John Trudell on the Political System incoherency and voters Interview Oct 2008

Wolf
26 Jun 202310:07

Summary

TLDRThe speaker in this video script discusses the shared responsibility of voters and politicians in the current political climate. They argue that voters often knowingly elect politicians who lie, and then complain about being betrayed. The speaker identifies as a non-voter and suggests that the real issue lies with the voters themselves, not the non-voters. They propose the idea of non-cooperation as a form of protest, questioning the effectiveness of traditional civil disobedience and encouraging a more thoughtful, non-reactive approach to societal issues.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ The speaker believes that voters share responsibility for political outcomes, as they elect politicians knowing they may lie or betray them.
  • ๐Ÿค” The speaker observes that voters often choose to believe what they want to hear from politicians, rather than what they know to be true.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ The speaker identifies themselves as a non-voter, part of the 'largest political party in America', implying that non-voters are a significant group.
  • ๐Ÿ” The speaker suggests that voters should demand clarity and coherence from political representatives, but often fail to do so.
  • ๐Ÿ’ญ The speaker criticizes the emotional reactions of voters, arguing that they lack clear thinking and contribute to the incoherence of the political system.
  • ๐Ÿ‘Ž The speaker points out that blaming non-voters is a way for voters to avoid taking responsibility for the politicians they elect.
  • ๐Ÿค The speaker questions the effectiveness of civil disobedience, suggesting that it may actually be a form of cooperation with the system being protested.
  • ๐Ÿคฏ The speaker proposes the idea of non-cooperation as a means to challenge the status quo, by not feeding energy into the system.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก The speaker encourages thinking about non-cooperation in various forms, such as economic non-participation or emotional self-control.
  • ๐ŸŽถ The speaker ends the transcript by encouraging others to create visual content for their songs, viewing it as a continuation of the creative process.

Q & A

  • What is the main point the speaker is making about voters and politicians?

    -The speaker suggests that voters share the blame for the actions of politicians because they knowingly elect them despite being aware of their tendency to lie and betray trust.

  • Why does the speaker identify as a non-voter?

    -The speaker identifies as a non-voter because they believe that voting does not change the system and that non-voters are unfairly blamed for the political situation.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the role of non-voters in the political system?

    -The speaker suggests that non-voters are part of the largest political party in America, implying that their non-participation is a form of protest against a system they view as inherently flawed.

  • What does the speaker believe is the real problem in the political system?

    -The speaker believes the real problem lies with the voters themselves, who do not hold politicians accountable and instead react emotionally to political promises.

  • How does the speaker view the concept of civil disobedience?

    -The speaker views civil disobedience, whether violent or non-violent, as a form of cooperation with the system being protested against, suggesting that it does not truly challenge the status quo.

  • What alternative to civil disobedience does the speaker propose?

    -The speaker proposes the concept of non-cooperation as an alternative, suggesting that withholding energy and participation from the system could be a more effective form of protest.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the emotional reactions of voters?

    -The speaker suggests that voters' emotional reactions and beliefs are based on insecurities and fears, which they should examine and not let dominate their decision-making.

  • How does the speaker encourage the use of their music?

    -The speaker encourages others to create visual content for their songs, viewing it as a continuation of the creative process and a way to further engage with the material.

  • What does the speaker imply about the nature of political promises?

    -The speaker implies that political promises are often lies, and that voters are complicit in this dynamic by choosing to believe what they want to hear rather than demanding honesty.

  • What historical pattern does the speaker refer to in the context of elections?

    -The speaker refers to a historical pattern of voters electing politicians who do not fulfill their promises, suggesting a cycle of betrayal and disappointment.

  • What does the speaker mean by 'non-cooperation' in the context of political participation?

    -The speaker means that instead of engaging in traditional forms of protest or voting, individuals should consider withdrawing their energy and participation from the political system as a form of resistance.

