HDMI Distribution over your Home Network? Low-Cost HDMI Matrix using IP-Based Hardware
Summary
TLDRThis video explores various methods for extending HDMI video throughout a home using Ethernet wiring, focusing on HDMI over IP as a cost-effective solution. The host discusses the limitations of long HDMI cables and introduces active optical cables, HDBaseT, and IP-based extenders. He demonstrates the setup and testing of HDMI over IP hardware, highlighting its ability to transmit video and audio over existing network infrastructure with low latency, making it ideal for desktop computing, gaming, and even business displays. However, it lacks support for HDMI CEC and is limited to 1080p resolution at 60fps.
Takeaways
- 🏠 The video discusses methods for sending HDMI video throughout a house using Ethernet wiring.
- 💡 The presenter aims to connect multiple computers to various desks and TVs without running new HDMI cables.
- 🔌 The first solution presented is using a long HDMI cable, which can be cost-effective but problematic for long distances.
- 🌐 An alternative is active optical cables, which can cover long distances but are expensive and fixed to a certain HDMI standard.
- 🔗 There are adapters that convert HDMI to RJ45 for use with Ethernet cables, but they have limitations and compatibility issues.
- 📺 HDBaseT is a standard that can transmit high-quality video over Ethernet, but it requires Cat6a cable for full capabilities.
- 🤖 HDMI over IP is the sixth option explored, compressing video for transmission over standard Ethernet hardware, supporting up to 16 transmitters and 253 receivers.
- 🔄 The hardware used in the video is provided by TESmart and supports various features like IR remote forwarding and USB keyboard and mouse data.
- 🎮 The presenter tests the HDMI over IP system with gaming, office work, and video editing, finding it suitable for low-latency applications.
- 📊 Bandwidth tests show that the HDMI over IP solution uses between 2-5.5 megabits per second, which is shareable over a network with multicast support.
- 🚫 Limitations include no support for HDMI CEC, potential IR compatibility issues, and a maximum resolution of 1080p at 60fps.
- 🛠️ The video also highlights unexpected use cases, such as controlling multiple displays for events or business information screens.
Q & A
What is the main goal discussed in the video script?
-The main goal discussed in the script is to send HDMI video all over the house using Ethernet wiring, allowing connection to any computer from any desk without running new wires.
What are the limitations of using long HDMI cables for video distribution?
-Long HDMI cables can be problematic as HDMI was not designed for very long distances. Thicker cables are needed for longer distances, and if the cable is too long, it may not work at all. Additionally, HDMI cables cannot be repaired once damaged.
What is an active optical cable and what are its advantages and disadvantages?
-An active optical cable is an HDMI cable with fibers built in, capable of transmitting signals over longer distances. The advantages include the ability to cover long distances, but the disadvantages are the higher cost and the fixed HDMI standard and bandwidth, which means the entire cable must be replaced when newer HDMI revisions come out.
What is HDBaseT and what does it support?
-HDBaseT is a standard that can send 4K video at 60 frames per second with 4:4:4 chroma sampling over a single Cat6a cable. However, it's important to note that it officially supports Cat6a, not Cat6, so with only Cat6, one is limited to 4:2:0 chroma subsampling.
What is HDMI over IP and how does it work?
-HDMI over IP is a method that compresses the HDMI video stream to fit within gigabit Ethernet bandwidth and carries it over standard gigabit Ethernet hardware. This allows the use of existing network wiring and switches to distribute video around the house.
What are the advantages of using HDMI over IP for video distribution?
-HDMI over IP allows for the use of existing Ethernet wiring and switches, reducing the need for new cabling. It also supports multiple transmitters and receivers, enabling the connection of multiple computers to multiple displays and the selection of the desired source from the display.
What is the bandwidth usage of the HDMI over IP solution presented in the script?
-The HDMI over IP solution uses between two to five megabits per second, which is significantly less than a full gigabit per second, allowing it to coexist with other network traffic without causing bandwidth issues.
