Clint Explains Phylogenetics - There are a million wrong ways to read a phylogenetic tree
Summary
TLDRThis video script explores the fascinating world of phylogenetic relationships among big cats, revealing that lions and tigers share a common ancestor. It explains the concept of a phylogenetic tree as a hypothesis that predicts genetic and anatomical similarities among species. The script clarifies the correct way to interpret these trees, emphasizing that the last common ancestor shared by tigers with any other species determines the closest living relatives. Using a phylogeny of lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, and grizzly bears, the video teaches viewers how to identify the closest relatives and encourages them to engage with the content through questions in the comments section.
Takeaways
- ๐ฆ Lions and tigers are both classified as 'big cats' and can interbreed to produce offspring such as ligers and tigons.
- ๐ The concept of a 'node' in a phylogenetic diagram represents the last common ancestor of two species, which was likely a population rather than a single individual or pair.
- ๐ฟ Phylogenetic diagrams are used to illustrate the hypothesis of evolutionary relationships between species, predicting genetic and anatomical similarities.
- ๐ฎ Phylogenies make predictions about potential fossil evidence that could show transitional stages between common ancestors and modern species.
- ๐จโ๐งโ๐ฆ The analogy of a family tree is used to explain how phylogenetic relationships work, with the closest relatives sharing the most recent common ancestors.
- ๐ค The position of individuals or species in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted; only the branching points (nodes) are significant.
- ๐ When adding more species to a phylogenetic tree, it becomes more informative, showing which species are more closely related to one another.
- ๐ The closest living relatives to tigers, according to the phylogeny in the script, are lions and leopards, as they share the most recent common ancestors with tigers.
- ๐ Lions and leopards are more closely related to each other than to tigers because they share more recent common ancestors.
- ๐งฌ Understanding phylogenetic trees is crucial for accurately determining the closest living relatives and the evolutionary history of species.
- ๐ The script encourages viewers to engage with the content by answering questions in the comments and subscribing for more educational videos.
Q & A
What is the significance of the term 'big cats' in the script?
-The term 'big cats' refers to a group of large-bodied felines, including lions and tigers, which share certain characteristics and are believed to have common ancestors.
What are ligers and tigons, as mentioned in the script?
-Ligers and tigons are hybrid animals resulting from the crossbreeding of lions and tigers. A liger is a cross between a male lion and a female tiger, while a tigon is a cross between a male tiger and a female lion.
What does the script suggest about the last common ancestor of lions and tigers?
-The script suggests that the last common ancestor of lions and tigers was not a single animal but a population whose descendants include both species. This population was the last to share common ancestors before the lineages diverged.
What is a phylogeny and why is it important in understanding evolutionary relationships?
-A phylogeny is a branching diagram that represents the evolutionary relationships among various species or other entities based on their genetic and anatomical similarities. It is important because it helps to visualize and understand the shared ancestry and the divergence of species over time.
What predictions does the hypothesis of shared common ancestors between lions and tigers make?
-The hypothesis predicts that lions and tigers should have considerable genetic and anatomical similarities due to their shared ancestry. It also predicts the existence of fossils that could show transitional forms between their common ancestors and the modern species.
Why is it said that the position of individuals on a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted?
-The position of individuals on a phylogenetic tree is arbitrary and does not affect the relationships depicted because what matters is the branching pattern, which represents the divergence of lineages and the time at which common ancestors were shared.
What does the script imply about the relationship between lions, tigers, and leopards?
-The script implies that lions and leopards are both the closest living relatives to tigers because they share a more recent common ancestor with tigers than they do with each other.
How does the script differentiate between closely related species and more distantly related ones on a phylogenetic tree?
-The script explains that closely related species share more recent common ancestors, while more distantly related species share ancestors further back in time. The branching points (nodes) on the phylogenetic tree represent these shared ancestors.
What is the purpose of the questions posed by the script at the end?
-The purpose of the questions is to test the viewer's understanding of phylogenetic trees and the concept of shared ancestry. It encourages viewers to apply the knowledge gained from the script to interpret the relationships between different species.
