Class Takeaways — The Art of Negotiation

Stanford Graduate School of Business
30 Nov 202306:16

Summary

TLDRIn this insightful video, Michele Gelfand, a professor at Stanford GSB, shares five key takeaways on negotiation. She emphasizes the importance of thorough preparation, understanding metaphors that guide negotiations, and creatively resolving conflicts. Gelfand also highlights the need to manage disputes constructively and recognize cultural differences in global negotiations. Throughout, she encourages negotiators to think strategically, focus on interests rather than power, and adapt their approach to achieve mutually beneficial agreements.

Takeaways

  • 📋 Preparation is crucial for successful negotiations; thoroughly analyze your and your partner's interests, goals, and alternatives to gain control and craft better agreements.
  • 🧩 Consider the metaphors you use during negotiations, as they guide your behavior and evaluation of success. Align your metaphor with the situation for better outcomes.
  • 🧠 Cultivate a shared, constructive metaphor with your counterpart to guide the negotiation process, such as problem-solving or teamwork, for more productive discussions.
  • 🤝 Recognize that not all issues are win-lose; many negotiations have integrative structures where trade-offs can satisfy both parties' priorities.
  • 🎨 Think creatively during negotiations to find solutions that address both parties' priorities, even when initial positions seem opposed.
  • ⚠️ In disputes, avoid escalating conflicts by focusing on interests rather than resorting to threats or power plays. A mixed strategy combining a cooperative approach with firm communication can help manage conflicts.
  • 🌍 Cultural intelligence (CQ) is essential for global negotiations. Understanding and adapting to cultural differences is key to securing high-quality agreements in international settings.
  • 💬 High CQ also enhances global leadership and the management of cross-cultural teams and networks, making it as crucial as IQ or EQ.
  • 🕒 In some situations, time constraints or the issue's importance may justify simply splitting the difference rather than striving for a win-win agreement.
  • 🏆 Aim for win-win agreements when possible, but recognize that practicality sometimes requires more straightforward compromises.

Q & A

  • Who is the speaker in the provided transcript?

    -The speaker is Michele Gelfand, a professor of organizational behavior at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

  • What is one of Michele Gelfand's favorite classes to teach at the GSB?

    -One of Michele Gelfand's favorite classes to teach at the GSB is negotiation.

  • Why is preparation important in the negotiation process according to the transcript?

    -Preparation is important because it allows individuals to analyze their own and others' perspectives, interests, goals, priorities, alternatives, strengths, and weaknesses, giving them more control over their actions and reactions during the negotiation.

  • What does Michele Gelfand recommend creating to aid in the preparation for a negotiation?

    -Michele Gelfand recommends creating an issue chart to help in the preparation for a negotiation.

  • What role do metaphors play in negotiations as described in the transcript?

    -Metaphors are a basic mechanism through which humans conceptualize experiences, including negotiations. They can guide goals, behavioral scripts, and criteria for evaluating the success of negotiations, but they can also hinder if not well-matched to the situation.

  • How can negotiators use metaphors to improve their negotiation process?

    -Negotiators can improve their process by cultivating a shared constructive metaphor, such as a problem-solving metaphor like solving a puzzle or playing on the same team, which can guide the negotiation process more productively.

  • What is a common assumption negotiators make about their interests in relation to their counterparts, according to the transcript?

    -Negotiators often assume that their interests are diametrically opposed to their counterparts, but many negotiations have an integrative structure where differences in priorities can be traded off.

  • Can you provide an example from the transcript where interests are not opposed and can be integrated?

    -An example given is planning a vacation where one person wants a beach spa and the other wants a mountain cabin. By trading off on lower priority issues, they can go to a spa in the mountains, satisfying both priorities.

  • How can negotiators manage disputes or rejected claims effectively, as suggested in the transcript?

    -Negotiators can manage disputes effectively by focusing on interests rather than using threats or appeals to power and rights, and by using a mixed communication strategy that combines a threat with cooperative communication and an appeal to interests.

