Splice DMCA strikes @TopMusicAttorneyfor reading terms of service to censor LEGITIMATE criticism 🤦

Louis Rossmann
25 Jul 202415:17

Summary

TLDRIn this video, host Lewis Rossman discusses the challenges of dealing with the music industry, particularly the misuse of copyright strikes and defamation suits by companies to silence critics. He highlights the case of a music industry attorney who received a copyright strike for analyzing and critiquing the terms of service of a company called Splice. Rossman demonstrates the ease of accessing Splice's 'proprietary' agreement to argue the absurdity of the claim, advocating for fair use and open dialogue over legal intimidation.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The host, Lewis Rossman, is frustrated with a ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and decides to replace it.
  • 😡 Lewis discusses the issue of companies filing false defamation suits or DMCA strikes to silence criticism.
  • 🗣️ He emphasizes the importance of responding to criticism and winning the 'Battle of Ideas' through dialogue rather than censorship.
  • 🎵 The video focuses on the music industry, specifically the legal issues surrounding the use of samples and licenses.
  • 📚 Lewis mentions his experience working at Avatar Studios and his observations about the music industry's legal practices.
  • 🤔 A music industry attorney scrutinizes Splice's terms of service and certified licenses, finding them misleading and confusing.
  • 🚫 The attorney receives a copyright strike for her video critiquing Splice's terms, despite her professional analysis and fair use of their documents.
  • 💬 Lewis invites companies to engage in honest conversations and debates rather than resorting to legal threats to silence critics.
  • 💳 He demonstrates how to sign up for Splice using a virtual card for privacy and security, highlighting the ease of accessing their proprietary agreements.
  • 📝 Lewis downloads a certified license from Splice to show that it is readily available and not a secret document, challenging the basis of the copyright strike.
  • 🤬 He passionately argues against the misuse of copyright laws to suppress valid criticism and encourages companies to face their critics directly.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue that Lewis Rossman is addressing in his video?

    -Lewis Rossman is addressing the issue of companies, particularly in the music industry, filing false defamation suits or DMCA strikes against critics who point out misleading or confusing terms in their contracts or terms of service.

  • Why is Lewis frustrated with the ceiling fan in his video?

    -Lewis is frustrated with the ceiling fan because it requires an app to operate, often doesn't work properly, and beeps at him, which he finds to be a 'royal pain in the ass'.

  • What is Lewis' approach to dealing with online criticism and negative comments about him?

    -Lewis chooses to respond to critics and engage in discussions rather than filing defamation lawsuits or trying to remove their posts. He believes in winning the 'battle of ideas' through open conversation.

  • What is the 'Streisand effect' mentioned by Lewis?

    -The 'Streisand effect' refers to a phenomenon where attempts to suppress or censor information end up drawing more attention to it, thereby increasing its visibility.

  • What is the music industry attorney's issue with Splice's terms of service?

    -The music industry attorney found Splice's terms of service to be misleading and confusing, particularly regarding the transfer of agreement rights, licensing of samples, and the duration of access to certified licenses.

  • Why did Splice issue a copyright strike against the music industry attorney's video?

    -Splice issued a copyright strike against the attorney's video because she read and analyzed their terms of service and certified license, which they claimed to be proprietary, and they considered this a violation of their copyright.

  • What does Lewis suggest as an alternative to filing false DMCA claims or defamation suits?

    -Lewis suggests that companies should engage in honest conversations and debates with critics, addressing their concerns and providing clarifications rather than resorting to legal threats to silence them.

  • How does Lewis demonstrate the accessibility of Splice's certified license in his video?

    -Lewis demonstrates by creating an account on Splice, adding sounds to his library, and generating a certified license, showing that it is not a secret or proprietary document as claimed by Splice.

  • What is Lewis' stance on the use of his videos by others?

    -Lewis is generally fine with others using his videos but draws the line at them falsely claiming authorship or pretending that his repair videos are their own.

  • What advice does Lewis give to companies that receive criticism online?

    -Lewis advises companies to respond to criticism with facts and evidence, to engage in open dialogue, and to accept that people have the right to criticize and express their opinions.

