Interview with LARGEST CALL OF DUTY CHEAT PROVIDER!

Summary

In this video, the creator follows up on a previous interview with a Call of Duty cheater by interviewing 'Zeer,' a prominent cheat developer. Zeer provides insight into the world of cheating, discussing how cheats are created, why they go undetected, and the limitations of Call of Duty's anti-cheat system, Ricochet. Zeer highlights the issues with current anti-cheat measures and suggests improvements. The video also includes a giveaway for a custom controller and encourages viewers to demand better anti-cheat efforts from Call of Duty.

Takeaways

• 🎮 The video is an interview with 'Zeer', the developer and owner of a major Call of Duty cheat provider, who provides insights into the world of gaming cheats.
• 🕵️‍♂️ 'Zeer' has been involved in cheat development for over 10 years and focuses on creating unique, undetectable cheats by focusing on security and bypasses.
• 🔒 The Call of Duty anti-cheat system, Ricochet, is described as bare-bones and lacking in several critical detections for both internal and external cheats, including DMA and computer vision cheats.
• 💡 Ricochet's anti-cheat efforts are hindered by a lack of funding, talent, and freedom, suggesting that Activision and Microsoft may not be fully committed to combating cheating.
• 🤖 The interview discusses the use of DMA (Direct Memory Access) cheats, which involve hardware that can read a game's memory in a way that is difficult for anti-cheat systems to detect.
• 🖼️ The potential of computer vision in cheating is highlighted, where AI models are trained to detect enemies in games, potentially leading to undetectable aimbot and triggerbot functionalities.
• 🎁 The video includes a giveaway of a fully kitted out controller from Aim controllers, emphasizing the quality and preference for this brand by the video creator.
• 📊 Ricochet assigns a 'trust score' to players, influencing how many reports are needed for a shadowban, with new accounts being more susceptible to shadowbans due to lower trust scores.
• 🚫 The shadowban system used by Ricochet is criticized for being ineffective and affecting both cheaters and legitimate players indiscriminately.
• 🛑 'Zeer' suggests that Activision should invest more in anti-cheat measures, including hiring more talent, using trusted computing modules for player identification, and implementing more comprehensive detections.
• 🕊️ Despite the prevalence of cheats, there is a denial that Activision or Ricochet collaborates with cheat providers or enables cheating in any way.

Q & A

Who is Zeer and what is his role in the Call of Duty community?

Zeer is the sole developer and owner of a cheat provider for the Call of Duty game series. He spends most of his time researching, reverse engineering, developing cheats, and selling them.

What is the primary challenge in verifying the authenticity of the interview with Zeer?

The main challenge was to verify the interview's authenticity without naming the provider, which could risk the video being taken down by Call of Duty. Zeer validated the interview by adding his Twitter handle to his website and tweeting about the interview.

How long has Zeer been involved in cheat development for Call of Duty?

Zeer has been involved in cheat development for more than 10 years, with a few years specifically dedicated to developing cheats for Call of Duty.

What measures does Ricochet, the anti-cheat system for Call of Duty, take to detect and counter cheating?

Ricochet collects data from players, such as hardware identifiers and running processes. It monitors components of the Windows operating system that are often abused by cheaters and protects the game's memory to prevent cheating.

How does the Ricochet anti-cheat system evaluate and issue Shadow bans to Call of Duty players?

The server-side component of Ricochet evaluates available information for Call of Duty players and issues Shadow bans if deemed necessary. It assigns a trust score to each player based on account age, stats, and behavior, which determines how many reports are needed for a Shadow ban.

What are Zeer's criticisms of the Ricochet anti-cheat system?

Zeer criticizes Ricochet for lacking several critical generic detections for internal and external cheats, not including detections for DMA cheating or computer vision-based cheating, and for not focusing enough on keeping known cheaters off the game due to easily circumvented hardware bans.

How does Zeer suggest Activision and the Ricochet team could improve the anti-cheat measures for Call of Duty?

