Kritik Naturalisasi Pemain, Anggota DPR Anita Jacoba Gah Dihujani Komentar Netizen | OneNews Update

Summary

Anita, a member of Indonesia's Commission 10, criticized the ongoing naturalization of foreign-born football players for the national team during a parliamentary meeting. She argued that Indonesia has enough talented athletes and should not rely on foreign players. Citing her experience in East Nusa Tenggara, she called for a focus on developing local talent through better coaching, rather than continually importing athletes. Her remarks, made in the presence of the Minister of Youth and Sports and PSSI officials, sparked debate about the future of naturalization in Indonesian football, with public reactions ranging from support to backlash.

Takeaways

• 😀 Anita, a member of Indonesia's DPR, criticized the naturalization of foreign-born players for the national football team (Timnas).
• 😀 She expressed concern that Indonesia relies too much on foreign players and should instead focus on developing local talent.
• 😀 Anita argued that Indonesia is not lacking in athletic potential and that regions like Nusa Tenggara Timur have many talented athletes in various sports.
• 😀 She questioned why Indonesia continues to bring in foreign players, suggesting that the focus should be on training and developing local athletes.
• 😀 Anita pointed out that Indonesia has already attempted the naturalization strategy several times without seeing significant success.
• 😀 She suggested that, if foreign expertise is needed, it should be in the form of foreign coaches, not players, to improve local training systems.
• 😀 The criticism from Anita came during a DPR meeting with officials from PSSI and Kemenpora on November 4, 2024.
• 😀 Anita emphasized that Indonesia's athletic development should not be dependent on imported players and that the country should invest in local coaches and training programs.
• 😀 Her remarks sparked strong reactions from Timnas supporters on social media, with many defending the naturalization process.
• 😀 The ongoing naturalization of three players—Kevin Dix Noa, Johana Lea Tomu, and Estella Lati—was a topic of discussion in the same meeting.
• 😀 The future of the naturalization program remains uncertain, with PSSI's next steps unclear in response to Anita's criticisms.

Q & A

What is Anita's primary criticism regarding Indonesia's national football team?

Anita criticizes the practice of naturalizing foreign players for Indonesia's national football team. She argues that Indonesia has enough local talent and should not rely on players from outside the country.

What does Anita believe about Indonesia's athletic potential?

Anita believes that Indonesia is not lacking in talented athletes and that there are many skilled individuals, especially in regions like Nusa Tenggara Timur, who could excel in sports such as football, athletics, and boxing.

How does Anita suggest improving Indonesia's football talent development?

Anita suggests focusing on improving local coaching and training infrastructure rather than relying on foreign athletes. She advocates for nurturing homegrown talent and questioning the continued importation of foreign players.

What was the context of Anita’s remarks about naturalization?

Anita made her remarks during a meeting of Commission 10 of the Indonesian Parliament, where the naturalization of foreign-born players was being discussed, specifically focusing on players like Kevin dix, Noa Johana Lea Tomu, and Estella Lati.

What is the central concern about naturalization that Anita raises?

Anita's central concern is that naturalization has not proven to be consistently successful and that Indonesia should focus on developing its own athletes instead of repeatedly turning to foreign players.

What are the implications of relying on foreign athletes for Indonesia's football future?

Relying on foreign athletes could undermine local talent development and lead to dependency on external sources rather than fostering a self-sustaining sports culture within Indonesia.

What is Anita’s stance on the success of previous naturalization efforts?

Anita is skeptical about the success of past naturalization efforts, noting that while some foreign players have been successful, the overall strategy has not consistently delivered the desired outcomes.

What specific region does Anita reference to highlight Indonesia's untapped athletic potential?

Anita references Nusa Tenggara Timur (East Nusa Tenggara), a region she describes as underdeveloped but rich in athletic talent that could be nurtured for success in various sports.

What does Anita recommend if foreign athletes are not the solution?

Anita recommends bringing in foreign coaches if necessary, rather than foreign players, to help train and develop local athletes to reach their full potential.

What is Anita's view on the future of naturalization in Indonesian football?

Anita hopes that the naturalization of foreign players will be the last resort, emphasizing the importance of focusing on local talent to ensure a sustainable and self-reliant sports future for Indonesia.