What are the requirements for the network switches when using HDMI over IP?
-For HDMI over IP to work efficiently, the network switches should support IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) and multicast, which allows the switch to manage the distribution of multicast traffic to only the necessary receivers.
What compatibility issues were encountered during the testing of the HDMI over IP solution?
-During testing, it was found that HDMI CEC (Consumer Electronics Control) was not supported over the HDMI over IP Bridge, and there were issues with infrared remote control compatibility, specifically with a TiVo device.
What are some potential use cases for HDMI over IP beyond home entertainment?
-Beyond home entertainment, HDMI over IP can be used in educational settings to control multiple displays for robotics competitions, and in business environments to manage information or advertising displays across a location using a single HDMI output.
What are the limitations of the HDMI over IP solution in terms of resolution and frame rate?
-The HDMI over IP solution presented in the script is limited to 1080p resolution at 60 frames per second, which is suitable for most office use cases but not adequate for 4K or high refresh rate gaming.
Outlines
🏠 Home HDMI Distribution Goals and Challenges
The script begins by setting the context for various home HDMI distribution needs, such as connecting multiple computers or sharing TV boxes across the house without new wiring. The narrator discusses the limitations of long HDMI cables, the cost and inflexibility of active optical cables, and the impracticality of passive adapters. The focus then shifts to exploring solutions like HDBaseT and HDMI over IP, which utilize existing Ethernet infrastructure for video distribution, with a particular interest in the latter for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
🔌 Introduction to HDMI over IP and Unboxing
This paragraph introduces the concept of HDMI over IP, which compresses video for transmission over Ethernet, allowing the use of existing network switches and wiring. The narrator shares that the hardware for the demonstration was provided by TESmart, emphasizing no monetary exchange influenced the review. The unboxing process reveals the components included, such as transmitters, receivers, power supplies, IR equipment, and a remote control, highlighting the setup's potential for extensive HDMI distribution within a home network.
📚 Basic Setup and Testing HDMI Extenders
The narrator demonstrates a basic setup using a thin client, an HDMI to DisplayPort adapter, and the HDMI over IP extenders. The process involves connecting the devices, ensuring they are on the same address, and testing the connection via Ethernet. The goal is to verify the functionality of the extenders in transmitting video and keyboard/mouse data over the network, showcasing the potential for extensive HDMI distribution without new cabling.
🎮 Real-World Testing: Gaming and Multi-Device Support
The script describes a real-world test of the HDMI over IP system, where the narrator游戏体验s gaming on a desktop computer connected to a receiver in another part of the house. The setup includes a gaming mouse, keyboard, and audio setup through the monitor. The narrator also tests the system's capability to handle multiple transmitters and receivers, including switching between a gaming PC and a TiVo using an IR remote, demonstrating the system's flexibility in managing various devices over a home network.
📺 HDMI over IP Limitations and Additional Use Cases
This paragraph discusses the limitations of the HDMI over IP system, such as the lack of support for HDMI CEC, which prevents TV remote controls from interacting with connected devices, and the system's inability to handle 4K or high-refresh-rate content. However, the narrator also discovers unexpected use cases, like using the extenders for robotics competitions and business displays, emphasizing the system's IP-based advantages for long-distance transmission and centralized control.
🔗 Conclusion and Future Projects
The conclusion summarizes the narrator's positive experience with the HDMI over IP system for various computer-related tasks, noting its low latency and suitability for activities like office work, video editing, and gaming. The narrator also expresses interest in using the system for upcoming projects and invites viewers to engage with their content, share suggestions, and join their Discord community for further interaction.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡HDMI
💡Ethernet
💡HDBaseT
💡Active Optical Cable
💡CAT5/CAT6 Cable
💡IP Multicast
💡IR (Infrared)
💡HDMI over IP
💡Transmitter and Receiver
💡USB KVM Extender
💡CEC (Consumer Electronics Control)
Highlights
The goal is to send HDMI video throughout the house using Ethernet wiring.
