Splice DMCA strikes @TopMusicAttorneyfor reading terms of service to censor LEGITIMATE criticism 🤦

Summary

In this video, host Lewis Rossman discusses the challenges of dealing with the music industry, particularly the misuse of copyright strikes and defamation suits by companies to silence critics. He highlights the case of a music industry attorney who received a copyright strike for analyzing and critiquing the terms of service of a company called Splice. Rossman demonstrates the ease of accessing Splice's 'proprietary' agreement to argue the absurdity of the claim, advocating for fair use and open dialogue over legal intimidation.

Takeaways

• 😀 The host, Lewis Rossman, is frustrated with a ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and decides to replace it.
• 😡 Lewis discusses the issue of companies filing false defamation suits or DMCA strikes to silence criticism.
• 🗣️ He emphasizes the importance of responding to criticism and winning the 'Battle of Ideas' through dialogue rather than censorship.
• 🎵 The video focuses on the music industry, specifically the legal issues surrounding the use of samples and licenses.
• 📚 Lewis mentions his experience working at Avatar Studios and his observations about the music industry's legal practices.
• 🤔 A music industry attorney scrutinizes Splice's terms of service and certified licenses, finding them misleading and confusing.
• 🚫 The attorney receives a copyright strike for her video critiquing Splice's terms, despite her professional analysis and fair use of their documents.
• 💬 Lewis invites companies to engage in honest conversations and debates rather than resorting to legal threats to silence critics.
• 💳 He demonstrates how to sign up for Splice using a virtual card for privacy and security, highlighting the ease of accessing their proprietary agreements.
• 📝 Lewis downloads a certified license from Splice to show that it is readily available and not a secret document, challenging the basis of the copyright strike.
• 🤬 He passionately argues against the misuse of copyright laws to suppress valid criticism and encourages companies to face their critics directly.

Q & A

What is the main issue that Lewis Rossman is addressing in his video?

Lewis Rossman is addressing the issue of companies, particularly in the music industry, filing false defamation suits or DMCA strikes against critics who point out misleading or confusing terms in their contracts or terms of service.

Why is Lewis frustrated with the ceiling fan in his video?

Lewis is frustrated with the ceiling fan because it requires an app to operate, often doesn't work properly, and beeps at him, which he finds to be a 'royal pain in the ass'.

What is Lewis' approach to dealing with online criticism and negative comments about him?

Lewis chooses to respond to critics and engage in discussions rather than filing defamation lawsuits or trying to remove their posts. He believes in winning the 'battle of ideas' through open conversation.

What is the 'Streisand effect' mentioned by Lewis?

The 'Streisand effect' refers to a phenomenon where attempts to suppress or censor information end up drawing more attention to it, thereby increasing its visibility.

What is the music industry attorney's issue with Splice's terms of service?

The music industry attorney found Splice's terms of service to be misleading and confusing, particularly regarding the transfer of agreement rights, licensing of samples, and the duration of access to certified licenses.

Why did Splice issue a copyright strike against the music industry attorney's video?

Splice issued a copyright strike against the attorney's video because she read and analyzed their terms of service and certified license, which they claimed to be proprietary, and they considered this a violation of their copyright.

What does Lewis suggest as an alternative to filing false DMCA claims or defamation suits?

Lewis suggests that companies should engage in honest conversations and debates with critics, addressing their concerns and providing clarifications rather than resorting to legal threats to silence them.

How does Lewis demonstrate the accessibility of Splice's certified license in his video?

Lewis demonstrates by creating an account on Splice, adding sounds to his library, and generating a certified license, showing that it is not a secret or proprietary document as claimed by Splice.

What is Lewis' stance on the use of his videos by others?

Lewis is generally fine with others using his videos but draws the line at them falsely claiming authorship or pretending that his repair videos are their own.

What advice does Lewis give to companies that receive criticism online?

Lewis advises companies to respond to criticism with facts and evidence, to engage in open dialogue, and to accept that people have the right to criticize and express their opinions.

What does Lewis propose as a consequence if Splice tries to DMCA claim his video?

Lewis dares Splice to try and DMCA claim his video, implying that he is ready to stand up against such actions and suggesting that it would not be a wise use of their resources.

