Why Adidas Lost Germany
Summary
TLDRThe German football association's switch from Adidas to Nike has sparked a national debate, symbolizing a significant shift in sports marketing. The historic partnership with Adidas, which began with the 1954 World Cup victory, has been a symbol of national pride. However, Nike's superior economic offer and global marketing prowess won over the DFB, signaling a new era in sports sponsorship and reflecting the changing dynamics of brand loyalty and economic interests in the globalized sports industry.
Takeaways
- 🏆 The German football national team's new kit deal with Nike has caused a national crisis, highlighting the deep historical ties between German football and Adidas.
- 🔄 The shift from Adidas to Nike marks the end of a 75-year partnership, which was previously seen as unbreakable.
- 📰 The decision was widely covered by mainstream media, with articles on the topic being the most read and commented on the day they were published.
- 🎖 Adidas' association with German football dates back to the 1954 World Cup, where the founder, Adi Dassler, provided the team with special studs for their boots.
- 💼 Adidas' strong connection to football helped it become the largest sports brand globally, supplying over 60% of national teams in the early 90s.
- 💰 The global sportswear market is worth $300 billion, making sponsorship deals during high-profile events like the World Cup extremely lucrative.
- 📈 Nike's entry into football in the 1990s was strategic, aiming to diversify from its core sports and capitalize on the sport's global popularity.
- 🤝 Nike's innovative marketing strategies, such as the 'Joga Bonito' campaign and partnerships with star players, significantly boosted its football sales.
- 🇩🇪 Nike's acquisition of the German national team sponsorship is a major coup, as it had struggled to establish a strong presence in the German market.
- 💼 The decision to partner with Nike was based on a transparent tender process, with Nike offering a significantly better economic proposal than Adidas.
- 💡 The move to Nike could signal a new era for German football, with the potential for innovative marketing and storytelling to engage fans and grow the sport.
Q & A
Why did the change of the German football national team's kit sponsor from Adidas to Nike cause such a significant reaction in Germany?
-The change was significant because Adidas and German football had a long-standing partnership that was deeply ingrained in the national identity. The move was seen as unpatriotic and shocking, causing a national crisis and extensive media coverage.
What is the historical significance of Adidas to German football?
-Adidas was founded by Adi Dassler, who provided the German team with special studs during their first World Cup win in 1954. This marked the beginning of a strong association between Adidas and German football, with Adidas becoming synonymous with the sport and contributing to Germany's success in subsequent World Cups.
How did Adidas' relationship with FIFA and other institutions impact its brand?
-Adidas' strong ties to football, including its role in commercializing FIFA, helped it become the biggest sports brand in the world. It supplied more than 60% of national teams at the beginning of the 90s, which solidified its position in the sportswear market.
What was Nike's strategy to enter the football market in the 1990s?
-Nike's strategy involved signing a $200 million 10-year contract with the Brazilian football federation and adopting a marketing approach that resonated with football culture, such as 'Joga Bonito' and 'The Secret Tournament'. This helped Nike establish a strong presence in football and increase its sales dramatically.
Why was Nike's entry into the German football market challenging?
-Nike faced challenges because the German football market was dominated by Adidas, which had a strong, almost untouchable presence due to its historical ties and the loyalty of top players and the German Football Association (DFB).
What factors led to the DFB choosing Nike over Adidas for their new kit deal?
-The DFB chose Nike because of its significantly better economic offer, which was reportedly around twice of what Adidas paid. Additionally, Nike's global distribution network and marketing prowess were attractive factors in the decision.
What was the controversy surrounding the DFB's decision to stay with Adidas in 2006?
-In 2006, Nike offered more than twice the amount Adidas did for a 10-year deal, but the DFB still chose Adidas. This decision was controversial and went to court due to suspicions of behind-the-scenes influence and potential corruption.
How did the public and politicians react to the DFB's decision to switch from Adidas to Nike?
-The public and some politicians, including the Vice Chancellor of Germany, reacted with shock and criticism, labeling the move as unpatriotic and shameful. The decision was widely discussed and debated in mainstream media and social platforms.
What are the key differences between Adidas and Nike's approach to sports marketing?
-Adidas is known for its focus on product quality and engineering, often associated with institutions. Nike, on the other hand, is recognized for its storytelling and marketing, focusing on athletes and creating a connection with the audience.
