Critical Thinking #2: Valid & Sound Arguments
Summary
TLDRThis script explores the concept of validity in deductive arguments, contrasting it with soundness and truth. It clarifies that a valid argument has a conclusion that logically follows from its premises, even if those premises are false, as in the example of 'Fido the flying dog.' Soundness, however, requires both validity and true premises. The script uses examples to illustrate these concepts and promotes 'Brilliant' for those interested in philosophy and critical thinking, offering hands-on learning through puzzles and real-world scenarios.
Takeaways
- π Validity in deductive arguments refers to the internal logic where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
- π A valid argument is not necessarily a good or sound one; it only means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
- πΎ The example of 'all dogs can fly' and 'Fido is a dog' illustrates a valid but not sound argument, as the premises are not true.
- π Soundness evaluates both the validity of an argument and the truth of its premises, requiring both to be true for the argument to be sound.
- π The argument 'Ted Cruz is a politician' is sound because it is valid and has true premises.
- π° The argument 'Paris is the capital of Germany' is not sound because, despite true premises, the conclusion does not logically follow.
- πΏ The argument about political affiliations being true (Marco Rubio is a Republican, Hillary Clinton is a Democrat) but leading to an invalid conclusion (Jill Stein is a Green Party member) shows that truth in premises doesn't guarantee argument validity.
- π€ Accepting conclusions should only be done for arguments that are both valid and sound, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking.
- π§ The script promotes 'Brilliant' as a platform for learning about logic, problem-solving, and critical thinking with hands-on lessons and puzzles.
- π Brilliant's learning approach involves engaging with real-world scenarios and problems, making learning practical and interactive.
- π‘ The offer for '20% off an annual Premium Membership' for the first 200 people who visit 'brilliant.org/criticalthinking' is a call to action for those interested in enhancing their critical thinking skills.
Q & A
What is the definition of a deductive argument?
-A deductive argument is an argument where the premises logically guarantee the conclusion. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, leaving no alternative.
What does it mean for an argument to be valid?
-An argument is valid if the truth of the premises would guarantee the truth of the conclusion. It is about the internal logic of the argument, not the truthfulness of the premises themselves.
How is a valid argument different from a sound argument?
-A valid argument has a logical structure where the conclusion follows from the premises. A sound argument, however, is not only valid but also has true premises.
Can you provide an example of a valid argument that is not sound?
-An example is the argument that 'All dogs can fly, and Fido is a dog, so Fido can fly.' It is valid in structure, but not sound because the premise 'All dogs can fly' is false.
What is the definition of soundness in the context of arguments?
-Soundness is an evaluation of an argument that is both valid and has true premises. A sound argument is logically structured and based on facts.
What is the difference between the properties of an argument and the property of a statement?
-Validity and soundness are properties of an argument, evaluating its logical structure and the truth of its premises. Truth is a property of a statement, referring to whether the statement corresponds to reality.
Can an argument be sound if its premises are true but the argument is invalid?
-No, an argument cannot be sound if it is invalid. Soundness requires both validity and true premises. If the argument's structure does not guarantee the conclusion, it is not sound.
Why should we only accept conclusions of arguments that are both valid and sound?
-We should only accept conclusions of arguments that are both valid and sound because they provide a reliable and logical basis for the conclusion, ensuring that the reasoning is correct and the premises are factual.
What is the role of critical thinking in evaluating the validity and soundness of arguments?
-Critical thinking is essential for evaluating the validity and soundness of arguments as it involves analyzing the structure of the argument, assessing the truth of the premises, and determining whether the conclusion logically follows.
What is the 'Brilliant' platform mentioned in the script, and how does it relate to the topic of arguments?
-Brilliant is an online learning platform that offers immersive lessons on various subjects, including logic, problem-solving, and critical thinking. It helps users develop skills to better understand and evaluate arguments, including their validity and soundness.
How can someone benefit from using the 'Brilliant' platform as mentioned in the script?
-By using the 'Brilliant' platform, users can engage with hands-on learning experiences, solving problems and puzzles designed by expert educators. This approach helps deepen understanding of subjects like logic and critical thinking, which are essential for evaluating arguments.