  • What does Lewis propose as a consequence if Splice tries to DMCA claim his video?

    -Lewis dares Splice to try and DMCA claim his video, implying that he is ready to stand up against such actions and suggesting that it would not be a wise use of their resources.

Outlines

00:00

😤 Frustration with a Smart Ceiling Fan

Lewis Rossman begins his video by expressing his frustration with a smart ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and frequently beeps at him. He humorously suggests destroying the fan and replacing it. The main topic of the video is the music industry's use of false defamation suits and DMCA strikes to suppress criticism. Lewis contrasts his own approach to criticism, where he engages and responds to critics rather than resorting to legal action. He also highlights his experience working in the music industry and his disdain for the unethical practices he witnessed.

05:01

📜 Legal Critique of Splice's Terms of Service

In this paragraph, Lewis discusses a music industry attorney who critiqued the terms of service and certified licenses of Splice, a company that provides sounds and clips for music production. The attorney found the terms misleading and confusing, particularly regarding the duration of access to licensed samples and the ability to transfer rights. Despite her professional critique, Splice issued a copyright strike against her video, which Lewis views as an abuse of power. He challenges Splice to engage in a fair discussion rather than resorting to legal intimidation.

10:02

💳 Signing Up for Splice to Expose Their Practices

Lewis demonstrates the process of signing up for a Splice account to download a sample and generate a certified license, highlighting the ease with which anyone can access these documents. He criticizes Splice for claiming that their terms of service and licenses are proprietary and deserving of copyright protection, arguing that this is a misinterpretation of fair use. Lewis emphasizes that the logo on the documents is for identification, not to claim authorship, and challenges Splice to engage in a fair debate rather than using legal threats.

15:06

🤬 Calling Out Splice for Legal Intimidation

In the final paragraph, Lewis passionately calls out Splice for their legal intimidation tactics, urging them to engage in an honest conversation or face the consequences of their actions. He recounts his own experience with Apple trying to remove a video he made about repairing a MacBook Air and how he stood his ground. Lewis encourages Splice to either correct their false claims or face public backlash. He ends by inviting viewers to look at his resume and decide for themselves whether challenging him is a good use of their time.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Right to Repair

The 'Right to Repair' is a movement advocating for consumers' ability to repair their own electronic devices or have them repaired by third parties, rather than being forced to replace them or pay high fees for manufacturer repairs. In the video, the host expresses frustration with the difficulty of repairing a ceiling fan, which he sees as a test of his resolve in supporting the right to repair. This theme is a reflection of broader consumer rights issues.

💡Defamation

Defamation refers to the act of making a false statement that damages someone's reputation. The video discusses how larger companies sometimes file false defamation suits to suppress criticism. The host contrasts his own approach of responding to critics with those who resort to legal action to silence them, highlighting the importance of free speech and the right to criticize.

💡DMCA Strikes

DMCA stands for the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. A 'DMCA Strike' is a legal action taken against content that is alleged to infringe on copyright. The video describes instances where companies file false DMCA strikes to remove criticism or content they don't like. The host criticizes this practice as an abuse of legal processes to silence legitimate discussion.

💡Music Industry

The music industry encompasses the businesses involved in the production, distribution, and sale of music. The video discusses the music industry's reputation for unethical practices, such as filing false legal claims against critics. The host's experience working in a recording studio provides him with firsthand insight into the industry's operations and the challenges faced by those within it.

💡Terms of Service

Terms of Service are the legal agreements between a service provider and its users, outlining the rules and conditions for using the service. In the video, the host discusses how a music industry attorney found certain terms of service from a company called Splice to be misleading and confusing. This highlights the importance of transparency and clarity in legal agreements.

💡Certified License

A 'Certified License' is a legal document that grants the right to use certain materials, such as music samples, in a manner that complies with copyright law. The video describes how the host generated a certified license from Splice, emphasizing the need for artists to have clear and accessible legal documentation to protect their rights.

