John Trudell on the Political System incoherency and voters Interview Oct 2008
Summary
TLDRThe speaker in this video script discusses the shared responsibility of voters and politicians in the current political climate. They argue that voters often knowingly elect politicians who lie, and then complain about being betrayed. The speaker identifies as a non-voter and suggests that the real issue lies with the voters themselves, not the non-voters. They propose the idea of non-cooperation as a form of protest, questioning the effectiveness of traditional civil disobedience and encouraging a more thoughtful, non-reactive approach to societal issues.
Takeaways
- ๐ณ๏ธ The speaker believes that voters share responsibility for political outcomes, as they elect politicians knowing they may lie or betray them.
- ๐ค The speaker observes that voters often choose to believe what they want to hear from politicians, rather than what they know to be true.
- ๐ฅ The speaker identifies themselves as a non-voter, part of the 'largest political party in America', implying that non-voters are a significant group.
- ๐ The speaker suggests that voters should demand clarity and coherence from political representatives, but often fail to do so.
- ๐ญ The speaker criticizes the emotional reactions of voters, arguing that they lack clear thinking and contribute to the incoherence of the political system.
- ๐ The speaker points out that blaming non-voters is a way for voters to avoid taking responsibility for the politicians they elect.
- ๐ค The speaker questions the effectiveness of civil disobedience, suggesting that it may actually be a form of cooperation with the system being protested.
- ๐คฏ The speaker proposes the idea of non-cooperation as a means to challenge the status quo, by not feeding energy into the system.
- ๐ก The speaker encourages thinking about non-cooperation in various forms, such as economic non-participation or emotional self-control.
- ๐ถ The speaker ends the transcript by encouraging others to create visual content for their songs, viewing it as a continuation of the creative process.
Q & A
What is the main point the speaker is making about voters and politicians?
-The speaker suggests that voters share the blame for the actions of politicians because they knowingly elect them despite being aware of their tendency to lie and betray trust.
Why does the speaker identify as a non-voter?
-The speaker identifies as a non-voter because they believe that voting does not change the system and that non-voters are unfairly blamed for the political situation.
What does the speaker suggest about the role of non-voters in the political system?
-The speaker suggests that non-voters are part of the largest political party in America, implying that their non-participation is a form of protest against a system they view as inherently flawed.
What does the speaker believe is the real problem in the political system?
-The speaker believes the real problem lies with the voters themselves, who do not hold politicians accountable and instead react emotionally to political promises.
How does the speaker view the concept of civil disobedience?
-The speaker views civil disobedience, whether violent or non-violent, as a form of cooperation with the system being protested against, suggesting that it does not truly challenge the status quo.
What alternative to civil disobedience does the speaker propose?
-The speaker proposes the concept of non-cooperation as an alternative, suggesting that withholding energy and participation from the system could be a more effective form of protest.
What does the speaker suggest about the emotional reactions of voters?
-The speaker suggests that voters' emotional reactions and beliefs are based on insecurities and fears, which they should examine and not let dominate their decision-making.
How does the speaker encourage the use of their music?
-The speaker encourages others to create visual content for their songs, viewing it as a continuation of the creative process and a way to further engage with the material.
What does the speaker imply about the nature of political promises?
-The speaker implies that political promises are often lies, and that voters are complicit in this dynamic by choosing to believe what they want to hear rather than demanding honesty.
What historical pattern does the speaker refer to in the context of elections?
-The speaker refers to a historical pattern of voters electing politicians who do not fulfill their promises, suggesting a cycle of betrayal and disappointment.
What does the speaker mean by 'non-cooperation' in the context of political participation?
-The speaker means that instead of engaging in traditional forms of protest or voting, individuals should consider withdrawing their energy and participation from the political system as a form of resistance.
Outlines
๐ณ๏ธ Voter Responsibility and Political Disillusionment
The speaker discusses the shared responsibility of voters and politicians in the current state of the country's political landscape. They argue that voters, who are aware of politicians' tendencies to lie and break promises, are complicit in the situation because they choose to believe what they want to hear rather than demanding transparency and coherence from their representatives. The speaker identifies as a non-voter, highlighting the irony of voters blaming non-voters for political issues while they themselves fail to hold politicians accountable. The paragraph emphasizes the need for voters to exercise their right to vote responsibly and to demand clear plans and actions from their elected officials, suggesting that the historical pattern of electoral behavior is a cycle of irresponsibility that voters perpetuate.