Zeer suggests that Activision should hire more talent, invest more money into anti-cheat, and give the Ricochet team more freedom to implement necessary measures. He also recommends using trusted computing modules for player identification, getting rid of the Shadow ban system, and implementing more general cheat detections.

Are there cheats available for Call of Duty on consoles, and how popular are they expected to become?

While it's hard to get access to the game's memory on consoles due to their locked-down nature, there are ways to cheat on console, and Zeer predicts that console cheating will become very popular in the near future.

What are the four methods Zeer mentions for cheating on consoles?

The four methods are: 1) Using cheat software on PC to share game information with a console player via a web browser, 2) Using a hardware device that mimics controller input on console, 3) Using computer vision object detection models to identify enemies on the screen, and 4) Capturing and decrypting network traffic to identify player locations.

What is Zeer's opinion on the prevalence of high-profile content creators or streamers using cheats?

Zeer states that high-profile individuals do not reveal their identity when purchasing cheats, using methods like throwaway email addresses and Bitcoin payments, making it difficult to confirm if they are using cheats.

What does Zeer believe the future of cheating in video games will involve?

Zeer believes that DMA and computer vision cheats are the unstoppable future of cheating in video games, as they are becoming more widespread and difficult to detect.

How does Zeer describe the process of developing cheats for new Call of Duty games before their official release?

Zeer explains that cheat developers work during the game's Early Access beta, often with customers who pre-order the game to provide them access. The engine, game, and security changes between titles are similar enough that adding support for a new game is relatively easy.

What is Zeer's estimate of the percentage of PC players using cheats in Call of Duty?

Zeer does not provide a specific percentage but mentions that there are at least tens of thousands of cheaters, emphasizing that even one cheater can ruin the experience for all other players in a game lobby.

What are DMA cheats and how do they work according to Zeer?

DMA cheats involve using a DMA board plugged into a computer running the game. The board can read the game's memory in a hard-to-detect way, and with the right firmware, it can mask as a legitimate PCIe device. The cheat software runs on a separate computer, using the game's memory read from the board to provide cheats like radar or ESP.

How does Zeer evaluate the effectiveness of the current anti-cheat measures against DMA and computer vision cheats?

Zeer believes that while some anti-cheat measures can detect lower-end DMA and computer vision cheats, advanced methods that use separate devices for screen capture, input, and running the AI model are nearly undetectable.

What does Zeer suggest is the role of Activision and Microsoft in the development of anti-cheat measures for Call of Duty?

Zeer implies that Activision and Microsoft should invest more in anti-cheat measures, hire more talented individuals, and give them the freedom to implement effective anti-cheat strategies, despite the lack of direct profit from such investments.

Outlines

00:00

🕵️‍♂️ Interview with a Call of Duty Cheat Developer

The video script begins with the host discussing a previous interview with a Call of Duty cheater, which led to an unexpected response from 'Zeer,' the developer and owner of a major cheat provider. Zeer offers insights into the world of game cheating, explaining the challenges of creating undetectable cheats and the limitations of the Ricochet anti-cheat system. The host also announces a giveaway of a high-end gaming controller and discusses the verification process of the interview's authenticity through Zeer's Twitter account.

05:02

🛡️ Analysis of Ricochet Anti-Cheat System's Ineffectiveness

In this paragraph, the conversation delves into the shortcomings of the Ricochet anti-cheat system, which lacks essential generic detections and struggles to keep up with the evolving tactics of cheat developers. The speaker, Zeer, criticizes the system's over-reliance on the Shadow ban mechanism and its failure to effectively deter cheating. He suggests that Activision and Microsoft are not investing adequately in anti-cheat measures, leading to a subpar gaming experience for legitimate players.

10:04

🎮 Console Cheating Methods and the Future of Cheating

The script addresses the issue of cheating on consoles, which is more challenging due to their closed nature, but not impossible. Zeer outlines various methods cheaters use on consoles, including sharing game data through web browsers, using hardware devices to mimic controller input, and employing computer vision models to detect enemies. He predicts that console cheating will become increasingly popular and discusses the potential for Activision to improve their anti-cheat measures if they invest more resources and grant the Ricochet team greater freedom.