Outlines
π Understanding Validity in Deductive Arguments
This paragraph introduces the concept of validity in the context of deductive arguments. It explains that a valid argument is one where the truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion, using the example of an argument that, although valid, is not sound due to false premises. The paragraph distinguishes between the validity of an argument and its soundness, which requires both validity and true premises. It provides examples to illustrate the difference, including one sound argument and one invalid argument, and emphasizes the importance of accepting only conclusions from arguments that are both valid and sound.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Validity
π‘Deductive Argument
π‘Soundness
π‘Premises
π‘Conclusion
π‘Truth
π‘Logical Guarantee
π‘Argument
π‘Critical Thinking
π‘Brilliant
Highlights
Exploring the technical meaning of 'validity' in the context of deductive arguments.
A deductive argument's premises logically guarantee its conclusion, with no alternative.
Validity is a tool for evaluating the internal logic of a deductive argument.
A valid argument does not necessarily mean it is good or sound.
Example given: 'All dogs can fly' is a valid but not sound argument due to false premises.
Soundness evaluates both the validity of an argument and the truthfulness of its premises.
A sound argument must be valid and have true premises.
Argument about US senators being politicians is sound due to validity and true premises.
An argument can have true premises but be invalid if the conclusion isn't logically guaranteed.
Example of an argument with true premises but an invalid conclusion: Paris and Germany.
Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton's political affiliations do not guarantee Jill Stein's.
Even with true premises, an argument is invalid if it doesn't logically guarantee the conclusion.
Only accept conclusions of arguments that are both valid and sound.
Brilliant.org is recommended for those interested in philosophy and critical thinking.
Brilliant offers immersive lessons on logic, problem-solving, and identifying fallacies.
Learning on Brilliant is hands-on, with real-world scenarios and puzzles by expert educators.
Special offer for the first 200 visitors to Brilliant through the provided link for a discounted Premium Membership.
Transcripts
we hear the words valid and validity
used all the time but I want to talk
about what validity means in a technical
sense with regard to something we've
already discussed deductive arguments as
a reminder a deductive argument is an
argument where the premises logically
guaranteed the conclusion for example if
a is B and B is C a must be C there is
no alternative the concept of validity
is a tool for evaluating the internal
logic of a deductive argument to say
that an argument is valid is not the
same as saying that the argument is good
or sound for example imagine the premise
that all dogs can fly and the second
premise that Fido is a dog the
conclusion would be that Fido can fly
although it might seem counterintuitive
this is a valid argument an argument is
valid if the truth of the premises would
guarantee the truth of the conclusion if
it is true that all dogs can fly then it
must be true that Fido the dog can fly
but let's put this argument under more
scrutiny this is a valid argument but it
is not a sound argument soundness is an
evaluation of both whether an argument
is valid and whether its premises are
true a sound argument must be both valid
and have true premises not all dogs can
fly so one of the premises is false and
our argument is not sound so validity
and soundness are properties of an
argument and truth is a property of a
statement here's an argument that is
sound because it is both valid and has
true premises all US senators are
politicians Ted Cruz is a US senator the
conclusion is that Ted Cruz is a
politician it's a horrible reality but
it is a reality and it is a sound
argument here's an argument where the
premises are true but the argument is
invalid so the argument is not sound
Paris is a city Germany is a country
conclusion Paris is the capital of
Germany it's not sound because that
conclusion is not guaranteed
by the truth of the premises but what
about this one Marco Rubio is a
Republican which is true Hillary Clinton
is a Democrat which is true and the
conclusion is that Jill Stein is a
member of the Green Party in this
particular case both of the premises are
true and the conclusion happens to be
true but the two premises don't
logically guarantee that conclusion so
the argument is invalid and therefore it
is not sound we should only accept
conclusions of arguments that are both
valid and sound if you're interested in
philosophy and critical thinking you
will love brilliant which has pretty
much become my go-to for learning things
online check out brilliance new
immersive lessons on logic
problem-solving multi level thinking
identifying false information and
identifying fallacies whether you
already have a grasp on any of these
subjects or you're looking for a fun and
engaging way to become acquainted with
these topics for the first time
brilliant really is the place to go
where you can actually learn hands-on by
solving problems and puzzles designed by
expert educators and unlike other
learning sites when I'm using brilliant
I'm actually learning by working
hands-on with real-world scenarios and
problems sign up for free by going to
brilliant org slash critical thinking
I've put a link in the description under
this video and the first 200 people who
visit will get 20% off an annual Premium
Membership visit brilliant org slash
critical thinking
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)