Outlines

00:00

😤 Frustration with a Smart Ceiling Fan

Lewis Rossman begins his video by expressing his frustration with a smart ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and frequently beeps at him. He humorously suggests destroying the fan and replacing it. The main topic of the video is the music industry's use of false defamation suits and DMCA strikes to suppress criticism. Lewis contrasts his own approach to criticism, where he engages and responds to critics rather than resorting to legal action. He also highlights his experience working in the music industry and his disdain for the unethical practices he witnessed.

05:01

📜 Legal Critique of Splice's Terms of Service

In this paragraph, Lewis discusses a music industry attorney who critiqued the terms of service and certified licenses of Splice, a company that provides sounds and clips for music production. The attorney found the terms misleading and confusing, particularly regarding the duration of access to licensed samples and the ability to transfer rights. Despite her professional critique, Splice issued a copyright strike against her video, which Lewis views as an abuse of power. He challenges Splice to engage in a fair discussion rather than resorting to legal intimidation.

10:02

💳 Signing Up for Splice to Expose Their Practices

Lewis demonstrates the process of signing up for a Splice account to download a sample and generate a certified license, highlighting the ease with which anyone can access these documents. He criticizes Splice for claiming that their terms of service and licenses are proprietary and deserving of copyright protection, arguing that this is a misinterpretation of fair use. Lewis emphasizes that the logo on the documents is for identification, not to claim authorship, and challenges Splice to engage in a fair debate rather than using legal threats.

15:06

🤬 Calling Out Splice for Legal Intimidation

In the final paragraph, Lewis passionately calls out Splice for their legal intimidation tactics, urging them to engage in an honest conversation or face the consequences of their actions. He recounts his own experience with Apple trying to remove a video he made about repairing a MacBook Air and how he stood his ground. Lewis encourages Splice to either correct their false claims or face public backlash. He ends by inviting viewers to look at his resume and decide for themselves whether challenging him is a good use of their time.

Keywords

💡Right to Repair

The 'Right to Repair' is a movement advocating for consumers' ability to repair their own electronic devices or have them repaired by third parties, rather than being forced to replace them or pay high fees for manufacturer repairs. In the video, the host expresses frustration with the difficulty of repairing a ceiling fan, which he sees as a test of his resolve in supporting the right to repair. This theme is a reflection of broader consumer rights issues.

💡Defamation

Defamation refers to the act of making a false statement that damages someone's reputation. The video discusses how larger companies sometimes file false defamation suits to suppress criticism. The host contrasts his own approach of responding to critics with those who resort to legal action to silence them, highlighting the importance of free speech and the right to criticize.

💡DMCA Strikes

DMCA stands for the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. A 'DMCA Strike' is a legal action taken against content that is alleged to infringe on copyright. The video describes instances where companies file false DMCA strikes to remove criticism or content they don't like. The host criticizes this practice as an abuse of legal processes to silence legitimate discussion.

💡Music Industry

The music industry encompasses the businesses involved in the production, distribution, and sale of music. The video discusses the music industry's reputation for unethical practices, such as filing false legal claims against critics. The host's experience working in a recording studio provides him with firsthand insight into the industry's operations and the challenges faced by those within it.

💡Terms of Service

Terms of Service are the legal agreements between a service provider and its users, outlining the rules and conditions for using the service. In the video, the host discusses how a music industry attorney found certain terms of service from a company called Splice to be misleading and confusing. This highlights the importance of transparency and clarity in legal agreements.

💡Certified License

A 'Certified License' is a legal document that grants the right to use certain materials, such as music samples, in a manner that complies with copyright law. The video describes how the host generated a certified license from Splice, emphasizing the need for artists to have clear and accessible legal documentation to protect their rights.

💡Fair Use

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material without permission under certain conditions, such as for commentary, criticism, or education. The video argues that the music industry attorney's analysis of Splice's terms of service falls under fair use, as it is a critical examination of a public document, not an infringement of copyright.

💡Proprietary Information

Proprietary information refers to data or knowledge that is owned by an individual or company and is kept secret or not publicly disclosed. The video criticizes Splice for claiming that their terms of service and certified licenses are proprietary and thus cannot be discussed or analyzed publicly, arguing that this is an attempt to stifle open discussion and critique.

💡Strian Effect

The Strian Effect is a psychological phenomenon where the more you try to suppress something, the more it spreads. The video suggests that attempts by companies to suppress criticism through legal means can backfire, leading to more people becoming aware of the issues and potentially sympathizing with the critic.