Outlines

00:00

๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Voter Responsibility and Political Disillusionment

The speaker discusses the shared responsibility of voters and politicians in the current state of the country's political landscape. They argue that voters, who are aware of politicians' tendencies to lie and break promises, are complicit in the situation because they choose to believe what they want to hear rather than demanding transparency and coherence from their representatives. The speaker identifies as a non-voter, highlighting the irony of voters blaming non-voters for political issues while they themselves fail to hold politicians accountable. The paragraph emphasizes the need for voters to exercise their right to vote responsibly and to demand clear plans and actions from their elected officials, suggesting that the historical pattern of electoral behavior is a cycle of irresponsibility that voters perpetuate.

05:00

๐Ÿค” The Concept of Non-Cooperation in Society

This paragraph delves into the idea of non-cooperation as a form of resistance against the status quo. The speaker questions the effectiveness of traditional forms of protest, such as demonstrations and civil disobedience, suggesting that these actions are still forms of cooperation with the system being protested against. They propose that true non-cooperation involves a refusal to engage with the system on its terms, including not giving it energy through emotional reactions or participation in economic activities. The speaker encourages the exploration of non-cooperation as a means to challenge the imprinted behaviors that lead to compliance with societal norms and systems. They also touch on the idea of using intelligence and clarity in thought to resist the emotional reactions that often drive participation in the system, advocating for a more thoughtful and less reactive approach to societal issues.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กVoters

Voters are individuals who participate in elections by casting votes for candidates or policies. In the context of the video, voters are portrayed as being complicit in the political system's shortcomings, as they elect politicians knowing they may not be truthful. The script mentions that voters blame politicians for betrayal but acknowledges that they are part of the problem due to their choice to vote for those they believe will lie to them.

๐Ÿ’กPoliticians

Politicians are individuals who hold or seek political office. The script discusses the common perception that politicians are known to lie and make promises they do not intend to keep. It suggests that politicians are part of the larger issue within the political system, contributing to the dissatisfaction and disillusionment of the voters.

๐Ÿ’กBetrayal

Betrayal refers to the act of breaking a promise or violating the trust of others. In the video, the term is used to describe the perceived actions of politicians who do not fulfill their promises to voters, leading to a sense of disappointment and abandonment among the electorate.

๐Ÿ’กComplicity

Complicity denotes the state of being involved in a wrongdoing or crime. The script uses this term to argue that voters are not merely victims but active participants in the political process, and thus share responsibility for the outcomes they criticize.

๐Ÿ’กNon-voters

Non-voters are individuals who choose not to participate in elections. The speaker identifies as a non-voter and suggests that this group is unfairly blamed by voters for political outcomes. The script implies that non-voters are part of the 'largest political party in America', indicating a significant portion of the population that abstains from voting.

๐Ÿ’กResponsibility

Responsibility in the video is discussed in the context of voters exercising their right to vote with a sense of duty and accountability. It is suggested that voters should not only demand honesty from politicians but also hold themselves accountable for the choices they make at the polls.

๐Ÿ’กCivil Disobedience

Civil disobedience is the act of peacefully resisting laws or policies through nonviolent means. The script questions the effectiveness of civil disobedience, suggesting that even acts of protest are forms of cooperation with the system being opposed, as they engage with and rely on societal structures.

๐Ÿ’กNon-cooperation

Non-cooperation is the concept of refusing to participate in or support a system or process. The video script proposes non-cooperation as a potential strategy for change, arguing that by not engaging with the political or economic systems, individuals can withhold energy and support from structures they oppose.

๐Ÿ’กEmotional Reactions

Emotional reactions refer to responses driven by feelings rather than rational thought. The script criticizes voters for reacting emotionally to political issues, suggesting that this leads to incoherent and ineffective political engagement.

๐Ÿ’กCoherence

Coherence in the video is used to describe the clarity and logical consistency of thought and action. The speaker argues that a lack of coherence in voters' demands and expectations contributes to the incoherence of the political system.