What potential benefits could the partnership with Nike bring to the German national football team?
-The partnership with Nike could bring significant financial resources for the development of football in Germany, a global distribution network to increase jersey sales, and innovative marketing strategies that could boost the team's brand and appeal to new fans.
What could be the long-term implications of the switch from Adidas to Nike for both brands?
-For Nike, it could mean solidifying its position in the German market and gaining a prestigious asset. For Adidas, it might offer the opportunity to invest in other teams and athletes, potentially leading to a more diversified and competitive portfolio.
Outlines
🏆 The End of an Era: Adidas Loses German Football Team Sponsorship
The German football national team's switch from Adidas to Nike has sparked a national crisis, with politicians like the Vice Chancellor expressing strong disapproval. This sports marketing deal is unusual in its impact, as it's rarely that such a change is headline news. The German Football Association's decision to leave Adidas, its partner for over 75 years, was met with shock and confusion by some, while others passionately defended the Adidas stripes as part of Germany's national identity. The narrative delves into the historical significance of Adidas in German football, from its founder Adi Dassler's role in the 1954 World Cup victory to its dominance in the global sportswear market. The financial implications of sports sponsorships are highlighted, with the global sportswear market valued at 300 billion and major sporting events offering significant branding opportunities.
💸 Nike's Strategic Move and the Shift in Sponsorship Dynamics
This paragraph discusses the controversy and implications of the German Football Association's (DFB) decision to switch from Adidas to Nike as its kit sponsor. The move is viewed as a significant financial and strategic play by Nike, which has historically struggled to establish a strong presence in the German market. The narrative explores the history of Adidas's influence and its deep-rooted connection with German football, including its role in commercializing FIFA and dominating the sportswear market. The shift is attributed to Nike's willingness to pay significantly more than Adidas, a move that is seen as overpaying but strategically essential for Nike to secure a foothold in the German market. The summary also touches on the cultural and marketing differences between Adidas and Nike, with Adidas focusing on product quality and Nike excelling in storytelling and athlete association. The potential benefits for all parties involved, including the German national team, are considered, along with the possibility of a future reunion between Adidas and DFB.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Vice Chancellor of Germany
💡Sports marketing deal
💡National identity
💡Adidas
💡Nike
💡Global sportswear market
💡Sponsorship
💡Cultural impact
💡Economic offer
💡Transparency and non-discriminatory tender
💡Patriotism
Highlights
The German football national team's new kit deal with Nike has caused a national crisis and debate, with politicians calling it unpatriotic and shameful.
The German Football Association's decision to leave Adidas for Nike after over 75 years is unprecedented and has drawn significant media attention.
The partnership between German football and Adidas was iconic, with Adidas supplying more than 60% of national teams in the 1990s.
Adidas' founder, Adi Dassler, played a key role in the 1954 World Cup victory, becoming a national hero and establishing Adidas as synonymous with football.
Nike realized the marketing potential of football in the 1990s and aggressively pursued partnerships, including a groundbreaking $200 million 10-year deal with Brazil.
Nike's innovative marketing campaigns, such as 'Joga Bonito', helped them become a major player in football, increasing their sales from $40 million in 1994 to over $2 billion in 2018.
Despite Nike's global success, they struggled to establish a strong presence in the German market, where Adidas held a dominant position.
The German Football Association's decision to partner with Nike was based on a transparent tender process, with Nike offering a significantly better economic proposal.
Nike's offer to the DFB was reportedly around 100 million euros per year, approximately twice what Adidas was paying.
Nike's extensive global distribution network and storytelling capabilities were key factors in their successful bid for the German national team kit deal.
The DFB's decision was influenced by the significant financial difference between Nike and Adidas' offers, making the choice of Adidas potentially corrupt.
Adidas' focus on product quality and engineering contrasts with Nike's emphasis on athlete partnerships and storytelling in their marketing strategies.
The transition to Nike represents a significant change for German football, ending an era of partnership with Adidas and opening up new opportunities for growth and development.
Nike's deal with the German national team is expected to benefit all parties involved, including the brand, the association, and the fans.
The potential for a future reunion between Adidas and the German national team in 2034 when the Nike contract ends adds an interesting perspective to the story.
The shift from Adidas to Nike reflects a broader change in German football, with new leadership seeking the best offers and being willing to make bold changes.
