly showcased
in the comments section of his videos
where men share their experiences of how
Dr Peterson helped them work on
themselves and improve their lives and
relationships and that's exactly what Dr
Peterson's two books 12 rules for life
and Beyond order are designed for to
give people a rubric for how to improve
their lives so to summarize Dr Peterson
is clearly identifying an important fact
weak men make for terrible partners and
create deep unhappiness for the women
they are attached to and that these men
need to look within and aim to earn the
trust and love of their Partners so
what's so wrong with that well a lot of
people feel that these men don't deserve
to be saved or helped since they are men
or as people would call them the enemy
so why should Jordan Peterson be helping
them and that's the question doesn't
incel deserve to be helped to be
encouraged to be better my guests here
from the tone of don't worry darling as
well as the Press interviews during the
promotions is that Olivia Wilde would
say no but I'll come back to this point
because we need to talk about the Third
Way that Dr Peterson is misrepresented
if Dr Peterson is insisting on talking
to and aiming to help struggling men
then that must mean that he is against
women at least that's the stance that a
lot of journalists have taken against
him trying to paint him as the ultimate
chauvinist out to bind women to their
kitchen stoves and restore men to their
rightful place but never once has Dr
Peterson made any such statement instead
I would argue that he is one of the few
voices that accurately articulates the
struggles that women are having with
modern men who are completely
ill-equipped for long-term relationships
our society has seen a massive rise in
hookup culture fueled by the
proliferation of dating apps as well as
the feminist movement attempts to break
down the stigmas of female promiscuity
but the truth is that hookup culture
hurts women and rewards men because it
gives men a free pass to use women
sexually and then move on to their next
Conquest meanwhile thanks to the sexual
Revolution women are told that they too
should be able to view sex just as
casually as men some something that as
the author Louise Perry discussed on
Chris Williamson's podcast is not
actually feasible what's wrong with this
sexual Revolution then
so my argument in the book is basically
that there are some really important
ways in which men and women are
different from one another one of those
differences for instance is that male
sexuality is different from female
sexuality on average that men are more
likely to be into things like casual sex
watching porn buying sex
um all things that have become much more
socially acceptable post-sexual
Revolution and my argument basically is
that
the sex Revolution was kicked off by the
pill and the which which did a pretty
good job of severing the link between
sex and reproduction and kind of gave
the impression that sex could just be a
Leisure activity that it didn't have to
mean anything it could just be sort of a
bit of fun and my argument is actually
that that idea that sex is just just a
bit of fun doesn't really mean anything
suit male interests much more than it
does female because casual sex in
particular is just one one men wanting
all the women do and two women carry all
of the risks associated with it like
physical risks like pregnancy and
violence and so on
um so Margaret basically is it's a bad
deal I'm a concerned for women I'm also
concerned for men I mean there's a lot
in the book about for instance the
really malign influence of porn on young
men like
that's in it superficial and short-term
way
great to be a really attractive man in
this sexual culture right you can
basically attract as many partners as
you like
you know consequence free sex is freely
available to you but I think actually in
the long run that's not a very
that's not a happy way to live your life
there's a whole genre of
um articles in women's in women's media
about encouraging women not to catch
feelings or I mean the way that it's
phrased is
um how anyone of any gender can not
catch feelings when they're having
casual sex and how to have casual sex in
like a fun feminist way etc etc but like
we know that women are much more likely
to bond quickly with their sexual
partners we know that they just much
less likely to like casual sex
um something that's a really interesting
and really marked difference between men
and women on average on in um sexuality
is women sexual disgust threshold is a
lot lot lower so women will get the ick
much easier than men will
but if you're going to participate if
you're going to have sex like a man you
have to overcome all of those instincts
right and so there's a this whole genre
of women's bags that will basically
like instructs their young readers
in how to suppress
their instincts and have sex that
actually they kind of know deep down
they shouldn't be having by the way if
you haven't watched this podcast please
do it's fascinating I will link it in
the description what's also interesting
about hookup culture especially through
dating apps is that it skews heavily in
favor of a small subset of men here's
Rob Henderson a PhD student in
evolutionary and Social Psychology
laying out the numbers so there's
there's three search basically showing
this so on Tinder uh women are they they
