Post-debate round table talk: Political analysts react to historic presidential showdown

Summary

このスクリプトは、CNNの大統領選討論番組の後番組を要約しています。政治分析家パネルと地域の選挙ウォッチパーティーからの報告者、さらに北フロリダ大学の学生が若年層の投票についてコメントしています。選挙討論の熱い瞬間や、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の激しい言葉の交換が取り上げられました。特に、移民、外交政策、経済、そして選挙討論における個人的な攻撃が注目されました。分析家はバイデン氏の体力と精神的適性、トランプ氏の自己規制の不足について議論しました。

Takeaways

• 📺 このスクリプトは、CNNの大統領選挙デバトの後番組を表しており、政治分析家やリポーター、さらにはノースカロライナ大学の学生が参加しています。
• 🗣 デバトでは、特に邊境巡視や選挙に関する熱烈な議論が行われ、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の間には強い対立があることがわかります。
• 🎙️ マイクミュートのシステムが導入されており、これによりより秩序正しい議論が行われることが期待されましたが、両者ともに質問への答えが不十分でした。
• 👴 トランプ氏は、自分の息子が犯罪者ではないと主張し、バイデン氏の息子に関連する非難を繰り返しました。
• 👴 バイデン氏は、トランプ氏の過去の政治的行動と、特に移民政策や外国との関係について批判しました。
• 🔍 トランプ氏は、自分の政権下ではテロがなかったと主張し、経済的圧力を通じてテロ組織に資金を提供しないようにとしていたと語りました。
• 🤔 トランプ氏とバイデン氏の両者の精神的、身体的適性について、国民が疑問を持つことが示唆されています。
• 📉 デバトでは、インフレという重要な問題があまり議論されず、選挙にかかわる重要な問題として浮上しなかったことが注目されます。
• 📹 スクリーンを分割することで、両者の反応を同時に観察することができましたが、バイデン氏は特にエネルギーに欠ける様子が目立ちました。
• 🗳️ デバトは、どちらの候補者にも好意を持たない選挙者にとって、特に助けになりませんでした。彼らが両者ともに持つ問題点を再度強調しただけです。
• 🌐 外国政策に関する議論では、特にアフガニスタンからの撤退や中東情勢が取り上げられ、トランプ氏は自らの政権下での外交政策の成果を強調しました。

Q & A

このトークショーは何についての議論をしていますか？

このトークショーは、CNNの大統領選挙デbateの後番組であり、政治分析家や報道関係者、さらには北フロリダ大学の学生らが参加して、選挙デbateの分析と議論を行っています。

トークショーで取り上げられた主なトピックは何ですか？

トークショーでは、国境パトロール、移民、選挙権、外国政策、経済、そして個人的な攻撃など、様々なトピックが議論されています。

トークショーのゲストはどのように選ばれましたか？

ゲストには政治分析家、地元の牧師、政治戦略家、そして元市長のチーフオブスタッフなどが参加しており、彼らはトークショーに多角的な視点を提供しています。

トークショーでディベートが行われた理由は何ですか？

ディベートは、選挙デbateの後で行われ、選挙デbateで見られた激しい瞬間や、各候補者の主張や政策について分析し、議論するためです。

トークショーでディベートが行われた背景には何がありますか？

ディベートの背景には、選挙デbateでの両候補者の激しい言い合いや、選挙戦における彼らの戦略やビジョンの違いがあります。

トークショーで特に注目されたのはどの部分ですか？

特に注目されたのは、候補者の声やエネルギー、そして彼らがどのように質問に答えるか、また、どのように自分たちの物語を伝えるかという部分です。

トークショーで議論された「ダブルヘッダー」とは何を指しますか？

「ダブルヘッダー」とは、どちらの候補者とも支持したくないという立場の有権者を指しており、彼らがどちらの候補者からも納得のいく答えを得られるかどうかが議論の焦点です。