💡Fair Use

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material without permission under certain conditions, such as for commentary, criticism, or education. The video argues that the music industry attorney's analysis of Splice's terms of service falls under fair use, as it is a critical examination of a public document, not an infringement of copyright.

💡Proprietary Information

Proprietary information refers to data or knowledge that is owned by an individual or company and is kept secret or not publicly disclosed. The video criticizes Splice for claiming that their terms of service and certified licenses are proprietary and thus cannot be discussed or analyzed publicly, arguing that this is an attempt to stifle open discussion and critique.

💡Strian Effect

The Strian Effect is a psychological phenomenon where the more you try to suppress something, the more it spreads. The video suggests that attempts by companies to suppress criticism through legal means can backfire, leading to more people becoming aware of the issues and potentially sympathizing with the critic.

💡Privacy

Privacy in the context of the video refers to the use of tools like Privacy.com to create virtual credit cards, protecting personal financial information from unauthorized charges or misuse. The host demonstrates this by signing up for a service with a virtual card, emphasizing the importance of protecting one's privacy in digital transactions.

💡Legal Contracts

Legal contracts are formal agreements between two or more parties that are enforceable by law. The video discusses how a music industry attorney scrutinized the legal contracts of a company, highlighting the need for clear and fair terms in agreements that impact artists and consumers.

Highlights

Lewis Rossman discusses his frustration with a ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and his decision to replace it.

He addresses the issue of 'right to repair' and his experience with house wiring that tests his resolve on this matter.

Lewis introduces the topic of the music industry's use of false defamation suits and DMCA strikes against critics.

He emphasizes his own approach to criticism, choosing to engage in 'the Battle of ideas' rather than resorting to legal action.

Lewis recounts his experience working in a top music studio and his view of the industry as a 'hive of scum and villainy'.

A music industry attorney's detailed analysis of Splice's terms of service and certified licenses is discussed, revealing potential misleading and confusing terms.

The attorney received a copyright strike for her video critiquing Splice's terms, despite her fair use argument and offer for discussion.

Lewis challenges Splice's actions, questioning the legitimacy of their DMCA claim and advocating for honest conversation over legal threats.

He demonstrates the ease of accessing Splice's proprietary agreement, contradicting claims of its secrecy and proprietary nature.

Lewis uses Privacy.com to create a virtual card for a free trial, highlighting a method to protect against unwanted charges.

He criticizes companies that use legal threats to silence critics rather than engaging in open dialogue.

Lewis shares his personal experience with Apple's attempt to remove a video he made, showing his stance on fair use and criticism.

He dares Splice to attempt a DMCA claim on his video, asserting his confidence in his right to critique and discuss their terms.

Lewis argues that companies should address criticisms with facts and evidence rather than resorting to legal intimidation.

He emphasizes the importance of standing up to bullies in the digital space and the potential for public opinion to shift through open debate.

The video concludes with Lewis encouraging viewers to learn from the situation and to stand up for fair use and open criticism.

