Clint Explains Phylogenetics - There are a million wrong ways to read a phylogenetic tree

Clint Explains
27 Feb 202107:45

Summary

TLDRThis video script explores the fascinating world of phylogenetic relationships among big cats, revealing that lions and tigers share a common ancestor. It explains the concept of a phylogenetic tree as a hypothesis that predicts genetic and anatomical similarities among species. The script clarifies the correct way to interpret these trees, emphasizing that the last common ancestor shared by tigers with any other species determines the closest living relatives. Using a phylogeny of lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, and grizzly bears, the video teaches viewers how to identify the closest relatives and encourages them to engage with the content through questions in the comments section.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿฆ Lions and tigers are both classified as 'big cats' and can interbreed to produce offspring such as ligers and tigons.
  • ๐Ÿ” The concept of a 'node' in a phylogenetic diagram represents the last common ancestor of two species, which was likely a population rather than a single individual or pair.
  • ๐ŸŒฟ Phylogenetic diagrams are used to illustrate the hypothesis of evolutionary relationships between species, predicting genetic and anatomical similarities.
  • ๐Ÿ”ฎ Phylogenies make predictions about potential fossil evidence that could show transitional stages between common ancestors and modern species.
  • ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ The analogy of a family tree is used to explain how phylogenetic relationships work, with the closest relatives sharing the most recent common ancestors.
  • ๐Ÿค” The position of individuals or species in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted; only the branching points (nodes) are significant.
  • ๐Ÿ† When adding more species to a phylogenetic tree, it becomes more informative, showing which species are more closely related to one another.
  • ๐Ÿ… The closest living relatives to tigers, according to the phylogeny in the script, are lions and leopards, as they share the most recent common ancestors with tigers.
  • ๐Ÿ† Lions and leopards are more closely related to each other than to tigers because they share more recent common ancestors.
  • ๐Ÿงฌ Understanding phylogenetic trees is crucial for accurately determining the closest living relatives and the evolutionary history of species.
  • ๐Ÿ“ The script encourages viewers to engage with the content by answering questions in the comments and subscribing for more educational videos.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of the term 'big cats' in the script?

    -The term 'big cats' refers to a group of large-bodied felines, including lions and tigers, which share certain characteristics and are believed to have common ancestors.

  • What are ligers and tigons, as mentioned in the script?

    -Ligers and tigons are hybrid animals resulting from the crossbreeding of lions and tigers. A liger is a cross between a male lion and a female tiger, while a tigon is a cross between a male tiger and a female lion.

  • What does the script suggest about the last common ancestor of lions and tigers?

    -The script suggests that the last common ancestor of lions and tigers was not a single animal but a population whose descendants include both species. This population was the last to share common ancestors before the lineages diverged.

  • What is a phylogeny and why is it important in understanding evolutionary relationships?

    -A phylogeny is a branching diagram that represents the evolutionary relationships among various species or other entities based on their genetic and anatomical similarities. It is important because it helps to visualize and understand the shared ancestry and the divergence of species over time.

  • What predictions does the hypothesis of shared common ancestors between lions and tigers make?

    -The hypothesis predicts that lions and tigers should have considerable genetic and anatomical similarities due to their shared ancestry. It also predicts the existence of fossils that could show transitional forms between their common ancestors and the modern species.

  • Why is it said that the position of individuals on a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted?

    -The position of individuals on a phylogenetic tree is arbitrary and does not affect the relationships depicted because what matters is the branching pattern, which represents the divergence of lineages and the time at which common ancestors were shared.

  • What does the script imply about the relationship between lions, tigers, and leopards?

    -The script implies that lions and leopards are both the closest living relatives to tigers because they share a more recent common ancestor with tigers than they do with each other.

  • How does the script differentiate between closely related species and more distantly related ones on a phylogenetic tree?

    -The script explains that closely related species share more recent common ancestors, while more distantly related species share ancestors further back in time. The branching points (nodes) on the phylogenetic tree represent these shared ancestors.

  • What is the purpose of the questions posed by the script at the end?

    -The purpose of the questions is to test the viewer's understanding of phylogenetic trees and the concept of shared ancestry. It encourages viewers to apply the knowledge gained from the script to interpret the relationships between different species.

  • How does the script suggest one can determine the closest living relatives of a species on a phylogenetic tree?

    -The script suggests that to determine the closest living relatives of a species, one should identify the last node where that species shares common ancestors with any other living group on the phylogeny. All species that share those ancestors are equally related to the focal species.