トークショーで言及された「ナレッジ」とは何を意味していますか？

「ナレッジ」とは、候補者が持つ物語やイメージ、そして彼らが国民に対してどのように印象を与えるかを指しており、これは選挙戦で重要な要素とされています。

トークショーでディベートの形式について何が言及されましたか？

ディベートの形式については、マイクのミュート機能の試験的な導入が話題となり、これは将来のディベートに向けての可能性があるとされています。

トークショーでディベートの主な問題点は何だと指摘されましたか？

ディベートの主な問題点としては、候補者の質問への答えの質、特に質問に直接答えなかったり、関係ない話題に飛び迂んだりすることが指摘されました。

トークショーでディベートの結果についてどのように評価されていますか？

ディベートの結果は、両候補者のエネルギーやコマンド、そして彼らがどのように議論に臨んだかに基づいて評価されており、特にジョー・バイデンのエネルギーとコマンドについて疑問が投げかけられています。

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ 政治分析家の見解: 熾烈な議論の分析

この段落では、CNNの政治分析家たちが大統領選挙討論の後で、熾烈な議論の瞬間を振り返っています。彼らは特に、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の間の激しい言葉の交換に焦点を当てています。トランプ氏は、より多くの国境警備隊員と署名を増やすことで何ができるかという議論を主張しています。バイデン氏は、トランプ氏の過去のコメントを引用し、彼が自分の言葉を理解していないと非難しています。さらに、トランプ氏の息子についても議論が行われ、彼が既に有罪判決を受けているか、または将来有罪判決を受ける可能性があると述べています。

05:01

📊 選挙の7つの主要な問題: 政治戦略とメディアの役割

この段落では、2024年の選挙において重要な7つの問題がNBCニュースによって紹介されています。それらは、中絶と女性権利、移民と南部国境、医療保障と医薬品の価格、税金、最高裁判所の裁判官、外国との貿易、そしてNATOと外国政策、ロシアとウクライナの戦争、そして中東の戦争に関する懸念です。さらに、トランプ氏とバイデン氏が外交政策に関する議論を行っている様子が語られており、トランプ氏は自らの政権下でテロがなかったことを主張しています。分析家たちは、トランプ氏とバイデン氏のメディアでの表現と、それが選挙に与える影響について議論しています。

10:02

🤔 選挙戦の戦略と候補者のイメージ

最後の段落では、トランプ氏とバイデン氏の選挙戦戦略が分析されています。トランプ氏はエネルギー的な姿勢を示し、バイデン氏は議論に集中しようとしていますが、その姿勢が常に伝わったわけではないと指摘されています。分析家は、バイデン氏が特にエネルギー的な姿勢を示さなければならず、選挙戦においてはそれが求められると述べています。また、トランプ氏は議論の中で自分の意見をはっきりと主張する必要があるとしています。彼らは、どちらの候補者にも選挙戦においては改善点があると結論付けています。

Keywords

💡大統領選挙

大統領選挙とは、国家の最高行政権を有する大統領を選出する選挙のことです。このビデオの主題は2024年の大統領選挙であり、両当事者が選挙に関連した様々な問題について論戦していることを示しています。例えば、「2 MAJOR WARS GOING ON」というフレーズは、選挙において重要な議題となっている外交政策や安全保障問題を示しています。

💡政策

政策とは、政府が国民の生活や国家の運営に影響を与えるための施策や方針のことを指します。ビデオでは、移民や保健、税金、最高裁判所の裁判官任命など、選挙における主要な政策議題が取り上げられています。特に、「HEALTH CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUGS」という用語は、国民の健康保障に関する政策の重要性を物語っています。

💡論戦

論戦とは、議論や討論を通じて主張を展開する行為であり、政治的な場面でよく見られます。ビデオでは、2つの異なるビジョンを有する候補者が互いに反対する立場を展開している様子が捉えられています。例えば、「2 CANDIDATES WHO DON'T LIKE EACH OTHER」というフレーズは、彼らの間の緊張関係を表しています。

💡メディア

メディアとは、情報やメッセージを伝える手段や組織を指し、報道や放送が含まれます。ビデオのテキストでは、「CNN」や「CHANNEL 4 STUDIOS」といったメディアが、選挙デベートの報道や分析を通じて役割を果たしていることが示されています。

💡選挙戦略

選挙戦略とは、候補者が選挙に勝つために採用する計画や方法のことです。ビデオでは、候補者の戦略的側面が議論されており、「STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES」というフレーズは、候補者が選挙戦術を立てる必要性を示しています。