💡Privacy

Privacy in the context of the video refers to the use of tools like Privacy.com to create virtual credit cards, protecting personal financial information from unauthorized charges or misuse. The host demonstrates this by signing up for a service with a virtual card, emphasizing the importance of protecting one's privacy in digital transactions.

💡Legal Contracts

Legal contracts are formal agreements between two or more parties that are enforceable by law. The video discusses how a music industry attorney scrutinized the legal contracts of a company, highlighting the need for clear and fair terms in agreements that impact artists and consumers.

Highlights

Lewis Rossman discusses his frustration with a ceiling fan that requires an app to operate and his decision to replace it.

He addresses the issue of 'right to repair' and his experience with house wiring that tests his resolve on this matter.

Lewis introduces the topic of the music industry's use of false defamation suits and DMCA strikes against critics.

He emphasizes his own approach to criticism, choosing to engage in 'the Battle of ideas' rather than resorting to legal action.

Lewis recounts his experience working in a top music studio and his view of the industry as a 'hive of scum and villainy'.

A music industry attorney's detailed analysis of Splice's terms of service and certified licenses is discussed, revealing potential misleading and confusing terms.

The attorney received a copyright strike for her video critiquing Splice's terms, despite her fair use argument and offer for discussion.

Lewis challenges Splice's actions, questioning the legitimacy of their DMCA claim and advocating for honest conversation over legal threats.

He demonstrates the ease of accessing Splice's proprietary agreement, contradicting claims of its secrecy and proprietary nature.

Lewis uses Privacy.com to create a virtual card for a free trial, highlighting a method to protect against unwanted charges.

He criticizes companies that use legal threats to silence critics rather than engaging in open dialogue.

Lewis shares his personal experience with Apple's attempt to remove a video he made, showing his stance on fair use and criticism.

He dares Splice to attempt a DMCA claim on his video, asserting his confidence in his right to critique and discuss their terms.

Lewis argues that companies should address criticisms with facts and evidence rather than resorting to legal intimidation.

He emphasizes the importance of standing up to bullies in the digital space and the potential for public opinion to shift through open debate.

The video concludes with Lewis encouraging viewers to learn from the situation and to stand up for fair use and open criticism.

