Feeling the Pinch? Tracing the Effects of Monetary Policy through Housing Markets
Summary
TLDRAt the IMF's spring meeting, John Bishop moderated a discussion on the impact of monetary policy on housing markets. Nina Banova and Alesia De Stefani presented findings from the World Economic Outlook, revealing that housing market characteristics, such as the prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages and regional house price overvaluation, significantly influence the effectiveness of monetary policy across countries. They highlighted the importance of understanding these characteristics for calibrating monetary policy and cautioned against the risks of overtightening due to potential delayed effects on consumption and GDP.
Takeaways
- 🏦 The effects of monetary policy on housing markets are being traced, with a focus on how different countries respond to changes in interest rates.
- 📈 Central Bank policy rates have increased significantly since early 2022, which typically leads to a slowdown in house prices and economic activity.
- 🏠 Housing markets are considered 'macro-critical' as they significantly impact the aggregate economy's response to major events, including monetary policy changes.
- 💼 Nina Banova and Alesa De Stefani from the IMF research department presented findings from the World Economic Outlook, focusing on why some countries are more affected by higher interest rates than others.
- 💡 Housing market characteristics, such as the prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages and regional house price overvaluation, determine how monetary policy impacts consumers.
- 📊 Countries with a high share of fixed-rate mortgages tend to see less impact on consumption when policy rates rise, as monthly payments do not adjust quickly to policy rate changes.
- 🌐 Regional variations in house price overvaluation can lead to different responses to monetary policy, with overvalued areas experiencing a more pronounced decline in GDP per capita and house prices.
- 🔄 The transmission of monetary policy through housing markets can be asymmetric, with tightening policies typically having a more immediate and larger impact on the real economy than loosening policies.
- 📚 The analysis suggests that understanding country-specific housing and mortgage market characteristics is crucial for calibrating monetary policy effectively.
- 🏢 Policymakers need to be cautious about the potential delayed effects of monetary policy, especially in countries with short mortgage fixation periods, where consumer spending could decline sharply once rates reset.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the session presented by Nina and Alesia?
-The main topic of the session is tracing the effects of monetary policy through housing markets. They discuss how different countries are affected by changes in interest rates, particularly through the lens of housing market characteristics.
Why is housing considered 'macro-critical'?
-Housing is considered 'macro-critical' because it is a significant part of a typical household's monthly expenses and wealth. Changes in housing markets, such as house prices and mortgage payments, can have substantial impacts on the overall economy and its response to monetary policy.
What are the two main housing market characteristics that were studied in the session?
-The two main housing market characteristics studied are the relative prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages in the stock of outstanding debt and the regional degree of house price overvaluation.
How does the prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages affect the transmission of monetary policy?
-In countries where fixed-rate mortgages are prevalent, fewer borrowers experience an increase in their monthly mortgage payments when central banks hike interest rates. This can result in a more muted response in terms of consumption and economic activity compared to countries where fixed-rate mortgages are less common.
What is the impact of housing market overvaluation on the effectiveness of monetary policy?
-In regions where housing markets are overvalued, an increase in policy rates can lead to a pronounced decline in GDP per capita and a steeper drop in house prices compared to areas where prices are not overvalued. This shows how household optimism and excessive borrowing can drive housing booms, which can quickly reverse when interest rates rise.
How do housing supply constraints affect the transmission of monetary policy?
-Housing supply constraints can make the effects of monetary policy more potent in areas where supply is more constrained. These areas tend to experience larger house price increases and higher borrowing, making households more sensitive to policy rate changes.
What is the main takeaway for policymakers from the analysis presented in the session?
-Policymakers should have a deep, country-specific understanding of housing and mortgage markets and how they evolve over time. This understanding can help calibrate monetary policy more effectively and avoid underestimating the delayed effects of monetary policy.
How do the characteristics of mortgage markets differ across countries, and why does this matter?
-Mortgage market characteristics, such as the prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages, vary significantly across countries. These differences can help explain why some countries feel the effects of rising interest rates more than others, which is crucial for understanding the transmission of monetary policy.
What is the method used to measure house price overvaluation in the analysis?
-The method used to measure overvaluation is by looking at the deviation of the price-to-income ratio from the long-term regional average. This approach allows for a broad inclusion of countries in the analysis.
Are the effects of monetary policy tightening and loosening symmetric in the housing market?