💡公衆の意見

公衆の意見とは、国民の考えや見解を指し、選挙においては非常に重要です。ビデオでは、「VOTERS」という言葉が何度も出てきており、彼らの意向が選挙結果に大きく影響を与えることを強調しています。

💡個人的な攻撃

個人的な攻撃とは、議論の中で相手を非難したり、個人的な属性を攻撃する行為です。ビデオでは、「HE TALKS ABOUT A CONVICTED FELON」というフレーズが、選挙デベート中の個人攻撃の一例を提供しています。

💡モデレート

モデレートとは、議論や討論を公正かつ秩序正しく進めることです。ビデオでは、「MODERATORS」という言葉が登場し、彼らが選挙デベートの進行役として重要な役割を果たしていることが示されています。

💡メディアの役割

メディアの役割とは、社会の情報伝達や公衆の意見形成に寄与することです。ビデオでは、「OUR REPORTERS」というフレーズが、メディアが選挙デベートを報道し、国民に情報を提供する役割を果たしていることを物語っています。

💡選挙戦術

選挙戦術とは、候補者が選挙に勝つために用いる戦術的なアプローチのことです。ビデオでは、「BIDEN」や「TRUMP」という候補者が選挙戦術を用いて議論に参加している様子が示されています。

💡公衆の関心

公衆の関心とは、国民が関心を寄せる問題やトピックを指します。ビデオでは、「7 BIG ISSUES AT STAKE IN THE 2024 ELECTION」というフレーズが、国民が選挙に関心を持つ主な問題を示しています。

Highlights

Post-debate analysis from CNN at Channel 4 Studios with a roundtable of political analysts and reporters.

Discussion on the impact of the debate on undecided voters and the candidates' strategies.

President Trump's comments on border patrol and immigration policy.

President Biden's response to Trump's comments, including references to his son and the term 'suckers'.

Analysis of Biden's energy levels and how they may affect voter perception.

Debate on the narrative surrounding immigrants and crime rates.

Trump's claims about his administration's impact on Iran and terrorism.

Biden's strategy to contrast his vision with Trump's on various issues.

The role of body language and non-verbal cues in the debate.

Concerns about Biden's mental and physical fitness for another term.

Trump's discipline and focus on the debate's key issues.

The experimental use of microphone muting during the debate.

Analysis of the moderators' performance and their role in the debate.

Foreign policy discussion, including Trump's comments on Afghanistan and Iran.

The split-screen effect on viewers' perception of the candidates.

Final thoughts on the debate's outcome and its potential impact on voters.

Transcripts

>>KENT JUSTICE: AND WELCOME

BACK. THIS IS A POST OF A SHOW

HERE POST FROM THE CNN

PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. YOU'VE

BEEN WATCHING JOIN I ALONG

WITH OUR GUEST. WE WATCHED THE

DEBATE HERE AT THE CHANNEL 4

STUDIOS. JOINING US FOR OUR

POST SHOWS OUR ROUNDTABLE OF

POLITICAL ANALYSTS.

>> ALONG WITH OUR REPORTERS

WHO ARE AT DEBATE WATCH

PARTIES ALL AROUND TOWN

TONIGHT. AND 2 STUDENTS FROM

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH

FLORIDA WHO HAVE A HOT TAKE ON

THE YOUNGER VOTE. SO FOR NOW,

LET'S LISTEN TO SOME OF THOSE

HEATED MOMENTS WE HEARD

TONIGHT.

>> THE TOTAL INITIATIVE

RELATIVE TO WHAT WE CAN DO

WITH MORE BORDER PATROL AND

MORE SIGNING OFF. PRESIDENT

TRUMP.

>> I REALLY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT

HE SAYS. THE END OF THIS SAID

DON'T THINK HE KNOWS WHAT HE

SAID. HE THAT I WENT TO THE

WAR TO CEMETERY. WE WANT

CHOOSE TO GO TO HOUSTON NEWS.

4 STAR GENERAL AND HE TOLD ME

SHOULD I DO WANT TO GO IN

THERE BECAUSE A BUNCH LOSERS

AND SUCKERS.

