5 Tuntutan Demo Indonesia Gelap yang Diserukan Ratusan Mahasiswa

Summary

On February 17, 2025, a mass student demonstration, part of the 'Dark Indonesia' movement, took place, voicing dissatisfaction with the government's budget efficiency policy. Students, led by the Indonesian Student Executive Board (BEMSI), raised five key demands: revocation of the Presidential Instruction on budget cuts, evaluation of the free meal program (MBG), repeal of the Minerba Bill allowing campuses to issue mining permits, ensuring allowances for educators are disbursed without bureaucratic obstacles, and calling for consistent government policy. The protest would continue if the government fails to address their concerns.

Takeaways

• 📅 The Dark Indonesia student demonstration took place on Monday, February 17, 2025.
• 👥 Hundreds of students participated in the demonstration to voice their concerns.
• 💸 The protest focused on dissatisfaction with the government’s budget efficiency policy.
• 🥗 Students criticized the free nutritious meal (MBG) program, questioning its effectiveness.
• 📜 One demand was the revocation of the Presidential Instruction regarding budget efficiency.
• 🔍 Students requested an evaluation of all MBG programs considered poorly implemented.
• ⛏️ They opposed the Minerba Bill article allowing campuses to process mining permits, citing threats to academic independence.
• 💰 Students demanded that allowances for lecturers and education staff be disbursed without bureaucratic obstacles or deductions.
• ⚖️ The protest highlighted inconsistencies in government policies and decision-making.
• 🏫 Emphasis was placed on the importance of adequate educational facilities and the potential impact of budget cuts on scholarships.
• 📢 The chairman of BEM Universitas Indonesia stated that demonstrations will continue if the government does not address their concerns.

Q & A

What was the main reason for the Dark Indonesia demonstration on February 17, 2025?

The demonstration was organized to express student disappointment with the government's budget efficiency policy and its impact on education programs.

How many students participated in the demonstration?

The demonstration was attended by hundreds of students.

What specific government program did the students criticize during the protest?

Students criticized the Free Nutritious Meal program (MBG) for being implemented inappropriately.

Who organized the demonstration and voiced the students' demands?

The demonstration was organized by members of the Indonesian Student Executive Board (BEMSI), including the chairman of BEM Universitas Indonesia.

What was the first demand made by the students in the demonstration?

Students urged the government to revoke the Presidential Instruction regarding budget efficiency.

Why did students demand an evaluation of all MBG programs?

They considered the MBG programs to be inappropriate in their implementation and felt they were ineffective.

What concern did students raise regarding the Minerba Bill article?

Students demanded the revocation of the Minerba Bill article that allows campuses to process mining permits, as it threatens academic independence.

What did students demand regarding lecturer and education staff allowances?

They asked the government to disburse allowances without deductions or obstacles caused by bureaucracy.

What criticism did students make about the government's overall policy approach?

Students protested the government's inconsistent attitude in making or implementing policies.

What did the chairman of BEM Universitas Indonesia say about the continuation of the demonstration?

He stated that the demonstration would continue if the Dark Indonesia action did not receive special attention from the government.

How did students express their disappointment during the demonstration?

They highlighted issues such as being misled, lying by authorities, inadequate educational facilities, and harmful budget cuts affecting scholarships.

What broader issue does the protest reflect about education in Indonesia?

The protest reflects concerns about government policies undermining educational support, academic independence, and fair treatment of staff and students.