Transcripts

play00:00

hey everybody how's it going hope you're

play00:01

having a lovely day welcome to today's

play00:02

episode of how lwis is getting effed I'm

play00:04

your host Lewis Rossman yes today the

play00:07

reason that my desk is such a mess over

play00:08

here is because I wanted to replace this

play00:10

ceiling fan that beeps at me requires an

play00:12

app to work it's it's a royal pain in

play00:13

the ass it never works right so I've

play00:15

decided to take this thing bash it the

play00:17

pieces throw it off my balcony which is

play00:19

what you should do when you have a cloud

play00:20

ceiling fan and the problem that I have

play00:22

here is um how I put this every time

play00:26

I've opened anything in this house with

play00:28

regards to wiring it really tests my

play00:30

resolve with regards to right to repair

play00:31

I would Pan the camera so that you could

play00:33

see that but I don't want to inflict

play00:34

that level of harm on my audience I can

play00:37

curse I can scream I can yell but there

play00:39

are some levels of profanity that should

play00:40

just not be seen on camera in all

play00:42

seriousness today we're going to be

play00:43

discussing the music industry and we're

play00:44

going to be continuing along that theme

play00:46

where it is that larger companies or

play00:48

smaller companies where they have some

play00:49

money decide that they don't like what

play00:51

somebody has said about them they don't

play00:52

like when they're criticized when they

play00:54

cannot win the argument of the battle of

play00:55

ideas they decide that they are going to

play00:57

file false defamation suits or false

play00:59

dmca strikes so that that criticism can

play01:01

be taken down there are many times that

play01:03

I've been criticized on many different

play01:04

websites there are people on Reddit that

play01:05

call me scammers liar cheater thief

play01:08

whatever and when that happens even when

play01:09

I know their full name I don't file

play01:11

defamation lawsuits I don't try to get

play01:13

their post removed I respond to them

play01:15

sometimes they have a small point but

play01:16

they go over it in a really slanderous

play01:18

and disgusting way and sometimes just

play01:19

slanderous garbage I respond to all of

play01:22

it I want to win the Battle of ideas I'm

play01:23

not going to win that by removing

play01:25

people's content that never works

play01:27

there's something called the strian

play01:28

effect the music industry in General I

play01:30

got to I actually worked at Avatar

play01:32

Studios back in 2007 and 2008 in New

play01:34

York City one of the best studios in the

play01:35

world I think it's the only place in the

play01:36

five burrows in New York City we you

play01:37

could actually record a symphony

play01:38

orchestra amazing place I never worked

play01:40

in the legal side of it but I worked you

play01:42

know I worked in the tech side of it

play01:43

fixing stter 800s and Eve 31 102s and

play01:45

stuff like that but I was in the room

play01:48

enough at the time to understand that

play01:50

the music industry is a a uh a hive of

play01:53

scum and villainy and that's before you

play01:55

get to the attorneys they're Liars

play01:57

they're cheaters they're scammers and

play01:58

I'm sure some of them are good people

play02:02

some of them are good people this one

play02:04

I'm sure is a good person so let's go

play02:05

over her particular issue so what she

play02:07

decided to do is she decided to go over

play02:09

the legal contracts both the terms of

play02:11

service and something called the

play02:12

certified license from a company called

play02:14

splice splyce allows you to find sounds

play02:17

and clips and stuff like that that you

play02:19

can use inside some of your content and

play02:21

she found out as a music industry

play02:23

attorney professional attorney certified

play02:26

by the bar that some of these terms of

play02:28

service were somewhat misleading and

play02:30

also confusing so she did a video that

play02:32

was very long and detailed where she

play02:34

went into this a lot of the terms that

play02:36

splice has are confusing some of these

play02:37

terms say things like the user can't

play02:39

transfer their agreement or rights but

play02:41

this conflicts with other parts

play02:42

suggesting that you can freely license

play02:44

remix or adopt samples the terms don't

play02:45

clearly explain how long users can

play02:48

access these certified license which are

play02:49

very important for providing legal use

play02:51

of a sample if I have a sample and I've

play02:53

uploaded that to a particular website I

play02:55

need to be able to demonstrate that I am

play02:57

not going to get sued because I actually

play02:59

have have the right to use this

play03:00

particular sample I need to be able to

play03:02

demonstrate that to everybody that I'm

play03:03

Distributing music with or I may not be

play03:05

able to get my royalties terms also

play03:07

imply that you may lose access to your

play03:08

account and licenses after the

play03:10

subscription ends but there are also

play03:11

conflicting statements from spice's

play03:13

legal team about whether this access is

play03:14

permanent or whether it's limited to

play03:16

five or six years so she decided to dig

play03:17

into this from the perspective of a

play03:19

music industry attorney and because she

play03:20

committed the crime of reading this

play03:22

company's terms of service and trying to

play03:24

give you her perspective as a music

play03:26

industry attorney so that you wouldn't

play03:27

get effed U she got a copy right strike

play03:30

on her particular Channel not only did

play03:32

they say that the terms of service was

play03:33

something that they could file a the MCA

play03:35

claim for they also were talking about

play03:37

how the certified license that they have

play03:38

is proprietary and because it's

play03:41

proprietary they can U they can file

play03:43

this type of claim on you for for

play03:45

literally reading it as if in a lawyer

play03:47

who is bar certified reading your terms

play03:49

of service is not the best definition of

play03:52

fair use that I've ever heard this woman

play03:54

spent something like 57 seconds showing

play03:56

this thing on screen with their logo in

play03:58

a video that was damn near an hour

play04:00

long and and that's what they they

play04:02

struck her for now she actually offered

play04:04

she said listen I'll have you on my

play04:06

channel I'm more than happy to have a

play04:08

discussion with you where you can

play04:09

clarify anything that you want to

play04:10

clarify and you know what they did they

play04:12

struck her [ __ ] anyway rather than have

play04:14

an honest conversation cuz I'll do that

play04:16

you go to Reddit whether it's a right to

play04:17

repair subreddit where I'm a hero or r/a

play04:20

where everybody hates me I will have an

play04:22

honest conversation with anybody who's

play04:24

willing to listen were they willing to

play04:25

have an honest conversation no they were

play04:28

afraid to have that honest conversation

play04:29

rather than actually engage with

play04:30

somebody they decided to just kind of

play04:32

remove their video and unfortunately it

play04:35

worked her video is not on her platform

play04:37

right now which I think is a crying

play04:39

shame so I what I decided that I think

play04:40

would be a fun thing to do is since this

play04:43

this agreement is considered so [ __ ]