>> MY SON WAS NOT ONLY IS IT

WAS NOT A SUCKER YOU SOCCER,

YOU'RE THE LOSING ONLY SHUN

THE STAGES OF CONVICTED FELONS

LOOKING AT RIGHT BUT WHEN HE

TALKS ABOUT A CONVICTED FELON,

HIS SON IS A CONVICTED FELON

AND A VERY HIGH LEVEL. HIS SON

IS CONVICTED, GOING TO BE

CONVICTED, PROBABLY NUMEROUS

OTHER TIMES SHOULD HAVE BEEN

CONVICTED BEFORE, BUT HIS

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LET THE

STATUTE LIMITATIONS LAPS AND

THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS. BUT

HE COULD BE A CONVICTED FELON

SOON AS HE GETS OUT OF OFFICE.

JOE COULD BE A CONVICTED FELON

WITH ALL OF THE THINGS THAT

HE'S DONE HAVING AND THE ON

THE NIGHT WAY PREGNANT. WOULD

HE TALK ABOUT.

>> UNION, THE MORALS AN ALLEY

CAT.

>> AND JOINING US AGAIN, OUR

PANEL OF POLITICAL ANALYST

RICK MULLANEY FROM THE PUBLIC

POLICY STITE. JOHN NEWMAN,

LOCAL PASTOR FOR 40 YEARS AND

A POLITICAL STRATEGISTS AND

GOVERNMENT LAW ATTORNEY,

FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF OR ALVIN

BROWN, CHRIS HAND IS WITH US.

ALL RIGHT. WHO WANTS TO GO

FIRST?

>>KENT JUSTICE: THERE WAS A

LOT OF WHAT WE SAW. CHRIS,

YOUR SO WE'RE GOING WITH BY

HUGHES, 2 CANDIDATES. THEY

DON'T LIKE EACH I MEAN, IT WAS

A PERSONAL DEBATE 2 CANDIDATES

WHO DON'T LIKE EACH OTHER, WE

HAVE VERY KIND OF DIFFERENT.

>> VISIONS FOR THE COUNTRY AND

STRONGLY OPPOSE THE OTHER

CANDIDATES VISION AS WELL. YOU

KNOW, BEFORE THE DEBATE, WE

TALKED ABOUT A COUPLE OF

THINGS. ONE WAS WHAT WAS GOING

TO BE THE IMPACT ON THOSE

VOTERS. THE SO-CALLED DOUBLE

HEADER VOTERS WHO DON'T WANT

EITHER OF THOSE CANDIDATES.

I'M NOT SURE WE SAW ANYTHING

TONIGHT THAT MADE THOSE VOTERS

FEEL BETTER ABOUT EITHER OF

THE CANDIDATES IN THE RACE. WE

ALSO TALKED ABOUT SOME OF THE

CANDIDATES STRATEGIC

IMPERATIVES FOR PRESIDENT

BIDEN. I LISTED 3, 1, WAS TO

BE TO CHANNEL THAT MARCH STATE

OF THE UNION ADDRESS BE

ENERGETIC, BE GIVE AS GOOD AS

HE GOT. AND THERE WERE SOME

MOMENTS OF THAT. BUT IT DID

NOT MATCH THE SAME 10 OR AS

THE MARCH STATE OF THE UNION

ADDRESS. NUMBER 2 IS TO DRAW

KIND OF AN EFFECT OF CONTRAST

BETWEEN HIMSELF AND PRESIDENT

TRUMP SOME ISSUES. HE DID THAT

LIKE FOREIGN POLICY LIKE THIS

SCHOOL POLICY AT TIMES. BUT

OTHERS HE SORT OF LET THE

FORMER PRESIDENT OUTFLANK HIM

ON ISSUES LIKE REPRODUCTIVE

CHOICE AND ABORTION. AND, YOU

KNOW, THE 3RD ISSUE WE TALKED

ABOUT WAS PROVIDED COMPELLING

ANSWER ON INFLATION. ONE THING

THAT WAS SURPRISING TONIGHT

WAS THAT INFLATION WASN'T MORE

OF A SUBJECT THE DEBATE. THERE

WASOMESCUSON BETWEEN

THE CANDIDATES ON THAT. BUT IT

REALLY WAS SORT OF DOMINATED

BY OTHER ISSUES, SOME OF WHICH

WEREN'T POLICY RELATED, SOME

OF WHICH WERE MORE PERSONAL IN

AND RICK POINT, I KNOW YOU

WANT TO POLICY JOHN NEWMAN,

YOU REFERENCE IN OUR PRE SHOW,

HEY, SOME OF THESE MAY BE BODY

LANGUAGE. THINGS COULD BE OF.