Transcripts

hey everybody how's it going hope you're

having a lovely day welcome to today's

episode of how lwis is getting effed I'm

your host Lewis Rossman yes today the

reason that my desk is such a mess over

here is because I wanted to replace this

ceiling fan that beeps at me requires an

app to work it's it's a royal pain in

the ass it never works right so I've

decided to take this thing bash it the

pieces throw it off my balcony which is

what you should do when you have a cloud

ceiling fan and the problem that I have

here is um how I put this every time

I've opened anything in this house with

regards to wiring it really tests my

resolve with regards to right to repair

I would Pan the camera so that you could

see that but I don't want to inflict

that level of harm on my audience I can

curse I can scream I can yell but there

are some levels of profanity that should

just not be seen on camera in all

seriousness today we're going to be

discussing the music industry and we're

going to be continuing along that theme

where it is that larger companies or

smaller companies where they have some

money decide that they don't like what

somebody has said about them they don't

like when they're criticized when they

cannot win the argument of the battle of

ideas they decide that they are going to

file false defamation suits or false

dmca strikes so that that criticism can

be taken down there are many times that

I've been criticized on many different

websites there are people on Reddit that

call me scammers liar cheater thief

whatever and when that happens even when

I know their full name I don't file

defamation lawsuits I don't try to get

their post removed I respond to them

sometimes they have a small point but

they go over it in a really slanderous

and disgusting way and sometimes just

slanderous garbage I respond to all of

it I want to win the Battle of ideas I'm

not going to win that by removing

people's content that never works

there's something called the strian

effect the music industry in General I

got to I actually worked at Avatar

Studios back in 2007 and 2008 in New

York City one of the best studios in the

world I think it's the only place in the

five burrows in New York City we you

could actually record a symphony

orchestra amazing place I never worked

in the legal side of it but I worked you

know I worked in the tech side of it

fixing stter 800s and Eve 31 102s and

stuff like that but I was in the room

enough at the time to understand that

the music industry is a a uh a hive of

scum and villainy and that's before you

get to the attorneys they're Liars

they're cheaters they're scammers and

I'm sure some of them are good people

some of them are good people this one

I'm sure is a good person so let's go

over her particular issue so what she

decided to do is she decided to go over

the legal contracts both the terms of

service and something called the

certified license from a company called

splice splyce allows you to find sounds

and clips and stuff like that that you

can use inside some of your content and

she found out as a music industry

attorney professional attorney certified

by the bar that some of these terms of

service were somewhat misleading and

also confusing so she did a video that

was very long and detailed where she

went into this a lot of the terms that

splice has are confusing some of these

terms say things like the user can't

transfer their agreement or rights but

this conflicts with other parts

suggesting that you can freely license

remix or adopt samples the terms don't

clearly explain how long users can

access these certified license which are

very important for providing legal use

of a sample if I have a sample and I've

uploaded that to a particular website I

need to be able to demonstrate that I am

not going to get sued because I actually

have have the right to use this

particular sample I need to be able to

demonstrate that to everybody that I'm

Distributing music with or I may not be

able to get my royalties terms also

imply that you may lose access to your

account and licenses after the

subscription ends but there are also

conflicting statements from spice's

legal team about whether this access is

permanent or whether it's limited to

five or six years so she decided to dig

into this from the perspective of a

music industry attorney and because she

committed the crime of reading this

company's terms of service and trying to

give you her perspective as a music

industry attorney so that you wouldn't

get effed U she got a copy right strike

on her particular Channel not only did

they say that the terms of service was

something that they could file a the MCA

claim for they also were talking about

how the certified license that they have

is proprietary and because it's

proprietary they can U they can file

this type of claim on you for for

literally reading it as if in a lawyer

who is bar certified reading your terms

of service is not the best definition of

fair use that I've ever heard this woman

spent something like 57 seconds showing

this thing on screen with their logo in

a video that was damn near an hour

long and and that's what they they

struck her for now she actually offered

she said listen I'll have you on my

channel I'm more than happy to have a

discussion with you where you can

clarify anything that you want to

clarify and you know what they did they

struck her [ __ ] anyway rather than have

an honest conversation cuz I'll do that

you go to Reddit whether it's a right to

repair subreddit where I'm a hero or r/a

where everybody hates me I will have an

honest conversation with anybody who's

willing to listen were they willing to

have an honest conversation no they were

afraid to have that honest conversation

rather than actually engage with

somebody they decided to just kind of

remove their video and unfortunately it

worked her video is not on her platform

right now which I think is a crying

shame so I what I decided that I think

would be a fun thing to do is since this

this agreement is considered so [ __ ]