like you know swipe right they like the
profiles of only four percent of the men
that they see on the app whereas for for
uh men when they see female profiles
they swipe right or like more than 60
percent that's six zero sixty percent
many people have made the argument that
by loosening the Norms around marriage
it's actually been to the benefit of of
men in some sense you know to be able to
have lots of promiscuous partners with
many different women and perhaps
impregnate some of them and not have to
stick around there's no obligation to
them Beyond
that means that it's advantageous to
Psychopathic men
right dark Triad types well exactly
because you know the the Hallmark of
psychopathy is
short-term advantage taken by a given
individual without care for anyone else
and it certainly seems to me like dating
apps like Tinder now I don't I don't
want to call every male who's successful
on Tinder a psychopath I'm not saying
that but I would say that it isn't
obvious to me at all that
if you're a successful polyamorous male
on Tinder and so that's going to be a
very tiny subset of man
they're hyper selected by women a tiny
subset of men who re who receive almost
no rejection
they're set up to learn to be
Psychopathic because
all their interactions with other people
can be devoted to short-term sexual
gratification with no emotional intimacy
or long-term commitment and that's a
hell of a training ground this means
that the men who are highly desired by
women don't have the incentive to settle
down since they have unlimited options
thanks to the apps and the women get
fewer opportunities to engage in
meaningful relationships with men while
also being told that they shouldn't need
to or want to have meaningful emotional
connections meanwhile the rest of the
men who get rejected by the women on the
apps fall into the incel category and
people might say good that's what they
deserve why do they deserve a long-term
relationship with a woman if they don't
have anything to offer and that is
exactly the point that Jordan Peterson
is making with his comments about what
we're now going to Rebrand as Chris
Williamson put it as celebrated monogamy
where we as a society should push people
to engage not in Shallow hookups that
lead to all sorts of misery but
meaningful long-term relationships
precisely because of the positive impact
they have on individual growth we often
talk about the male gaze which is prone
to over sexualizing women but we never
talk about the female gays even though
it is the foundation for almost all
romantic films it has the power to make
a man incredibly self-conscious women
are the Discerning picky party we aren't
willing to just be with anyone men have
to earn our affections and this
gatekeeping that we do often as the very
positive effect of forcing men to grow
up and evolve from resentful immature
boys to competent confident men
ultimately giving men a focal point in
their journey of redemption a tale as
old as time so coming back to don't
worry darling here's why I would argue
that Olivia Wilde doesn't really believe
in the story of male Redemption and
that's because of how she used Shia
LaBeouf to Virtue signal during the
promotion of her film here's what she
had to say back in August during an
interview with variety I say this as
someone who is such an admirer of his
work she said his process was not
conducive to the ethos that I demand in
my Productions he has a process that in
some ways seems to require combative
energy and I don't personally believe
that that is conducive to the best
performances she continued I believe
that creating a safe trusting
environment is the best way to get
people to do their best work ultimately
my responsibility is to the production
and to the cast to protect them that was
my job Shia LaBeouf came out to
contradict the story stating that he was
absolutely not fired and even showed
proof of a video sent to him by wild
where she asked him to try to make it
work
reach out because
I'm not ready to give up on this yet and
I too am heartbroken and I want
out and
you know I think this might be a bit of
a wake-up call for Miss Flo and I want
to know if you're open to giving this a
shot with me
with us if she really commits if she
really puts her her mind and heart into
it at this point
and if you guys can make peace and I
respect your point of view I respect
hers but if you guys can do it what do
you think
is there hope is there hope you let me
know
he also shared a letter that he wrote to
Wild in an effort to clear up the
situation and for the sake of full
context I'm going to read out the entire
letter Olivia I hope this finds you
inspired purposeful fulfilled and well I
pray every night that you and your
family have health happiness and
everything God would give me no joke
every night before I sleep I have a
little girl Isabelle she is five months
old and just beginning to develop the
last half of her laugh it's amazing Mia
my wife and I have found each other
again and are journeying towards a
healthy family with love and mutual
respect I have embarked on a journey
that feels Redemptive and righteous
dirty word but fitting right to you now
with 627 days of sobriety and a moral
compass that never existed before my
great humbling that was the last year
and a quarter of my life I reached out
to you a few months ago to make amends
and I still pray one day that you can
find space in your heart to forgive me