Outlines

00:00

๐Ÿ… Understanding the Evolutionary Relationship of Big Cats

This paragraph introduces the concept of phylogeny, which is a visual representation of the evolutionary relationships between species. It explains that lions and tigers, despite being distinct today, share a common ancestor. The script uses a diagram to illustrate how these species diverged from a common population at some point in time, creating two separate lineages. It emphasizes that this common ancestor was not a single animal but a population whose descendants include both species. The paragraph also discusses how a phylogeny can predict genetic and anatomical similarities and guide the search for transitional fossils. It concludes by explaining that a phylogeny becomes more informative when more species are included, allowing for a more detailed understanding of relationships and ancestry.

05:02

๐Ÿ” Correctly Interpreting Phylogenetic Trees to Determine Closest Relatives

This paragraph delves into the correct interpretation of phylogenetic trees, highlighting the common mistakes made even by experts. It stresses the importance of identifying the most recent common ancestor shared by a species with others on the tree to determine the closest living relatives. Using the example of tigers, it clarifies that both lions and leopards are equally the closest living relatives to tigers, as they share the most recent common ancestor. The paragraph also explains that the position of nodes in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted, only the timing of common ancestry does. It concludes with a call to action for viewers to participate in the comments section to answer questions about phylogenetic relationships among lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, and grizzly bears, and to engage in a discussion to solidify their understanding.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กBig Cats

The term 'Big Cats' refers to a group of large, carnivorous felines that includes lions, tigers, leopards, and jaguars. In the context of the video, big cats are used to illustrate the concept of common ancestry, as both lions and tigers are categorized under this group and share evolutionary traits, as well as the ability to interbreed, producing offspring like ligers and tigons.

๐Ÿ’กOffspring

In the script, 'offspring' is used to describe the progeny resulting from the breeding of two different species, such as ligers (a mix of lion and tiger) and tigons (a mix of tiger and lioness). This concept is important in the video as it demonstrates the genetic proximity between lions and tigers, supporting the idea of a shared ancestry.

๐Ÿ’กCommon Ancestors

The concept of 'common ancestors' is central to the video's theme of phylogenetic relationships. It refers to the last organism or population from which all members of a group are descended. The video explains that lions and tigers share a common ancestor, indicating they diverged from a single lineage at some point in their evolutionary history.

๐Ÿ’กNode

In the context of phylogenetic trees, a 'node' represents the point where two evolutionary lineages converge, indicating the last common ancestor of the species that branch off from this point. The video uses the node to illustrate the moment when the lineages of lions and tigers diverged from a shared ancestral population.

๐Ÿ’กPhylogeny

Phylogeny is a model that visually represents the evolutionary relationships among various species or groups of organisms. The video script uses the concept of phylogeny to hypothesize and explain the relationships between lions, tigers, and other big cats, showing how they are all interconnected through shared ancestry.

๐Ÿ’กGenetic Similarities

The video posits that if lions and tigers share common ancestors, they should exhibit 'genetic similarities,' which refers to the presence of similar DNA sequences or genetic markers. This is used as a prediction to support the hypothesis that these species are related through common ancestry.

๐Ÿ’กFossils

Fossils are the preserved remains or traces of animals, plants, and other organisms from the past. In the video, fossils are mentioned as evidence that could potentially reveal the evolutionary steps between the common ancestors and the modern species like lions and tigers.

๐Ÿ’กClosest Living Relatives

The term 'closest living relatives' is used in the video to describe the species that share the most recent common ancestor with the subject organism, in this case, the tiger. The video explains that both lions and leopards are the closest living relatives to the tiger based on the phylogenetic tree presented.

๐Ÿ’กAnatomical Similarities

Anatomical similarities refer to the shared physical characteristics among different species, which can be a result of common ancestry. The video implies that lions and tigers, being related, would have considerable anatomical similarities, supporting the hypothesis of shared evolutionary history.

๐Ÿ’กInterpreting Phylogenetic Trees

The video emphasizes the correct way to interpret phylogenetic trees, which is to identify the most recent common ancestor shared with other species. It explains that understanding this concept is crucial for determining the closest living relatives and the evolutionary relationships among different organisms.

๐Ÿ’กEvolutionary Divergence

Evolutionary divergence is the process by which different species evolve from a common ancestor. The video discusses how the population that was once a single group became two separate populations, represented by the node in the phylogenetic tree, indicating the point of divergence for lions and tigers.

Highlights

Lions and tigers are both big cats and can interbreed to produce ligers and tigons.