play04:44

proprietary I figured it would be kind

play04:45

of fun to try and go through their

play04:47

website and figure out how to actually

play04:48

get access to this and see if I can so

play04:51

how difficult is it to get access to

play04:52

this proprietary agreement that you're

play04:54

going to be receiving and that you're

play04:55

also going to be sharing with every

play04:57

single music streaming and hosting

play04:58

service or anybody that buys your music

play05:00

you know again one of my friends Jake

play05:02

Palumbo he has a recording studio in New

play05:04

York City but he also produces music for

play05:06

other people he actually produced the

play05:07

music for my H for my commercial going

play05:10

over the fact that um what was the name

play05:12

of it it's on the tip of my tongue they

play05:13

make the CompTIA that CompTIA was

play05:16

lobbying against right to repair he

play05:17

produced the music for that cuz he's a

play05:18

cool dude he's damn good at what he does

play05:20

he needs to be able to demonstrate to

play05:21

his clients when he sells the music that

play05:23

you are not going to get in trouble if I

play05:25

give I sell you this beat and you use it

play05:27

in your music that's what these licenses

play05:28

are for so let's go through this so the

play05:30

way this works is I can make an account

play05:32

here I just made an account let me add

play05:34

uh some sounds to my library so it says

play05:36

over here that I need to sign up for a

play05:37

subscription start free trial as usual

play05:40

it's going to require a credit or debit

play05:41

card which most companies hope that I'm

play05:43

going to forget which is why I use

play05:45

privacy.com check out privacy look look

play05:47

at this [ __ ] right here look at how

play05:48

[ __ ] beautiful this is I can create a

play05:50

I can create a virtual card I'm going to

play05:52

name it splice can spice can

play05:57

sucket yeah they should to sponsor me

play06:00

this is the kind of [ __ ] I'd actually

play06:01

have on the channel as a sponsor no not

play06:03

kidding so what this does is I can add a

play06:05

debit card which I hope to God I block

play06:07

out the last four digits of and then

play06:08

after I do that it creates me a a credit

play06:11

card that I can copy and paste into here

play06:14

and then watch this this this is

play06:16

literally a card that will work and then

play06:18

I can immediately delete it so let's say

play06:20

that they keep charging me let's say

play06:21

I've signed up for a membership at one

play06:22

of those scumbag gyms that requires that

play06:24

I uh that that I that I send them

play06:26

certified mail in order to cancel even

play06:28

though I can sign up online in 5 seconds

play06:30

rather than go through all those hoops

play06:32

and have to deal with all that [ __ ] I

play06:33

can essentially tell them to to suck it

play06:36

by doing this so I can uh do this I can

play06:38

click continue to check out and this

play06:40

card is going to work if I set it up so

play06:42

I'm going to set it up for a a single

play06:43

time transaction limit this is the other

play06:45

thing you can also make sure that they

play06:46

can't they want to change the terms of

play06:48

the sale and automatically opt you into

play06:49

charging you more money they can't do

play06:51

that so I'm going to set it up for 35

play06:53

bucks and I'm going to set that up as a

play06:54

single use card hit setup and I'm going

play06:56

to do this continue to check out here we

play06:59

go here we

play07:01

go yeah start free

play07:04

trial okay so let's see over here and I

play07:08

go right over here and I close the

play07:10

[ __ ] card nice try anyway do that and

play07:13

now once it's closed uh splice SK socket

play07:17

yeah that card is gone will cannot be

play07:20

used it says closed beautiful so let's

play07:22

browse around their site uh it says I

play07:23

need to download an app I use Arch Linux

play07:25

so I know that that shit's never going

play07:27

to work uh let's let's see am I able to

play07:29

get get access to a sound over here I'm

play07:30

going to try and get a get a sound you

play07:32

can download free samples during your

play07:34

