Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Side-by-Side Tests

Summary

In a head-to-head comparison, the video script evaluates the performance of CLA 3.5 Sonet against GPT 40 across various tasks, including creative writing, image description, coding, sentiment analysis, and conversational skills. CLA 3.5 Sonet demonstrates superiority in creative writing and coding challenges, while GPT 40 excels in question answering and image generation. The final verdict leans towards CLA 3.5 Sonet for its nuanced responses and speed, suggesting a shift in the narrator's preference for coding tasks and API usage, despite GPT 40's continued use for daily chats due to its integrated features.

Takeaways

• 🧠 CLA 3.5 Sonet is highly intelligent, scoring close to domain experts in advanced reasoning tests.
• 💻 It excels in coding tasks, outperforming previous models like GPT-40 and Opus in coding benchmarks.
• 👀 CLA 3.5 Sonet has state-of-the-art vision capabilities, leading in multiple vision-based benchmarks.
• 📝 Anthropic's new 'artifacts' feature allows for interactive content generation, enhancing user experience.
• ⚡ The model is remarkably fast, generating text at a rate of 80 tokens per second.
• 📚 In creative writing, CLA 3.5 Sonet produced more engaging and emotionally resonant stories compared to GPT-40.
• 🎨 For poetry, CLA 3.5 Sonet again outperformed GPT-40 with a shorter but more impactful poem.
• 🐉 In dialogue creation, CLA 3.5 Sonet created more realistic and engaging conversations between a dragon and a knight.
• 🖼️ Both models were accurate in basic image description tasks, but CLA 3.5 Sonet provided more detail.
• 🔍 In coding challenges, CLA 3.5 Sonet's code for a responsive navigation bar was more effective and visually appealing.
• 🤖 GPT-40 and CLA 3.5 Sonet performed similarly in sentiment analysis, but Sonet's response was more concise and accurate in complex cases.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video script?

The main purpose of the video script is to compare the performance of two AI models, CLA 3.5 Sonet and GPT 40, across various tasks and benchmarks.

What are the five highlights of CLA 3.5 Sonet mentioned in the script?

The five highlights of CLA 3.5 Sonet are its advanced reasoning capabilities, coding proficiency, state-of-the-art vision capabilities, new feature called 'artifacts' for content generation, and its fast text generation speed.

How does CLA 3.5 Sonet perform on the Graduate level reasoning benchmark?

CLA 3.5 Sonet performs close to the average domain expert, scoring significantly higher than the average non-expert on the Graduate level reasoning benchmark.

What is the significance of the coding benchmark mentioned in the script?

The coding benchmark is significant as it measures the AI's ability to solve programming problems, with CLA 3.5 Sonet outperforming GPT 40 in this area according to the benchmarks mentioned.

What is the 'artifacts' feature in CLA 3.5 Sonet and how does it work?

The 'artifacts' feature in CLA 3.5 Sonet allows for the generation of content such as code snippets or text documents with interactive elements. For example, if it generates HTML or JavaScript, it can be run live within the editor, providing a dynamic preview of the work.

How does the video script compare the speed of text generation between CLA 3.5 Sonet and GPT 40?

The script states that CLA 3.5 Sonet generates text at around 80 tokens per second, which is faster than GPT 40 and significantly faster than CLA Opus.

What is the format of the head-to-head tests between CLA 3.5 Sonet and GPT 40?

The head-to-head tests involve giving both models the same prompt and evaluating their responses based on subjective criteria, with points awarded to the winner of each test.

Which creative writing tasks were used to test the AI models in the script?

The creative writing tasks included writing a flash fiction story about a time-traveling bunny detective and creating a poem about a rainy day.

How did CLA 3.5 Sonet perform in the image description tests?

CLA 3.5 Sonet performed well in the image description tests, providing detailed and accurate descriptions, especially when compared to GPT 40.

What was the outcome of the coding tests between CLA 3.5 Sonet and GPT 40?

CLA 3.5 Sonet was found to be superior in the coding tests, particularly in creating a responsive navigation bar and a countdown timer, due to its use of the 'artifacts' feature and more accurate code.

How did the video script evaluate the conversational skills of the AI models?

The conversational skills were evaluated by having a back-and-forth conversation with each model, looking for empathy, context maintenance, and natural language use, with CLA 3.5 Sonet being the preferred model in this category.

What was the final tally of points between CLA 3.5 Sonet and GPT 40 after all tests?

The final tally was six points for GPT 40 and eight points for CLA 3.5 Sonet.

What changes does the author intend to make in their use of the AI models after the tests?

The author plans to switch all coding tasks to use CLA 3.5 Sonet, likely switch the majority of their company's API usage to CLA 3.5 Sonet, and continue using GPT for day-to-day tasks due to its additional features like custom gpts, internet searches, image generation, and voice chat.