Teori ketergantungan

Summary

This video delves into dependency theory, featuring key figures like Dos Santos, Cardoso, and Paul Baran. Dos Santos defines dependency as a condition where a country’s economic life is shaped by the expansion of another, outlining three forms of dependency: colonial, financial-industrial, and technological-industrial. Cardoso adds a historical structural method and discusses the role of both external and internal factors in creating dependency. Baran, a neo-Marxist, argues that capitalist interaction with pre-capitalist nations hinders their development. The video highlights the persistent inequalities and external control that keep peripheral countries from developing independently.

Takeaways

• 😀 Dosantos' theory of dependency states that certain countries' economic life is influenced by the development of other countries, with the dependent countries acting as recipients of external consequences.
• 😀 Dosantos describes three forms of dependency: colonial dependency, financial-industrial dependency, and industrial-technological dependency.
• 😀 Colonial dependency involves colonized countries exporting goods needed by the central country, with an exploitative relationship between the populations.
• 😀 Financial-industrial dependency occurs when a peripheral country is independent but still controlled financially by central countries, with exports continuing to benefit the central powers.
• 😀 Industrial-technological dependency sees multinational companies invest in peripheral countries, but the technology and patents remain controlled by the central countries, limiting local development.
• 😀 According to Dosantos, capitalism is not a solution to dependency but may exacerbate issues such as low wages, low purchasing power, capital flight, and an absence of local industry formation.
• 😀 Cardoso's contribution to dependency theory includes three formulations: historical structural method, influence of external and internal factors, and the potential for development within dynamic dependency.
• 😀 Cardoso argues that development issues are not limited to industrial growth strategies but also depend on the presence of popular movements and political awareness of the people.
• 😀 Cardoso highlights negative impacts of dependency, such as income inequality, focus on durable goods not for the masses, and increased foreign debt, as well as capital-intensive technology harming economic growth.
• 😀 Paul Baran, a neo-Marxist, claims that advanced capitalist countries' influence on peripheral countries inhibits their independent development, with the capitalist system in peripheral countries being hindered and stunted.
• 😀 Baran's theory suggests that pre-capitalist peripheral countries have their own dynamics, and interference by advanced capitalist countries can halt their natural development, keeping them in backwardness.

Q & A

What is dependency theory as explained by Dos Santos?

Dos Santos defines dependency as a condition where the economic life of a country is influenced by the development of other countries, and peripheral countries are primarily recipients of the economic consequences of central countries' actions.

How does Dos Santos' view of dependency differ from Frank's perspective?

Unlike Frank, who views the relationship between satellite and metropolis countries as negative, Dos Santos argues that the relationship can be positive, with peripheral countries developing in line with central countries' growth.

What are the three forms of dependency according to Dos Santos?

The three forms of dependency described by Dos Santos are: 1) Colonial dependency, where peripheral countries are exploited for resources; 2) Financial-industrial dependency, where peripheral countries' finances are controlled by central countries; and 3) Industrial-technological dependency, where multinational corporations invest in peripheral countries but retain control over technology and patents.

What issues arise in peripheral countries due to industrialization, according to Dos Santos?

Dos Santos highlights several problems: low wages that reduce workers' purchasing power, capital-intensive technologies that replace workers, and the outflow of profits that limits the growth of domestic industries.

Does Dos Santos believe that capitalism can solve the problem of dependency?

No, Dos Santos argues that capitalism is not the solution to the dependency problem, but rather contributes to the perpetuation of underdevelopment in peripheral countries.

What is Fernando Henrique Cardoso’s approach to dependency theory?

Cardoso introduces three formulations: 1) The historical structural method, analyzing historical context; 2) The impact of both internal (economic, social, political issues) and external (foreign domination) factors on dependency; and 3) The possibility of dynamic dependency, where development and dependency can coexist.

What are the negative impacts of dependency theory according to Cardoso?

Cardoso identifies several negative impacts, including unequal income distribution, economic inequalities, an over-focus on durable goods rather than mass consumer products, increasing foreign debt, and the use of capital-intensive technologies that limit labor-intensive job growth.

What is Paul Baran’s view on the relationship between peripheral and advanced capitalist countries?

Paul Baran, a neo-Marxist theorist, argues that the interaction of advanced capitalist countries with pre-capitalist peripheral countries stunts the development of the latter. He believes that if left undisturbed, peripheral countries could have developed independently.

How does Baran describe the capitalist system in peripheral countries?

Baran describes the capitalist system in peripheral countries as being stunted, akin to a disease (referred to as 'cretinism'), where development is hindered by external capitalist influence, unlike the natural capitalist development seen in central countries.

How does Baran suggest that peripheral countries could have developed differently?

Baran suggests that if peripheral countries were not influenced or interfered with by advanced capitalist countries, they could have developed their own unique economic and political systems, leading to more independent and sustainable growth.