-The effects are not symmetric. Tightening impulses typically transmit faster and to a larger degree to real economic outcomes and house prices than loosening impulses. For example, fixed-rate mortgages are more effective in dampening a tightening impulse than a loosening one.
How does the homeownership rate with mortgages affect the transmission of monetary policy?
-Homeownership rates in isolation do not significantly affect the transmission of monetary policy. However, homeownership with mortgages is very different, as these homeowners are more sensitive to changes in interest rates, affecting their consumption and the overall economy.
Outlines
🏛️ Introduction to the Analytical Session on Monetary Policy and Housing Markets
The session, moderated by John Bishop from the IMF, opens with a focus on the impact of monetary policy through housing markets. John introduces the presenters, Nina Bovska and Alesia De Stefani, from the IMF research department, who will explore why some countries are more affected by rising interest rates than others. They aim to understand if monetary policy effects differ due to variations in housing market characteristics, such as the prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages and regional house price overvaluations.
📈 Impact of Fixed-Rate Mortgages on Monetary Policy Transmission
Nina and Alesia present findings from the World Economic Outlook, emphasizing how fixed-rate mortgages influence the transmission of monetary policy. They illustrate that in countries where such mortgages are less common, consumption declines more significantly after a policy rate increase. This is attributed to the immediate impact on adjustable-rate mortgage payments, leading to reduced spending on non-housing items and affecting aggregate demand.
🌆 Effects of Regional House Price Overvaluations on Economic Activity
The presenters delve into the consequences of monetary policy in overvalued housing markets, showing that policy rate hikes lead to pronounced declines in GDP per capita and house prices in these areas. They suggest that the optimism driving housing booms can quickly reverse with rising interest rates, leading to significant economic repercussions.
🌐 Understanding Variances in Monetary Policy Impact Across Countries
Nina and Alesia discuss the importance of recognizing the differences in housing and mortgage market characteristics across countries, which can explain the varying impacts of monetary policy. They highlight that changes in these characteristics over time may weaken the transmission of monetary policy, and policymakers should be cautious about the potential delayed effects of their decisions.
🤔 Audience Questions on Housing Market Analysis
The session includes a Q&A segment where the audience poses questions about the relationship between housing prices, inflation, and earnings, the measurement of housing market overvaluation, and the symmetry of effects in tightening and loosening monetary policy environments. The presenters address these queries, providing insights into the direct and indirect impacts of monetary policy on housing markets and the importance of considering housing market dynamics.
🏡 Final Thoughts on Housing Market Characteristics and Monetary Policy
In conclusion, Nina and Alesia stress that the same change in policy rates can have varied effects due to differing housing market characteristics. They note that these characteristics are not static and can change significantly over time, influencing the effectiveness of monetary policy. The presenters advocate for a deep understanding of housing and mortgage markets for the successful calibration of monetary policy.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Monetary Policy
💡Housing Markets
💡Fixed-Rate Mortgages
💡Policy Rates
💡Overvaluation
💡Economic Activity
💡Transmission Mechanism
💡Aggregate Demand
💡Regional Analysis
💡Refinancing
💡Macrocritical
Highlights
Monetary policy effects on housing markets vary significantly across countries due to differences in housing market characteristics.
Central Bank policy rates have increased since 2022, typically leading to a slowdown in house prices and economic activity.
Despite predictions of a recession in 2023, many countries have shown robust house prices and real growth, challenging the effectiveness of monetary policy.
Fixed-rate mortgages insulate borrowers from immediate policy rate increases, affecting the transmission of monetary policy.
Countries with a high prevalence of fixed-rate mortgages experience less impact from Central Bank interest rate hikes.
Regional house price overvaluation impacts the effectiveness of monetary policy, with overvalued areas showing steeper declines in GDP per capita and house prices.
Housing market characteristics, such as the share of fixed-rate mortgages and regional house price overvaluation, can explain the varying impacts of interest rate changes.
Changes in housing market characteristics over time can weaken the transmission channels of monetary policy in some countries.
Policymakers should consider the specific housing and mortgage market dynamics of a country when calibrating monetary policy.
Overtightening monetary policy could present risks, especially in countries with short mortgage fixation periods where consumer spending could decline sharply.
The study finds that the effects of monetary policy tightening are more pronounced in areas with constrained housing supply.