Lions and tigers share a common ancestor, which was likely a population rather than a single pair of animals.

The point of intersection in a phylogenetic diagram represents the last common ancestor of two species.

A phylogeny visually represents the hypothesis of evolutionary relationships between species.

Genetic and anatomical similarities are predicted if two species share common ancestors.

Fossils can provide evidence for the evolutionary transition between common ancestors and modern species.

A phylogeny of only two species is not as informative as one that includes multiple species.

The closeness of relatives in a phylogenetic tree is determined by the recency of shared ancestors.

The position of individuals in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the interpretation of relationships.

Adding more individuals to a phylogenetic tree provides a more detailed understanding of relationships.

The closest living relatives to the tiger are lions and leopards, as they share the most recent common ancestor.

Leopards and lions are more closely related to each other than to tigers due to more recent common ancestors.

Interpreting phylogenetic trees correctly is crucial to understanding evolutionary relationships.

There is only one correct way to interpret a phylogenetic tree, which is based on the last shared common ancestor.

Phylogenetic trees can be misinterpreted even by experts due to their complexity.

The video includes questions for viewers to test their understanding of interpreting phylogenetic trees.

Encouragement for viewers to subscribe and engage with the content for more learning opportunities.

Transcripts

play00:05

[Music]

play00:09

well hi

play00:09

there got some big news

play00:12

lions are not tigers but they are both

play00:16

cats

play00:18

they're both big cats and if you breed

play00:20

them together

play00:21

they can produce offspring ligers and

play00:24

tigons

play00:25

so it probably won't come as any big

play00:27

shock to learn

play00:28

that lions and tigers share common

play00:31

ancestors

play00:32

if i were to show this as a diagram i

play00:34

might draw something like this

play00:36

in this case i can see that today i have

play00:39

two distinct organisms lions and tigers

play00:43

but if i follow the lines back in time

play00:45

long enough

play00:46

i will run into a point where the two

play00:49

lines intersect

play00:51

this point of intersection is called a

play00:53

node

play00:54

and it represents the last common

play00:56

ancestor of both

play00:57

lions and tigers to be clear

play01:01

this likely wasn't a lion or a tiger

play01:04

it also wasn't a single animal or a pair

play01:07

of animals

play01:08

but a population whose descendants

play01:10

include both lions

play01:12

and tigers this population at this point

play01:15

in time

play01:16

was the last time that lions and tigers

play01:19

shared common ancestors before their two

play01:21

lineages went their separate ways

play01:24

this could have happened because part of

play01:25

the population became

play01:27

physically isolated from the rest

play01:30

or because some of them made choices

play01:34

like which mates they picked to isolate

play01:37

themselves genetically

play01:38

from the rest of the population either

play01:41

way

play01:41

this population that was previously a

play01:44

single population

play01:45

became after this point represented by

play01:47

the node

play01:48

two separate populations in this diagram

play01:52

called a phylogeny visually represents

play01:55

my hypothesis

play01:56

that these two species alive today are

play01:59

related

play01:59

and share common ancestors like any

play02:02

hypothesis

play02:03

this one makes predictions for example

play02:07

i would predict that if lions and tigers

play02:10

share common ancestors

play02:11

they should have considerable genetic

play02:14

and anatomical similarities

play02:16

i would also make many predictions about

play02:19

fossils that could be found

play02:21

to show steps in the transition between

play02:23

their common ancestors

play02:25

and modern lions and tigers the

play02:27

phylogeny itself

play02:29

is a hypothesis a model that would

play02:31

explain

play02:32

the evolutionary relationship between

play02:35

these two

play02:35

organisms however a phylogeny showing

play02:38

the relationships between

play02:40

only two species is not that interesting

play02:43

this is like a family tree depicting the

play02:45

relationship between

play02:46

two people we can be pretty confident

play02:49

that they're related

play02:50

so somewhere they share common ancestors

play02:53

but that's about all that it says it

play02:56

doesn't get interesting until we add in

play02:59

a third person

play03:00

timmy and wanda are both humans and of

play03:04

the two people here

play03:05

timmy's closest relative is wanda well

play03:08

other than timmy himself

play03:10

they also share ancestors cool

play03:14

but the story doesn't get interesting

play03:15

until i add in spencer

play03:17

timmy wanda and spencer are all humans

play03:20

as such

play03:21

they all share ancestors but the two

play03:23

that share ancestors

play03:25