๐Ÿ’กImprinted Behavior

Imprinted behavior refers to patterns of action that are ingrained through social conditioning. The script suggests that the tendency to protest and demonstrate is an example of imprinted behavior that may not be as effective as non-cooperation in bringing about change.

Highlights

Voters are as responsible as politicians for the state of the country due to their complicity in electing known liars.

Politicians are known to lie, and voters knowingly elect them, expecting to hear what they want despite the deception.

Non-voters are part of the largest political party in America, believing their vote holds no power against systemic lies.

Voters blame non-voters without taking responsibility for the political representatives they elect.

Voters should demand clear plans and coherent actions from politicians instead of passively accepting promises.

The real problem lies with voters themselves, not non-voters, as they perpetuate the cycle of electing untrustworthy leaders.

The concept of non-cooperation needs to be explored as a form of protest against the system.

Protests and demonstrations, even when non-violent, are a form of cooperation with the system they oppose.

Non-cooperation can be a powerful tool by withholding energy and participation from the system.

Organizing non-spending days or staying home can be forms of non-cooperation against the economic system.

Non-cooperation involves thinking clearly and coherently before reacting emotionally to societal issues.

Examining and overcoming personal insecurities and fears is a form of non-cooperation with societal control.

Civil disobedience, both violent and non-violent, is inherently cooperative with the state's systems for managing dissent.

The need for thinkers to explore non-cooperation as an alternative to the ineffective romanticized idea of civil disobedience.

Encouragement for individuals to create visual content for songs as a form of creative continuation.

The transformative process from thoughts to words, music, and distribution as an invitation for others to add their creative layer.