trial going to take this let's see how

play07:37

do I download a [ __ ] sample

play07:42

here create a stack with a loop I don't

play07:44

want to do that [ __ ] let's see samples

play07:47

get

play07:49

collection this download will not

play07:51

include any credits credits will only be

play07:52

us in samples that are not in your

play07:54

library 20 samples from grp Fusion I've

play07:57

been added to your library library sound

play08:00

okay generate certified license full

play08:04

legal name Louis Rosman I am a beat

play08:09

maker uh

play08:12

Rosman beat

play08:14

making

play08:15

group

play08:18

in um I can't help myself I'm a child

play08:22

okay download certified license right

play08:24

now so I can download the license okay I

play08:26

downloaded my license and I'm going to

play08:28

open it so as you can see this is a

play08:31

certified license which essentially

play08:32

anybody can generate it takes you 90

play08:35

seconds of time to generate if you're an

play08:36

idiot and it probably takes you 5

play08:38

Seconds of time to generate after

play08:39

signing up for a free account if you

play08:41

actually have a brain which is more than

play08:42

I could say for myself this is not some

play08:44

sort of secret proprietary top secret

play08:47

documents like there's there this is not

play08:49

like there's Trade Secrets inside of

play08:50

here it's it's a license agreement for

play08:52

you and and frankly having an attorney

play08:55

go through the terms of service or go

play08:57

through a music contract on this type of

play08:59

website is fair use it's not like she's

play09:01

claiming with this because it has the

play09:03

splice logo she's not saying that she

play09:04

works for splyce the reason that this

play09:06

logo is here the reason this is here is

play09:08

not so that you could claim something

play09:09

that's not true because there are people

play09:11

out there that use my videos one of the

play09:12

the SC most scumbag things people do on

play09:14

Earth I've always told people you can

play09:15

use my videos however you want feel free

play09:17

to incorporate it use it to [ __ ] on me

play09:19

whatever else the one thing I will not

play09:20

accept people doing is pretending that

play09:23

my videos on data recovery or repair are

play09:25

theirs you do not get to pretend that

play09:26

your repair shop do those did those

play09:28

repairs if you you want have repair

play09:30

videos on your channel that that make it

play09:32

look like you did those repairs how

play09:34

about you fix something don't CL you're

play09:35

not allowed to claim authorship of it

play09:37

but over here she's not trying to claim

play09:38

authorship she's not trying to say that

play09:40

I work for splyce she makes it very

play09:41

obvious that she has her own legal

play09:43

services and she makes it very obvious

play09:44

in all of her video she's separate from

play09:46

splyce so the idea that this can be

play09:47

taken down for some sort of copyright

play09:49

[ __ ] because she's showing a

play09:50

proprietary document that takes 10

play09:52

seconds to find that has their logo on

play09:55

it is [ __ ] the reason that logo is

play09:57

there is not so that she can claim

play09:58

authorship at the document or pretend

play09:59

that she's an authorized agent of splice

play10:01

that is on the document so that she can

play10:03

demonstrate that what she's reading is a

play10:05

splice document and not something that

play10:07

she pulled out of her ass that's

play10:08

something that is there for

play10:09

identification purposes this would be

play10:11

similar to if I show you a 10K or a 10 Q

play10:14

from a company like Verizon they have

play10:15

their logo in the corner of it or

play10:17

something and they say that that's a

play10:18

copyright violation as if it's not fair

play10:20

use if somebody is using this to

play10:22

demonstrate the profits that they've

play10:23

made in a given year when talking about

play10:25

fines theyve faced from the FTC this is

play10:27

something that I find particularly

play10:28

despicable and and again this is

play10:29

something that I've had happen to me

play10:31

this is why I'm very sensitive to this

play10:32

because I did a video 8 years ago where