>> I WANT TO TALK ABOUT ONE

THING THAT STOOD OUT TO ME.

THE FIRST MOMENT I HEARD

PRESIDENT BIDEN SPEAK HIS

VOICE SEEMED WEEK. THERE ARE

THERE ARE SOME OF THESE

INTANGIBLE THINGS THAT ALSO

IMPACT HOW A VIEWER RECEIVES

SPEAKERS IN THE DEBATE. YES,

SO MUCH OF THIS IS FOR. AND I

THINK IN MANY INSTANCES HE

DIDN'T PROJECT WELL AND THAT

FITS NARRATIVE THAT'S BEEN

ALREADY PUT OUT THERE ABOUT

HIM. AND AT THIS POINT REALLY

IS ABOUT THE NARRATIVES.

PEOPLE KIND OF HAVE BIG IN

WHAT THEY ALREADY ARE

PREDISPOSED TO THINK ABOUT THE

CANDIDATES ON BOTH SIDES IN

FOR PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS CHRIS

SAID IT HAD TO BE MORE ENERGY.

AND HE DIDN'T ALWAYS PROJECT

THAT. SOMETIMES DID. SOMETIMES

DIDN'T CLEARLY TRUMP WAS

BASICALLY DOING HIS GREATEST

HITS, BUT HE WAS ALWAYS

TALKING ABOUT D ARND KD

FOU A WAY TO DO TONIGHT.

BUT ALWAYS NO MATTER WHAT IT

WAS OUT TALKING ABOUT CHILD

CARE. BUT IT'S IMMIGRATION

TALKING ABOUT WHATEVER

IMMIGRATION. BUT THERE'S SO

MUCH BAKED IN ALREADY TO HAVE

TO BE SOME KIND OF DEMARCATION

TO SEPARATE WHAT'S ALREADY

BAKED IN. FACTS ARE NOT NEARLY

AS IMPORTANT AS WHAT THE

NARRATIVE IS. TALKING ABOUT

THIS EARLIER. OUR ECONOMY IS

FUNDAMENTALLY STRONG, BUT THE

NARRATIVE IS THAT IT'S GOING

TO HELP. IMMIGRANTS BY AND

LARGE WHO COME IN ILLEGALLY DO

NOT COME AT A HIGH LEVEL OF

IME.BUT THE NARRATIVE IS

ALL THE CRIME GOING UP RIGHT

NOW IS BECAUSE OF IMMIGRATION.

SO IT'S REALLY ABOUT THE

NARRATIVE THAT PRESIDENT BIDEN

HAS HAS A LOT TO BREAK. FACTS,

BUT THE STORYTELLING IS NOT AS

STRONG AS NEEDS TO BE. AND

TONIGHT THE NEED TO BE

SOMETHING STRENGTHEN THE

STORY. AND IN MANY WAYS DIDN'T

QUITE HEAR RICK. I KNOW THAT

YOU'VE GOT A REACTION TO THIS

DEBATE THAT WE WATCHED HERE

FOR AN HOUR AND A HALF AS OVER

DISAPPOINTING DEBATE ON A

POSITIVE NOTE. LET ME SAY THIS

WAS AN EXPERIMENT WITH THE

MICROPHONES BE MUTED AND

EXPERIMENT.

>> WITH NO DIEN ANDI

THINK THERE'S SOME THINGS TO

WORK OUT. BUT THAT HAS SOME

POTENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE. IT

ACTUALLY IT ACTUALLY CAN WORK.