Transcripts
“Unpatriotic, shameful, destroying our home.”
These are the words of the Vice Chancellor of Germany
and other politicians. They are not talking about a war, the climate,
or racism. But about the new kit of the German football national team.
It is very rare that a sports marketing deal is causing a national crisis. Usually,
those things are not discussed in mainstream media but only on nerdy YouTube channels.
But the news about the German Football Association leaving Adidas for Nike - after
more than 75 years - was even sent as a push notification by major German media outlets.
Some readers were confused about the relevance criteria for the breaking news, but the articles
were the most read and commented on that day. Many people, like the Vice Chancellor,
could hardly imagine a German jersey, a piece of national identity, without the three stripes.
Why is this such a big deal?
Think Michael Jordan and Nike, Rolex and Wimbledon,
Red Bull and Formula 1. Some partners just go hand in hand. German football and Adidas
was one of those. Nobody thought this love affair would ever end.
So what happened?
Welcome to Athletic Interest and how Adidas lost Germany.
When Germany won its first World Cup title in 1954, coach Sepp Herberger is said to have said
in the rain in Bern: "Adi, put on the studs" And Adi Dassler, the founder and namesake of Adidas,
screwed his special studs onto the football boots that the whole world would soon be wearing.
The World Cup final became the miracle of Bern and Dassler became the nation's
shoemaker, sitting on the coach's bench. This bronze statue of Dassler in front of
the Adidas World Headquarters is a reminder of this story.
From then on, Adidas became synonymous with football. Three more World Cup titles
followed for Germany, in Adidas shirts. During the 70s, Adidas boss Horst Dassler,
the son of Adi, played a key role in commercializing FIFA - from creating
a television market to arranging sponsorships and broadcasting
rights. They basically invented sports marketing and with it a whole industry.
Its strong ties to football made Adidas the biggest sports brand in
the world - and explain why the football map looked like this at the beginning of the 90s.
Adidas supplied more than 60% of the national teams, and Nike had none!
Why does this even matter? Because there is A LOT of money at stake.
The global sportswear market is worth 300 billion.
And the World Cup, EURO, or Copa are some of the world’s biggest sporting events with
a huge global audience. So having your logo on the right shirts can mean big business.
That's also what Nike realized at the beginning of the 90s.
At that time, Nike knew nothing about football, and football knew nothing about Nike.
But at the 94 World Cup in the US, Nike Co-Founder Phil Knight saw the Brazilian
national team take the title in front of a record-breaking crowd. It made him think.
After conquering running, tennis, and basketball by signing the right athletes,
to become a truly global brand, Nike had to get into football.
And Knight had a plan. He told his employees that to understand
football truly, they had to see the game through the eyes of Brazilians.
And that's what they did. Two years later,
a $200 million 10 year-contract was signed in New York between the Brazilian federation and Nike.
Not only was the deal itself groundbreaking,
but it was also the way that Nike activated the partnership.
The Brazil national team killing time at the “Airport.”
“The Secret Tournament”, viral Ronaldinhos,
Joga Bonito, and robots taking over football. Nike truly left its mark on football culture.
And it paid off…Nike’s football sales went from 40 million in 94 to more than
2 billion in 2018 - also thanks to sponsoring the World Cup-winning
team in Russia. Nike had gained the ground to the all-time leader Adidas.
But they never managed to conquer one market. The largest European
one. They never really got a hold of Germany.
While Nike grew to become the market leader and overtook Adidas in more and more sports
and countries, German football was always Adidas territory. Adidas and the DFB was
almost like a holy relationship. The best players? Ballack, Kahn, Schweinsteiger,
Lahm, Müller, Neuer. For generations, all Adidas. The three stripes were untouchable.
So what the heck happened? How did Adidas lose its edge?
There is a lot hidden in the official announcement of the
DFB. Managing Director Holger Blask said that partnering with Nike was "the result
of a transparent and non-discriminatory tender. Nike submitted by far the best economic offer."
This might sound like the obvious. How else would the process have worked?
But it wasn't always like that. The DFB didn't always go for the best offer.
In 2006, Nike already tried to sign the DFB - with 500 million euros for ten years. That was
more than twice the Adidas offer, but somehow the DFB still stayed with Adidas. The controversial
decision even went to court because it was a little bit too obvious that something was
off - and decision makers influenced (=on the Adidas payroll) behind the scenes.