Housing supply constraints can amplify the impact of monetary policy on house prices and economic activity.
The presentation emphasizes the importance of a deep understanding of country-specific housing and mortgage markets for effective monetary policy calibration.
The analysis does not take a normative stance on the optimal design of mortgage markets but highlights the trade-offs involved.
The study does not specifically address the impact of inflation or the pricing of real estate in relation to monetary policy effects.
The response of private consumption and house prices to monetary policy varies depending on the degree of homeownership with mortgages.
The analysis suggests that the aggregate effects of monetary policy are influenced by the interplay of housing market and mortgage market characteristics.
The presentation concludes with the importance of considering how housing market characteristics have evolved over time for the calibration of monetary policy.
Transcripts
good afternoon and welcome to the final
analytical corner of these spring
meetings and this one is on uh tracing
the effects of monetary policy through
housing markets my name is John Bishop I
work in the secretary's Department of
the IMF I'm going to be the moderator
for this session I'm gonna bring my
colleagues uh Nina bovska and Alesia de
Stefani onto the stage they're going to
present for about 10 minutes and then
we'll open up the floor for your
questions so please join me welcoming
Nina and alessie to the stage big round
of
applause thank you very much John and
thank you everyone for
coming um have you tried buying a house
or an apartment
recently if you did you might have
noticed that in many countries mortgage
rates have gone up
because look at this chart
here what this chart shows you is that
Central Bank policy rates which
generally Drive the cost of borrowing
increased a lot since early
2022 since Rising policy rates typically
result in a Slowdown of house prices and
economic activity many economies
predicted a recession in
2023 but house prices and real growth
have so far State robust in many
countries challenging these
predictions this was very interesting to
us is monetary policy no longer
effective or perhaps our policies have a
delay we took a closer look at the
mechanics of the housing market to find
out I am Nina banova of the IMF research
department and I'm Alesa theany also of
the IMF research Department today we
will present the main findings from
chapter two of the world economic
Outlook the main question were asking
today is why are some countries feeling
the pinch of higher interest rates While
others are not and we answer this
question by studying housing markets why
housing well because housing matters for
a typical household rent or mortgage
payments are the largest chunk of their
monthly expenses and if you own a home
you know that there is a lot of wealth
stored in the value of your house this
is why economists like to say that
housing is macroc critical this is just
a fancy word for saying that housing
markets matter for the way the aggregate
economy will respond to big events
including changes in monetary
policy here is a summary of our findings
housing market characteristics determine
how much monetary policy is felt by
consumers through the so-called housing
channels of monetary policy because
housing market characteristics very a
lot across countries these differences
can help explain why some countries are
feeling the effects of rising interest
rates Now While others do not seem to
moreover shifts in these housing market
characteristics over the last few years
have made these channels weaker in
several
countries you're probably wondering what
are these housing market characteristics
today we focus on two the relative
prevalence of fixed rate mortgages in
the stock of outstanding debt and the
regional degree of house price
overvaluation to give you an example of
what we mean take a look at this chart
here the chart shows you the Share of
fixed rate mortgages outstanding across
countries what what do we mean by fixed
rate mortgage well these are just
mortgages for which monthly payments do
not change once the mortgage is issued
no matter what they don't adjust to
policy rates or exchange rates or
inflation this means that in countries
where the share of fixed rate mortgages
is high fewer borrowers will experience
an increase in their monthly mortgage
payments when the Central Bank decides
to hike interest rates as you can see in
the chart countries are quite different
in the this respect in some countries
like the us or Mexico fixed rate
mortgages are very popular whilst in
others like Australia or South Africa
much less
so similarly this chart
here shows overvaluation of house prices
in 12 countries and the variation of
this overvaluation across different
regions within certain countries as you
can see in certain countries there is a
significant variation in the degree of
evaluation and specific regions within
the country experience very hot housing
markets picture places like London or
Brussels or other similar bustling Urban
centers in contrast other countries
maintain a more balanced temperature in
their housing markets both of these
housing market characteristics affect
the strength of monetary policy
transmission to the real economy let us
show you why
we we start with fixed rate mortgages in
this chart here you see how a 1
percentage Point increase in policy
rates affects real private consumption
several quarters after the increase in
policy rates the chart in particular
shows the consumption declines much more
in countries where fixed rate mortgages
are rare compared to countries where