Six solutions for sending HDMI video over long distances are discussed.
Using a long cable through walls is the cheapest option but not ideal for long distances.
Active optical cables can go long distances but are expensive and fixed to certain HDMI standards.
Passive adapters that split HDMI into RJ45 are not recommended due to signal integrity issues.
HDMI over CAT5 or Cat6 solutions convert HDMI to RJ45 but do not use Ethernet switches.
HDBaseT can send 4K 60fps video over a single Cat6A cable, but not officially over Cat6.
HDMI over IP compresses the video stream to fit within gigabit Ethernet, using existing network switches.
TESmart provided the hardware for testing HDMI over IP solutions.
The HDMI over IP system includes transmitters, receivers, IR receivers, and a remote.
Receivers and transmitters support keyboard and mouse input, and HDMI output.
The bandwidth used by HDMI over IP is between 2 to 5.5 megabits per second.
IP multicast is used for efficient bandwidth usage across the network.
Unmanaged switches without multicast support can flood the network with data.
Managed switches with IGMP support are recommended for optimal performance.
HDMI over IP is suitable for gaming and general desktop usage with low latency.
The system does not support HDMI CEC for remote control functionality.
Infrared forwarding does not work with all devices, such as the tested TiVo.
The HDMI over IP solution is limited to 1080p at 60fps.
The system is cost-effective and easy to set up, using standard Ethernet cabling.
Potential business use cases include driving information displays over a network.
The HDMI over IP extenders are self-assigning IP addresses in a specific subnet.
Transcripts
So. you want to send HDMI video all over your house? Maybe you're crazy like me,
and you want to put all your computers in your basement server rack, and then connect to any
computer from any desk in the house? That's my goal, but maybe you have simpler needs. Maybe you
want to share a cable or satellite TV box with a couple TVs in the house? Or maybe you want to
stream content from your office to your living room without a proprietary solution like AirPlay
or Chromecast and you don't want to pull any new wires, just use the Ethernet that you already
have? In this video I'm going to cover a couple different methods for sending HDMI video over long
distances using Ethernet wiring. So if you want to send HDMI video around your house you really
have about six solutions. Your first option is to get a long cable and run it through the wall. This
is probably the cheapest but depending on how far you're going it might not be ideal. If you just
want to put your media cabinet or your computer a few feet away and hide the wiring in the wall
that's perfectly fine, do that. But when you start running HDMI through the attic then you're asking
for a bad time. HDMI was not designed to go super long distances, so you need thicker
and thicker cables and eventually it just won't work at all Also you can't repair an HDMI cable.
Ask me what it's like to go back in the attic and put a new cable in after you already ran a cable
because I've broken an HDMI connector off trying to mount a TV on the wall. That was not fun,
very very sad day. Your next option is an active optical cable. These are HDMI cables with fibers
built in. They do all of the fiber translation for you so they look just like a regular HDMI
cable (some of them need power too). These can absolutely go the distance but they're also
relatively expensive and also they're fixed at a certain HDMI standard and bandwidth, so when newer
HDMI revisions come out you can't just replace the ends, you have to replace the entire cable through
the wall. There are, or at least there used to be, passive adapters, that would split up an HDMI
into more than one RJ45, but these are pretty awful because you're relying on an HDMI signal,
designed to run over a carefully made cable, and instead you're sending it over Cat5e or Cat6,
which is not really something it was designed to do. But at least you can use Cat6 that's
already in the wall if you have it. Then we get to solutions that convert HDMI into RJ45 to run over
CAT5 or Cat6 cable. All of these will absolutely work you can use the Ethernet wiring already in
your house, but it's important to remember that these are not based on Ethernet so you can't use
your Ethernet switches and you can't usually carry Ethernet over the same wiring. There is
a standard for this called HDBaseT, and HDBaseT is currently able to send 4K 60 frames per second
with 444 chroma sampling (which is 18 gigabits per second of video) over a single cat 6A cable.
