Intel Core i9-10900K Vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT : MANA PROCESSOR YANG TERBAIK ?

Summary

In this comparison video, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is put head-to-head with Intel's latest Core i9-10900K processor. The video highlights their performance across synthetic benchmarks, gaming tests, and content creation tasks. While the Intel chip excels in single-core performance, the Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the i9-10900K in multi-core tasks and power efficiency. The Ryzen 9 also proves to be more economical, offering better value for gamers and content creators, despite the higher power consumption of the Intel chip. The final recommendation depends on specific use cases and budget considerations.

Takeaways

• 😀 The comparison in the video is between the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 XT and Intel Core i9-10900K processors, focusing on performance, power consumption, and suitability for different use cases.
• 😀 The Intel Core i9-10900K is a new generation processor with a base frequency of 5.3 GHz, while the Ryzen 9 3900 XT has 12 cores and 24 threads, offering better multicore performance.
• 😀 The Ryzen 9 3900 XT outperforms the Intel i9-10900K in multi-core tasks like rendering, with the Ryzen being faster in Adobe Media Encoder and Blender tests.
• 😀 Despite the i9-10900K having a higher clock speed, the Ryzen 9 3900 XT leads in multicore-heavy tasks, showcasing its superior performance in applications like rendering and encoding.
• 😀 In gaming tests, the Ryzen 9 3900 XT shows better performance in some titles (e.g., Forza Horizon 4 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider), though Intel's i9-10900K is still competitive in other games like GTA V.
• 😀 When considering power consumption, the Intel i9-10900K consumes significantly more power (284W) than the Ryzen 9 3900 XT (174W), making the AMD processor more energy-efficient.
• 😀 The i9-10900K provides strong performance in applications that require high clock speeds and specific Intel features but is less efficient than the Ryzen in terms of power consumption.
• 😀 For everyday applications, the Ryzen 9 3900 XT may be a better option if you don't need Intel-specific features, as it is generally more cost-effective and performs better in multi-core tasks.
• 😀 The video discusses the pricing difference, with the Ryzen 9 3900 XT being priced around 8 million IDR and the Intel i9-10900K ranging from 9 million to 12.5 million IDR.
• 😀 The final recommendation depends on user needs: Intel's i9-10900K is ideal for users requiring Intel-specific features, while the Ryzen 9 3900 XT is better for gamers and content creators who prioritize performance over specific features.

Q & A

What is the main comparison in the video?

The video compares the performance of two processors: the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and the Intel Core i9-10900K.

How do the core configurations of the Ryzen 9 3900X and Intel Core i9-10900K differ?

The Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i9-10900K has 10 cores and 20 threads.

What is the key feature of the Intel Core i9-10900K that could potentially boost its performance?

The Intel Core i9-10900K features Turbo Boost Technology 3.0, which allows it to achieve higher clock frequencies, up to 5.3 GHz.

How do the two processors compare in terms of synthetic CPU performance?

The Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in both single-core and multi-core tests, showcasing superior multicore performance.

In terms of rendering performance, which processor performs better?

The Ryzen 9 3900X is faster in rendering tasks, completing tests like the Firestrike and Blender benchmarks several seconds ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900K.

How do the processors perform in media encoding tests using Adobe Media Encoder?

The Ryzen 9 3900X consistently outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in media encoding tasks, showing a significant advantage, especially in software encoding.

Which processor performs better in gaming benchmarks?

The Ryzen 9 3900X generally performs better in gaming, particularly in titles like Forza Horizon 4 and Red Dead Redemption 2, due to its higher multi-core performance.

Does the number of cores in a processor directly impact gaming performance?

While multi-core performance is important, gaming benchmarks show that in some cases, the difference in performance between the two processors is not drastic, with both providing high frame rates.

What are the power consumption differences between the two processors?

The Intel Core i9-10900K consumes significantly more power, drawing 284 watts compared to the Ryzen 9 3900X's 174 watts, indicating a higher energy demand for Intel’s processor.

Which processor offers better value for money for gamers and content creators?

The Ryzen 9 3900X is considered better value for money, offering superior multi-core performance at a lower price compared to the Intel Core i9-10900K, making it a better choice for gamers and content creators who don’t need specific Intel features.