fixed rate mortgages are very
common this difference is actually quite
large five quarters after 1% percentage
Point increase in policy rates private
consumption is about 2 percentage points
lower in a country where fixed rate
mortgages are rare relative to a country
where fixed R mortgages are very common
if you think about it this result makes
sense in countries where fixed R
mortgages are rare many consumers will
feel the increase in policy rates in
their monthly mortgage payments because
their payments adjust relatively quickly
to changes in monetary policy and
increasing mortgage payments means that
some people may need to reduce their
spending on other non-housing related
items and aggregate demand will
suffer now let's look at the impact of
monetary policy tightening in areas
where housing markets are hot or
overvalued in these regions as you can
see in the picture
here there is a pronounced decline in
GDP per capita an increase of 1
percentage point in the policy rate
reduces GDP per capita by the same
amount one percentage point
and house prices take an even steeper
hit in overvalued areas house prices
drop 1.5 percentage points more than in
areas where prices are not
overvalued these are Big effects and
really show how household optimism and
excessive borrowing Drive housing booms
but at the same time that optimism can
reverse very quickly when interest rates
rise with serious consequence es on
house prices and GDP per
capita now let's try to bring this
evidence together by going back to our
initial question why do some countries
feel the pinch of higher policy rates in
this tightening cycle more relative to
others the heat map here can help us
understand why groups of countries that
are shaded in dark purple on the zat map
experience large changes in housing or
mortgage Market characteristics over
time which are associated with weaker
effects of monetary policy these are
countries that for example have seen an
increase in the share of fixed rate
mortgages in stock or a decline in the
degree of regional house price
overvaluation this is the case of many
advanced economies for example so what
are the key takeaways from these
analysis two main ones first the same
change in policy rates has different
effects in different countries because
of housing market characteristics are so
different second in many countries
transmission may have become weaker in
recent years precisely because of
changes in this housing market
characteristics over
time so what does this mean for policy
makers first our finding suggest that a
deep country specific understanding of
housing markets and how they evolve over
time can help calibrate monetary policy
second it may be tempting to think that
too much tightening is less costly
because fewer people have have felt the
pinch so far but overtightening or
leaving rates higher for longer could
present its own risks some countries
have short mortgage fixation periods
which means that as mortgage rates reset
consumer spending could decline sharply
this means that there is a potential for
monetary policy transmission to suddenly
become more effective suggesting a
cautious approach to rate hikes policy
makers need to be aware of how housing
market characteristics have changed in
recent years to avoid the risk of
underestimating the effects of monetary
policy which could materialize with a
delay thank
[Applause]
you Nina Alesia thank you so much great
presentation all right now it's time to
hear from from you and your voices uh
are there any questions in the
audience I sense is that a question sir
all right if you don't mind please uh
stand up and give us your name your
affiliation and a short question please
thanks um can you hear
me
hello okay Rodrigo
valderama uh Embassy Row
invest you mentioned that um I know this
effect of the the pricing inverse to the
interest rate in other words that uh
interest rates do affect the pricing of
the housing but isn't that also a
reflection of eventually inflation and
don't the pricing of doesn't the pricing
of real estate have to catch up to that
and therefore you have to have higher uh
earnings of of the population too to be
able to pay for that
right so thank you for the question um
the the chapter really looks at monetary
policy transmission and the marginal
effect of monetary policy on housing
market developments we don't look
particularly at inflation as an outcome
variable just out of we really want to
link these uh analysis to channels that
are the what Nina mentioned housing
channels and monetary policy
transmission and so we look at outcomes
that are more directly related to these
housing channels such as house prices
and real private consumption you are
right that to a certain extent
developments in house prices will feed
into inflationary Dynamics but this is
not something that we are specifically
looking at in the chapter
okay any other questions from the
audience yes the the lady there well we
have a microphone for you right hello
yes Ellen or from University of London
um how do you measure the
overvaluation um thank you for the
question so um in our analysis the way
we measure overvaluation is that we are
looking at the deviation of the price to
income ratio from the long-term Regional
average because this is what we're doing
in the regional analysis I have to
mention that there could be also other
ways to measure overvaluation but the
reason why we have opted to use a
deviation of the price to income ratio
from its long-term average is because we
need to um include as many countries as
possible in the sample and then if we
want to consider other measures of our
evaluation um we would be more limited
in terms of data