But it's important to note that I said Cat6a, not Cat6. The standard doesn't officially allow
you to do that over Cat6, so if all you have is Cat6, you're limited to 420 chroma sub sampling
(which is still probably fine but something you should be aware of). So these solutions are able
to push beyond gigabit because they're not using standard Ethernet infrastructure and that means
there's still point to point. You're connecting one transmitter to one receiver. So if you're
building the ultimate home theater, HDBaseT or an active optical cable or conduit is probably what
you want to go with. But I'm not doing that, in fact I barely even watch TV. I get my news
from Reddit. I care about desktops, workstations, and gaming, all things I can do on my computer.
And actually I have a couple of computers. I have some that run Linux like my test system over here.
I have my thin clients that I play with. I have my big gaming desktop that heats up my bedroom.
What I'd really like to be able to do is put all of those in the basement where
they can use all the power and make all the noise they want and stay out of my life,
but then when I want to use one for my living room or my bed or my office or another office,
I can choose which computer I want to be connected to, and use it like I'm sitting at it,
without all the hassle of running a whole bunch of HDMI wires from every computer to every display.
So that means I need a switch. I need all of my sources to come in and get distributed to
all of my displays, with the ability for the display to select which source it's coming from.
So given my goals in mind I was specifically looking for the sixth option. HDMI over IP.
What this does is it compresses the HDMI video stream down to a bandwidth that fits
within gigabit Ethernet and then it carries it over standard gigabit Ethernet Hardware.
This means I can use the network wiring and also the network switches I already have in my house,
and because I can use the network switches, that means that I can switch where the video goes.
Now, the hardware I've chosen does actually support 16 transmitters and 253 receivers,
and any of the receivers can connect to any of the transmitters (potentially all of them connecting
to the same transmitter if you want to do that), and that means I can now have 16 computers in my
house connected to a whole bunch of displays, and choose from the display which computer I want to
be using. And on the back end my network switches cost the same as any other network switches,
which is not that much. It's a whole lot cheaper than buying an HDBaseT Matrix I'll tell you that.
The hardware I'm using for this video is sold by and was provided to me by TESmart.
While they did supply me with the hardware,no money changed hands, and I reached out to them asking for
these products to do a video. So, hopefully you can jump in with me as I explore HDMI over IP
and how using standard networking protocols can drastically reduce the cost of HDMI distribution.
So, this is the box I got let's take a look at what's inside. So we got a user manual
We got a piece of foam
two units, I'll take a look at these in a second
under that we've got
We'll see what that is in a second, and another one
Looks like an IR receiver, IR transmitter, and a remote with 16 buttons I'm guessing
that corresponds to the 16 transmitters you can tune to.
So this one I believe is a power supply
Sure is so it looks like we've got 5 volt 2 amp, it's got a pretty standard Barrel Jack
I didn't measure it but doesn't look oddly sized it's not USB but that is the same voltage as USB
so if you want to power it off like a TVs USB port or something I'm sure that's possible and
I guess this one is another power supply, yeah same thing So one for each side and star of the show itself
Receiver
Transmitter. So this is everything we got here in the box so we got the transmitter, transmitter's
power supply, the IR Blaster because IR goes from receiver to transmitter, transmitter blasts it on
whatever device uses IR, the receiver, this is where the TV goes, receiver's power supply, IR receiver if
you need, IR remote if you need it, taking a look at these boxes, so they got 5 volt in, it's
labeled UTP but it is Ethernet, so you can connect this to Ethernet switches and Ethernet devices, it
will work and the bandwidth it uses isn't even that high as we'll see later, and then HDMI input
so if you just need HDMI you just have to use this one side of the device. On the other side we
have the infrared out USB, out that's a full-sized USB B, so it's not USBC or micro, and then there's
a seven segment display for what address it is one through 16 and a button to change it.