15:04

🤖 The Rise of DMA and Computer Vision Cheating Techniques

This section explores the advanced cheating methods of DMA and computer vision. DMA involves using a hardware board to read the game's memory, while computer vision employs AI models to detect enemies on the screen. Zeer explains how these methods work and how they can be nearly undetectable by current anti-cheat systems. He also discusses the potential for these techniques to become mainstream and the challenges they pose to maintaining fair gameplay.

20:04

🏆 The Impact of Cheating on Competitive Integrity and the Call for Change

The final paragraph wraps up the interview with a reflection on the state of cheating in Call of Duty and the need for Activision to take action. Zeer emphasizes that while cheating can never be completely eradicated, it can be managed better. The host calls for the Call of Duty community to demand change and highlights the disparity between the information provided by a cheat developer and the lack of transparency from Activision. The host also promotes a fellow YouTuber for further insights and thanks the sponsor for supporting the video.

Keywords

💡Call of Duty

Call of Duty is a popular first-person shooter video game franchise. In the script, it is the central theme as the video discusses the issue of cheating in its online multiplayer modes. The video interviews a cheat developer for the game, highlighting the challenges faced by the game's anti-cheat system, Ricochet, in detecting and preventing cheating.

💡Cheating

Cheating in this context refers to the use of unauthorized software or methods to gain an unfair advantage in video games, specifically in Call of Duty. The script explores the prevalence of cheating, the methods used, and the impact on the gaming community. It is a key issue being addressed in the video, with insights provided by a cheat developer.

💡Ricochet

Ricochet is the anti-cheat system used in Call of Duty games. The script discusses its effectiveness and limitations in detecting and preventing cheating. It is a critical component in the video's discussion on how cheats often go undetected and the challenges faced by the game developers in curbing cheating.

💡Cheats

Cheats, in the context of the video, are software or hardware solutions that allow players to cheat in games. The script mentions the development, sale, and use of cheats in Call of Duty, emphasizing the sophistication of these tools and their ability to evade detection by anti-cheat systems like Ricochet.

💡Zeer

Zeer is the username of the interviewee in the script, who is a developer and owner of a cheat provider. His perspective provides an inside look into the world of game cheating, discussing the development of cheats, their undetectability, and the interaction with anti-cheat systems.

💡Shadowban

Shadowban is a term used in the script to describe a measure taken by the Call of Duty anti-cheat system where players suspected of cheating are temporarily banned from the game. The script critiques this system as ineffective, as it affects both cheaters and legitimate players and can be easily circumvented.

💡DMA (Direct Memory Access)

DMA cheats, as mentioned in the script, are a type of cheating method where a hardware device is used to read the game's memory directly, making it difficult for anti-cheat systems to detect. The script discusses this advanced method of cheating and its implications for game integrity.

💡Computer Vision

Computer vision in the script refers to the use of AI models to detect enemies in a video game, which can then be used for cheating purposes such as aiming assistance. The script predicts that this technology will become more widespread and difficult to counteract in the future.

💡Hardware Bans

Hardware bans are a measure taken against cheaters where their hardware identifiers are banned from the game. The script discusses the effectiveness of this method and how it can be circumvented by cheaters using spoofers or replacement hardware.

💡Trust Score

The trust score, as mentioned in the script, is a metric used by Call of Duty's anti-cheat system to evaluate player behavior and determine the likelihood of cheating. The script suggests that new accounts have a low trust score, making them more susceptible to shadowbans when reported.

💡Console Cheating

Console cheating refers to the use of cheats on gaming consoles, which are typically more difficult to implement due to the closed nature of these systems. The script outlines several methods cheaters use to cheat on consoles, highlighting the adaptability of cheat developers.

Highlights

Interview with a Call of Duty cheat developer reveals insights into the world of in-game cheating.

Zeer, the developer, discusses the complexity and security of creating undetectable cheats for Call of Duty.