are there any more questions from the
audience for Nina and
Alesia so while our audience uh thinks
for a moment I just want to ask you know
these effects you're describing are they
symmetric are they the same you know a
tightening and a loosening environment
thank you for that thank you J for that
question yes we we do look at a symmetry
we actually look at how um well the same
change in policy rates affects the real
economy and house prices uh whether the
the impulse is a tightening impulse or a
loening one and what we find is fairly
consistent with the rest of the
literature in that Titan and impulses
typically transmit faster and to a
larger degree to real economic outcomes
what we do that is a little bit
different from what the literature is
done also is looking at how these
asymmetry plays out in relation to some
of the characteristics we study so for
example we take a look at fixed
mortgages and we look at what the
literature has defined the ref financing
channel of monetary policy it we don't
have specific information on the ease of
refinancing across countries but what we
find is that a tightening impulse that
fixed rate mortgages are more ENT in
dampening a tightening impulse than a
loening one and the mechanism is simply
that if you think about it during a
tightening episode people don't really
have an incentive to go out and
refinance their mortgages and so
monetary policy transmission of the real
to the real economy will be delayed more
in a loening cycle you could think that
if people have the opportunity to go out
and refinance their loans they have an
incentive to do so the dampening will be
much less
pronounced yes and uh I mean just to um
reiterate and and to give a short like
bottom line uh these are also findings
that are consistent with with the
literature so across different housing
and mortgage Market characteristics we
find uh more potent effects of a
tightening uh in monetary policy and the
intuition behind that essentially is
that more house households uh get um con
less constrainted when monetary policy
eases compared to households that become
constrained when monetary policy
Titans wonderful thank you any other
questions from the audience for Nina Le
yes we have a question in the the far
back yes
sir uh hi uh my name is soan I'm an
undergraduate student um when looking at
how you examin the heterogenity of
different countries that's how you
looked at Lo value ratios in household
debt I'm wondering if you considered
looking at how cours favor bankruptcy
towards the borrower or creditor and if
you think that has an impact thank you
um yeah yes we we thought about that
that of course is something that plays
probably plays a big role in the way you
know then a boom bus cycle will play out
and the aggregate effects on real
economic activity will play out
unfortunately these tend to be
institutional variables and it's quite
difficult to collect quantitative
information on this kind of indicators
for a broad set of countries and a
number of years CU you know the analysis
also relies on a fairly long time series
but in principle you're absolutely right
this is something that when you're
thinking about defaults for example will
have uh certainly a big
role great question other uh questions
from the audience yes so we have a
gentleman in a the red tie back there
it's me again um
I I'd be curious to see or understand
whether or not you felt this had
implications for real interest rates it
strikes me as though some of the impacts
of a uh long maturity fixed mortgage
Market in the United States may be
partially explanatory towards Why Us
real rates are higher and these then
have
KnockOn uh foreign exchange implications
so I just curious to get your your views
there thank
you I wish we would be able to answer
your question but unfortunately this is
beyond the scope of the analysis that we
have conducted so as Alysia mentioned so
the focus of the analytical chapter was
to look uh at the transmission of
monetary policy through housing market
and we are focusing on local housing
market characteristics because housing
markets are essentially local and also
mortgage Market characteristics which
are essentially characterizing the whole
country um so unfortunately uh that was
outside of the scope but thank you for
the
question yes a question there from that
gentleman thank you Ed and Raj for
Global fund uh my question is is there a
policy recommendation of the types of
loans that should be given uh fixed or
or not uh that's the first question and
the second is uh is there a re response
from the supply site uh that is more
robust uh depending on the type of of uh
loans that that are given if it's fixed
or
not um so on the first question on
mortgage Market design um the short
answer is we do not take a normative
stance here we're not making
recommendations on what's the optimal
design of mortgage markets but of course
there are important tradeoffs to
consider right when you thinking about
fixation periods for uh for mortgages
you're thinking about something that as
we show could have implications for
monetary policy transmission but on the
other hand there are reasons why
consumers benefit from having certainty
about the relative mortgage payments
this can have aggregate implications
that we really do not get into the
chapter so the chapter essentially takes
a very agnostic approach to to the way
we think we just take these variables as
given and then estimate how these
Dynamics play out in explaining
divergencies in aggregate
Dynamics um to the question on Supply we
do look at I assume for Supply you mean
supply of
credit housing Supply uh on that I mean
maybe Nina you want to come in on this
yeah sure I can I can take that that
