COMO FAZER RESENHA CRÍTICA com DOIS OU MAIS AUTORES – Explicação e exemplo com passo a passo no WORD

Metodologia Descomplicada

7 Jun 202216:13

Summary

TLDRThis video script offers a step-by-step guide on writing a critical review in Microsoft Word, focusing on comparing two texts with different authors or perspectives on the same topic. It covers formatting according to ABNT standards, organizing content logically, and presenting references. The script emphasizes summarizing each text, comparing their main ideas, and providing a critical analysis, including strengths and weaknesses, before concluding with recommendations for the texts' target audience.

Takeaways

😀 The video provides a step-by-step guide on how to write a critical review in Word, focusing on two different authors or texts with similar topics but different focuses.
📝 It emphasizes the importance of organizing the document according to ABNT standards, including margins, layout, and font specifications.
🖼️ The video suggests adding customized images to the review, with specific margins for top, bottom, left, and right.
✍️ It instructs to start the review with a header that includes the institution's name, course, discipline, professor's name, and the student's full name.
📚 The script mentions that the review should begin with the reference of the texts being reviewed, as per the latest ABNT standard (NBR 6028, 2021).
📝 The video outlines the structure of a critical review, which includes identifying and presenting the material, summarizing the content, and then sharing personal opinions.
🔍 It advises to read the texts thoroughly to compare and contrast them, focusing on the main ideas and objectives of each text.
📈 The method section of the texts should be examined, detailing how the research was conducted, including data collection and analysis methods.
📊 Results and conclusions from the texts should be summarized, highlighting the authors' findings and contributions to the subject.
📝 The review should be written in the reviewer's own words to avoid plagiarism, focusing on understanding and interpreting the texts.
📝 Finally, the video suggests providing recommendations for the texts, considering who might benefit from reading them and in what context.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is to demonstrate step-by-step in Word how to write a critical review of two different authors' works.
What is the purpose of the review according to the script?
-The purpose of the review is to summarize and critically analyze the content of the texts, presenting the author's own opinion on the material.
What are the initial steps for setting up the document according to ABNT norms?
-The initial steps include setting the margins, layout, page orientation, and ensuring the text is justified, with Arial font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing.
What should be included in the header of the review document?
-The header should include the institution's name, course, discipline, professor's name, and the student's full name.
Why is it important to include the reference at the beginning of the review according to NBR 6028 of 2021?
-According to NBR 6028 of 2021, the reference should be included at the beginning to provide context and identify the material being reviewed.
How should the authors of the articles be presented in the review?
-The authors should be presented with their full names, and if there are many authors, a more succinct presentation is recommended.
What is the first step in writing the review after presenting the material?
-The first step is to summarize the material, understanding and interpreting the main ideas before presenting one's own opinion.
What are the key elements to include in the summary of the articles or chapters?
-The key elements include the general objective, specific objectives, theoretical framework, methodology, main findings, and conclusions.
How should the comparison between the two texts be structured in the review?
-The comparison should highlight the main focus of each text, the author's viewpoints, and how they complement or contrast with each other.
What is the importance of including critical analysis in the review?
-Critical analysis is important to provide a balanced view, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the texts, and to present the reviewer's own insights.
How should the review conclude?
-The review should conclude with recommendations on who might benefit from reading the texts, considering their applicability to specific disciplines or general audiences.

Outlines

00:00

📝 Writing a Critical Review in Word

This paragraph introduces the video's focus on demonstrating how to write a critical review in Microsoft Word, step by step. It discusses the task of comparing two texts, possibly by different authors or with different focuses on the same subject. The speaker outlines the initial steps, such as setting up margins according to ABNT norms, choosing the font and size, and aligning the text. The paragraph concludes with the instruction to start typing the review with a header that includes the institution's name, course, discipline, professor's name, and the student's full name.

05:01

📚 Organizing and Writing the Review

The speaker continues by explaining the structure of a critical review, starting with the reference section as per the latest ABNT standard, NBR 6028 of 2021. They emphasize the importance of summarizing the material before expressing one's opinion. The paragraph details how to present the material, including the authors' names and the titles of the works being reviewed. It also touches on the need to read and compare the texts thoroughly, discussing the authors' viewpoints on the subject and their research objectives, theoretical framework, methodology, results, and conclusions.

10:03

🔍 Analyzing and Comparing Texts

This section delves into the process of analyzing and comparing the two texts. The speaker advises on how to synthesize the main focus of each text and how to articulate the understanding gained from both texts. They suggest writing a paragraph to clarify the focus of each text and then expressing one's opinion on the general understanding of both texts, highlighting any differences or complementarities in their perspectives.