The challenges of reverse engineering cheat software and the difficulty for anti-cheat teams to implement reliable detection.

Ricochet anti-cheat's limitations and its ineffectiveness against certain types of cheating, including dma and computer vision-based cheats.

The role of Activision's investment and the need for more talented individuals to improve anti-cheat measures.

Zeer's opinion on the ineffectiveness of the Shadow ban system and its impact on both cheaters and legitimate players.

The potential of console cheating to become popular with the use of various methods to access game memory.

Suggestions for Call of Duty to improve anti-cheat, including trusted computing, permanent hardware bans, and dedicated teams for cheat provider detection.

The difficulty in detecting dma cheats and the potential for advanced anti-cheats to give them some trouble.

Computer vision cheats, how they work, and their potential to become mainstream in the future.

The use of AI models in detecting enemies in video games and the challenges of detecting computer vision cheats.

The likelihood of high-profile content creators or streamers using cheats and the anonymity provided by cheat developers.

Zeer's skepticism about Call of Duty's commitment to improving their anti-cheat system due to profitability concerns.

The process of cheat developers preparing for new Call of Duty releases and the ease of adapting existing cheats.

Estimates of the percentage of PC players using cheats in Call of Duty and the impact of a single cheater on the game's integrity.

A discussion on dma and computer vision cheats being the future of cheating in video games and their potential to be undetectable.

The conclusion of the interview emphasizing the need for change in Call of Duty's approach to anti-cheat and the community's role in demanding it.