The receiver is similar, interestingly this side has Ethernet
and this side has it on the receiver so it almost looks kind of upside down
receiver you got the same story, power, Ethernet, HDMI out, so if that's all you need you don't
have to mount it with the other side accessible. And on the other side we have IR in, keyboard and
mouse, this is strictly for keyboards and mice it is not passing through raw USB data
it's just passing through the hid keyboard and mouse data, and the address of the receiver
So to do the most basic test of these HDMI extenders I've got a pretty basic setup
here we can test with. This is a Thin Client I reviewed in a previous video, it has a DisplayPort
output that's going to monitor with an HDMI input, so I have a DisplayPort to HDMI adapter cable
I've got this little keyboard and mouse plugged in over USB. so you can see it's booted up
it's running Ubuntu it's working so now we're going to bring in the pair of extenders here
so we've got the HDMI input side, and the HDMI output side, so let's put them like this
so this is HDMI from The Thin Client we're going to go into the input on the transmitter
power both of these from the ugly purple power strip power
okay the USB keyboard
this is USB to my keyboard, I'm going to plug it into the receiver. Here is a USB cord I have. Important
to note if you're actually going to use USB it doesn't come with one of the USB cables in the box
so I have to buy one they're not super common anymore even though it is a USB standard
connector and it has been for decades. Now HDMI, so HDMI to the monitor going to the receiver
so I've got everything connected except ethernet. So this little logo came up
that means we have no connection, they wouldn't connect anyway because this
one's a five and that one's a one. Let's plug in the network and see what happens
tiniest little ethernet cable here
so now we need to match their addresses so I'm going to put the transmitter on address two
so just keep clicking the button until we're on two, and I'll put the receiver in two as well
There's my Thin Client! Keyboard connected to the receiver, monitor connected to the receiver
ethernet connected to the transmitter, USB to the Thin Client, HDMI to the Thin Client
so this is the most basic setup you could do, you could take this cable and extend it hundreds of
feet, gigabit Ethernet supports 100 meters which is 330 feet, if you need to go that far that's a thing
but the real advantage that these things propose is that they should be able to use
ethernet switches to hook up more than one of these, so we should be able to share a network
with our existing home network and not have to run all new cabling just for this HDMI
So now we brought this little thing in intercepting our traffic this is a Mikrotik hEX
and it is basically a low-cost router switch, and it can act as a network switch or as a router
and do a couple other things, and I'm going to use it to measure how much bandwidth is
going across this link because in theory these things could be using a full gigabit per second
which would mean they're not compressing the image a whole lot, but they could also
be using something like h.265 compression and compressed to go down to a few megabits, so we
will see. The reason it's important to know how much bandwidth they're using is because
if we want to connect a bunch of these all over our house, and we want to use the same cabling
that we're already using for our home network and for our Wi-Fi, we don't want a gigabit of
bandwidth from one of these to start causing problems for our Wi-Fi. So I've got Winbox (Mikrotik GUI)
pulled up and I have the transmitter connected to Ether 4 and the receiver connected to Ether 3.
so we can see the transmitter sending about two to three megabits per second
which is not outrageously high but the screen isn't really doing anything, so what happens if
we play back a video is the bandwidth going to go up? So I've got a video playing full screen
and it looks like our bandwidth is jumping up to between four and five megabits per second here 5.5
is roughly the peak that I've seen and this isn't a super intense video so I guess that makes sense
Another thing to note about this is this uses IP multicast, so what that means is instead of
broadcasting this video from the transmitter to the receiver, or from the transmitter separately
to each receiver it's sending it out to the group the multicast group and letting the switch decide
which receivers it should send it to, and if your network supports igmp and multicast
then the bandwidth of these devices can easily be shared across the network, so if you're using
unmanaged switches that don't support igmp, or multicast you'll end up flooding the network with
a bunch of data because this is running at like five megabits per second and five megabits per
second from each of your transmitters broadcast out to everyone is not a great thing, so you
might want to have separate switches if you're going to go that approach. Another approach you
can have is to use managed switches or smart switches that do support igmp and then the switch
will know which receivers would like to receive a certain multicast group and only send it to those
destinations. So in this case this device I'm using from Mikrotik does support igmp and it is enabled,
so it's only sending data to the receiver on Ether 3 because that's the only one that's subscribed to
it. And this is not anything fancy this is a pretty common internet standard for multicast, so it
should not be hard to find equipment that supports multicast and igmp to build a network out of this.