proprietary I figured it would be kind

of fun to try and go through their

website and figure out how to actually

get access to this and see if I can so

how difficult is it to get access to

this proprietary agreement that you're

going to be receiving and that you're

also going to be sharing with every

single music streaming and hosting

service or anybody that buys your music

you know again one of my friends Jake

Palumbo he has a recording studio in New

York City but he also produces music for

other people he actually produced the

music for my H for my commercial going

over the fact that um what was the name

of it it's on the tip of my tongue they

make the CompTIA that CompTIA was

lobbying against right to repair he

produced the music for that cuz he's a

cool dude he's damn good at what he does

he needs to be able to demonstrate to

his clients when he sells the music that

you are not going to get in trouble if I

give I sell you this beat and you use it

in your music that's what these licenses

are for so let's go through this so the

way this works is I can make an account

here I just made an account let me add

uh some sounds to my library so it says

over here that I need to sign up for a

subscription start free trial as usual

it's going to require a credit or debit

card which most companies hope that I'm

going to forget which is why I use

privacy.com check out privacy look look

at this [ __ ] right here look at how

[ __ ] beautiful this is I can create a

I can create a virtual card I'm going to

name it splice can spice can

sucket yeah they should to sponsor me

this is the kind of [ __ ] I'd actually

have on the channel as a sponsor no not

kidding so what this does is I can add a

debit card which I hope to God I block

out the last four digits of and then

after I do that it creates me a a credit

card that I can copy and paste into here

and then watch this this this is

literally a card that will work and then

I can immediately delete it so let's say

that they keep charging me let's say

I've signed up for a membership at one

of those scumbag gyms that requires that

I uh that that I that I send them

certified mail in order to cancel even

though I can sign up online in 5 seconds

rather than go through all those hoops

and have to deal with all that [ __ ] I

can essentially tell them to to suck it

by doing this so I can uh do this I can

click continue to check out and this

card is going to work if I set it up so

I'm going to set it up for a a single

time transaction limit this is the other

thing you can also make sure that they

can't they want to change the terms of

the sale and automatically opt you into

charging you more money they can't do

that so I'm going to set it up for 35

bucks and I'm going to set that up as a

single use card hit setup and I'm going

to do this continue to check out here we

go here we

go yeah start free

trial okay so let's see over here and I

go right over here and I close the

[ __ ] card nice try anyway do that and

now once it's closed uh splice SK socket

yeah that card is gone will cannot be

used it says closed beautiful so let's

browse around their site uh it says I

need to download an app I use Arch Linux

so I know that that shit's never going

to work uh let's let's see am I able to

get get access to a sound over here I'm

going to try and get a get a sound you

can download free samples during your

trial going to take this let's see how

do I download a [ __ ] sample

here create a stack with a loop I don't

want to do that [ __ ] let's see samples

get

collection this download will not

include any credits credits will only be

us in samples that are not in your

library 20 samples from grp Fusion I've

been added to your library library sound

okay generate certified license full

legal name Louis Rosman I am a beat

maker uh

Rosman beat

making

group

in um I can't help myself I'm a child

okay download certified license right

now so I can download the license okay I

downloaded my license and I'm going to

open it so as you can see this is a

certified license which essentially

anybody can generate it takes you 90

seconds of time to generate if you're an

idiot and it probably takes you 5

Seconds of time to generate after

signing up for a free account if you

actually have a brain which is more than

I could say for myself this is not some

sort of secret proprietary top secret

documents like there's there this is not

like there's Trade Secrets inside of

here it's it's a license agreement for

you and and frankly having an attorney

go through the terms of service or go

through a music contract on this type of

website is fair use it's not like she's

claiming with this because it has the

splice logo she's not saying that she

works for splyce the reason that this

logo is here the reason this is here is

not so that you could claim something

that's not true because there are people

out there that use my videos one of the

the SC most scumbag things people do on

Earth I've always told people you can

use my videos however you want feel free

to incorporate it use it to [ __ ] on me

whatever else the one thing I will not

accept people doing is pretending that

my videos on data recovery or repair are

theirs you do not get to pretend that

your repair shop do those did those

repairs if you you want have repair

videos on your channel that that make it

look like you did those repairs how

about you fix something don't CL you're

not allowed to claim authorship of it

but over here she's not trying to claim

authorship she's not trying to say that

I work for splyce she makes it very

obvious that she has her own legal

services and she makes it very obvious

in all of her video she's separate from

splyce so the idea that this can be

taken down for some sort of copyright

[ __ ] because she's showing a

proprietary document that takes 10

seconds to find that has their logo on

it is [ __ ] the reason that logo is

there is not so that she can claim

authorship at the document or pretend

that she's an authorized agent of splice

that is on the document so that she can

demonstrate that what she's reading is a

splice document and not something that

she pulled out of her ass that's

something that is there for

identification purposes this would be

similar to if I show you a 10K or a 10 Q

from a company like Verizon they have

their logo in the corner of it or

something and they say that that's a

copyright violation as if it's not fair

use if somebody is using this to

demonstrate the profits that they've

made in a given year when talking about