It was proof that the power of Adidas,
also a shareholder of Bayern Munich since 2002, was too great.
Bayern's CEO at the time said about a potential signing of the DFB with Nike:
"I have already told the DFB boss that our players will no longer be available."
Rumors had it that the old, German men running the DFB were afraid
they would have to start speaking English with their shirt supplier.
Reading the comments of Germany’s Vice Chancellor, you get the feeling that some
still live in those times. Thinking that it is a matter of patriotism when choosing
the main sponsor shows a complete lack of understanding of globalized sports in 2024.
It is not about where your brand partner is from, but what it can do for you. Nike pays
100m per year according to Handelsblatt, so around twice of what Adidas paid.
A distribution network of more than 6,000 stores around the world to put your jerseys
in front of customers helps as well. Or a storytelling machine that makes people
queue for your products like a bunch of sneakerheads for the newest Air Jordans.
Especially when you have some serious PR problems (greetings from Qatar).
After all, the DFB is not buying anything. They are selling. And the American company is willing
to pay significantly more to be involved in German football than the German competitor brand. Even
if the DFB didn't need cash, which they did, it would've been crazy not to take the Nike offer.
A DFB spokesperson said they wouldn't have left their long-time partner Adidas for only 2 million
more a year. But that the difference was so significant that if they had chosen Adidas
because of "loyalty and tradition", they would have probably had the public prosecutor in the
house the same day for corruption. So they had no choice but to go for the Nike offer.
Apparently, the Adidas offer was not competitive. But there is another
way to look at this. Adidas offered the market value. But Nike overpaid.
Because the German national team has more value for Nike than it has for Adidas. Think about the
portfolio of Adidas and Nike. It's not that difficult for Adidas to find a replacement
for Germany. France is up for grabs. And they are selling more Argentina jerseys anyway.
But Nike never got a hold of the German market. There are two top tier sports
marketing assets in Germany that beat everything else. There is Bayern Munich,
where Adidas is a shareholder so they are locked in forever. And there is the German national
team - that seemed to be locked in forever as well. Now Nike got the chance - and they took it.
But it wasn't only about the money. It's worth looking at
the differences between Adidas and Nike.
Adidas is all about the product. They're known for good shoes,
good balls, good apparel. Typical German engineering.
But they were always associated with institutions, from Fifa to the DFB.
Nike on the other hand is associated with athletes. And known for their marketing rather
than the technicalities of their products. They are best at telling good stories about
their athletes and products. And looking at players like Florian Wirtz or Jamal Musiala,
there are a lot of hidden gems to tell stories about to the world.
Athletic Interest viewers might know we are a bit biased, but:
Nike pays twice of what Adidas did. It’s the biggest sports federation
in the world partnering with the biggest sportswear brand in the world.
Nike is among the most popular brands among Gen Z, the next gen of sports fans.
The deal just makes sense. German football was as encrusted in its structures
as its team's play at the last two World Cups. But it looks like now there are people in charge
going for the best offer and willing to change things up even when headwinds are to be expected.
It is the end of an era. But if Nike does only half for the
German national team of what they did for the Brazilian national team in the 90s,
it could be a win-win-win for the brands, the association - and most importantly, the fans.
Nike finally gets its big asset in the German market. German football gets more
money to develop. And even Adidas might be better off this way, with a free budget to
spend wisely on other teams and athletes. Although this one might still hurt a while,
even the famous Adi Dassler statue has the DFB crest on its chest…
But who knows: maybe we see a romantic reunion story in 2034 when the Nike
contract ends. After all, Germany has some experience with reunions.
Browse More Related Video
The History of Adidas
Pestle Analysis NIKE 2019 - Nike Case Study | The Rise of Nike | MyAssignmenthelp
This SECRET Brand is KILLING Nike and Adidas in India? | Decathlon Business Case Study
Nike vs. Adidas: The Ultimate Sneaker Showdown.
بث مباشر | #هلا_كافيه، نستضيف: وليد بن جمعة العبيداني - المؤسس والمدير التنفيذي لشركة صناع الريا…
الجزائر تستعين بخبرة فوزي لقجع بعد الاقصاء من الكان وتستعد للتعاقد مع مدرب منتخب المغرب سابقا
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)