  • What is the key to mastering a global negotiation, according to Michele Gelfand?

    -The key to mastering a global negotiation is cultural intelligence, which is critical for understanding and managing cultural differences that can affect the negotiation process.

  • What is the importance of cultural intelligence (CQ) in global negotiations and leadership, as mentioned in the transcript?

    -Cultural intelligence is important because it enables individuals to interact effectively across cultures, manage global teams, be effective global leaders, and handle complex cross-cultural networks, ultimately leading to the development of high-quality agreements worldwide.

  • What does Michele Gelfand's family tease her about regarding her approach to negotiations?

    -Michele Gelfand's family teases her about her tendency to always aim for win-win agreements, questioning if it's necessary in every situation.

  • When might it be acceptable to not aim for a win-win agreement, as suggested by the transcript?

    -It might be acceptable to not aim for a win-win agreement when there is not enough time or when the issues at hand are not of significant importance.

Outlines

00:00

🎓 The Importance of Preparation in Negotiation

Michele Gelfand, a professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business, introduces the concept of negotiation, emphasizing how common it is in daily life. She points out that many people fail to prepare adequately for negotiations, which often leads to leaving value on the table. She advocates for thorough preparation, including creating an issue chart to analyze both personal and counterpart perspectives, interests, priorities, and alternatives. Preparation, she argues, grants better control over the negotiation process and enhances the ability to craft successful agreements.

05:01

💡 The Power of Metaphors in Negotiation

Gelfand discusses the role of metaphors in shaping how people approach and conduct negotiations. Metaphors, often unconsciously used, can significantly influence goals, behaviors, and evaluation criteria. She suggests that some metaphors, like a 'battle' or a 'relationship,' may not always fit the negotiation context. By carefully choosing and even co-creating a constructive metaphor, such as 'solving a puzzle' or 'playing on the same team,' negotiators can steer the process toward more productive outcomes.

🎯 Recognizing and Leveraging Integrative Negotiation

Gelfand highlights the common misconception that all negotiation interests are directly opposed. She explains that many negotiations have integrative potential, where parties can trade off on issues based on differing priorities. Using a personal example of vacation planning with her husband, she illustrates how understanding and prioritizing different aspects can lead to a solution that satisfies both parties. She encourages negotiators to think creatively and outside the box to identify such win-win opportunities.

⚖️ Managing Disputes with Interest-Based Strategies

In this segment, Gelfand addresses how to manage disputes effectively in negotiations. She notes that negative behaviors, such as threats, often lead to rapid conflict escalation. Instead of focusing on power and rights, she recommends returning to underlying interests. For situations where others resort to power-based tactics, a mixed strategy combining cooperative communication with a subtle threat can help manage disputes more productively.

🌍 The Importance of Cultural Intelligence in Global Negotiations

Gelfand emphasizes the critical role of cultural intelligence (CQ) in global negotiations. She argues that technical skills and general intelligence are not enough to succeed across cultural boundaries. Mismanaging cultural differences can have significant negative impacts on global business dealings. Cultivating CQ, which includes understanding and adapting to different cultural contexts, is essential for developing high-quality agreements and effectively leading global teams.

😊 Embracing Practicality in Negotiation: When to Split the Difference

Gelfand shares a personal anecdote about how her kids tease her for always trying to create win-win agreements. She acknowledges that while creating win-win outcomes is ideal, there are times when it’s more practical to simply split the difference, especially when time is limited or the stakes are low. This segment highlights the balance between striving for optimal outcomes and recognizing when a straightforward compromise is more appropriate.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Negotiation

Negotiation refers to the process by which two or more parties discuss their differences to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. In the video, the concept of negotiation is central, as Michele Gelfand teaches strategies to improve negotiation skills. She emphasizes that effective negotiation requires preparation, understanding of both parties' interests, and creative problem-solving.