okay if any of you are really curious how it does IP, it looks like the devices are
self-assigning IP addresses in the 192.168.167 region, so hopefully you're not using that region
for your network, but if you're not that won't really conflict, because you can have
more than one IP subnet on the same Layer Two they just won't be able to talk to each other.
And in general it's using the multicast group as I expected it would
It looks like it's using two different ports, but I guess that's for it to decide
And then occasionally we'll see unicast traffic as well, and I believe that is USB data
Ao now that we know these things do work, and they do work with standard Ethernet hardware let's set
up a bit of a more real world test.
So I've got the transmitter hooked up to my desktop computer
it's mirroring this screen on the HDMI output to the transmitter. I have USB connected back
to the desktop and ethernet is connected to my home network, so I'm relying on my home
Network's wired ethernet switches to transmit video. I'm going to try gaming on this setup
from another office around the house. So for the receiver side of this experiment
got the IP KVM extender, it's hooked up to a network cable it goes all the way down
to the basement to my network switch, I've got a monitor attached over HDMI, I've got my keyboard
my gaming mouse, this is a wireless mouse but it's not Bluetooth, it has a dongle and it's plugged in
to one of the keyboard and mouse ports. For audio I have a pair of earbuds they're plugged into
the monitor, the monitor supports HDMI audio but doesn't have speakers, so I have to plug into an
output from the monitor, or otherwise separate the audio out of the HDMI because this does
support audio but it only over HDMI. So as you know I've used Portal for testing in the past
I'm pretty good at it I like to think, I guess you'll be the judge of that, let's see how this goes
It's my favorite part of the game, the old section, I love this section. We gotta go up there
not letting you guys hear the audio because I don't want any copyright strikes here
It feels fine to play on, I've usually done 60fps gaming, I don't do high frame rate gaming
but if you're comparing this to something like Steam remote play or moonlight
it's on par with those for sure
It seems like the volume keys on the keyboard aren't getting passed through, something to be aware of if you need those.
So for this test I wanted to throw in a lot of the features that it's supposed to support all at once
so we've tested directly linking them, we've tested them over my home network, now we're going to test
multiple transmitters, multiple receivers. So this TV here has the second receiver and as you can
see it's connected to my gaming PC of my bedroom but using their infrared remote that came with it
you can switch over to the TiVo. TiVo is down in the cabinet, it's got its own transmitter
transmitting ID 2 so when I click 2 on the remote I get the TiVo. Now if you're like me you probably
had a really hard time finding devices that use infrared, and the TiVo is the only device I could
find in my house that use an infrared remote. I normally use the Apple TV which has an RF remote
so I tried to test if the infrared forwarding works through the system
and it didn't work with the TiVo. That doesn't mean it won't work with anything else, but if I aim my
TiVo remote at the receiver here, I've got an IR blaster facing into the TiVo and I don't get anything
but if infrared's important to you compatibility might not be perfect, I don't have any other
devices I can test with really so this is what it is.
Now I can game from down here on the couch because why not?