play10:34

I was demonstrating to you where the

play10:35

fuse was on an Apple product and how to

play10:37

replace it when your keyboard or your

play10:38

trackpad doesn't work on an a1466

play10:40

MacBook Air and apple kind of they had

play10:43

kpatrick at Townson asked me to remove

play10:44

my video and I did not remove my video

play10:46

because I believed I was in the right

play10:47

and as the great arani said when you're

play10:49

in the right let nobody push you around

play10:51

so you're going to twist me and him into

play10:53

the bookends right that's right that's

play10:55

right he's going to twist you and him in

play10:56

a book end you got nothing to worry

play10:57

about Ral you're in the right nobody can

play10:59

put you around why don't you trut

play11:01

unfortunately she has 68,000 subscribers

play11:03

and something tells me she's making less

play11:04

off of her YouTube channel than splyce

play11:06

is making off of their business model

play11:07

which means that splyce would have the

play11:08

money to defend this in court whereas I

play11:10

I'm not quite sure if she would have

play11:12

that which is why they would go after

play11:13

her and one of the things that just

play11:15

really pisses me off about these

play11:16

companies is that when they decide to go

play11:17

after somebody that is smaller that

play11:19

actually told the truth this woman told

play11:21

the truth is she not certified by the

play11:22

bar is she not a real attorney is she

play11:24

not giving her opinion on splic terms of

play11:26

service are these opinions not valid and

play11:28

above all if those opinions are not

play11:30

valid and she says I'll have you on my

play11:32

show I'll record the call I'll ask these

play11:34

questions and you can provide answers to

play11:36

clarify how about you pick on somebody

play11:37

her own size she has 60 or 70,000

play11:39

subscribers maybe she doesn't have the

play11:41

money to be able to fight you in court I

play11:43

do if you want to be the [ __ ] be the

play11:45

whole [ __ ] if you're saying that that's

play11:46

misinformation you go on her show and

play11:48

tell her why you go do what I do on

play11:50

Reddit respond to the people that are

play11:52

criticizing you with facts evidence

play11:54

everything else and if you can't do that

play11:55

then sucks to suck take it on the chin

play11:57

and [ __ ] deal with it people are

play11:59

allowed to criticize you they're allowed

play12:00

to give their opinions on you she's a

play12:02

lawyer if you have a problem with it go

play12:03

to the [ __ ] Arizona State bars and

play12:05

tell them that she's a [ __ ] lawyer go to

play12:06

her show and tell her here's what you

play12:08

got wrong don't take down her content

play12:10

using [ __ ] misleading ass crap if

play12:13

somebody criticizes me if they say that

play12:14

there's an issue with my website which

play12:16

there probably is because I don't update

play12:17

this thing as long as often as I should

play12:19

I actually got a cple me I got a couple

play12:20

of things I got to update on this

play12:21

because there's some Services we don't

play12:22

offer anymore because getting parts to

play12:24

stuff is [ __ ] miserable now but if

play12:25

somebody goes over my site and they

play12:27

criticize this website and I say oh like

play12:29

you showed the Rosman group logo up here

play12:31

on my website so I'm copyright striking

play12:33

you that's [ __ ] that's fair use

play12:35

they're not using that because they want

play12:36

to pretend that they're me nor are they

play12:37

using this because the sole monetization

play12:40

in the video all of it is based on that

play12:41

little logo and if this little logo

play12:43

wasn't here well I guess their video

play12:44

would have been worthless that's

play12:45

obviously [ __ ] and everybody knows

play12:46

that's [ __ ] they're using a

play12:48

technicality in the law that they're

play12:49

hoping that somebody at Google whoever

play12:50

the [ __ ] reviews these DMC takedown

play12:52

notices is not going to notice but I

play12:54

noticed and I hope my audience notices

play12:55

and guess what you may say that you

play12:57

don't want people showing your [ __ ]