AND IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE

RECENT DEBATES, THE 5 IN THE

REPUBLICAN PRIMARY, THEY WERE

WORST BRAWLS. YOU CAN'T STOP

PEOPLE FROM BEING DISPARAGING

WHICH HAPPENED TONIGHT. BUT

THOSE WERE WORSE. I THINK THAT

IT DOES PUT A LITTLE BIT

GREATER BURDEN ON THE

MODERATORS. AND I THOUGHT THEY

DID A GOOD JOB, BUT THEY WERE

RELUCTANT TO ENTER THE FRAY. I

THOUGHT THEY'RE TRYING TO BE

OBJECTIVE IN THAT KIND OF

SITUATION. YOU NEED FOLLOW UP

QUESTIONS BECAUSE ONE OF THE

DEFINING PARTS OF THIS DEBATE

WAS THE FAILURE TO ANSWER TO

BE REONVE QUEIONS

AND THAT PUTS A BURDEN ON THE

MODERATE. SO PROCEDURALLY ON

THAT NOTE ON THE ON THE

MICROPHONES AND AND AS FAR AS

AUDIENCE, I THINK THERE'S

POTENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE. THAT

WAS AN IMPROVEMENT. BUT ON THE

DEBATE ITSELF, I SAID COMING

IN TONIGHT, THE BIG QUESTION

THE NATION WAS ASKING WAS,

DOES JOE BIDEN HAVE THE MENTAL

AND PHYSICAL FITNESS? THE

STAMINA ENERGY TO SERVE FOR

ANOTHER 4 YEARS? I'M NOT SO

SURE HE ANSWERED THAT TONIGHT

WITH A RESOUNDING YES, IT WAS

A LITTLE BIT PROBLEMATIC IN

FOR JEN AND FOR DONALD TRUMP.

COULD HE HAVE THE DISCIPLINE

TO NOT LOOK TO THE PAST, TO

NOT BE A PERSONAL GRIEVANCE

AND TO LOOK FORWARD. I'M NOT

SO SURE HE WAS DISCIPLINED

EITHER. HE WAS RAMBLING AND THE

WAS NOT RESPONSIVE TO

QUESTIONS. I THOUGHT IT WAS A

CHALLENGING NIGHT FOR BOTH. I

REALLY DO.

>>JOY PURDY: VERY INTERESTING.

WE JUST POPPED UP A GRAPHIC

SHOWING ACCORDING TO NBC NEWS,

7 BIG ISSUES AT STAKE IN THE

2024 ELECTION. YOU SEE IT NOW

ABORTION AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS,

IMMIGRATION AND THE SOUTHERN

BORDER, HEALTH CARE AND

PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, TAXES,

JUDGES IN THE SUPREME COURT

TRADE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND

FOREIGN POLICY AND NATO WITH

CONCERNS TO 2 MAJOR WARS GOING

ON THE WAR BETWEEN RUSSIA AND

UKRAINE AND THE WAR IN THE

MIDDLE EAST. THAT'S

INCREASINGLY BECOMING A

REGIONAL WAR. ALSO, YOU KNOW,

GOING BACK TO BEING TOLD THAT

WE HAVE SOME SOUND FROM THE

DEBATE TALKING ABOUT FOREIGN

POLICY. LET'S LISTEN.

>> AND AS FAR AS HIS STATE IS

CONCERNED, I WAS GETTING OUT

OF AFGHANISTAN, BUT WE ARE

GETTING OUT WITH DIGNITY WITH

STRENGTH, WITH POWER. HE GOT

OUT. IT WAS THE MOST

EMBARRASSING DAY. ISRAEL WOULD

HAVE NEVER BEEN INVADED. IN A

MILLION YEARS BY HAMAS. YOU

KNOW WHY? BECAUSE IRAN WAS

BROKE WITH ME. I WOULD LET ANYB

THEY RAN OUT OF MONEY. THEY

WERE BROKE THAT NO MONEY FOR

HAMAS. THEY HAD NO MONEY FOR

ANYTHING, NO MONEY FOR TERROR.

THAT'S WHY YOU HAD NO TERROR

AT ALL DURING MY

ADMINISTRATION. THIS PLACE THE

WHOLE WORLD IS BLOWING UP

UNDER HIM. VERY INTERESTING.

>>JOY PURDY: 2 THINGS THAT I

NOTICED. NUMBER ONE, YOU

CALLED IT, JOHN. TAKE A LOOK

AT SEE HOW SEE IT AND WAS

GOING TO BE PRESENTING THIS.

THEY DID DO THE SPLIT SCREEN.

SO EVEN THOUGH MIKES WERE

MUTED, WE COULD SEE REACTIONS

BECAUSE THEY PUT THEM BOTH UP.