Transcripts

as many of you know a few weeks ago I

made a video where I interviewed a Call

of Duty cheater that interview put me on

a path to find some answers I reached

out to Call of Duty directly but as you

could expect I was ignored but little

did I know answers were coming but not

from the source that I was expecting the

owner of one of the largest Call of Duty

cheat providers reached out to help

provide some clarity to the questions

that we all want answers to so tell me a

little bit about who you are and what

you do my username is zeer I'm the soul

developer and own owner of the cheat

provider most of my everyday life has

spent researching reverse engineering

developing cheats and selling them are

there cheats available on console and if

so how popular are they going to become

before we get any further I will be

giving away a fully kitted out

controller from Aim controllers these

controllers are amazing I've been using

one for more than a year and I would

never use another brandom controller at

this point they really are that good all

you have to do to enter the giveaway is

subscribe like the video and reply down

below I will pick one win winner on the

12th and I will reply to you in the

comments if you've won buckle up for

this video it's going to be a wild ride

the most challenging part of doing this

interview was trying to figure out a way

to verify that the interview was real

without naming the provider which would

put the video at risk to be taken down

by Call of Duty and I did it to protect

myself to prove the legitimacy of this

interview zeer simply added his Twitter

to his website at the bottom and then

tweeted from that Twitter that the

interview with me is real those that

need validation will easily be able to

find the information with all that being

said let's hop right into the interview

so tell me a little bit about who you

are and what you do my username is zeer

I'm the sole developer and owner of the

cheat provider most of my everyday life

has spent researching reverse

engineering developing cheats and

selling them how long have you been

creating cheats and how long have you

been creating Call of Duty cheats I've

been involved in cheat development in

general for more than 10 years I've been

developing cheats for Call of Duty for a

few years so why are cheats able to go

undetect ected for so long a lot of

people think that Ricochet can simply

buy undetected cheats and detect them

but it isn't that easy I make unique

bypasses and focus on security so that

it's hard for the anti-che team to

reverse engineer our unique bypasses and

see how they function it is incredibly

hard to reverse engineer most cheat

software and even if they get the job

done it wouldn't necessarily be clear to

the antiche team how they could

Implement a reliable detection with

without false positives so what does the

Call of Duty anti-che actually do

Ricochet collects data from players such

as Hardware identifiers and information

on running processes it also monitors

components of the Windows operating

system that are often abused by cheaters

the anti-che does what it can to protect

access to the game's memory which

includes useful information such as

player locations ricochets driver

protects itself and other components of

the anti-che and is usually used for

targeted detections of cheat providers

selling kernel cheat software Ricochet

server side component evaluates

available information for Call of Duty

players and issues them Shadow bands if

it's deemed necessary as far as I can

tell through large scale testing and

other factors Call of Duty assigns a

trust score to each player based on

account age stats

behavioristic and other factors this

trust score determines how many reports

a player needs to be shadowbanned new

accounts have a very low trust score by

default which is why new players who get

reported a few times will be

shadowbanned extremely low trust score

can result in Kill limits and

disconnects is Ricochet anti-che as good

as it should be or as good as it could

be Ricochet is an extremely bare

anti-che Ricochet does not include

several critical generic detections for

internal and external cheats Ricochet

does not include any detections at all

or even flags for dma cheating or other

novel methods of cheating such as

computer vision based cheating in

addition Ricochet implements targeted

detections of popular cheat providers

too rarely for how many popular

providers exist for Call of Duty and

Ricochet seems to have poor judgment

about which providers to Target finally

Ricochet does not focus enough on

keeping known cheaters off their game

their Hardware banss are easy to get

around they don't hardware Ban known

cheaters until the cheater has been

permanently banned two or more times for

cheating Ricochet seems far too focused

on their server side Shadow band system

which is ineffective because it affects

legitimate players just as much as it

affects closet cheaters and Shadow bands

remove after a few days for both closet

cheaters and legitimate players what is

the cause of the Ricochet anti-che

coming up so short against detecting

cheating Ricochet seems to lack funding

talent and freedom in terms of funding

Activision's investors may not be

interested in seeing Activision invest

heavily in anti-che because anti-che

doesn't have a clear return on

investment in terms of talent and

freedom team Ricochet needs more

talented individuals with experience and

those individuals need to be free to do

what they feel needs to be done to stop

cheating I can imagine that the Ricochet

team is likely running into many walls

with Activision and Microsoft in terms

of being able to implement what they

need to implement to decrease cheating

is the shadow band system useful in

discouraging cheating the shadowban

system is ineffective closet cheaters