for the failed collaboration we shared
what inspired this email today is your
latest variety story I am greatly
honored by your words on my work thank
you that felt good to read I am a little
confused about the narrative that I was
fired however you and I both know the
reasons for my exit I quit your film
because your actors and I couldn't find
time to rehearse I have included as a
reminder the screenshots of our text
exchange on that day and my text to Toby
I know that you are beginning your press
run for don't worry darling and that the
news of my firing is attractive
clickbait and I am still persona non
grata and may remain as such for the
rest of my life but speaking of my
daughter I often think about the news
articles she will read when she is
literate and though I O and will owe for
the rest of my life I only owe for my
actions my feelings with Twigs are
fundamental and real but they are not
the narrative that has been represented
there is a time and a place to deal with
such things and I'm trying to navigate a
nuanced situation with respect for her
and the truth hence my silence but this
situation with your film and my firing
will never have a court date with which
to deal with the facts if lies are
repeated enough in the public they
become truth and so it makes it that
much harder for me to crawl out of the
hole that I have dug with my behaviors
to be able to provide for my family
firing me never took place Olivia and
while I fully understand stand the
attractiveness of pushing that story
because of the current social landscape
the social currency that brings it is
not the truth so I am humbly asking as a
person with an eye towards making things
right that you correct the narrative as
best you can I hope none of this
negatively affects you and that your
film is successful in all the ways you
want it to be every blessing to you Shia
but while continued to stick by The
Narrative that she had fired Le buff and
being forced to choose her actress
repeatedly indicating that it was his
onset behavior that led to this fire
once it became clear that it was not a
tenable working relationship I was given
an ultimatum I chose my actress which
I'm very happy I did at the time was I
bummed that we weren't able to make it
work sure did information about him come
to light later that made me confident we
made the right decision absolutely but
text between Le buff and Pugh confirmed
that Florence P was never uncomfortable
with him but it simply came down to
availability to rehearse together
meanwhile wild complained that there
shouldn't be such a fixation on the
behind the scenes drama I don't feel
like my male directing colleagues are
answering questions about their cat I
would agree with you when in fact she
was the one who started up in the first
place by bringing up the fact that she
had to fire Le buff due to his onset
Behavior and the real irony of it is
that wild had a falling out with
Florence Pew with Pew making it very
clear that she would not be
participating in any of the promotions
for the movie the rumor is that the
reason for the falling out is that Pugh
did not feel supported when she asked
for resources during filming of intimate
scenes and was generally frustrated that
wild and Harry Styles who started dating
during the production would allegedly
run off together leaving Pew to manage
as the pseudo director so as much as I
understand Wild's frustration that her
male directors don't face the sword of
scrutiny I would argue that it's not
because of her gender but her blatant
ill use of people like Jordan Peterson
and child above in order to shamelessly
promote her film and that despite
knowing Shia and working closely with
him instead of having any empathy for
him or belief in his ability to redeem
himself she chose to stand on top of his
tattered reputation in in order to
Virtue signal and bolster her position
as the ultimate feminist and for that
she definitely deserves to be criticized
in closing I leave you with this clip of
Jordan Peterson sit down with Piers
Morgan where he was asked about Olivia
Wilde's comments the film director
Olivia Wilde has a new movie out which
yeah she says it's based on you this
insane man this pseudo-intellectual hero
to the in-cell community in cell being
these weirdo loner men uh who are
despicable in many ways is that you are
you the intellectual hero to these
people
sure why not you know
um
people have been after me for a long
time by because I've been speaking to
disaffected young men you know what a
terrible thing to do that is
thought the marginalized we're supposed
to have a voice
is making emotional talk about it well
God you know
it's very difficult to understand
how demoralized people are
and certainly many young men are in that
category and you get these casual
insults these these in cells is what
does it mean it's like well these men
they're they don't know how to make
themselves attractive to women who are
very picky and good for them women like
be picky that's that's your gift man
demand high standards from your man fair
enough but all these men who are
alienated it's like
they're Lonesome and and and they don't
know what to do and everyone piles abuse
on them
thank you for watching everyone if you
enjoyed this video please like share and
subscribe thank you and I'll see you
next time
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)