๐ค The Concept of Non-Cooperation in Society
This paragraph delves into the idea of non-cooperation as a form of resistance against the status quo. The speaker questions the effectiveness of traditional forms of protest, such as demonstrations and civil disobedience, suggesting that these actions are still forms of cooperation with the system being protested against. They propose that true non-cooperation involves a refusal to engage with the system on its terms, including not giving it energy through emotional reactions or participation in economic activities. The speaker encourages the exploration of non-cooperation as a means to challenge the imprinted behaviors that lead to compliance with societal norms and systems. They also touch on the idea of using intelligence and clarity in thought to resist the emotional reactions that often drive participation in the system, advocating for a more thoughtful and less reactive approach to societal issues.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กVoters
๐กPoliticians
๐กBetrayal
๐กComplicity
๐กNon-voters
๐กResponsibility
๐กCivil Disobedience
๐กNon-cooperation
๐กEmotional Reactions
๐กCoherence
๐กImprinted Behavior
Highlights
Voters are as responsible as politicians for the state of the country due to their complicity in electing known liars.
Politicians are known to lie, and voters knowingly elect them, expecting to hear what they want despite the deception.
Non-voters are part of the largest political party in America, believing their vote holds no power against systemic lies.
Voters blame non-voters without taking responsibility for the political representatives they elect.
Voters should demand clear plans and coherent actions from politicians instead of passively accepting promises.
The real problem lies with voters themselves, not non-voters, as they perpetuate the cycle of electing untrustworthy leaders.
The concept of non-cooperation needs to be explored as a form of protest against the system.
Protests and demonstrations, even when non-violent, are a form of cooperation with the system they oppose.
Non-cooperation can be a powerful tool by withholding energy and participation from the system.
Organizing non-spending days or staying home can be forms of non-cooperation against the economic system.
Non-cooperation involves thinking clearly and coherently before reacting emotionally to societal issues.
Examining and overcoming personal insecurities and fears is a form of non-cooperation with societal control.
Civil disobedience, both violent and non-violent, is inherently cooperative with the state's systems for managing dissent.
The need for thinkers to explore non-cooperation as an alternative to the ineffective romanticized idea of civil disobedience.
Encouragement for individuals to create visual content for songs as a form of creative continuation.
The transformative process from thoughts to words, music, and distribution as an invitation for others to add their creative layer.
Transcripts
well
yeah well you know
I find interesting about the voters the
voters blame the politicians
and Washington for betraying them and I
find this a really interesting
observation
because the voters are as responsible as
the politicians are for what's going on
in this country because the pollen I
mean it's it's common knowledge in
America that what goes on in this
country is that the politi the
politicians are known to lie they lie
they promise everybody knows this is it
just the way that it is and so the
voters that elect these politicians that
they end up complaining about betraying
them we're lying to them from the
beginning and the voters knew it but
they didn't want to accept what they
knew they wanted to believe what they
wanted to hear
so when you look at this overall
situation in the whole political thing
it isn't just the representatives and
the politicians it's the voters they
have a complicity in this too they help
to create the situation
and my attitude is he is like see I'm
not
I'm a non-voter
all right and and I'm a member of the
largest political party in America the
non-voters
all right because the non-voters just
get it hold it what I got to say doesn't
really mean anything it's all a lie
so what I'm going to say so about the
voting thing is that people that want to
vote but and then people who don't who
do vote they blame the non-voters
and see how I mean again somebody to
blame see they blame the non-voters but
they're not but the voters aren't taking
responsibility for saying to the
political Representatives that they vote
for we want you to make sense to us we
want you to do good coherent things we
want to see your plans we want to hear
your plans
but the voters don't say that they don't
demand that what they go to the
politicians and do as they as it promise
me what I want to hear
you know so so if we're going to really
look what's going on in this country the
real problem is the voters themselves
it's not the non-voters
you know I mean you know and I think
that so what I think when people
point at the non-voters when voters
point at the non-voters I look at the
voters and I think well you know
if you Embrace this right to vote and
and you believe in it so much
then you need to you to use and exercise
this right or responsible you need to
exercise this not as a right but as a
responsibility and as a responsibility
you need to be clear and coherent and
make sense about what you're doing
but if the voters aren't making any
sense then how do they expect the
leadership to make any sense if the
voters condone that every political
election year the cycle they've condone
it I mean it's a historical pattern all
one has to do is just go back and look
at the history of the electoral process