who get reported are shadowbanned for

for a few days and legitimate players

who get reported are shadowbanned for a

few days it's a system that temporarily

affects closet cheaters and legitimate

players both every cheater I've seen get

a shadow ban had their Shadow ban

removed after a few days unless it was

during an actual detection cheaters will

just ask for more time on their

subscription to compensate for the

shadow ban and then they'll wait it out

the shadowband system and spmm both

enforce my theory that Call of Duty is

pandering to Casual players

skilled legitimate players are paired

with all of the game's cheaters thanks

to spmm and everyone in these lobbies

periodically gets Shadow ban meanwhile

casual players enjoy the game freely

Call of Duty shouldn't neglect their

competitive player base because Cod is a

competitive FPS game are there cheats

available on console and if so how

popular are they going to become it's

hard to get access to the game's memory

on Console because consoles are locked

down however there are four ways to

cheat on console that I know of one if a

console player has someone on their team

who is on PC that PC player could use

cheat software to read The Game's memory

and find information like enemy

locations in the match with this

information the PC cheater can share via

web browser a radar with their console

friend two the console cheater can use a

hardware device that mimics controller

input to help the cheater with things

like recoil three the cheater can

capture their gameplay and use a

computer vision object detection model

to identify enemies on the screen after

enemies on the screen are identified the

cheater could use either a hardware or

mechanical method to move their aim to

the detected enemies and handle recoil

which accomplishes Aimbot and recoil

control triggerbot could also be

accomplished which is when your gun

automatically shoots anytime an enemy is

in your Crosshair four the cheater can

capture Network traffic decrypt it and

figure out what network traffic they can

use to identify player locations which

can be drawn on a radar on a separate

device

all forms of console cheating are going

to become very popular in the near

future cheaters do not want to be

limited only to PC do you feel that Call

of Duty could make the anti-che better

if they wanted to yes if Activision

hired more Talent invested more money

into anti-che and gave the Ricochet team

more freedom to do what they need to do

the anti-che would be infinitely better

Activision and Microsoft undoubtedly

have the resources necessary to make

cheating a nonissue on Call of Duty what

do you feel that Call of Duty should be

doing to fix the cheating issue first

keep known cheaters off the game by

using trusted Computing modern

motherboards have a trusted platform

module chip Call of Duty needs to force

their player base to enable their TPM so

they can use their players TPM for

identification the TPM cannot be spoofed

so players would be identifiable at all

times without the ability to change

their IP or spoof Hardware identifiers

to get out of their hardware Ban

Ricochet also needs to permanently

Hardware any known cheaters after the

first offense using the TPM instead of

after two offenses which is what they do

now second get rid of the Shadow band

system instead of automatically putting

players in a Timeout that lifts after a

few days Ricochet needs to allocate more

server resources and even human

resources to review the most flagged and

reported players on the game while

letting them play the result of these

deeper reviews should be a permanent ban

and deep hardware Ban if cheating is

detected Beyond a reasonable doubt this

will enable legitimate players to enjoy

the game while cheaters slowly get

permanently removed from the Call of

Duty experience third Implement more

General internal and external cheat

detections most modern anti-cheats

detect many bypasses that work on

Ricochet currently fourth acquire a

dedicated team for targeting cheat

providers they might current be hiring

third parties for targeted detections

but they need talent hired full-time on

team Ricochet to reverse engineer and

detect the larger cheat providers every

targeted detection should include the

team logging who is using the cheat for

a few weeks to ensure the ban wave

affects all users of that cheat

provider every cheater detected by

targeted detections needs to be issued

the deepest hardware Ban possible after

the the first offense including their

TPM but also additional Hardware

identifiers that aren't usually

implemented for generic Hardware bands

this would be clever because even if a

cheater replaces their TPM chip or

motherboard and uses a spoofer they

would be surprised to still be Hardware

banned because most spoofers will only

spoof identifiers Bann for generic

Hardware bands by grabbing additional

identifiers in special circumstances

Ricochet will be able to implement

Hardware bands that persist most

spoofers and even Hardware replacement

imagine buying new hardware and buying a

spoofer to evade a hardware Ban only to

be Hardware banned again this would make

most cheaters give

up Fifth Implement several blocks and

detections for dma dma cheaters use

Hardware that masks itself as a

legitimate device like a network card

for example Ricochet needs to outright

block unnecessary devices from being

used while the game is running this

would mean that even if a hacker masked

their dma device perfectly as a

legitimate device it would still be

blocked Ricochet then needs to implement

scans and detections to distinguish the

remaining devices between dma devices

and legitimate devices cheaters use

firmware to mass their dma devices as

legitimate so this task can be done by

targeting popular dma firmware providers

and implementing things like timing or