question so uh basically this was uh uh
something that we were also very
interested because the literature has
shown that housing Supply constraints
are really important determinant of the
differences in house prices across
different regions uh so uh what we are
doing is that we are looking at the
transmission of monetary policy in areas
where housing Supply is more constrained
versus areas where housing Supply is
less constrained and what we find is
that the monetary policy is more potent
in areas where housing Supply uh is more
constrained and I mean if you want to
think about this like about the channels
through which these um effects operate
essentially areas where housing Supply
why is more constrained um they also
experience larger house price uh
increases and this is a component also
with a higher borrowing so housing they
they tend to experience housing booms uh
but also there is more uh leverage which
makes um households or borrowers uh more
mortgage dependent and uh also it makes
them more sensitive to the uh policy
rate changes which are then translated
to mortgage rate uh uh
changes great any more questions from
the audience yes uh hand shot up right
away we get that microphone to you sir
yes hi uh thank you very much uh for the
uh enlightening presentation I Amash
from Turkey an economist in a private
company I am wondering of how much uh of
the overall total variation uh in
consumption of consumption and inflation
uh originate uh from these two factors
that you are uh focusing on in your
study because uh if it's large could it
be also a threat to the overall a
long-term effectiveness of the monol and
transmission mechanism thank
you so um thank you for the question so
I think this is for sure something uh
very interesting but it's outside again
of the scope of our analysis because we
have not looked at how different shocks
affect consumption so that we can
disaggregate what variation of
consumption uh comes from what shock but
what we can tell you is that indeed uh
they uh depending on on the on mortgage
market and housing market
characteristics we find that consumption
is affected and also GDP per capita are
more affected in certain countries where
uh some of these characteristics that we
are studying are more more
prevalent yeah and maybe just let me
chime in on that uh the the
we're conducting essentially what is a
reduced form analysis so aggregating
these factors up and trying to
understand how what role each of them
plays in the aggregate transmission of
monetary policies is a task that is well
beyond the theoretical contributions
that even the literature the academic
literature has has achieved to this
point so you will need a model that is
able to take all of these into account
in a general equilibrium framework and
it's just a bit beyond the the scope you
know on a marginal level these
characteristics are quantitatively
relevant if you uh see the impulse
response functions which shown for
example the share of fixed right
mortgages the the Divergence in private
consumption between one state of the
world where fixed R mortgages are very
prevalent and the state of the world
where they're rare is two percentage
points which is pretty large effect so
you know on a marginal sense very
relevant in aggregate it's hard to say
given what we're doing here
all right I think we have time for maybe
one more question if there's another one
from the
audience
yes did the analysis go into the level
of saying which degree of housing
markets were I'm sorry Mark I'm just
representing private company
um what is the renters versus owners
I could not would you mind repeating
because I could not what degree of
housing markets are comprised of renters
versus
owners thank
you yeah we actually do look into that
and we find for example that you know uh
the the response of PR private
consumption or house prices um met like
the the degree of response depends a lot
on how many people own a mortgage for
example home owners ship rates per se so
what you're asking the difference you
know different countries have different
ownership rates do not seem to matter in
this sample in isolation and we think
the reason it doesn't matter in this
sample which is not to say they don't
matter uh in specific countries is
because we have a broad set of economies
in which a lot of people own homes for
example without any leverage attached to
it they just own outright and that means
that of course these people are
essentially you know they're completely
shielded from any changes in interest
rates because they don't borrow so home
ownership rates in isolation not much
difference home ownership with mortgages
very different that's that's the short
answer all right so our time is uh
drawing to a close but Alesia Nina take
us home what's the big takeaway you want
to leave our audience with yeah so two
main takeaways from today the first is
that as we mentioned before the same
change in policy rates can have very
different effects in different countries
because housing market characteristics
and mortgage Market characteristics
differ so much and the second is that
these mortgage or housing market
characteristics are not fixed they can
actually change over time and change a
lot and this can have important
implications for monetary policy the
last point that I will add is that our
findings also suggest that deep country
specific understanding uh of uh housing
market and mortgage markets
is important and also how they evolve
over time also for the calibration of
monetary
policy great and thank you everybody
thank you so much everyone Round of
Applause for Nina and Alesia
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)