in this country
so I think yeah you know so I think uh
so I think the whole everyone in the
political system is participating in is
being completely irresponsible
even though in their hearts they believe
but they're emotionally reacting see
they're not thinking the voters aren't
thinking they react they're reacting out
of emotional beliefs to what they're
afraid of or what they hate or all this
and that you know and there's no
clarency coming out of them either
so therefore there's no coherency coming
out of the system no one's requiring it
you know I think the concept of
non-cooperation really needs to be
uh
thought about
because when I look at you know our our
imprinted Behavior pattern is to protest
and demonstrate
against whatever it is that we're
opposing in a political Society type of
sense and to organize
people and energy to do this protesting
and is demonstrating
but when you really look at it
would we're cooperating with the system
that we're protesting against
because if you do it
civil so when I look at like Civil
Disobedience whether it's violent or
non-violent
it's cooperating
all right it's cooperating with the
system itself
so so if you're protesting and you get
the permits you're cooperating all right
and I'm not judging this is you're
cooperating
and you're cooperating when you buy
magic markers to make the signs the
protest signs you're cooperating when
you buy water the little bottles of
water your pro you're cooperating when
you organize the people mass movements
of people and by the get the logistics
if you're non-violently Civil
Disobedience I mean if it's violent
Civil Disobedience you're cooperating
you're doing you're still doing the same
thing you're getting whatever it is for
your demonstration and you're
cooperating in the economic system and
then when you clash with the state
you're cooperating with the state's
little war games and how it works out is
a little it's little processes to
contain these kinds of demonstrations
see so the whole thing is based upon
cooperation
and I think that you know we and and
obviously
I I think well anyway I just think that
needs to be thought about so it seems
like if everything we're doing is
cooperating with them then we need to
really examine and think about
non-cooperation because if we're
cooperating with them we're giving them
our energy
so it's really becomes to me a matter of
well how do we not cooperate with them
how do we not give them that energy and
we can only not give them that energy by
not cooperating with them
and I figure well that's all based upon
how we've been imprinted to perceive
reality
you know and how do I and you know and
if I'm not using my intelligence to
think as clearly and coherently about
the issues that I'm confronted with
personally or Society wise right if I'm
if I'm just being incoherent emotional
reactionary reactionary emotional
believer then I'm cooperating with them
it doesn't matter how much I protest it
doesn't matter what else I do I'm
cooperating with them
see so we need to be thinking in terms
of how do we not give them the energy
how do we not cooperate with them
you know what does it mean you know I
mean yeah so I really think this is
something that the thinkers need to
explore how do I mean on you know on one
level you can say well organize
try to organize 30 percent of the
population not to spend any money on the
same day as a as an economic statement
and you're not cooperating with them
because you're not feeding into the
monetary system so that's one way of
non-cooperation all right where people
can stay at home and keep their
identities and do all the stuff that's
one way of non-cooperation all right
another way of non-cooperation
another way of non-cooperation is to not
emotionally react to think things out
before we Act
you know so you know it's like uh
another way of non-cooperation is you
know if our lives are dominated if the
basically how we participate in this
reality and perceive this reality is
based upon our own insecurities and
fears but then obviously we should we
should examine those insecurities and
fears and recognize where they come from
all right and and not let them dominate
our lives anymore
that's a way of not cooperating so
non-cooperation I think really needs to
be explored
versus this romanticized civil
disobedience
thing because it's not working
but about the music stuff
yeah anybody that wants to take and put
make any kind of images to anywhere in
any of the songs
I I highly encourage you I would like it
all right so if you if I've got songs
out there and people want to put video
make it to video stuff they have I
encourage it go for it do it you know
um
because in a way
the lines that that started all this the
lines that became the lines that became
thoughts that became words that became
put down on paper that became recorded
that became put down on paper and it
became uh bonded to music from the lines
and it became recorded so you know and
put out and distributed so if someone
wants to break come along and put images
to these lines as a part of this
continuation of the lines then yes I
would appreciate it I like it I am you
know it would be very good
so if somebody wants to do it I'm on for
it
[Music]
I've done some dying in this life I'm in
life I'm in
trying to do good but getting lost
getting lost
moments of Happiness are fleeing things
fleeing things
[Music]
I've done some crying when the moon said
so
we said so
[Music]
I've done some crying when the moon said
so the
the soul
always running when pain begins
pain begins I forgot this sadness that's
got to end
got to win
got to end
I've done some crying when the moon said
so
when the moon said soul
oh
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)