more recently will be more closely

play03:27

related to one another than they are

play03:29

to anybody else for example if timmy and

play03:32

wanda are siblings

play03:35

then they share parents and if spencer

play03:37

also shares ancestors with them

play03:39

but 10 generations back then timmy and

play03:42

wanda will be more closely related to

play03:43

one another than they are to spencer

play03:46

also worth noticing is that spencer is

play03:48

no more closely related to timmy

play03:50

than he is to wanda he's equally related

play03:53

to both of them because he shares the

play03:56

same ancestors with both of them

play03:58

also if i flip the way that i drew the

play04:00

diagram so that timmy is on the top and

play04:03

wanda on the bottom that doesn't change

play04:06

the story

play04:06

at all if i flip it so that spencer is

play04:09

on the very top instead of the very

play04:11

bottom

play04:12

that also changes nothing their position

play04:15

on the diagram

play04:16

doesn't mean anything all that matters

play04:18

is how recently they shared

play04:20

ancestors with the other individuals on

play04:22

the tree if i add in a new person

play04:24

janet and find out that she goes here on

play04:27

the diagram

play04:29

what i know is that janet shares

play04:31

ancestors more recently with timmy and

play04:33

wanda than she does with spencer

play04:35

but spencer is equally related to janet

play04:38

timmy and wanda because the last

play04:41

ancestors that he shares with any of

play04:43

them

play04:43

he shares with all of them this is

play04:46

exactly

play04:47

the same way that our phylogenetic trees

play04:49

work yes

play04:51

lions and tigers share common ancestors

play04:53

but what happens

play04:54

if i add in a leopard a cheetah and a

play04:57

grizzly bear

play04:59

which one is the closest relative to the

play05:01

tiger

play05:02

this is where we need to remember what

play05:04

we discussed with the family tree

play05:06

there are a million wrong ways to

play05:08

interpret a phylogenetic

play05:10

tree and only one is the right way

play05:14

so when i'm trying to answer the

play05:15

question which is the closest living

play05:18

relative to the tiger

play05:19

i need to remember the one right way

play05:22

even phylogenetics graduate students

play05:24

often make mistakes with this

play05:26

because the more you know about these

play05:27

diagrams the more wrong ways you can

play05:29

come up with to interpret them

play05:31

the only right way is to identify the

play05:33

last time that tigers

play05:35

share common ancestors with any other

play05:37

living group on this phylogeny

play05:39

and everything else that shares those

play05:42

ancestors with the tiger

play05:44

are equally related to the tiger and

play05:47

the closest living relatives to the

play05:49

tiger in this case

play05:51

the last time that tigers share

play05:52

ancestors with any other living

play05:54

organisms on this phylogeny

play05:56

was at this node it shared those

play05:59

ancestors with both

play06:00

lions and leopards therefore lions and

play06:03

leopards

play06:04

are both the closest living relatives to

play06:07

the tiger

play06:07

remember when the ancestors of tigers

play06:10

split off from the ancestors of leopards

play06:11

and lions

play06:12

there was no difference between the

play06:14

ancestors of leopards and the ancestors

play06:16

of lions

play06:17

they were the same thing so one of them

play06:20

is not more closely related to tigers

play06:22

than the other

play06:24

leopards and lions are more closely

play06:26

related to one another than they are to

play06:28

tigers

play06:29

because they share more recent common

play06:30

ancestors with one another than they do

play06:32

with tigers

play06:33

but they are both equally related to

play06:34

tigers and now you know

play06:36

but to make sure that you understand how

play06:38

to interpret phylogenetic trees i have a

play06:40

couple of questions for you to answer

play06:42

down in the comments please feel free to

play06:44

ask questions

play06:45

and help one another with these

play06:47

questions as well

play06:49

so first looking at our phylogeny of

play06:51

lions tigers leopards cheetahs and

play06:53

grizzly bears

play06:55

what are the closest living relatives on

play06:57

this phylogeny

play06:58

to cheetahs second if i would be to flip

play07:02

all of these nodes resulting in this

play07:04

phylogeny

play07:06

does it depict the same hypothesis about

play07:08

the relationships between these

play07:09

organisms

play07:10

or a different hypothesis again

play07:13

please answer in the comments and let's

play07:15

make sure we've all got this

play07:17

if you've learned something today please

play07:18

like this video

play07:20

if you'd like to learn more about this

play07:21

topic and other topics in the future

play07:24

please subscribe and click the little

play07:25

bell and we hope to see you real soon

play07:44

you

Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
EvolutionPhylogenyBig CatsLionsTigersLeopardsCheetahsGrizzly BearsAncestral LineageGenetic SimilaritySpecies Relations