Imran Khan Bashes Cipher Case Judge | Breaking News From Adiala Jail | imran Khan Lawyer Media Talk

Summary

In the recent proceedings of the Cypher case trial, an unexpected turn of events unfolded in court. Imran Khan's counsel, Sikandar Julkarnan, filed an adjournment application due to dental surgery, and another lead counsel, Taimoor, was engaged in Multan for campaign purposes. Despite their requests, the judge denied all adjournments and proceeded with the examination via government-appointed associates, ignoring the defense's plea for their presence and media coverage. This unique situation highlights concerns over fair trial standards, as both accused and media were notably absent from the court proceedings, raising questions about transparency and compliance with High Court orders.

Takeaways

• 😟 Imran Khan's lawyer sought adjournment citing Khan's dental surgery and inability to travel from Lahore
• 😟 The other accused, Taimur's lawyer also sought adjournment citing his election campaign in Multan
• 😠 The judge refused all requests for adjournment despite assurances from Khan and Taimur to appear on Monday
• 😠 Judge refused request to allow media inside court during proceedings
• 😟 Prosecution started presenting evidence using associates of government prosecutors instead of defendants' lawyers
• 😟 Defendants objected that prosecution by government lawyers was unfair and aimed at securing conviction
• 😟 Proceedings continued beyond normal court timing of 3:30 PM despite objections
• 😠 Requests for adjournment citing absence of senior lawyers from both sides was refused
• 😟 Judge spoke directly to Imran Khan and Taimur on video conference but still refused adjournment
• 😠 Overall, proceedings seemed biased with prosecution using government lawyers and restrictions imposed on media access

Q & A

What was the reason for Sikandar Julkarnan's absence from the trial?

Sikandar Julkarnan was absent from the trial because he underwent dental surgery and was on bed rest, unable to travel from Lahore.

Why could Taimur not attend the court proceedings?

Taimur was engaged in his campaign activities in Multan and therefore could not attend the court proceedings.

What alternative was proposed for the accused's absence during the trial?

A conference call was arranged so that the accused, Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Imran Khan, could discuss the situation directly from their locations.

What was the reaction of the judge to the requests for adjournment and conducting proceedings via conference call?

The judge denied all requests for adjournment and the proposal for conducting proceedings via conference call, insisting on proceeding with the trial.

What action did the prosecution take when the defendants' counsel were unavailable?

The prosecution appointed two of its associates to start the cross-examination of the witnesses in the absence of the defendants' counsel.

What concern did the accused raise regarding the prosecution team?

The accused objected to being cross-examined by the prosecution team, alleging that it was biased and aimed at securing a conviction against them.

How did the court handle the request for media presence during the proceedings?

The court turned down the request for media presence during the proceedings, despite objections from the accused.

What was the response of Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi regarding their availability for the trial?

Both Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi expressed their willingness to travel for the trial, stating they could be present by the next morning or any given time as required.

What was the issue raised regarding court timings?

It was pointed out that the court was continuing proceedings beyond the official closing time of 3:30 PM, against which objections were raised.

What was the outcome of the requests made by the defendants and their counsel during the trial?

All requests made by the defendants and their counsel, including those for adjournments, media presence, and consideration of their absence, were denied by the court.