Transcripts

play00:01

well

play00:03

yeah well you know

play00:06

I find interesting about the voters the

play00:08

voters blame the politicians

play00:12

and Washington for betraying them and I

play00:15

find this a really interesting

play00:16

observation

play00:18

because the voters are as responsible as

play00:21

the politicians are for what's going on

play00:23

in this country because the pollen I

play00:26

mean it's it's common knowledge in

play00:27

America that what goes on in this

play00:29

country is that the politi the

play00:30

politicians are known to lie they lie

play00:33

they promise everybody knows this is it

play00:34

just the way that it is and so the

play00:36

voters that elect these politicians that

play00:39

they end up complaining about betraying

play00:41

them we're lying to them from the

play00:43

beginning and the voters knew it but

play00:45

they didn't want to accept what they

play00:47

knew they wanted to believe what they

play00:49

wanted to hear

play00:50

so when you look at this overall

play00:52

situation in the whole political thing

play00:54

it isn't just the representatives and

play00:55

the politicians it's the voters they

play00:57

have a complicity in this too they help

play00:59

to create the situation

play01:01

and my attitude is he is like see I'm

play01:04

not

play01:05

I'm a non-voter

play01:07

all right and and I'm a member of the

play01:09

largest political party in America the

play01:12

non-voters

play01:13

all right because the non-voters just

play01:15

get it hold it what I got to say doesn't

play01:17

really mean anything it's all a lie

play01:20

so what I'm going to say so about the

play01:22

voting thing is that people that want to

play01:24

vote but and then people who don't who

play01:26

do vote they blame the non-voters

play01:29

and see how I mean again somebody to

play01:31

blame see they blame the non-voters but

play01:34

they're not but the voters aren't taking

play01:35

responsibility for saying to the

play01:37

political Representatives that they vote

play01:39

for we want you to make sense to us we

play01:41

want you to do good coherent things we

play01:43

want to see your plans we want to hear

play01:45

your plans

play01:46

but the voters don't say that they don't

play01:48

demand that what they go to the

play01:49

politicians and do as they as it promise

play01:52

me what I want to hear

play01:54

you know so so if we're going to really

play01:57

look what's going on in this country the

play01:58

real problem is the voters themselves

play02:00

it's not the non-voters

play02:03

you know I mean you know and I think

play02:05

that so what I think when people

play02:08

point at the non-voters when voters

play02:11

point at the non-voters I look at the

play02:13

voters and I think well you know

play02:15

if you Embrace this right to vote and

play02:17

and you believe in it so much

play02:20

then you need to you to use and exercise

play02:22

this right or responsible you need to

play02:25

exercise this not as a right but as a

play02:27

responsibility and as a responsibility

play02:29

you need to be clear and coherent and

play02:31

make sense about what you're doing

play02:33

but if the voters aren't making any

play02:35

sense then how do they expect the

play02:37

leadership to make any sense if the

play02:39

voters condone that every political

play02:40

election year the cycle they've condone

play02:43

it I mean it's a historical pattern all

play02:45

one has to do is just go back and look

play02:47

at the history of the electoral process

play02:49

in this country

play02:51

so I think yeah you know so I think uh

play02:54

so I think the whole everyone in the

play02:57

political system is participating in is

play02:58

being completely irresponsible

play03:01

even though in their hearts they believe

play03:03

but they're emotionally reacting see

play03:05

they're not thinking the voters aren't

play03:06

thinking they react they're reacting out

play03:08

of emotional beliefs to what they're

play03:10

afraid of or what they hate or all this

play03:11

and that you know and there's no

play03:13

clarency coming out of them either

play03:16

so therefore there's no coherency coming

play03:17

out of the system no one's requiring it

play03:24

you know I think the concept of

play03:25

non-cooperation really needs to be

play03:28

uh

play03:30

thought about

play03:33

because when I look at you know our our

play03:35

imprinted Behavior pattern is to protest

play03:38

and demonstrate

play03:40

against whatever it is that we're

play03:41

opposing in a political Society type of

play03:45

sense and to organize

play03:48

people and energy to do this protesting

play03:50

and is demonstrating

play03:52

but when you really look at it

play03:54

would we're cooperating with the system

play03:58

that we're protesting against

play04:02

because if you do it

play04:04

civil so when I look at like Civil

play04:06

Disobedience whether it's violent or

play04:08

non-violent

play04:10

it's cooperating

play04:12

all right it's cooperating with the

play04:14

system itself

play04:16

so so if you're protesting and you get

play04:19

the permits you're cooperating all right

play04:22

and I'm not judging this is you're

play04:23

cooperating

play04:24

and you're cooperating when you buy

play04:26

magic markers to make the signs the

play04:28

protest signs you're cooperating when

play04:30

you buy water the little bottles of

play04:32

water your pro you're cooperating when

play04:34

you organize the people mass movements

play04:37

of people and by the get the logistics

play04:40

if you're non-violently Civil

play04:42

