Supreme Court से High Court को लगी फटकार, CJI बोले: 28वीं बार जादू कर दोगे क्या? BR Gavai | #dblive

Summary

Lakhshya Tanwar's case highlights the flaws in India's judicial system, where he spent over four years in jail without a clear verdict. His bail hearing was postponed 27 times, leading to the Supreme Court intervening. The Court criticized the prolonged delays and insufficient progress in his trial, where out of 365 witnesses, only three had testified. The Court stressed that personal freedom is a fundamental right, and if trials are delayed without substantial evidence, bail must be granted. This case calls into question the efficiency of the legal system and urges for faster judicial proceedings.

Takeaways

• 😀 Lakshya Tanwar has been in jail for nearly four years, awaiting trial for a serious fraud case under investigation by the CBI.
• 😀 His bail application was postponed 27 times by the Allahabad High Court, which caused significant delays in his case.
• 😀 The case includes serious charges like fraud, criminal conspiracy, and violations of anti-corruption laws, making it a highly significant matter.
• 😀 The Supreme Court intervened after the High Court failed to make substantial progress in the trial, criticizing the repeated delays.
• 😀 The Supreme Court emphasized that personal freedom is a fundamental right and that delays in trials should not hinder an individual's liberty.
• 😀 Only three out of 365 witnesses had testified in the trial, further highlighting the inefficiency of the judicial process in this case.
• 😀 The Supreme Court expressed frustration over the lack of progress in the case and remarked that the repeated delays were a mockery of justice.
• 😀 The Chief Justice of India, BR Gavai, pointed out the injustice of a person being in jail for four years without the trial being concluded.
• 😀 The Supreme Court granted Lakshya Tanwar bail, urging the authorities to expedite the trial and avoid further delays.
• 😀 This case raises broader questions about the efficiency of the Indian judicial system, particularly concerning trial delays and the impact on personal freedoms.

Q & A

What happened to Lakshya Tanwar's case in the Allahabad High Court?

Lakshya Tanwar's case was repeatedly delayed in the Allahabad High Court, with his bail plea being postponed 27 times. This caused significant delays in his case and led to a Supreme Court intervention.

Who intervened in the case, and what action did they take?

The Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih of the Supreme Court intervened. They not only reprimanded the Allahabad High Court but also granted immediate bail to Lakshya Tanwar.

What were the allegations against Lakshya Tanwar?

Lakshya Tanwar was accused of a major fraud case under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), with charges including cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. Additionally, anti-corruption laws were also applied in his case.

How long had Lakshya Tanwar been in jail before his bail was granted?

Lakshya Tanwar had been in jail for nearly 4 years (3 years, 8 months, and 24 days) before his bail was granted by the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court say about the delays in the trial?

The Supreme Court strongly criticized the delays, stating that if someone has been in jail for 4 years without a conclusion to their trial, it mocks justice. The Court emphasized that personal freedom is a fundamental right and must not be delayed.

What did the Supreme Court reveal about the progress of the trial?

The Supreme Court revealed that out of 365 witnesses in the case, only three had testified, highlighting the significant lack of progress in the trial.

What was the reaction of the Supreme Court regarding the repeated postponements of hearings?

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) expressed frustration, sarcastically questioning if a magic solution would be found after 27 postponed hearings and emphasizing that justice should not be delayed indefinitely.

What directive did the Supreme Court give to the CBI?

The Supreme Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to ensure that witness testimonies were completed promptly and that there should be no further delays in the trial process.

What does this case imply about the state of India’s judicial system?

This case raises concerns about the inefficiency and delays in the judicial system, particularly in high-profile cases. It questions the accountability of courts and law enforcement agencies in ensuring timely justice.

How does this case affect people who have been waiting for justice in jail?

This case highlights the struggles of individuals who spend years in jail without being proven guilty or facing a trial. It offers hope to those who have been awaiting justice for a long time, as the Supreme Court's intervention shows that delays cannot be accepted indefinitely.