💡Preparation

Preparation involves the steps taken before entering a negotiation to understand one’s own interests, goals, and alternatives, as well as those of the other party. The video highlights the importance of preparation as a key factor in successful negotiations, suggesting that it helps negotiators maintain control and craft better agreements. Without proper preparation, negotiators are at a disadvantage.

💡Metaphors

Metaphors are figurative language devices that shape how individuals conceptualize and approach negotiations. In the video, Gelfand discusses how different metaphors, like 'battle' or 'dance,' can influence negotiation strategies and outcomes. She advises negotiators to consciously choose metaphors that align with the specific context of the negotiation to guide their behavior and decisions.

💡Integrative Negotiation

Integrative negotiation is a strategy where parties collaborate to find mutually beneficial solutions by trading off on issues that are of different priorities to each party. Gelfand illustrates this with an example of planning a vacation, where by focusing on different priorities, both parties can achieve their main objectives. This contrasts with distributive negotiation, where one party’s gain is the other’s loss.

💡Interests

Interests refer to the underlying needs, desires, or concerns that motivate individuals in a negotiation. The video stresses the importance of focusing on interests rather than positions to find common ground and achieve win-win outcomes. Gelfand suggests that even when faced with threats or power plays, returning to underlying interests can help resolve disputes effectively.

💡Cultural Intelligence (CQ)

Cultural Intelligence (CQ) is the ability to understand and adapt to different cultural contexts, which is crucial in global negotiations. Gelfand points out that cultural differences, if not managed properly, can derail negotiations, mergers, and other international business dealings. She argues that CQ is even more important than technical competence or general intelligence in cross-cultural negotiations.

💡Creative Problem-Solving

Creative problem-solving in negotiations involves thinking outside the box to find innovative solutions that satisfy both parties. Gelfand encourages negotiators to be creative, as it allows them to uncover value and craft agreements that might not be immediately obvious. This approach is especially useful in integrative negotiations where there are multiple issues at play.

💡Disputes

Disputes are conflicts that arise when parties disagree on certain issues during a negotiation. The video explains that disputes are inevitable, but can be managed effectively by focusing on interests rather than escalating conflicts through threats or appeals to rights. Gelfand advises using a mixed communication strategy to navigate disputes and return to productive discussions.

💡Power Strategies

Power strategies involve the use of threats, demands, or appeals to authority to influence the outcome of a negotiation. Gelfand warns that while these strategies may be effective in the short term, they often lead to escalations and unproductive negotiations. Instead, she advocates for balancing power strategies with cooperative communication that appeals to the other party’s interests.

💡Win-Win Agreements

Win-win agreements are outcomes where all parties involved in a negotiation achieve their primary objectives, leading to mutual satisfaction. Gelfand’s emphasis on win-win agreements reflects her belief that negotiations should strive for solutions that benefit everyone. Although she acknowledges that sometimes a simple compromise is necessary, her goal is often to create agreements where everyone wins.

Highlights

Preparation is a vital part of the negotiation process, and many people fail to properly analyze their own and others' perspectives before discussions.

Creating an issue chart and understanding your interests, goals, priorities, alternatives, strengths, and weaknesses, as well as those of your partner, leads to better control and outcomes in negotiations.

Asking questions and testing assumptions during negotiation helps fill in gaps in information and prevents leaving value on the table.

Metaphors are fundamental to how humans conceptualize experiences, including negotiations, and can either help or hinder the process.

Being aware of the metaphors guiding your negotiation, such as viewing it as a game, battle, or dance, is essential for aligning them with the situation.

Negotiating the negotiation by cultivating a shared, constructive metaphor, like solving a puzzle or playing on the same team, can make the process more productive.

Negotiators often assume their interests are opposed to their counterparts, but recognizing integrative structures where priorities can be traded off leads to better outcomes.

Creativity is crucial in negotiations, as seen in the example of choosing a spa in the mountains to satisfy both parties' priorities.

Disputes and rejected claims are inevitable, but they can be managed effectively by focusing on underlying interests rather than escalating through threats.

In negotiations, a mixed communication strategy that combines a threat with cooperative communication and appeals to interests can better manage disputes.