fines theyve faced from the FTC this is

something that I find particularly

despicable and and again this is

something that I've had happen to me

this is why I'm very sensitive to this

because I did a video 8 years ago where

I was demonstrating to you where the

fuse was on an Apple product and how to

replace it when your keyboard or your

trackpad doesn't work on an a1466

MacBook Air and apple kind of they had

kpatrick at Townson asked me to remove

my video and I did not remove my video

because I believed I was in the right

and as the great arani said when you're

in the right let nobody push you around

so you're going to twist me and him into

the bookends right that's right that's

right he's going to twist you and him in

a book end you got nothing to worry

about Ral you're in the right nobody can

put you around why don't you trut

unfortunately she has 68,000 subscribers

and something tells me she's making less

off of her YouTube channel than splyce

is making off of their business model

which means that splyce would have the

money to defend this in court whereas I

I'm not quite sure if she would have

that which is why they would go after

her and one of the things that just

really pisses me off about these

companies is that when they decide to go

after somebody that is smaller that

actually told the truth this woman told

the truth is she not certified by the

bar is she not a real attorney is she

not giving her opinion on splic terms of

service are these opinions not valid and

above all if those opinions are not

valid and she says I'll have you on my

show I'll record the call I'll ask these

questions and you can provide answers to

clarify how about you pick on somebody

her own size she has 60 or 70,000

subscribers maybe she doesn't have the

money to be able to fight you in court I

do if you want to be the [ __ ] be the

whole [ __ ] if you're saying that that's

misinformation you go on her show and

tell her why you go do what I do on

Reddit respond to the people that are

criticizing you with facts evidence

everything else and if you can't do that

then sucks to suck take it on the chin

and [ __ ] deal with it people are

allowed to criticize you they're allowed

to give their opinions on you she's a

lawyer if you have a problem with it go

to the [ __ ] Arizona State bars and

tell them that she's a [ __ ] lawyer go to

her show and tell her here's what you

got wrong don't take down her content

using [ __ ] misleading ass crap if

somebody criticizes me if they say that

there's an issue with my website which

there probably is because I don't update

this thing as long as often as I should

I actually got a cple me I got a couple

of things I got to update on this

because there's some Services we don't

offer anymore because getting parts to

stuff is [ __ ] miserable now but if

somebody goes over my site and they

criticize this website and I say oh like

you showed the Rosman group logo up here

on my website so I'm copyright striking

you that's [ __ ] that's fair use

they're not using that because they want

to pretend that they're me nor are they

using this because the sole monetization

in the video all of it is based on that

little logo and if this little logo

wasn't here well I guess their video

would have been worthless that's

obviously [ __ ] and everybody knows

that's [ __ ] they're using a

technicality in the law that they're

hoping that somebody at Google whoever

the [ __ ] reviews these DMC takedown

notices is not going to notice but I

noticed and I hope my audience notices

and guess what you may say that you

don't want people showing your [ __ ]

logo on screen you're dmca claim them

try to do that [ __ ] to me I [ __ ] dare

you you pieces of [ __ ] want to say that

uh that that showing your terms of use

which is publicly on your website is

something that that is copyrighted or

proprietary information you want to say

that this license over here because it

has your logo on it is something that's

proprietary

information take down my video file a

dmca claim I [ __ ] Dare You Apple did

not succeed in getting my video taken

down and they have a$3 trillion market

cap you think I'm afraid of you I'm not

afraid of people like you I'm more than

happy to stand up to people like you I

[ __ ] dare you try to get this video

taken down see what happens [ __ ] around

and find out Google me look at my resume

take a look at what I did and come to

your own conclusion about whether you

think that's a good use of your time cuz

I think it isn't personally I think that

you should resend that false fraudulent

dmca claim that you filed against this

young attorney and I also believe that

you should apologize to her show up on

her show tell her why she's wrong and

stop being a [ __ ] coward stop trying

to push people around with these fake

claims and this fake defamation [ __ ] cuz

it's not going to work at the end of the

day you think think you have shut down

one person criticizing you but you have

not you have actually created Millions

maybe even two million people more that

know that your company is staffed by

little cowardly pieces of [ __ ] when

people read my redit post even if I say

yeah you know I kind of [ __ ] up here

but here's where you're wrong even if I

lose that particular argument even if

that I never convince that individual

that I'm not a scammer a liar or a

cheater what happens is there'll be

other people that read that post and

when they see that exchange back and

forth even if I lost that one particular

argument with that individual because

that individual is just never going to

change their mind or ever consider an

alternate point of view the hundreds of

people that read that may read that and

go huh you know what may he has a point

wow you know I thought he was an [ __ ]

but wow this person criticizing him

really seems to like have their head up

their ass H you never know it's worth it

to get your argument out there it's

worth it to demonstrate your side even

if you don't convince the people that

you're talking to but you're not willing

to do that you want to delete people you

want to erase them off the internet if

they disagree with you that's [ __ ]

and if you try to dmca claim this video

if you try to do any sort of fraudulent

[ __ ] on my channel because you decide to

stop being a [ __ ] and pick on somebody

your own [ __ ]

size do your best do your best this is

what I do for a living look through my

resume [ __ ] around and find out that's

it for today and as always I hope you

learned something I'll see you all on

the next video bye now