15:05

📝 Concluding the Critical Review

The final paragraph discusses the conclusion of the critical review, which includes making critical analysis points about the texts, highlighting both positive and negative aspects with supporting arguments. It emphasizes the importance of this section in transforming a summary into a critical review. The speaker also talks about recommending the texts to specific audiences, considering who might benefit from reading them and in what context, such as students, professionals, or the general public.

🌐 Applicability and Accessibility of the Review

In the last paragraph, the speaker considers the applicability and accessibility of the texts being reviewed. They ponder on the potential use of the texts for various audiences, such as students, researchers, policymakers, consumers, and professionals in health. The paragraph concludes with a reminder of the importance of making a recommendation at the end of the review, considering the usefulness of the texts for specific disciplines or general knowledge.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Review

A review in the context of this video refers to a critical evaluation of one or more texts, such as articles or book chapters, often required in academic settings. It involves summarizing the main points, analyzing the content, and providing an opinion on the material. In the script, the process of writing a review is detailed, emphasizing the importance of understanding and comparing different authors' perspectives on the same topic.

💡Critical Analysis

Critical analysis is the process of evaluating texts or works by identifying strengths and weaknesses, and providing reasoned arguments. The script mentions the necessity of a critical analysis in a review, where the reviewer not only summarizes the content but also offers a personal perspective on the material's effectiveness, clarity, and contribution to the field.

💡ABNT Norm

The ABNT Norm, or Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, is a set of standards used in Brazil for various academic and technical writing formats. The script refers to ABNT as a guideline for setting up the margins, layout, and formatting of the review document, ensuring that the review adheres to a recognized academic standard.

💡Text Alignment

Text alignment is the arrangement of text on a page, such as left, right, center, or justified. In the script, justified text alignment is recommended for the review, which is a common format in formal writing to create a neat and professional appearance.

💡Font and Size

The choice of font and size is crucial for readability and presentation in written documents. The script suggests using Arial font size 12 for the review, which is a common choice for its clarity and universality in academic texts.

💡Introduction

In the context of a review, the introduction sets the stage by providing background information, stating the purpose, and outlining the structure of the review. The script describes the importance of starting with an introduction that includes the header with institutional details, course, discipline, professor's name, and the reviewer's name.

💡Reference

A reference in academic writing is the citation of sources used in the research. The script explains that according to the NBR 6028 norm, a review should begin with a reference, which in this case would be the articles or chapters being reviewed.

💡Summary

A summary is a condensed version of a longer text, highlighting the main points without adding personal interpretation. The script emphasizes the need to summarize the content of the texts being reviewed before providing a critical analysis, ensuring that the review is based on a clear understanding of the material.

💡Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework is the set of theories and concepts that provide a basis for understanding and interpreting the research. The script mentions that if the texts have a theoretical framework, it should be outlined in the review, showing how the authors have built their arguments on existing knowledge.

💡Methodology

Methodology refers to the procedures and strategies used in a study to collect and analyze data. The script indicates that the review should discuss the methodology of the texts, explaining how the authors conducted their research and why their approach is valid.

💡Results and Conclusions

Results and conclusions are the outcomes and final thoughts of a research study. In the script, it's mentioned that the review should include a discussion of the main findings and conclusions of the texts, providing insight into what the authors discovered and their final thoughts on the subject.

💡Recommendation

Recommendation in a review suggests the value and potential use of the texts being analyzed. The script advises that the review should end with a recommendation, considering who might benefit from reading the texts and in what contexts they could be applied.

Highlights

Introduction to creating a review in Word, step by step.

The review will compare two texts with different focuses but the same subject.

Explanation of how to organize margins according to ABNT standards.

Instructions on setting up page layout, images, and text alignment.

Choosing the right font and size for the review as per academic standards.

Importance of justifying text alignment for formal academic writing.

How to start the review with a header including institution, course, and professor's name.

The necessity of including references at the beginning of the review as per NBR 6028.

Guidance on how to write the reference for the texts being reviewed.

Approach to presenting the material to be reviewed concisely.

Strategies for summarizing the content of the articles or chapters.

The importance of understanding the general objective of the articles before reviewing.

How to address the theoretical framework and methodology of the articles.

Analyzing and interpreting the results and findings of the articles.

Writing the review in your own words to avoid plagiarism.

Identifying the limitations and suggestions for future research in the articles.

Comparing the focus of each text to highlight their differences or complementarities.

The critical analysis of the texts, emphasizing both positive and negative aspects.

Recommending the texts based on their target audience and practical applications.

The final recommendation on who might benefit from reading the reviewed texts.

Adapting the review process for texts from the same author or varying numbers of texts.

Closing thoughts on what constitutes a good review and its purpose.