Global negotiations require cultural intelligence (CQ) rather than just technical competence or general intelligence.

Cultural differences, if not managed well, can derail global business operations, making CQ critical for effective global leadership and cross-cultural negotiations.

High cultural intelligence is essential for managing global teams, being an effective leader, and developing high-quality agreements in international contexts.

Sometimes, splitting the difference is necessary when time is limited, or the issue isn't important enough to warrant a win-win agreement.

The speaker's children humorously critique her obsession with win-win agreements, highlighting that not every negotiation needs to reach a win-win outcome.

Transcripts

play00:00

[MUSIC]

play00:06

Hi, I'm Michele Gelfand,

play00:08

I'm a professor of organizational

play00:10

behavior at the Stanford Graduate

play00:11

School of Business.

play00:12

One of my favorite classes to teach

play00:15

at the GSB is negotiation.

play00:17

Even though negotiations

play00:18

are pervasive, research shows that

play00:20

we often leave value at the table.

play00:22

I have five key takeaways from my

play00:24

class on negotiation to

play00:25

share with you today.

play00:26

[MUSIC]

play00:31

Preparation is a vital part

play00:32

of the negotiation process,

play00:34

yet many people fail to properly

play00:36

analyze their own and others'

play00:38

perspectives prior to discussions.

play00:41

I recommend that you create

play00:42

an issue chart and spend time

play00:43

thinking through your own interests

play00:45

and goals, your priorities,

play00:47

your alternatives, and

play00:48

your strengths and your weaknesses.

play00:50

And then do the same for

play00:51

your partner.

play00:52

The more complete the information

play00:54

you have about yourself and

play00:56

your partner, the more control

play00:57

you'll have over your actions

play00:59

reactions during the process, and

play01:01

the better able you'll be to craft

play01:02

great agreement.

play01:03

If you don't prepare, you're

play01:05

putting yourself at a disadvantage.

play01:06

In life we

play01:07

will leave value at the table.

play01:09

As you negotiate, ask questions

play01:11

to try to fill in gaps in

play01:12

the information you have and

play01:13

test the assumptions that you made.

play01:15

[MUSIC]

play01:19

Metaphors are a basic mechanism

play01:21

through which humans conceptualize

play01:23

experience, including negotiations.

play01:25

Metaphors are more than linguistic

play01:27

devices, they can help or

play01:29

hinder negotiations.

play01:30

Yet we're often completely unaware

play01:32

of the metaphors guiding us at

play01:34

the negotiation table.

play01:36

Is this an individual or

play01:37

a team sport, a battle, a dance,

play01:40

a date, a puzzle,

play01:41

a visit to the dentist, or

play01:43

a necessary evil?

play01:45

Metaphors guide our goals or

play01:46

behavioral scripts and

play01:47

the criteria we use to evaluate

play01:49

the success of the negotiation.

play01:52

But a lot of time our metaphors are

play01:53

not well-matched to the situation.

play01:55

A relationship metaphor, for

play01:57

example, is not well-matched to

play01:59

a distributive single-issue task.

play02:01

On the other hand, a game or

play02:02

battle metaphor is not well-matched

play02:04

to an integrative negotiation.

play02:06

Think more clearly about your

play02:08

metaphors and

play02:09

you'll be a better negotiator.

play02:10

The best negotiators also cultivate

play02:12

a shared constructive metaphor

play02:14

to guide the process.

play02:15

A problem solving metaphor like

play02:17

solving a puzzle or

play02:18

playing on the same team.

play02:20

In other words,

play02:21

negotiate the negotiation.

play02:22

Generate a shared metaphor to

play02:24

guide the process, and

play02:25

it will be more productive.

play02:26

[MUSIC]

play02:32

Research has shown that negotiators

play02:34

often assume that their interests

play02:36

are diametrically opposed

play02:37

to their counterparts.

play02:39

Although some issues might be

play02:40

win-lose, many of the negotiations

play02:42

have an integrative structure

play02:44

wherein there can be differences in

play02:45

priorities individuals have on the

play02:47

issues that could be traded off.