How does the script suggest one can determine the closest living relatives of a species on a phylogenetic tree?
-The script suggests that to determine the closest living relatives of a species, one should identify the last node where that species shares common ancestors with any other living group on the phylogeny. All species that share those ancestors are equally related to the focal species.
Outlines
๐ Understanding the Evolutionary Relationship of Big Cats
This paragraph introduces the concept of phylogeny, which is a visual representation of the evolutionary relationships between species. It explains that lions and tigers, despite being distinct today, share a common ancestor. The script uses a diagram to illustrate how these species diverged from a common population at some point in time, creating two separate lineages. It emphasizes that this common ancestor was not a single animal but a population whose descendants include both species. The paragraph also discusses how a phylogeny can predict genetic and anatomical similarities and guide the search for transitional fossils. It concludes by explaining that a phylogeny becomes more informative when more species are included, allowing for a more detailed understanding of relationships and ancestry.
๐ Correctly Interpreting Phylogenetic Trees to Determine Closest Relatives
This paragraph delves into the correct interpretation of phylogenetic trees, highlighting the common mistakes made even by experts. It stresses the importance of identifying the most recent common ancestor shared by a species with others on the tree to determine the closest living relatives. Using the example of tigers, it clarifies that both lions and leopards are equally the closest living relatives to tigers, as they share the most recent common ancestor. The paragraph also explains that the position of nodes in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the relationships depicted, only the timing of common ancestry does. It concludes with a call to action for viewers to participate in the comments section to answer questions about phylogenetic relationships among lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, and grizzly bears, and to engage in a discussion to solidify their understanding.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กBig Cats
๐กOffspring
๐กCommon Ancestors
๐กNode
๐กPhylogeny
๐กGenetic Similarities
๐กFossils
๐กClosest Living Relatives
๐กAnatomical Similarities
๐กInterpreting Phylogenetic Trees
๐กEvolutionary Divergence
Highlights
Lions and tigers are both big cats and can interbreed to produce ligers and tigons.
Lions and tigers share a common ancestor, which was likely a population rather than a single pair of animals.
The point of intersection in a phylogenetic diagram represents the last common ancestor of two species.
A phylogeny visually represents the hypothesis of evolutionary relationships between species.
Genetic and anatomical similarities are predicted if two species share common ancestors.
Fossils can provide evidence for the evolutionary transition between common ancestors and modern species.
A phylogeny of only two species is not as informative as one that includes multiple species.
The closeness of relatives in a phylogenetic tree is determined by the recency of shared ancestors.
The position of individuals in a phylogenetic tree does not affect the interpretation of relationships.
Adding more individuals to a phylogenetic tree provides a more detailed understanding of relationships.
The closest living relatives to the tiger are lions and leopards, as they share the most recent common ancestor.
Leopards and lions are more closely related to each other than to tigers due to more recent common ancestors.
Interpreting phylogenetic trees correctly is crucial to understanding evolutionary relationships.
There is only one correct way to interpret a phylogenetic tree, which is based on the last shared common ancestor.
Phylogenetic trees can be misinterpreted even by experts due to their complexity.
The video includes questions for viewers to test their understanding of interpreting phylogenetic trees.
Encouragement for viewers to subscribe and engage with the content for more learning opportunities.