latency checks for

flagging these implementations would not

solve dma cheating but would assist

Ricochet in detecting or blocking lower

end dma firmware finally as for computer

vision cheets some mechanism exists to

capture the screen and handle input

Additionally the AI model has to run

somewhere Ricochet could look into

detecting these three vectors as best

they

can dma and computer vision sheets are

an impossible problem to fully solve

Ricochet would simply do their best to

limit the problem so I see people ask

this question a lot does Call of Duty

allow some providers to operate and do

some providers work with Activision this

is my favorite rumor no Activision and

Ricochet do not collaborate with or

enable cheaters at all some game

companies do hire cheaters for anti-che

efforts which I think is smart but I've

never heard of Activision or Microsoft

doing this in these situations a game

company would hire a cheat developer to

work on their anti-che team under the

agreement that the cheater ceases all

cheat development activity do you think

that the current anti-che is a failure

and that Call of Duty is completely to

blame for the anti-che not working

Ricochet is not a failure but it is

inexcusably incomplete an Activision

should issue the players an apology for

the lack of resources being invested

into anti-che they should then convince

their investors that investing in anti

anti-che will have an indirect return

and move forward with hiring more talent

and paying them well Activision should

also consider hiring Cooperative cheat

developers that they discover the

identities of instead of attacking them

anyone hired should be given enough

freedom to limit the cheating problem

effectively so how long does it take

cheat developers to come back online

undetected once they have been detected

most talented cheat developers can have

their cheat fully undetected again

within a few days or weeks some cheat

providers have a much harder time fixing

detections it depends on the cheat

developer and what methods they use to

figure out what component of their cheat

was detected I can't go into too much

detail here because I'm really

protective of the methods I use to stay

ahead of Ricochet how can cheat

providers have cheats ready for the new

Call of Duty games before they are

released we develop our cheats during

the game's Early Access beta usually we

have customers who pre-order the game

for us and pass access to us the engine

game and security changes between each

new Call of Duty title are similar

enough that it's very easy to add

support for a new game for the last

three Call of Duty releases it took me a

few hours or less what percentage of PC

players do you think are using cheats on

Call of Duty I have no idea what

percentage of PC players are cheating at

any given time tens of thousands at

least the game has more legitimate

players than cheaters obviously but in a

game of war zone for example it only

takes one cheater to ruin the

competitive integrity for all 100 or

more other players in the lobby now

here's a question I know people want to

know do you know if there's any

high-profile content creators or

streamers using cheats I get asked this

a lot but the boring truth is that

high-profile people do not tell me who

they are they buy my cheats using

throwaway email addresses and pay with

Bitcoin I don't ask my customers for any

personal information at all I do get

asked by customers for my advice

regarding cheating while streaming or

cheating into tournaments but I am never

sure if the person asking me these

questions is a high-profile Creator or

streamer sometimes people ask me to make

them a custom private cheat but I

explained to them that even high-profile

cheaters just use publicly available

cheats with Good Records the custom

private cheats for sale all over Discord

for example are just scams they are copy

and pasted projects being marketed as

private options for streamers it's

completely bogus a truly unique bypass

and cheat takes immense effort to make

an equality cheat being used by

thousands is safer than a crap cheat

being used by one do you expect Call of

Duty to actually improve their anti-che

anytime soon I don't think so anti-che

is not profitable in a measurable way

anti-che requires complete passion and

dedication to stopping cheaters

Activision is a public traded company

that was just acquired by another

publicly traded company I do not think

this idea of spending millions of

dollars on on a proper anti-che without

any measurable return on investment

would appeal to either company

meaningful anti-cheats are created by

companies who throw away the concept of

profit and become determined to stop

cheaters for the sake of their game so

we mentioned dma earlier so what are dma

cheats and how does it work let's talk

about making a cheat right now I need

access to the game's memory right I need

to read it because the game's memory

tells me everything I need to know it

tells me where the enemy are where I am

it gives me information I can use to

draw enemies from my screen's

two-dimensional perspective if I shoot

someone their health will change in the

game's memory the game's memory is

everything well with dma cheating I put

a dma board into my computer running the

game the dma board is just a hardware

board that plugs into a pcie slot on my

motherboard this board can read The

Game's memory in a way that is very hard

to detect now to prevent the anti-che

from from detecting this board I plugged

into my computer I will flash firmware

to the board that masks it as a

legitimate pcie device I could maybe buy

a Wi-Fi adapter that is a PCI board and

reverse the firmware for that board and

mimic it with my dma board for example I

then connect a cable to my dma board and

put that cable into another computer

this other computer is where my cheat