play02:49

For example,

play02:50

imagine that my husband and

play02:51

I are trying to plan a vacation.

play02:53

I want to go to the spa at

play02:54

the beach, whereas he wants to go

play02:56

to a cabin in the mountains.

play02:57

At first glance,

play02:58

it seems like we're going to go on

play03:00

different vacations.

play03:01

But through further discussion,

play03:02

we discover that my priority is

play03:04

the spa and the location is a lower

play03:06

priority, whereas he prioritizes

play03:07

the mountains and

play03:08

the accommodations are a lower

play03:10

priority.

play03:11

By trading off on low priority

play03:12

issues and

play03:13

going to a spa in the mountains,

play03:15

we each get our priorities.

play03:17

When negotiating,

play03:18

think outside the box.

play03:20

The best

play03:20

negotiators are very creative.

play03:22

[MUSIC]

play03:28

Disputes or rejected claims

play03:29

are inevitable, but there is

play03:31

a way to manage them effectively.

play03:33

Research finds that people tend to

play03:35

reciprocate negative behaviors like

play03:37

threats to a much greater extent

play03:39

than positive strategies, causing

play03:41

conflicts to escalate rapidly.

play03:43

In an unproductive negotiation,

play03:45

people use a lot of threats and

play03:46

appeals to their rights and

play03:48

don't focus as much on their

play03:50

underlying interests.

play03:51

In an effective system,

play03:53

people focus a lot on interest and

play03:55

use very few appeals to power and

play03:57

rights.

play03:58

Always aim at getting back to your

play04:00

interests even in the face of

play04:01

threats and

play04:02

power strategies from others.

play04:04

If others are using rights and

play04:06

power strategies,

play04:07

a mixed communication strategy that

play04:09

combines a threat with

play04:10

a cooperative communication and

play04:11

appeal to interests will help you

play04:13

better manage disputes.

play04:14

[MUSIC]

play04:19

In today's global

play04:20

interdependent world,

play04:21

we are bound to be negotiating

play04:23

across cultural boundaries.

play04:24

But people often assume that

play04:26

what works in their own culture

play04:27

works everywhere.

play04:29

They mistakenly think that it's

play04:30

technical competence and general

play04:32

intelligence that are needed to be

play04:34

an effective negotiator.

play04:35

But in a global negotiation,

play04:37

it's cultural intelligence that's

play04:39

key to mastering the deal.

play04:41

Cultural differences,

play04:42

if not properly managed, can derail

play04:44

mergers and acquisitions,

play04:46

expatriate assignments, and

play04:47

damage our global capital.

play04:49

High CQ is also critical for

play04:51

managing global teams,

play04:52

being an effective global leader,

play04:55

and managing complex cross-cultural

play04:57

networks.

play04:58

Beyond IQ or even EQ,

play04:59

research shows that if you

play05:00

cultivate cultural intelligence,

play05:02

the desire and

play05:03

ability interact across cultures,

play05:05

you'll be in a much better position

play05:07

to develop high quality agreements

play05:09

anywhere around the world, ciao.

play05:11

[MUSIC]

play05:26

My kids think that it's fun to make

play05:28

fun of me, that I like to create

play05:30

win-win agreements all the time.

play05:32

Really mom, do we have to always

play05:34

create win-win agreements?

play05:36

And can't we just split

play05:37

the difference?

play05:38

They have a point, sometimes

play05:39

we don't have enough time or

play05:41

things are not important to you.

play05:42

You don't need to create

play05:43

a win-win agreement,

play05:43

you can just split the difference.

play05:44

But they do make fun of me being

play05:46

a little bit obsessed with

play05:47

win-win agreements.

play05:48

[MUSIC]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Negotiation TipsCultural IntelligenceProblem SolvingBusiness StrategyEffective CommunicationCross-CulturalValue CreationOrganizational BehaviorStanford GSBConflict Management