play12:58

logo on screen you're dmca claim them

play13:00

try to do that [ __ ] to me I [ __ ] dare

play13:02

you you pieces of [ __ ] want to say that

play13:05

uh that that showing your terms of use

play13:07

which is publicly on your website is

play13:08

something that that is copyrighted or

play13:10

proprietary information you want to say

play13:12

that this license over here because it

play13:13

has your logo on it is something that's

play13:15

proprietary

play13:16

information take down my video file a

play13:19

dmca claim I [ __ ] Dare You Apple did

play13:23

not succeed in getting my video taken

play13:24

down and they have a$3 trillion market

play13:26

cap you think I'm afraid of you I'm not

play13:28

afraid of people like you I'm more than

play13:29

happy to stand up to people like you I

play13:31

[ __ ] dare you try to get this video

play13:32

taken down see what happens [ __ ] around

play13:34

and find out Google me look at my resume

play13:36

take a look at what I did and come to

play13:37

your own conclusion about whether you

play13:38

think that's a good use of your time cuz

play13:40

I think it isn't personally I think that

play13:41

you should resend that false fraudulent

play13:44

dmca claim that you filed against this

play13:46

young attorney and I also believe that

play13:48

you should apologize to her show up on

play13:50

her show tell her why she's wrong and

play13:52

stop being a [ __ ] coward stop trying

play13:53

to push people around with these fake

play13:55

claims and this fake defamation [ __ ] cuz

play13:57

it's not going to work at the end of the

play13:58

day you think think you have shut down

play13:59

one person criticizing you but you have

play14:01

not you have actually created Millions

play14:03

maybe even two million people more that

play14:05

know that your company is staffed by

play14:06

little cowardly pieces of [ __ ] when

play14:08

people read my redit post even if I say

play14:10

yeah you know I kind of [ __ ] up here

play14:11

but here's where you're wrong even if I

play14:13

lose that particular argument even if

play14:15

that I never convince that individual

play14:16

that I'm not a scammer a liar or a

play14:18

cheater what happens is there'll be

play14:19

other people that read that post and

play14:21

when they see that exchange back and

play14:22

forth even if I lost that one particular

play14:24

argument with that individual because

play14:25

that individual is just never going to

play14:26

change their mind or ever consider an

play14:28

alternate point of view the hundreds of

play14:29

people that read that may read that and

play14:31

go huh you know what may he has a point

play14:34

wow you know I thought he was an [ __ ]

play14:35

but wow this person criticizing him

play14:36

really seems to like have their head up

play14:38

their ass H you never know it's worth it

play14:41

to get your argument out there it's

play14:43

worth it to demonstrate your side even

play14:44

if you don't convince the people that

play14:45

you're talking to but you're not willing

play14:47

to do that you want to delete people you

play14:48

want to erase them off the internet if

play14:49

they disagree with you that's [ __ ]

play14:51

and if you try to dmca claim this video

play14:54

if you try to do any sort of fraudulent

play14:56

[ __ ] on my channel because you decide to

play14:58

stop being a [ __ ] and pick on somebody

play15:00

your own [ __ ]

play15:01

size do your best do your best this is

play15:05

what I do for a living look through my

play15:07

resume [ __ ] around and find out that's

play15:10

it for today and as always I hope you

play15:13

learned something I'll see you all on

play15:14

the next video bye now

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Music IndustryLegal BattlesContent CriticismFair UseTerms of ServiceCopyright IssuesDefamation SuitsDMCA StrikesRight to RepairOnline Censorship