BUT COND, I OUGHIT WAS

A GREAT IDEA TO KEEP THE

QUESTIONS UP THERE THAT THEY

HAD ASKED BECAUSE YOU DON'T

REALIZE HOW MUCH OFF TOPIC

BOTH OF THEM WENT. TELL YOU,

YOU KNOW, THE QUESTIONS RIGHT

WAITING FOR THE TO THE PLACE

THAT MADE US IT MADE IT EASY

FOR VIEWERS TO THAT WAS THE

QUESTION. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. ONE POINT

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GOLF.

>> THERE WAS NEVER A QUESTION

ABOUT TOURNAMENT ON THE SPLIT

SCREEN. I ACTUALLY THINK THE

SPLIT SCREEN HURT JOE BIDEN

TONIGHT THIS WAS NOT THE JOE

BIDEN OF THE STATE OF THE

UNION ADDRESS IN THAT ADDRESS.

HE WAS AN ER JET, A VERY

ENERGETIC, RY HIGH HE WAS

SOMEWHAT IN COMMAND AND GOT

HIGH MARKS FOR IT. TONIGHT WAS

NOT THAT JOE BIDEN AND THE

SPLIT SCREEN HURT. DONALD

TRUMP MAY HAVE BEEN RAMBLING A

NON RESPONSIVE, BUT HE LOOKED

ENERGETIC AND HE LOOKED IN

COMMAND. JOE BIDEN DID NOT

LOOK IN COMMAND AND DID NOT

QUITE HAVE THE ENERGY. I

THOUGHT IT WAS A CHALLENGING

DEBATE TO WATCH, BUT I THINK

IT WAS A PARTICULARLY

CHALLENGING NIGHT FOR JOE

BIDEN. DONALD TRUMP WITH DID

NOT MEET THE STANDARD OF THE

DISCIPLINE. I THOUGHT HE

NEEDED TO HAVE A GREAT NIGHT,

BUT HE HAD ENOUGH TO SHOW

ENERGY ON THE AGE ISSUE AND

ENOUGH TO SHOW COMMAND. AND I T

THEM AN IN CHRISTMAS. THIS THE

VOTERS WHO DON'T LIKE EITHER

CANDIDATE.

>> WHERE THEY HELPED AT ALL

TONIGHT, I DON'T THINK THEY

WERE BECAUSE I THINK SOME OF

THE TRAITS THEY DON'T LIKE

ABOUT BOTH OF THESE

CANDIDATES. WE'RE VERY PRESENT

SORT OF THROUGHOUT THE DEBATE.

IF YOU'RE AN UNDECIDED VOTER

WHO'S CONCERNED ABOUT DONALD

TRUMP'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE

TRUTH AND HE'S KIND OF THE WAY

HE ADDRESSED HIS POLITICAL

ENEMIES AND THOSE SORTS OF

ISSUES. PROBABLY YOU DIDN'T

SEE A LOT DIFFERENT. RICK IS

TOTALLY RIGHT. HE WAS MORE

INCOME AND MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE,

MORENERGIC. I'M NOT SURE

HE WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL THAN

HE OFTEN IS. AND I THINK THAT

IS A TRAIT THAT SOME OF THOSE

KIND OF DOUBLE HEADER VOTERS

ARE BONE DIDN'T LIKE BOTH

CANDIDATES ARE LOOKING FOR FOR

JOE BIDEN. AND I SAY THIS

RESPECTFULLY, HIS STRATEGIC

IMPERATIVE COMING IN,

PARTICULARLY WITH THOSE SWING

VOTERS AND THOSE VOTERS WHO

DON'T LIKE OTHER CANDIDATES

WAS TO SHOW HIMSELF AS

ENERGETIC INCOME AND A UP TO

THE JOB. AND I'M NOT SURE THAT

HE ACCOMPLISHED THAT STRATEGIC

IMPERATIVE THIS EVENING. SO

I'M NOT SURE THOSE VOTERS CAMP

OR IN ANY DIFFERENT PLACE

AFTER THIS DEBA TH THEY

WERE BEFOREHAND. THANK YOU,

CHRIS. ALL RIGHT. STICK WITH

US. WE'RE GOING TO BE RIGHT

BACK AFTER THIS BREAK.