6 Hal yang Harus Ada dalam Literature Review | Seri Skripsi Part 14

Emak Bangsa
28 Jan 202112:09

Summary

TLDRIn this video, the speaker provides a detailed guide on how to create a literature review using Atlas.ti software. Key points include understanding the historical background, identifying current issues, applying relevant theories or models, forming research questions, and analyzing findings. The speaker also explains the coding process in Atlas.ti, from adding documents to exporting results and writing the review. Additionally, they highlight the distinction between a general literature review and a systematic literature review, emphasizing the importance of qualitative research methodology in the process.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ˜€ Historical background in research includes understanding the researcher's background, when the research was conducted, and the reason behind it.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ The issue or topic of the research is crucial to identify as it addresses current, relevant problems in society.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ The theoretical framework or model used in the research should be explored, as it provides the foundation for understanding the research approach.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ Comparing research with studies from abroad helps contextualize the findings and highlight unique elements in the local context.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ The research question is essential for guiding the study and understanding its core focus.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ Research findings should be discussed in detail to understand the outcomes of the study and how they relate to the initial hypothesis.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ A qualitative research methodology should be considered when analyzing data and the steps involved in the research process.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ Atlas.TI software can be used to organize and code research data, making the literature review process more efficient.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ The steps for creating a literature review with Atlas.TI include adding documents, coding the data, exporting results, and analyzing the data.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ Coding is a critical step to categorize and extract meaningful information from the research articles being reviewed.
  • ๐Ÿ˜€ The software allows for a systematic process, ensuring a thorough analysis of the literature and a comprehensive final review.

Q & A

  • What is the primary focus of this video?

    -The video focuses on explaining how to conduct a literature review using Atlas.ti software. It covers the six criteria to include in the review, as well as steps for coding and analyzing the literature.

  • What are the six main criteria discussed for conducting a literature review?

    -The six criteria for conducting a literature review are: historical background, the issue being addressed, the theoretical framework or models used, research questions, research findings, and data analysis methodology.

  • How is the historical background defined in the context of a literature review?

    -The historical background includes the context in which the research was conducted, such as the history of the issue being studied, when the research was conducted, and why the researcher chose this topic.

  • What is the difference between a literature review and a systematic literature review?

    -A literature review provides a summary of relevant studies and concepts, while a systematic literature review follows a more structured, methodical process to gather and analyze data across multiple studies, often with predefined criteria for inclusion.

  • What role does theory play in the literature review process?

    -Theoretical frameworks and models are crucial as they help guide the research approach and inform how findings are interpreted. They provide context for understanding phenomena, such as how self-acceptance or other concepts influence the topic under study.

  • Can you explain the significance of the concept 'narimo ing pandum' mentioned in the video?

    -'Narimo ing pandum' is a Javanese concept of acceptance and gratitude for whatever life presents, which was used in the research to understand how people with chronic conditions can cope and psychologically recover.

  • What should be included in the literature review when comparing local and international research?

    -The literature review should highlight the unique aspects of local research, such as cultural concepts or practices that may not be found in international studies, thereby differentiating the research's approach or perspective.

  • How do you identify research questions in a literature review?

    -Research questions are developed by identifying gaps or issues in the existing literature. For example, the question might focus on how a particular concept, like self-acceptance, affects the recovery of individuals with certain health conditions.

  • What are the steps for using Atlas.ti in the literature review process?

    -The steps for using Atlas.ti include: 1) adding documents to the software, 2) organizing documents by name and year of research, 3) coding the documents based on the criteria, 4) exporting the results, and 5) narrating the findings.

  • Why is coding an important step in conducting a literature review with Atlas.ti?

    -Coding is crucial because it helps to categorize and tag relevant themes and data from the documents. This allows for easier analysis and helps to identify patterns or insights related to the research questions.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Literature ReviewAtlas.TIResearch MethodologyCodingQualitative ResearchStigma ResearchLiterature Review ProcessData AnalysisResearch FrameworksSystematic Review