Transcripts
[Music]
well hi
there got some big news
lions are not tigers but they are both
cats
they're both big cats and if you breed
them together
they can produce offspring ligers and
tigons
so it probably won't come as any big
shock to learn
that lions and tigers share common
ancestors
if i were to show this as a diagram i
might draw something like this
in this case i can see that today i have
two distinct organisms lions and tigers
but if i follow the lines back in time
long enough
i will run into a point where the two
lines intersect
this point of intersection is called a
node
and it represents the last common
ancestor of both
lions and tigers to be clear
this likely wasn't a lion or a tiger
it also wasn't a single animal or a pair
of animals
but a population whose descendants
include both lions
and tigers this population at this point
in time
was the last time that lions and tigers
shared common ancestors before their two
lineages went their separate ways
this could have happened because part of
the population became
physically isolated from the rest
or because some of them made choices
like which mates they picked to isolate
themselves genetically
from the rest of the population either
way
this population that was previously a
single population
became after this point represented by
the node
two separate populations in this diagram
called a phylogeny visually represents
my hypothesis
that these two species alive today are
related
and share common ancestors like any
hypothesis
this one makes predictions for example
i would predict that if lions and tigers
share common ancestors
they should have considerable genetic
and anatomical similarities
i would also make many predictions about
fossils that could be found
to show steps in the transition between
their common ancestors
and modern lions and tigers the
phylogeny itself
is a hypothesis a model that would
explain
the evolutionary relationship between
these two
organisms however a phylogeny showing
the relationships between
only two species is not that interesting
this is like a family tree depicting the
relationship between
two people we can be pretty confident
that they're related
so somewhere they share common ancestors
but that's about all that it says it
doesn't get interesting until we add in
a third person
timmy and wanda are both humans and of
the two people here
timmy's closest relative is wanda well
other than timmy himself
they also share ancestors cool
but the story doesn't get interesting
until i add in spencer
timmy wanda and spencer are all humans
as such
they all share ancestors but the two
that share ancestors
more recently will be more closely
related to one another than they are
to anybody else for example if timmy and
wanda are siblings
then they share parents and if spencer
also shares ancestors with them
but 10 generations back then timmy and
wanda will be more closely related to
one another than they are to spencer
also worth noticing is that spencer is
no more closely related to timmy
than he is to wanda he's equally related
to both of them because he shares the
same ancestors with both of them
also if i flip the way that i drew the
diagram so that timmy is on the top and
wanda on the bottom that doesn't change
the story
at all if i flip it so that spencer is
on the very top instead of the very
bottom
that also changes nothing their position
on the diagram
doesn't mean anything all that matters
is how recently they shared
ancestors with the other individuals on
the tree if i add in a new person
janet and find out that she goes here on
the diagram
what i know is that janet shares
ancestors more recently with timmy and
wanda than she does with spencer
but spencer is equally related to janet
timmy and wanda because the last
ancestors that he shares with any of
them
he shares with all of them this is
exactly
the same way that our phylogenetic trees
work yes
lions and tigers share common ancestors
but what happens
if i add in a leopard a cheetah and a
grizzly bear
which one is the closest relative to the
tiger
this is where we need to remember what
we discussed with the family tree
there are a million wrong ways to
interpret a phylogenetic
tree and only one is the right way
so when i'm trying to answer the
question which is the closest living
relative to the tiger
i need to remember the one right way
even phylogenetics graduate students
often make mistakes with this
because the more you know about these
diagrams the more wrong ways you can
come up with to interpret them
the only right way is to identify the
last time that tigers
share common ancestors with any other
living group on this phylogeny
and everything else that shares those
ancestors with the tiger
are equally related to the tiger and
the closest living relatives to the
tiger in this case
the last time that tigers share
ancestors with any other living
organisms on this phylogeny
was at this node it shared those
ancestors with both
lions and leopards therefore lions and
leopards
are both the closest living relatives to
the tiger
remember when the ancestors of tigers
split off from the ancestors of leopards
and lions
there was no difference between the
ancestors of leopards and the ancestors
of lions
they were the same thing so one of them
is not more closely related to tigers
than the other
leopards and lions are more closely
related to one another than they are to
tigers
because they share more recent common
ancestors with one another than they do
with tigers
but they are both equally related to
tigers and now you know
but to make sure that you understand how
to interpret phylogenetic trees i have a
couple of questions for you to answer
down in the comments please feel free to
ask questions
and help one another with these
questions as well
so first looking at our phylogeny of
lions tigers leopards cheetahs and
grizzly bears
what are the closest living relatives on
this phylogeny
to cheetahs second if i would be to flip
all of these nodes resulting in this
phylogeny
does it depict the same hypothesis about
the relationships between these
organisms
or a different hypothesis again
please answer in the comments and let's
make sure we've all got this
if you've learned something today please
like this video
if you'd like to learn more about this
topic and other topics in the future
please subscribe and click the little
bell and we hope to see you real soon
you
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)