Disobedience I mean if it's violent

play04:44

Civil Disobedience you're cooperating

play04:46

you're doing you're still doing the same

play04:48

thing you're getting whatever it is for

play04:50

your demonstration and you're

play04:52

cooperating in the economic system and

play04:54

then when you clash with the state

play04:56

you're cooperating with the state's

play04:58

little war games and how it works out is

play05:00

a little it's little processes to

play05:02

contain these kinds of demonstrations

play05:03

see so the whole thing is based upon

play05:05

cooperation

play05:07

and I think that you know we and and

play05:10

obviously

play05:12

I I think well anyway I just think that

play05:13

needs to be thought about so it seems

play05:15

like if everything we're doing is

play05:17

cooperating with them then we need to

play05:19

really examine and think about

play05:20

non-cooperation because if we're

play05:22

cooperating with them we're giving them

play05:24

our energy

play05:25

so it's really becomes to me a matter of

play05:27

well how do we not cooperate with them

play05:29

how do we not give them that energy and

play05:31

we can only not give them that energy by

play05:32

not cooperating with them

play05:35

and I figure well that's all based upon

play05:37

how we've been imprinted to perceive

play05:39

reality

play05:41

you know and how do I and you know and

play05:44

if I'm not using my intelligence to

play05:47

think as clearly and coherently about

play05:48

the issues that I'm confronted with

play05:50

personally or Society wise right if I'm

play05:54

if I'm just being incoherent emotional

play05:56

reactionary reactionary emotional

play05:59

believer then I'm cooperating with them

play06:02

it doesn't matter how much I protest it

play06:04

doesn't matter what else I do I'm

play06:06

cooperating with them

play06:08

see so we need to be thinking in terms

play06:10

of how do we not give them the energy

play06:12

how do we not cooperate with them

play06:14

you know what does it mean you know I

play06:16

mean yeah so I really think this is

play06:18

something that the thinkers need to

play06:20

explore how do I mean on you know on one

play06:23

level you can say well organize

play06:26

try to organize 30 percent of the

play06:27

population not to spend any money on the

play06:29

same day as a as an economic statement

play06:32

and you're not cooperating with them

play06:33

because you're not feeding into the

play06:35

monetary system so that's one way of

play06:37

non-cooperation all right where people

play06:40

can stay at home and keep their

play06:41

identities and do all the stuff that's

play06:43

one way of non-cooperation all right

play06:45

another way of non-cooperation

play06:48

another way of non-cooperation is to not

play06:51

emotionally react to think things out

play06:54

before we Act

play06:55

you know so you know it's like uh

play06:58

another way of non-cooperation is you

play07:01

know if our lives are dominated if the

play07:04

basically how we participate in this

play07:06

reality and perceive this reality is

play07:07

based upon our own insecurities and

play07:09

fears but then obviously we should we

play07:11

should examine those insecurities and

play07:13

fears and recognize where they come from

play07:15

all right and and not let them dominate

play07:19

our lives anymore

play07:21

that's a way of not cooperating so

play07:23

non-cooperation I think really needs to

play07:25

be explored

play07:26

versus this romanticized civil

play07:28

disobedience

play07:31

thing because it's not working

play07:37

but about the music stuff

play07:39

yeah anybody that wants to take and put

play07:42

make any kind of images to anywhere in

play07:45

any of the songs

play07:47

I I highly encourage you I would like it

play07:50

all right so if you if I've got songs

play07:52

out there and people want to put video

play07:54

make it to video stuff they have I

play07:56

encourage it go for it do it you know

play07:59

um

play08:01

because in a way

play08:03

the lines that that started all this the

play08:06

lines that became the lines that became

play08:08

thoughts that became words that became

play08:10

put down on paper that became recorded

play08:12

that became put down on paper and it

play08:15

became uh bonded to music from the lines

play08:17

and it became recorded so you know and

play08:20

put out and distributed so if someone

play08:22

wants to break come along and put images

play08:24

to these lines as a part of this

play08:26

continuation of the lines then yes I

play08:29

would appreciate it I like it I am you

play08:31

know it would be very good

play08:32

so if somebody wants to do it I'm on for

play08:36

it

play08:40

[Music]

play08:47

I've done some dying in this life I'm in

play08:51

life I'm in

play08:54

trying to do good but getting lost

play08:59

getting lost

play09:02

moments of Happiness are fleeing things

play09:06

fleeing things

play09:09

[Music]

play09:11

I've done some crying when the moon said

play09:15

so

play09:20

we said so

play09:21

[Music]

play09:27

I've done some crying when the moon said

play09:30

so the

play09:32

the soul

play09:34

always running when pain begins

play09:39

pain begins I forgot this sadness that's

play09:44

got to end

play09:46

got to win

play09:48

got to end

play09:50

I've done some crying when the moon said

play09:54

so

play09:58

when the moon said soul

play10:02

oh

Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Voter ResponsibilityPolitical SystemNon-VoterCivil DisobedienceEmotional ReactionSocial CritiquePolitical AwarenessElection CycleProtest DynamicsNon-CooperationSystemic Issues