So I'm back up here at another TV in the house and I have the second receiver
The first receiver was downstairs, the first transmitter is connected to my gaming desktop
the second transmitter is connected to the TiVo and the second receiver is connected up here
so you can see I'm able to see the TiVo over the network, I did confirm
also that the TiVo is using HDCP and it has negotiated HDCP so I'm not sure
what the requirements are for that but it works. I've got the IR receiver here again
can switch back to the gaming desktop. So all of these little HDMI boxes are just connected to
my home network with wired Ethernet. I'm not doing anything special. I have a switch that does support
igmp snooping, it is a managed switch but other than using a managed switch. I'm not segregating
them with vlans, I'm not using a separate switch, they're just plugged into regular network drops
around my house, they go down to the basement, they get switched, they come back up everywhere
so the cost of cabling to set up something like this is the same as
setting up a home network, you don't have to pull HDMI through the walls
it's pretty great if this is what you care about.
So for the next trick I've hooked up
the Apple TV. So the Apple TV is one of the most modern devices I have and it is working
I use its RF remote
good stuff
one test I wanted to try was to see if I could use the TVs remote over HDMI CEC
so CEC is a protocol that's part of HDMI that allows the TV to send commands to
devices downstream or devices downstream to send command back upstream to the TV
so for example the Apple TV uses this when you say "sleep all connected devices" it's using CEC
to turn off the TV. But likewise the TV can share its remote buttons with other things over HDMI
which unfortunately is not working over the HDMI over IP Bridge, so another feature to consider if it's important to you
Now for using the computer none of this matters you'll use a keyboard
and mouse probably some sort of wireless keyboard plugged in there all will be good
So thanks for coming along on my tour of HDMI over IP. These units specifically have worked
very well for a lot of the use cases that I care about, specifically, working with computers
keyboard and mouse support is just fine the latency is very low and I can do general
desktop office work, video editing, gaming, all that good stuff. In addition, while working with
these I found a bunch of use cases that I hadn't expected going into this video
so in addition to running a YouTube channel I also mentor a lot of Elementary through High School
robotics teams, and I run competitions for them. During these competitions, I often
have to set up a dozen Windows laptops to show rankings and statistics all around the event and
that's a giant pain. using these extenders I can connect all of my screens around the event to
my network that I'm already running, and use one HDMI output on my desktop to drive all of them
I didn't think of that before I started this video but now I want to use these for that too
There are also some business use cases, if you're the kind of business that likes having screens all
over with information or advertising whatever your business is into you can drive them all with this
instead of having a little Raspberry Pi (which you can't buy anymore!) at every single display
and since they're based on IP you can trunk them over fiber long distances like you would
with any other IP traffic. So what about downsides? If you're using them for media they don't support
HDMI CEC, so you can't use the remote control on your TV to send commands to devices over HDMI
now this was not advertised as a product feature but it's a feature that would be useful to me I
also wasn't able to get infrared to work with my TiVo now that doesn't matter to me because I don't
use TiVo I use Apple TV which has an RF remote but if you still like using infrared something
to consider. These are also limited to 1080p at 60 frames per second which is clearly advertised in
the product page and it's perfectly fine for my office use cases but if you're trying to do 4K
or high refresh rate gaming it won't work for you. I've got a huge list of projects coming up doing
all sorts of weird stuff, so like and subscribe if you want to see more of that in the future
if you want to chat directly or have suggestions for future videos you can slide into my Discord
link down in the description below. I do always love hearing from subscribers about how they've
used my videos to develop something cool in their life and I would love to hear from you as well so
hopefully you can come along for my future topics and as always I'll see you on the next adventure
Browse More Related Video
Compramos a NOVA Q70D da SAMSUNG!!! Valeu a pena mesmo?
Video Cables - CompTIA A+ 220-1101 - 3.1
Xbox Series X on a PC Monitor TESTED! [1440p, 4K, 120hz, HDMI 2.1] | The Tech Chap
Adapters and Converters - CompTIA A+ 220-1101 - 3.1
Lenovo Laptop ideaPad slim3 15IRU8 Intel Core i5-13420H 83EM0023IN Latest 2024 with ADP Review Hindi
Westinghouse TV Sound But NO Picture | Black Screen WITH Sound | 10-Min Fixes
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)