software will run and use the game's

memory that is reading from the board I

can then have a game memory based cheat

without anything changing in the memory

of the game's computer I could for

example draw a radar on my second PC or

any device I want showing my location

and the enemy locations if I really

wanted to get Advanced I could use

what's called a fuser to show my ESP

over the game on the monitor I'm using

to play the game a fuser outputs your

second computer's display output over

your first computer's display output and

then removes the color black so so I

could draw my ESP with a black

background on my second computer and

then put it over my game display and

remove the black background what remains

is ESP overlaying my game without any

detection vectors because the fuser

mimics my monitor for Aimbot and

triggerbot I can use a hardware device

called a km box this device mimics one

Mouse input when in reality my second

computer's cheat software is helping me

control my mouse could dma cheats be

detected with with a proper anti-che

Riot Vanguard has done okay against poor

to medium quality dma firmware

particularly the mass sold options dma

is very hard to stop entirely but I

think the best examples of anti-cheats

in the world will give dma cheaters a

bit of trouble long term Call of Duty is

probably not going to do anything

meaningful to stop dma do you think that

dma will be the future of cheating in

video games dma and computer vision

cheats are the Unstoppable future of

cheating so we spoke about computer

vision earlier so what is computer

vision and how are cheat developers

using it basically you train an AI model

to detect enemies in a video game then

you use some undetected method for

capturing the screen and another

undetected method for input so that you

can automatically detect enemies on the

screen and aim at them with recoil

control triggerbot is also possible is

computer vision being used on PC or

console or on both it's being used on

both will get better as the underlying

technology advances cheaters are not

advancing computer vision technology

larger companies like car manufacturers

are funding and advancing computer

vision for use cases such as

self-driving cars and cheaters are

utilizing publicly available releases

for the purposes of cheating one example

is the you only look once model are dma

and computer vision being used now and

are they available for most cheap

providers dma and computer vision are

are starting to become more widespread

in the near future they will both be

rampant I don't think competitive

Integrity will ever exist in gaming but

the goal should be to limit the cheating

problem as much as possible what kind of

anti-che would you need to detect

computer vision any traditional

anti-cheat would be fine assuming the

cheater is using only one device if the

computer vision cheat is running on the

same computer as the game the antiche

could just find it with the same methods

it uses to find other types of running

cheat software and Advanced computer

vision setups that use novel methods for

screen capture novel methods for input

and run the AI model on a separate

device are in my opinion unable to be

beaten by any type of anti-che how soon

before cheats that use computer vision

become mainstream they are getting quite

popular they will be mainstream in the

cheating space soon the technology needs

a bit more time to improve for certain

games where enemies aren't as visually

clear as they are in a game like CS2

what an AI anti antiche be the only

effective detection method for computer

vision and dma there are traditional

anti-che measures that can be taken

client side against some dma and

computer vision cheaters the dma

hardware is plugged into the computer

running the game so the device can be

scanned and tested by Advanced

anti-cheats dma devices with poor

quality firmware are easier to detect in

terms of computer vision the antiche

could look for methods of capturing the

screen influencing input or the AI model

itself if it's running on the same

devices the game the problems arise with

Advanced dma firmware or Advanced

computer vision cheating methods you

could theoretically use Hardware to

capture your gameplay Hardware to

influence your input and run the AI

model on a separate device doing this

would be nearly undetectable just like

dma cheaters with proper firmware and

cheats that don't write to the game's

memory are nearly undetectable in these

situations cheating becomes a fact that

Gamers have to deal with there is no

magic server side AI anti-che coming

proper closet cheaters are

indistinguishable from legitimate

players even when reviewed by AI so

that's pretty much the end of the

interview uh I don't know what else to

say other than Call of Duty has some

serious questions to answer right now we

just got more answers from a cheat

developer than we have from Call of Duty

in 4 years my mind was blown from this

interview and i' learned a lot and I'm

honored that I was able to be the person

to bring you this information and I will

always stand with the Call of Duty

Community we all need to demand change

from Call of Duty right now and nothing

less it's time for some change those of

you guys that would like more of a deep

dive on this information I highly

encourage you to go check out it's HOA

on YouTube I will put his channel in the

description below he's got some stuff in

the works coming out in a few days on

this exact information and I would also

like to give a massive shout out to aim

controllers they hooked me up with some

free controllers to give out to the

community for giveaways so be sure to go

on socials show them some love for

helping out and if you do buy a

controller from as use code caps to

check out much love Gamers and I will

catch you guys in the next

[Music]

video